Obstetrics and Gynecology
9 questionsWhat is the most appropriate management for a 28-year-old hemodynamically stable patient with mild abdominal pain and an unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy measuring 2.5 x 3 cm, with β-hCG level of 8500 mIU/mL, visible fetal cardiac activity, and who desires future fertility?
Most common cause of secondary PPH is :
What is the recommended management for a patient with complete placenta previa at 38 weeks gestation without any vaginal bleeding?
Which of the following statements about nabothian cysts is true?
What is the most common cause of pelvic inflammatory disease?
Which of the following is the PRIMARY risk factor for cervical carcinoma?
What is the most common cause of death in cervical cancer?
Which of the following is not a standard treatment option for CIN III?
What size of Hegar's dilator, when passed through the internal os, indicates cervical incompetence?
NEET-PG 2015 - Obstetrics and Gynecology NEET-PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1201: What is the most appropriate management for a 28-year-old hemodynamically stable patient with mild abdominal pain and an unruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy measuring 2.5 x 3 cm, with β-hCG level of 8500 mIU/mL, visible fetal cardiac activity, and who desires future fertility?
- A. Methotrexate therapy
- B. Laparoscopic salpingostomy (Correct Answer)
- C. Laparoscopic salpingectomy
- D. Expectant management
Explanation: ***Laparoscopic salpingostomy*** - This patient desires future fertility, making **salpingostomy** (tube-preserving surgery) the most appropriate management. - Salpingostomy involves making an incision in the fallopian tube, removing the ectopic pregnancy, and leaving the tube intact to preserve fertility potential. - While the presence of **fetal cardiac activity** and **β-hCG of 8500 mIU/mL** contraindicate medical management, they do not contraindicate conservative surgical management in a hemodynamically stable patient. - The patient meets criteria for conservative surgery: hemodynamically stable, unruptured ectopic, and desires future fertility. *Methotrexate therapy* - This patient has **absolute contraindications for methotrexate**: β-hCG level >5000 mIU/mL (here 8500) and presence of **fetal cardiac activity**. - Methotrexate is only suitable for hemodynamically stable patients with ectopic mass <3.5-4 cm, β-hCG <5000 mIU/mL, no fetal cardiac activity, and normal liver/renal function. - The high β-hCG and cardiac activity indicate a viable ectopic pregnancy that is unlikely to respond to medical management. *Laparoscopic salpingectomy* - Salpingectomy involves **complete removal of the affected fallopian tube**, which significantly reduces future fertility if this is the only functional tube or if the contralateral tube is damaged. - This option is preferred when: the tube is severely damaged, there is uncontrolled bleeding, recurrent ectopic in the same tube, or the patient does not desire future fertility. - Since this patient **specifically desires future fertility** and is hemodynamically stable with an unruptured ectopic, salpingostomy (tube preservation) is preferred over salpingectomy. *Expectant management* - Expectant management requires **very low or declining β-hCG levels** (typically <1000-1500 mIU/mL), absence of fetal cardiac activity, and very small ectopic size (<2 cm). - This patient has β-hCG of 8500 mIU/mL with **visible fetal cardiac activity**, indicating a viable growing ectopic pregnancy with high rupture risk. - These findings make expectant management unsafe and inappropriate.
Question 1202: Most common cause of secondary PPH is :
- A. Retained placenta (Correct Answer)
- B. Cervical tear
- C. Uterine atony
- D. Vaginal laceration
Explanation: ***Retained placenta*** - Retained placental tissue prevents the uterus from contracting effectively, leading to continued bleeding after delivery. - While it's a common cause of primary PPH as well, it often presents as a secondary PPH when small fragments remain and later detach or become infected. *Uterine atony* - This is the **most common cause of primary PPH**, occurring within 24 hours of delivery due to the uterus failing to contract. - It is less likely to be the primary cause of secondary PPH unless there's a delayed presentation. *Vaginal laceration* - Lacerations of the vagina usually present as **primary PPH**, with bright red blood despite a well-contracted uterus. - While bleeding can persist, it's not the most common cause of delayed, secondary PPH. *Cervical tear* - Cervical tears also typically cause **primary PPH**, characterized by continuous bleeding immediately after delivery. - Similar to vaginal lacerations, while continuous bleeding can occur, it's not the most common etiology for secondary PPH.
Question 1203: What is the recommended management for a patient with complete placenta previa at 38 weeks gestation without any vaginal bleeding?
- A. Elective caesarean section (Correct Answer)
- B. Observation and monitoring until delivery
- C. Conservative management with bed rest
- D. Urgent caesarean section due to bleeding risk
Explanation: ***Elective caesarean section*** - For women with **complete placenta previa** at term (38 weeks), an **elective caesarean section** is the recommended mode of delivery to avoid significant hemorrhage. - Even in the absence of bleeding, the risk of massive hemorrhage during labor with a complete previa is high, necessitating planned surgical delivery. *Observation and monitoring until delivery* - This approach is not safe for complete placenta previa at term due to the high risk of **unpredictable, severe hemorrhage** once labor begins or the cervix dilates. - Active monitoring without planned intervention carries significant maternal and fetal risk. *Conservative management with bed rest* - While bed rest may be used in cases of **placenta previa with bleeding** earlier in gestation to prolong pregnancy, it does not address the fundamental risk of hemorrhage from a complete previa at 38 weeks. - It would not prevent the need for an eventual caesarean section and prolongs potential risks. *Urgent caesarean section due to bleeding risk* - While there is a bleeding risk, this scenario describes a patient at 38 weeks gestation **without any vaginal bleeding**, making it an elective, rather than urgent, situation. - An **urgent caesarean section** is typically reserved for cases where active bleeding or other obstetric emergencies are present.
Question 1204: Which of the following statements about nabothian cysts is true?
- A. It is a premalignant condition that requires excision.
- B. It is a malignant condition.
- C. Squamous epithelium grows over columnar epithelium, blocking mucus-secreting glands. (Correct Answer)
- D. It may be associated with chronic irritation and inflammation but is not defined by it.
Explanation: ***Squamous epithelium grows over columnar epithelium, blocking mucus-secreting glands.*** - **Nabothian cysts** form when the **squamous epithelium** of the ectocervix grows over the **columnar epithelium** of the endocervix during the process of **squamous metaplasia**. - This epithelial overgrowth obstructs the ducts of the **mucus-secreting endocervical glands**, leading to mucus retention and cyst formation. - This is the **classic pathophysiological mechanism** and the defining feature of nabothian cyst formation. *It is a premalignant condition that requires excision.* - **Nabothian cysts are completely benign** and have **no malignant or premalignant potential**. - They are **incidental findings** that require **no treatment** and can be safely observed. - Misclassifying them as premalignant would lead to unnecessary surgical interventions. *It is a malignant condition.* - **Nabothian cysts** are universally considered **benign retention cysts** with no malignant characteristics. - They are among the most common benign findings on cervical examination. *It may be associated with chronic irritation and inflammation but is not defined by it.* - While **chronic cervicitis** can be a predisposing factor for squamous metaplasia (which leads to nabothian cysts), this statement is **too vague** to be the best answer. - The **defining characteristic** of a nabothian cyst is the **anatomical mechanism** (squamous epithelium blocking glandular ducts), not the associated inflammatory conditions.
Question 1205: What is the most common cause of pelvic inflammatory disease?
- A. Chlamydia and gonorrhea infections (Correct Answer)
- B. Pelvic peritonitis
- C. Puerperal sepsis
- D. Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD)
Explanation: ***Correct: Chlamydia and gonorrhea infections*** - **Chlamydia trachomatis** and **Neisseria gonorrhoeae** are the most frequently identified bacterial causes of PID, accounting for the majority of cases. - These infections often begin as **asymptomatic cervical infections** that ascend to the upper genital tract (uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries). - They cause inflammation and scarring of the fallopian tubes and surrounding pelvic structures, forming the pathological basis of PID. - Early detection and treatment are crucial to prevent long-term complications like infertility and chronic pelvic pain. *Incorrect: Pelvic peritonitis* - **Pelvic peritonitis** is an inflammation of the peritoneum within the pelvis, which is a **complication** of severe PID, not the primary cause. - It represents a more advanced stage of infection where inflammation has spread beyond the reproductive organs to the peritoneal cavity. - While it involves pelvic inflammation, its origin typically stems from untreated bacterial infections like Chlamydia or gonorrhea. *Incorrect: Puerperal sepsis* - **Puerperal sepsis** is an infection of the genital tract occurring specifically after **childbirth, miscarriage, or abortion**. - While it involves pelvic infection, it is a distinct clinical entity related to the **postpartum or post-abortion period**. - PID, in contrast, typically occurs in sexually active women of reproductive age, unrelated to pregnancy outcomes. *Incorrect: Intrauterine Contraceptive Device (IUCD)* - An **IUCD** is an **independent risk factor** for PID, particularly in the first 3 weeks after insertion. - The IUCD itself does not directly cause PID; rather, it may facilitate the entry and ascent of pre-existing cervical infections. - The increased risk is primarily during insertion when bacteria can be introduced into the uterine cavity. - Modern IUCDs have lower PID risk, and the benefit-risk ratio favors their use in appropriate candidates.
Question 1206: Which of the following is the PRIMARY risk factor for cervical carcinoma?
- A. Human papilloma virus (Correct Answer)
- B. Smoking
- C. Low socioeconomic status
- D. All of the options
Explanation: ***Human papilloma virus*** - **High-risk HPV types**, particularly **HPV 16 and 18**, are the primary causative agent of cervical carcinoma, responsible for over 90% of cases. - HPV infection is the **most significant and essential risk factor**, leading to persistent changes in cervical cells that can progress to **dysplasia** and eventually **invasive cancer**. - Cervical cancer is considered an **HPV-associated malignancy**, making HPV the central etiological factor. *Smoking* - **Smoking** is an important cofactor that increases the risk of cervical carcinoma in women with HPV infection, but it is not the primary cause. - Smoking impairs the immune system's ability to clear HPV infections and promotes progression of HPV-induced lesions. - Without HPV infection, smoking alone does not cause cervical cancer. *Low socioeconomic status* - **Low socioeconomic status** is an indirect risk factor associated with reduced access to healthcare and **cervical cancer screening** (Pap smears). - It does not directly cause cervical cancer but leads to delayed diagnosis and treatment, resulting in poorer outcomes. *All of the options* - While all listed factors influence cervical carcinoma risk, **Human papillomavirus (HPV)** is the primary and essential causative agent. - The other factors are cofactors or indirect associations, not primary causes.
Question 1207: What is the most common cause of death in cervical cancer?
- A. Infection
- B. Haemorrhage
- C. Metastasis to vital organs
- D. Renal failure (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Renal failure*** - As cervical cancer progresses, it can invade surrounding structures, including the **ureters**. - **Ureteral obstruction** leads to **hydronephrosis** and ultimately **renal failure**, which is a common cause of death. *Infection* - While infections can occur due to immunosuppression or compromised tissue integrity in advanced cancer, they are generally **not the most common direct cause of death**. - Infections are often secondary complications rather than the primary mode of mortality. *Haemorrhage* - Local invasion of blood vessels by advanced cervical cancer can cause **significant bleeding** (haemorrhage). - While potentially life-threatening, it is **less frequent** as a direct cause of death compared to renal failure. *Metastasis to vital organs* - Cervical cancer can metastasize to distant organs like the lungs, liver, or bone; however, direct organ failure solely due to metastases is **less common than renal complications** from local tumor spread. - The impact of metastases often contributes to overall decline but is not the most frequent immediate cause of death.
Question 1208: Which of the following is not a standard treatment option for CIN III?
- A. LLETZ
- B. Conization
- C. Hysterectomy
- D. Wertheim's hysterectomy (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Wertheim's hysterectomy*** - A **Wertheim's hysterectomy**, also known as a **radical hysterectomy**, involves removal of the uterus, cervix, parametrium, and upper vagina, along with pelvic lymph node dissection. This is typically reserved for **invasive cervical cancer**, not CIN III. - While hysterectomy can be a treatment option for CIN III in specific circumstances (e.g., patient preference, coexisting uterine pathology), a Wertheim's hysterectomy is an **overly aggressive procedure** for precancerous lesions due to its significant morbidity. *LLETZ* - **Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ)**, also known as LEEP (Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure), is a common and effective outpatient treatment for CIN III. - It involves using a heated wire loop to **excise the abnormal tissue** from the cervix, allowing for histological examination. *Conization* - **Cold knife conization** involves excising a cone-shaped piece of tissue from the cervix using a scalpel. This method is highly effective for CIN III. - It provides **excellent pathological specimens** for evaluation of margins, which is crucial for confirming complete removal of the lesion. *Hysterectomy* - **Hysterectomy** (removal of the uterus, usually simple hysterectomy) can be considered a treatment option for CIN III, particularly in women who have completed childbearing and have other indications for hysterectomy, or when repeated excisional procedures have failed. - While effective, it is a more **invasive procedure** than LLETZ or conization and generally reserved for specific cases where conservative management is not suitable or desired.
Question 1209: What size of Hegar's dilator, when passed through the internal os, indicates cervical incompetence?
- A. 4
- B. 6
- C. 10
- D. 8 or more (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***8 or more*** - The passage of a **Hegar's dilator of size 8 mm or larger** through the internal os without resistance is a classic diagnostic criterion for **cervical incompetence** or insufficiency. - This finding suggests a **weakened cervix** that is unable to withstand the pressure of a growing pregnancy, leading to recurrent mid-trimester pregnancy losses or preterm births. *4* - A Hegar's dilator of size 4 mm is relatively small and can often pass through a normal, non-pregnant **cervical os** without indicating pathology. - This size would not be considered abnormal and does not signify **cervical incompetence**. *6* - While a Hegar's dilator of 6 mm is larger than 4 mm, it is still generally within the range that might pass through a normal cervix, especially in **multiparous women**, without definitively diagnosing incompetence. - The threshold for diagnosing **cervical incompetence** is typically set higher, at 8 mm or more. *10* - While the passage of a 10 mm Hegar's dilator would certainly indicate **cervical incompetence**, the diagnostic cutoff is typically considered to be **8 mm or more**. - Any dilator **equal to or greater than 8 mm** confirms the diagnosis, so 10 mm is not the *only* size indicating incompetence.
Pediatrics
1 questionsThere is overlapping of skull sutures which can be reduced with gentle pressure. What is the grade of moulding?
NEET-PG 2015 - Pediatrics NEET-PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1201: There is overlapping of skull sutures which can be reduced with gentle pressure. What is the grade of moulding?
- A. Grade 1
- B. Grade 2 (Correct Answer)
- C. Grade 3
- D. Grade 4
Explanation: ***Grade 2*** - **Grade 2 moulding** is characterized by overriding of the skull sutures that can be reduced with gentle pressure. This indicates moderate moulding of the fetal head. - This degree of moulding is a common finding during labor and delivery and usually resolves without intervention. *Grade 1* - **Grade 1 moulding** involves the apposition (touching) of the skull bones without actual overlap. - It signifies minimal moulding of the fetal head. *Grade 3* - **Grade 3 moulding** involves significant overlapping of the skull sutures that is fixed and cannot be reduced with gentle pressure. - This indicates severe moulding and may sometimes be associated with increased risk of intracranial complications. *Grade 4* - There is no universally recognized "Grade 4" for fetal head moulding in standard classifications. - Moulding is typically classified up to Grade 3, indicating increasing severity.