Pediatric Trauma — MCQs
In splenic injury, conservative management is done in which of the following?
A child is brought to the casualty department with reports of violent shaking by parents. What is the most likely injury?
Which of the following is a characteristic feature of Battered Baby Syndrome (Non-Accidental Injury)?
Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) includes:
A traumatic injury to an 8-year-old child, with marking of a rickshaw tyre found on the body, is an example of -
What is the correct sequence of management in a patient who presents to the casualty with an RTA? 1. Cervical spine stabilization 2. Intubation 3. IV cannulation 4. CECT
In a radiograph of suspected non-accidental injury, which of the following fractures is LEAST specific for child abuse?
An unconscious child is brought to the casualty. What is the correct sequence of the management?
What is the maintenance fluid requirement in a 6 kg child ?
According to the Lund and Browder chart, what percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) does the head and face represent in a 1-year-old child?
Pediatric Trauma Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1: In splenic injury, conservative management is done in which of the following?
- A. Extreme pallor and hypotension
- B. Young patient (Correct Answer)
- C. Shattered spleen
- D. Hemodynamically unstable
Explanation: ***Young patient*** - **Conservative management** of splenic injury is often favored in **younger patients** due to their greater capacity for healing and the desire to preserve splenic function. - The risk of **overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI)** is higher in children, making splenic preservation a priority. *Extreme pallor and hypotension* - **Extreme pallor** and **hypotension** are signs of significant blood loss and **hemodynamic instability**, which typically necessitate surgical intervention. - **Conservative management** is usually contraindicated in such cases as the patient is actively bleeding. *Shattered spleen* - A **shattered spleen** indicates a severe, often **grade IV or V** splenic injury, where the spleen is extensively fragmented. - This level of injury is associated with uncontrollable bleeding and almost always requires **splenectomy**. *Hemodynamically unstable* - **Hemodynamic instability**, characterized by persistent hypotension, tachycardia, or inadequate organ perfusion, is a **contraindication** to conservative management. - Patients who are **hemodynamically unstable** need immediate surgical exploration to control bleeding.
Question 2: A child is brought to the casualty department with reports of violent shaking by parents. What is the most likely injury?
- A. Skull bone fracture
- B. Long bone fracture
- C. Subdural haematoma (Correct Answer)
- D. Ruptured spleen
Explanation: ***Subdural haematoma*** - **Violent shaking** in infants (known as **shaken baby syndrome**) causes characteristic neurological injuries due to acceleration-deceleration forces, leading to tearing of **bridging veins** and often presenting as **subdural haematoma**. - The infant's immature brain and weak neck muscles make them particularly vulnerable to these forces, resulting in significant intracranial bleeding without direct impact. *Skull bone fracture* - While possible in cases of severe trauma, **skull fractures** are less specific to violent shaking alone, often requiring a direct impact. - Shaking causes shearing forces on the brain's delicate structures rather than directly fracturing the skull unless there is an impact. *Long bone fracture* - **Long bone fractures**, such as spiral fractures, can occur in child abuse but are typically associated with **twisting or direct impact** rather than the primary mechanism of violent shaking. - While possible, they are not the most immediate or common injury directly resulting from the shearing forces of shaking. *Ruptured spleen* - A **ruptured spleen** indicates significant **abdominal trauma**, usually a direct blow or crush injury, which is not the primary mechanism of injury in violent shaking. - While internal organ damage can occur in child abuse, it's less characteristic of trauma solely from violent shaking compared to intracranial injuries.
Question 3: Which of the following is a characteristic feature of Battered Baby Syndrome (Non-Accidental Injury)?
- A. Stab injury
- B. Firearm injury
- C. Bruises of varying ages (Correct Answer)
- D. None of the options
Explanation: ***Bruises of varying ages*** - The presence of bruises at **different stages of healing** is a hallmark indicator of **non-accidental trauma** or Battered Baby Syndrome, as it suggests repeated injuries occurring over time rather than a single incident. - **Forensic significance**: Fresh bruises (red/purple) alongside older bruises (yellow/green/brown) indicate multiple episodes of trauma, which is inconsistent with the caregiver's explanation of a single accidental event. - Other classic features include fractures (especially metaphyseal/corner fractures, rib fractures), subdural hematomas, retinal hemorrhages, and injuries in protected body areas. *Stab injury* - While a stab injury represents severe trauma requiring forensic investigation, it is **not characteristic** of the typical presentation pattern of Battered Baby Syndrome. - Stab wounds indicate a specific violent act rather than the pattern of **repeated blunt force trauma** that defines the syndrome. - Battered Baby Syndrome classically involves injuries from shaking, hitting, or blunt trauma rather than penetrating injuries. *Firearm injury* - A firearm injury is a distinct acute traumatic event that does not represent the **chronic, repetitive abuse pattern** seen in Battered Baby Syndrome. - Such injuries are typically isolated incidents rather than part of ongoing physical abuse with varied injury ages. - The syndrome is characterized by multiple injuries at different healing stages from repeated episodes, not single penetrating trauma. *None of the options* - This option is incorrect because "bruises of varying ages" is a **well-established forensic indicator** for diagnosing Battered Baby Syndrome in medical literature and practice. - The presence of injuries at multiple stages of healing is one of the most important diagnostic features that raises suspicion for non-accidental injury in pediatric forensic medicine.
Question 4: Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) includes:
- A. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) + Blood Pressure (BP) + Respiratory Rate (RR)
- B. Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Injury Severity Score (ISS) + Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)
- C. Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Injury Severity Score (ISS) + Age (Correct Answer)
- D. Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) + Age
Explanation: ***Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Injury Severity Score (ISS) + Age*** - TRISS is a trauma scoring system that combines **physiological measures** (RTS), **anatomical injury severity** (ISS), and **patient age** to predict survival probability. - The RTS component further incorporates **Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)**, **systolic blood pressure (SBP)**, and **respiratory rate (RR)**, while ISS is derived from the **Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)**. *Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) + Blood Pressure (BP) + Respiratory Rate (RR)* - These three components together constitute the **physiological parameters** of the **Revised Trauma Score (RTS)**, which is *a part* of TRISS, but not TRISS itself. - This option lacks the crucial **anatomical injury assessment (ISS)** and **age**, which are essential for TRISS. *Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Injury Severity Score (ISS) + Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)* - This option is redundant as the **Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)** is already a component of the **Revised Trauma Score (RTS)**. - It correctly identifies RTS and ISS but adds GCS as a separate, extra factor, failing to include **age**, which is vital for TRISS. *Revised Trauma Score (RTS) + Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) + Age* - This option correctly includes **age** and the **Revised Trauma Score (RTS)** but is missing the **anatomical injury severity (ISS)**. - Similar to the third option, **GCS** is already incorporated within RTS, making its separate mention here redundant.
Question 5: A traumatic injury to an 8-year-old child, with marking of a rickshaw tyre found on the body, is an example of -
- A. Pattern bruises (Correct Answer)
- B. Imprint abrasion
- C. Percolated bruise
- D. Contusion
Explanation: ***Pattern bruises*** - This scenario describes **pattern bruising**, where the **shape of the injuring object** (rickshaw tyre) is clearly visible on the body. - Pattern bruises are indicative of severe trauma and provide crucial **forensic evidence** about the **weapon or mechanism of injury**. - This is the **specific forensic medicine term** for bruises that retain the characteristic pattern of the causative object. *Imprint abrasion* - An imprint abrasion occurs when the **surface features of an object are scraped onto the skin**, leaving a superficial injury with disruption of the epidermis. - This typically involves **scraping or rubbing** of the skin surface, whereas the question describes **marking** on the body, which in forensic context refers to a bruise (subcutaneous hemorrhage) rather than a superficial abrasion. *Percolated bruise* - A percolated bruise refers to a bruise where the **blood has spread extensively** through the tissue planes, often making its initial impact site difficult to discern. - The pattern becomes **diffuse and indistinct**, which is the opposite of the clear tyre marking described in the question. *Contusion* - A contusion is the **general medical term** for a bruise - any blunt force injury causing damaged capillaries and blood vessels with subcutaneous bleeding. - While the injury IS technically a contusion, **"pattern bruise" is the more specific and correct forensic medicine terminology** that describes a contusion with the distinctive shape of the causative object. - In forensic medicine, specificity matters - we use "pattern bruise" to immediately convey that the injury has evidential value showing the weapon's characteristics.
Question 6: What is the correct sequence of management in a patient who presents to the casualty with an RTA? 1. Cervical spine stabilization 2. Intubation 3. IV cannulation 4. CECT
- A. 2,1,4,3
- B. 1,3,2,4
- C. 2,1,3,4
- D. 1,2,3,4 (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***1,2,3,4*** - This sequence follows the **ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support)** protocol, prioritizing immediate life threats in order. - **Cervical spine stabilization** is the **first action upon patient contact** to prevent secondary neurological injury in any trauma patient. - **Airway management (intubation)** is then performed **with maintained in-line c-spine stabilization** - these occur nearly simultaneously but c-spine protection is instituted first. - **IV cannulation (circulation)** follows to establish vascular access for resuscitation and medications. - **CECT (imaging)** is performed last, once the patient is stabilized after addressing immediate life threats. - This follows the **ATLS Primary Survey: Airway (with c-spine protection) → Breathing → Circulation → Disability → Exposure**. *2,1,4,3* - This incorrectly places intubation **before** cervical spine stabilization is initiated. - In ATLS, **c-spine protection must be applied immediately upon patient contact** before any airway manipulation. - Delaying IV cannulation until after CECT is inappropriate as circulatory access is critical for early resuscitation. *1,3,2,4* - While this correctly starts with cervical spine stabilization, it incorrectly places **IV cannulation before intubation**. - In the ATLS primary survey, **Airway comes before Circulation** - securing the airway takes priority over establishing IV access. - This sequence could delay critical airway management in a patient with respiratory compromise. *2,1,3,4* - This sequence places **intubation before cervical spine stabilization**, which violates ATLS principles. - **C-spine stabilization must be the first action** upon approaching any trauma patient to prevent secondary spinal cord injury. - While intubation with in-line stabilization is possible, the c-spine protection must be instituted first, not after beginning airway manipulation.
Question 7: In a radiograph of suspected non-accidental injury, which of the following fractures is LEAST specific for child abuse?
- A. Metaphysis corner fracture
- B. Costochondral & rib junction fracture
- C. Parietal bone fracture (Correct Answer)
- D. Sternal fracture
Explanation: ***Parietal bone fracture*** - While **parietal bone fractures** are commonly seen in both accidental and non-accidental pediatric head trauma, they are **less specific for child abuse** compared to the classic skeletal injuries listed below. - Isolated skull fractures, particularly **simple linear parietal fractures**, can result from accidental falls and require additional clinical context (age, mechanism, associated injuries) to determine if abuse is suspected. - Complex, multiple, or depressed skull fractures are more concerning, but a simple parietal fracture alone is less diagnostic than the pathognomonic fractures of NAI. *Metaphyseal corner fracture* - Also known as **"bucket handle"** or **"corner" fractures**, these are **highly specific and virtually pathognomonic** for **non-accidental injury** in infants and young children. - They result from violent **shaking, twisting, or pulling forces** applied to the extremities, causing avulsion at the metaphyseal-epiphyseal junction. - These fractures are rarely seen in accidental trauma. *Costochondral & rib junction fracture* - **Posterior rib fractures** and **costochondral junction fractures** are **highly specific for NAI** in infants. - They result from **anteroposterior chest compression** during forceful squeezing or gripping of the thorax. - Accidental rib fractures in children are rare due to chest wall elasticity, making these fractures particularly suspicious. *Sternal fracture* - **Sternal fractures** are extremely rare in children due to the **flexibility of the pediatric sternum** and chest wall. - Their presence, especially without a history of **severe high-impact trauma** (e.g., motor vehicle collision), is **highly suspicious for non-accidental injury**. - Often result from direct forceful blows or severe compression injuries.
Question 8: An unconscious child is brought to the casualty. What is the correct sequence of the management?
- A. Circulation, Airway, Breathing
- B. Breathing, Circulation, Airway
- C. Circulation, Breathing, Airway
- D. Airway, Breathing, Circulation (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Airway, Breathing, Circulation*** - The **ABC sequence** is the cornerstone of pediatric resuscitation as per **PALS (Pediatric Advanced Life Support) guidelines** - In an unconscious child, a patent **airway** is the absolute first priority - without this, no oxygen can reach the lungs regardless of breathing effort - Once airway patency is ensured, **breathing** must be assessed and supported to provide adequate ventilation and oxygenation - Only after securing airway and breathing should **circulation** be addressed, as effective circulation without oxygenation is futile - This sequence prevents **hypoxic brain injury**, which can occur within 4-6 minutes of oxygen deprivation *Circulation, Airway, Breathing* - This violates the fundamental **ABC principle** of emergency management - Prioritizing **circulation** before establishing a patent **airway** means attempting to circulate deoxygenated blood - Without airway patency, any circulatory support will fail to deliver oxygen to vital organs, leading to **irreversible hypoxic damage** - In pediatric emergencies, respiratory failure is more common than primary cardiac arrest, making airway management even more critical *Breathing, Circulation, Airway* - Attempting to support **breathing** before securing the **airway** is physiologically ineffective - An obstructed airway prevents air entry despite breathing efforts or bag-mask ventilation attempts - This sequence can lead to **gastric distension, aspiration**, and worsening hypoxia - Delays in airway management increase the risk of **cardiac arrest** from prolonged hypoxemia *Circulation, Breathing, Airway* - This sequence dangerously delays **airway management**, the most time-critical intervention - In an unconscious child, airway obstruction from tongue falling back or secretions is common and immediately life-threatening - Without a patent airway, neither breathing support nor circulatory measures can prevent **brain death** from anoxia - Following this sequence contradicts all **international resuscitation guidelines** (PALS, AHA, ERC)
Question 9: What is the maintenance fluid requirement in a 6 kg child ?
- A. 240 ml/day
- B. 600 ml/day (Correct Answer)
- C. 300 ml/day
- D. 1200 ml/day
Explanation: **600 ml/day** - The **Holliday-Segar formula** is used to calculate maintenance fluid requirements. For the first 10 kg of body weight, the requirement is 100 ml/kg/day. - For a 6 kg child, the calculation is 6 kg * 100 ml/kg/day = **600 ml/day**. *240 ml/day* - This value is significantly **lower** than the recommended maintenance fluid for a 6 kg child, which would lead to **dehydration**. - It does not align with the standard Holliday-Segar formula for this weight. *300 ml/day* - This amount is **insufficient** for a 6 kg child's daily maintenance fluid needs and would risk **hypovolemia**. - It represents roughly half of the calculated requirement based on standard pediatric guidelines. *1200 ml/day* - This volume is significantly **higher** than the maintenance fluid requirement for a 6 kg child and could lead to **fluid overload** and hyponatremia. - This calculation might be appropriate for a much heavier child or in situations of increased fluid loss.
Question 10: According to the Lund and Browder chart, what percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) does the head and face represent in a 1-year-old child?
- A. 16%
- B. 10%
- C. 19% (Correct Answer)
- D. 13%
Explanation: ***19%*** - The **Lund and Browder chart** accounts for age-related variations in body proportions, assigning a larger percentage of **total body surface area (TBSA)** to the head in infants and young children. - For a **1-year-old child**, the head and face are estimated to represent approximately **19% TBSA**, which decreases with age as the body proportions change. *16%* - While 16% is a value sometimes associated with the head, it is not the accurate percentage for a **1-year-old child** according to the **Lund and Browder chart**. - This percentage is typically closer to that of an **older child** or adult's head, as body proportions change over time. *10%* - **10% TBSA** is far too low for the head and face of a **1-year-old child** as per the Lund and Browder chart. - This value is usually associated with areas like the **arms** in children or the head of an **adult** in some simpler TBSA estimation methods. *13%* - **13% TBSA** is an underestimation for the head and face of a **1-year-old child** when using the **Lund and Browder chart**. - The large relative size of an infant's head means it contributes a significantly higher percentage to their **total body surface area**.
Want unlimited practice?
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free