Organ Procurement — MCQs

10 questions

In cases of death due to road traffic accidents, what is the standard practice regarding timing of post-mortem examination in India?

Police inquest is NOT required in:

Professional death sentence is given by:

Best guide for the management of Resuscitation is:

Leading questions are permitted only in-

Which of the following procedures is not typically covered by the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) for reimbursement of surgery done by a non-governmental organization (NGO) eye hospital?

All are true about dying declaration except

Which one of the following is used for the preservation of blood for transfusions?

Which of the following is not a diagnostic criteria for declaring brainstem death?

Q10

Dying declaration comes under?

Organ Procurement Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 1: In cases of death due to road traffic accidents, what is the standard practice regarding timing of post-mortem examination in India?

A. No mandatory waiting period - conducted as soon as possible (Correct Answer)
B. 24 hours
C. 72 hours
D. 48 hours

Explanation: ***No mandatory waiting period - conducted as soon as possible*** - In medico-legal cases including road traffic accidents, **there is no mandatory waiting period** before conducting post-mortem examination in India. - Post-mortem should be conducted **as soon as possible after death is confirmed** to preserve forensic evidence and establish cause of death accurately. - Delays can lead to **decomposition, loss of vital evidence**, and compromise the medico-legal investigation. - The body is examined after **proper identification, documentation, and legal formalities** are completed, but without arbitrary time delays. *72 hours mandatory waiting* - This is **incorrect** - there is no 72-hour waiting period mandated for post-mortem in RTA cases. - Such delays would compromise forensic evidence and are **not part of standard medico-legal practice**. - Confusion may arise from other legal timeframes, but not for autopsy timing. *24 hours mandatory waiting* - This is **incorrect** - no such mandatory waiting period exists in Indian forensic practice for RTA deaths. - Post-mortems are conducted **promptly, not after arbitrary waiting periods**. *48 hours mandatory waiting* - This is **incorrect** - there is no mandatory 48-hour waiting period. - Delays in autopsy are **avoided to preserve evidence quality** and expedite medico-legal investigations.

Question 2: Police inquest is NOT required in:

A. Suicide
B. Murder
C. Death in police custody
D. Natural death due to disease in elderly person at home (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Natural death due to disease in elderly person at home*** - Police inquest is **NOT required** for natural deaths occurring at home with a known medical condition - A registered medical practitioner who has been attending the deceased can issue a death certificate - No suspicion of foul play or unnatural circumstances exists - This is the only scenario among the options where police involvement is not mandated *Death in police custody* - Police inquest is **absolutely required** under **Section 176 CrPC** (mandatory magisterial inquiry) - Custodial deaths are considered highly sensitive and require thorough investigation - Ensures accountability and rules out torture, negligence, or human rights violations - Automatic judicial oversight is mandated by law *Suicide* - Police inquest is **required** as suicide is classified as an **unnatural death** - Investigation needed to confirm manner of death and rule out homicide - Section 174 CrPC mandates police investigation for all unnatural deaths - Documentation required for legal and insurance purposes *Murder* - Police inquest is **absolutely required** as murder is a **criminal homicide** - Section 174 CrPC mandates immediate police investigation - Crime scene examination, evidence collection, and suspect identification are essential - Forms the basis for criminal prosecution under IPC Section 302

Question 3: Professional death sentence is given by:

A. Central Health Ministry
B. Indian Medical Association
C. State Medical Council
D. National Medical Commission (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***National Medical Commission*** - A "professional death sentence" refers to the **permanent revocation of a medical license**, which prevents a doctor from practicing medicine. - The **National Medical Commission (NMC)**, established under the NMC Act 2019, is the **apex regulatory body** for medical practice in India with ultimate authority over disciplinary matters. - Under **Section 30 of the NMC Act**, the NMC has the power to impose penalties including **permanent removal from the medical register**, which constitutes the professional death sentence. - While State Medical Councils conduct investigations and initial disciplinary proceedings, the **NMC has appellate and final jurisdiction** over license revocation. *State Medical Council* - State Medical Councils register practitioners and handle primary disciplinary actions within their respective states. - They conduct initial investigations and can impose temporary suspensions or penalties. - However, they do **not have the ultimate authority** to permanently revoke licenses; such decisions fall under the NMC's appellate jurisdiction. *Central Health Ministry* - The **Central Health Ministry** formulates national health policies and oversees healthcare planning and funding. - It does not directly regulate individual medical practitioners or have authority to revoke medical licenses. - Its role is administrative and policy-oriented, not disciplinary. *Indian Medical Association* - The **IMA** is a voluntary professional body and advocacy organization for doctors. - It promotes ethical practices and represents doctors' interests but has **no legal authority** to grant or revoke medical licenses. - It is not a regulatory body under Indian law.

Question 4: Best guide for the management of Resuscitation is:

A. Saturation of Oxygen
B. CVP
C. Blood pressure
D. Urine output (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Urine output*** - **Urine output** is considered the **gold standard** for assessing adequacy of resuscitation as it directly reflects **end-organ perfusion** and **tissue oxygenation**. A target of **0.5-1 mL/kg/hour** indicates adequate renal perfusion and overall circulatory status. - It serves as a reliable **endpoint of resuscitation** in trauma and critical care protocols, providing objective evidence that fluid resuscitation has achieved adequate **tissue perfusion** and **microcirculatory flow**. *Saturation of Oxygen* - While **oxygen saturation** is crucial for ensuring adequate **oxygen delivery** to tissues, it represents only one component of the oxygen delivery equation and doesn't reflect **tissue perfusion** adequacy. - Maintaining normal oxygen saturation does not guarantee adequate **end-organ perfusion** if cardiac output or tissue perfusion is compromised during resuscitation. *CVP* - **Central venous pressure** has poor correlation with actual **intravascular volume status** and **cardiac preload**, making it an unreliable guide for fluid resuscitation. - CVP measurements are influenced by multiple factors including **ventilator settings**, **tricuspid valve function**, and **chest wall compliance**, limiting its utility as a resuscitation endpoint. *Blood pressure* - While **blood pressure** provides immediate feedback on **circulatory status** and is emphasized in current **ACLS** and **ATLS** protocols as an immediate target, it may not accurately reflect **microcirculatory perfusion**. - Blood pressure can be maintained through **vasoconstriction** while **end-organ perfusion** remains inadequate, making it less reliable than urine output for assessing true resuscitation adequacy.

Question 5: Leading questions are permitted only in-

A. Re-examination
B. Examination in chief
C. Dying declaration
D. Cross examination (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Cross examination*** - **Leading questions** are questions that suggest the answer the examiner wishes to elicit. They are generally permitted in **cross-examination** to challenge the witness's testimony and probe for inconsistencies. - The purpose of cross-examination is to test the **veracity** and **accuracy** of the evidence given by the witness during direct examination. *Re-examination* - **Re-examination** follows cross-examination and is conducted by the party who called the witness, but it is limited to explaining or clarifying matters raised during cross-examination. - **Leading questions** are generally not allowed during re-examination, as its purpose is to rehabilitate the witness, not introduce new evidence or suggest answers. *Examination in chief* - **Examination in chief** (or direct examination) is when a lawyer questions their own witness to elicit factual information relevant to their case. - **Leading questions** are typically prohibited during examination in chief to ensure that the testimony is the witness's own and not influenced by the lawyer. *Dying declaration* - A **dying declaration** is a statement made by a person who is conscious and believes death is imminent, regarding the cause and circumstances of their impending death. - It is an exception to the **hearsay rule** and is usually recorded as a statement, not as a process involving direct questioning where leading questions would be applied in a court setting.

Question 6: Which of the following procedures is not typically covered by the National Programme for Control of Blindness (NPCB) for reimbursement of surgery done by a non-governmental organization (NGO) eye hospital?

A. Cataract surgery
B. Pan retinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy
C. Syringing and probing of the nasolacrimal duct (Correct Answer)
D. Trabeculectomy surgery

Explanation: ***Syringing and probing of the nasolacrimal duct*** - While important for lacrimal drainage issues, procedures like **syringing and probing** are generally considered minor and less vision-restoring compared to the major surgeries targeted by the **NPCB**. - The **NPCB** focuses on interventions for leading causes of blindness, primarily **cataract** and other significant vision-threatening conditions, which this procedure typically isn't. *Cataract surgery* - **Cataract surgery** is a cornerstone of the **NPCB's** efforts, as cataracts are the leading cause of reversible blindness. - Reimbursement for **cataract surgery** is a primary objective to improve access and reduce the burden of blindness. *Pan retinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy* - **Diabetic retinopathy** is a major cause of preventable blindness, and **pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP)** is a key intervention to preserve vision. - The **NPCB** includes procedures for **diabetic retinopathy** management due to its significant public health impact. *Trabeculectomy surgery* - **Trabeculectomy** is a surgical procedure for **glaucoma**, which is another significant cause of irreversible blindness. - The **NPCB** includes interventions for **glaucoma** given its severe vision-threatening nature and the need for surgical management in many cases.

Question 7: All are true about dying declaration except

A. Cross examination permitted (Correct Answer)
B. Practiced in India
C. Oath is not needed
D. Made to Judicial Magistrate Or Medical officer

Explanation: ***Cross-examination permitted*** - A **dying declaration** is an exception to the hearsay rule, and the declarant (the dying person) is **not available for cross-examination**, as they are deceased. - The principle is based on the belief that a dying person would not lie, thus making cross-examination unnecessary for truthfulness in this context. *Practiced in India* - Dying declarations are indeed a recognized and practiced form of evidence in **Indian law**, specifically under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. - They are considered a significant piece of evidence in criminal proceedings, especially in cases of murder or culpable homicide. *Oath is not needed* - A dying declaration does **not require an oath** to be administered to the declarant at the time of making the statement. - The belief that a person on the verge of death would speak the truth, known as the maxim **"nemo moriturus praesumitur mentiri"** (no one about to die is presumed to lie), substitutes the need for an oath. *Made to Judicial Magistrate Or Medical officer* - While a dying declaration can be made to **anyone**, including ordinary citizens, statements recorded by a **Judicial Magistrate** or a **Medical Officer** are generally given higher evidentiary value due to their impartiality and official capacity. - A medical officer can attest to the declarant's **mental fitness** at the time of making the statement, which is crucial for its admissibility.

Question 8: Which one of the following is used for the preservation of blood for transfusions?

A. Heparin
B. Citrate phosphate dextrose (Correct Answer)
C. Thrombin
D. EDTA

Explanation: ***Citrate phosphate dextrose*** - This anticoagulant solution is commonly used for blood preservation in blood banks because **citrate** chelates **calcium ions**, preventing coagulation. - The **phosphate** acts as a buffer to maintain pH, and **dextrose** provides energy for red blood cell metabolism during storage. - **CPD** allows blood storage for up to **21 days**, and when adenine is added (CPDA-1), storage can be extended to **35 days**. *Heparin* - **Heparin** is an anticoagulant that works by enhancing the activity of **antithrombin III**, but it is generally not used for long-term blood storage for transfusion due to its short half-life and potential to activate platelets upon prolonged contact. - While effective as an anticoagulant, heparin is not suitable for routine blood bank storage as it does not adequately support the viability of red blood cells over extended periods. *Thrombin* - **Thrombin** is a procoagulant enzyme involved in the final stages of the coagulation cascade, converting fibrinogen to fibrin, thus promoting clot formation. - Using thrombin would cause immediate blood clotting, making it entirely unsuitable for preserving blood for transfusion purposes. *EDTA* - **EDTA (Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid)** is a chelating anticoagulant commonly used in **laboratory samples** for hematological testing (e.g., CBC). - However, it is **not used for blood transfusion** because it can cause morphological changes in cells and is toxic when transfused, making it unsuitable for therapeutic blood storage.

Question 9: Which of the following is not a diagnostic criteria for declaring brainstem death?

A. A positive apnea test
B. Lack of cerebromotor response to pain in all extremities
C. Absence of brainstem reflexes
D. Absence of stretch reflex from all extremities is essential (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Absence of stretch reflex from all extremities is essential*** - While loss of **deep tendon reflexes** may occur in brain death, it is not a specific diagnostic criterion for brainstem death. [1] - The stretch reflex primarily indicates the integrity of the **spinal reflex arc**, which can persist even in brainstem death. *A positive apnea test* - A **positive apnea test** (no spontaneous respirations despite CO2 rising to a critical level) is a crucial criterion for declaring brainstem death, indicating irreversible cessation of brainstem respiratory control. [1], [2] - It demonstrates the absence of the **medullary respiratory center's function**. *Lack of cerebromotor response to pain in all extremities* - The absence of any **motor response** to noxious stimuli in the cranial nerve distribution or in the limbs, mediated by brainstem pathways, is a key component of brainstem death criteria. [1], [2] - This specifically excludes **spinal reflexes**, which may still be present. *Absence of brainstem reflexes* - This is a fundamental criterion, encompassing the absence of **pupillary light reflexes**, **oculocephalic reflexes** (doll's eyes), **oculovestibular reflexes** (caloric reflexes), **corneal reflexes**, **gag reflex**, and **cough reflex**. [1], [2] - Their absence indicates complete and irreversible loss of **brainstem function**, which is prerequisite for brainstem death.

Question 10: Dying declaration comes under?

A. Section 60 IEA
B. 291 CrPC
C. Section 32 IEA (Correct Answer)
D. Section 32 IPC

Explanation: ***Section 32 IEA*** - This section of the **Indian Evidence Act (IEA)** specifically deals with cases in which a statement of a relevant fact by a person who is dead or cannot be found, etc., is relevant. - A **dying declaration** is a statement made by a person as to the cause of their death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in their death when the cause of that person's death is in question. *Section 60 IEA* - This section refers to **oral evidence** and states that oral evidence must, in all cases whatever, be direct. - It does not specifically address the admissibility of statements made by deceased persons. *291 CrPC* - This section relates to the **Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)** and deals with the evidence of formal character, which can be proved by affidavit. - It is not concerned with the concept of dying declarations. *Section 32 IPC* - This refers to the **Indian Penal Code (IPC)**, which defines various offenses and their punishments. - Section 32 of the IPC states that words referring to acts include illegal omissions; it does not deal with evidence or dying declarations.

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free