False Allegations — MCQs
The IPC section associated with grievous injury is?
What does Section 191 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) pertain to?
The onus of proof in civil negligence case against a doctor lies with:
All of the following are disruptive, impulse control and conduct disorders except:
A 16-year-old girl comes to a doctor with fractured forearm. She said she tripped and fell but cigarette burns were observed on her forearm. What will be your next step?
Antemortem abrasions can be confused with:
Which of the following is NOT used for procuring criminal abortion?
Which of the following is NOT true about gang rape?
In case of a rape victim, within how many days should a vaginal swab be taken?
A pregnant female dies during an illegal abortion. Under which section of the Indian Penal Code can the doctor be punished?
False Allegations Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1: The IPC section associated with grievous injury is?
- A. 300
- B. 302
- C. 320 (Correct Answer)
- D. 420
Explanation: ***320*** - Section **320** of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) specifically defines what constitutes **grievous hurt**. - This section outlines the types of injuries considered severe enough to be classified as grievous, such as **emasculation**, permanent privation of the sight of either eye, or hearing of either ear, privation of any member or joint, destruction or permanent impairing of the powers of any member or joint, permanent disfiguration of the head or face, fracture or dislocation of a bone or tooth, or any hurt which endangers life or causes severe bodily pain for twenty days. *300* - Section **300** of the IPC defines **murder**. - It describes the various circumstances under which an act causing death amounts to murder, distinguishing it from general homicide. *302* - Section **302** of the IPC prescribes the **punishment for murder**, which is typically death or life imprisonment. - This section deals with the punitive aspect rather than the definition of grievous injury itself. *420* - Section **420** of the IPC deals with **cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property**. - This section is related to financial crimes and fraud, having no connection to bodily injury.
Question 2: What does Section 191 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) pertain to?
- A. Medical negligence
- B. Assault punishment
- C. Giving false evidence (Correct Answer)
- D. Hostile witness
Explanation: ***Giving false evidence*** - Section 191 of the Indian Penal Code **specifically defines the offence of giving false evidence** - It addresses situations where a person, under oath or express provision of law to state the truth, makes a statement that is false and which he/she either **knows or believes to be false**, or does not believe to be true - This section is fundamental to **maintaining the integrity of legal proceedings** and protecting against perjury *Medical negligence* - Medical negligence is typically covered under **other sections of the IPC**, such as Section 304A (causing death by negligence) or Section 338 (causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others) - It may also be addressed under **civil law provisions** or the Consumer Protection Act - It involves a breach of duty by a medical professional that causes harm to a patient *Hostile witness* - The concept of a hostile witness is related to **evidentiary rules in criminal procedure**, particularly under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - **Not defined or addressed by any specific section in the IPC** - A hostile witness is one who does not support the party that called them to testify, often contradicting their own prior statements *Assault punishment* - The punishment for assault is covered under **Sections 351 to 358 of the IPC** - These sections define what constitutes assault and criminal force, along with penalties for different degrees of such offenses - Section 191 has no connection to assault-related provisions
Question 3: The onus of proof in civil negligence case against a doctor lies with:
- A. Hospital administration
- B. Patient (Correct Answer)
- C. Doctor
- D. Medical board
Explanation: ***Patient*** - In civil negligence cases, the **plaintiff** (the patient, in this context) bears the **onus of proof**, meaning they must demonstrate that the doctor was negligent. - The patient must establish **duty of care**, **breach of that duty**, **causation** of injury due to the breach, and actual **damages**. *Hospital administration* - The hospital administration might be named as a co-defendant, but the primary burden of proving negligence against the doctor still rests with the patient. - Their liability would usually be **vicarious** (for the actions of employees) or for institutional failures, not for proving individual doctor negligence. *Doctor* - The doctor is the **defendant** in a civil negligence case and is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. - The doctor's role is to **defend** against the allegations, not to prove their own innocence of negligence. *Medical board* - A medical board is a **regulatory body** responsible for licensing and discipline, not for adjudicating civil negligence claims. - They conduct investigations into professional misconduct, but this is separate from the **burden of proof** in a civil lawsuit.
Question 4: All of the following are disruptive, impulse control and conduct disorders except:
- A. Conduct disorder
- B. Oppositional defiant disorder
- C. Intermittent explosive disorder
- D. Munchausen syndrome (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Munchausen syndrome*** - This is an older term for **factitious disorder imposed on self**, where an individual feigns or induces illness to assume the sick role. - It is classified under **somatic symptom and related disorders**, not disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders. *Conduct disorder* - This disorder is characterized by a repetitive and persistent pattern of behavior in which the basic rights of others or major age-appropriate societal norms or rules are violated. - It is explicitly listed as a **disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorder** in the DSM-5. *Oppositional defiant disorder* - This involves a pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness lasting at least 6 months. - It is a primary diagnosis within the category of **disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders**. *Intermittent explosive disorder* - Characterized by recurrent behavioral outbursts representing a failure to control aggressive impulses, often disproportionate to the provocation. - This disorder is a core example of an **impulse control disorder** within the disruptive, impulse control, and conduct disorders section of the DSM-5.
Question 5: A 16-year-old girl comes to a doctor with fractured forearm. She said she tripped and fell but cigarette burns were observed on her forearm. What will be your next step?
- A. To tell or discuss with colleagues that she is a case of abuse
- B. To inform higher authorities
- C. To do a complete physical examination (Correct Answer)
- D. To call local social worker for help
Explanation: ***To do a complete physical examination*** - A comprehensive **physical examination** is essential to assess the full extent of injuries and to identify any other signs of abuse that might not be immediately apparent. - This step ensures that all medical needs are addressed and that any potential harm is documented appropriately within the medical record. *To tell or discuss with colleagues that she is a case of abuse* - While suspicion of abuse is high, immediately labeling the patient as a "case of abuse" to colleagues without further assessment can be premature and may compromise patient confidentiality. - Discussing with colleagues should follow a thorough examination and be part of a structured approach to **interprofessional collaboration** once concerns are medically substantiated. *To inform higher authorities* - Reporting to higher authorities is a critical step in cases of suspected abuse, but it typically follows a **thorough medical evaluation** and documentation of findings. - Informing authorities prematurely without a complete medical assessment could lead to incomplete information and potentially delay necessary medical care for the patient. *To call local social worker for help* - Involving a social worker is an important component of managing suspected child abuse, as they can provide support and guidance for the patient and family. - However, the immediate priority is to address the patient's medical needs and gather medical evidence through a **complete physical examination** before initiating social services.
Question 6: Antemortem abrasions can be confused with:
- A. Eczema
- B. Joule burn
- C. Chemical burn
- D. Ant bite marks (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Ant bite marks*** - Ant bite marks can closely **mimic the appearance of antemortem abrasions**, especially multiple, small, clustered abraded areas. - Both can present with **small, reddish lesions**, making differentiation difficult without careful examination or a history of ant exposure. *Eczema* - Eczema typically presents as **inflamed, itchy, and often scaly patches of skin**, which are distinct from the superficial scraping injury of an abrasion. - While eczema can involve skin breakdown from scratching, the underlying pathology and appearance differ significantly from an acute abrasive injury. *Chemical burn* - A chemical burn usually causes **discoloration, blistering, deep tissue damage, or necrosis**, which is more severe and distinct from a superficial abrasion. - The pattern of injury in a chemical burn is typically characterized by the corrosive nature of the substance, unlike the mechanical trauma of an abrasion. *Joule burn* - A Joule burn (electrical burn) is associated with **entry and exit wounds, charring, and deep tissue coagulation**, which are very different from the superficial epidermal loss of an abrasion. - Electrical burns often leave a distinct, localized pattern of thermal injury not seen with abrasions.
Question 7: Which of the following is NOT used for procuring criminal abortion?
- A. Ripe fruit of papaya (Correct Answer)
- B. Saffron
- C. Seeds of carrot
- D. Unripe fruit of pineapple
Explanation: In Forensic Medicine, substances used to induce criminal abortion are classified as **Abortifacients**. These are typically divided into local irritants and systemic poisons (ecbolics and emmenagogues). **Why Option A is Correct:** The **ripe fruit of papaya** is considered safe and does not possess abortifacient properties. In contrast, the **unripe or semi-ripe papaya** contains high concentrations of **latex and papain**. Papain acts like prostaglandin and oxytocin, which can trigger uterine contractions and lead to miscarriage. Therefore, while unripe papaya is a known abortifacient, the ripe version is not used for procuring criminal abortion. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Saffron (Option B):** In large doses, saffron acts as a systemic emmenagogue (stimulates menstrual flow) and can cause uterine contractions, leading to abortion. * **Seeds of Carrot (Option C):** Specifically the seeds of *Daucus carota* (Wild Carrot) have been used traditionally as an "herbal morning-after pill." They contain terpenoids that block progesterone synthesis, preventing implantation or disrupting an early pregnancy. * **Unripe fruit of pineapple (Option D):** Unripe pineapple contains **bromelain**, a proteolytic enzyme that can soften the cervix and induce uterine contractions. Like unripe papaya, it is a classic example of a dietary abortifacient. **NEET-PG High-Yield Pearls:** * **Common Local Irritants:** Abortion sticks (coated with *Calotropis* or *Plumbago rosea*), marking nut (*Semecarpus anacardium*). * **Common Systemic Abortifacients:** Ergot, Quinine, Pennyroyal oil, and Lead (the only metal used as an abortifacient). * **Legal Aspect:** Criminal abortion is dealt with under **Sections 312-316 of the IPC**. If the woman dies during the attempt, it falls under **Section 314 IPC**.
Question 8: Which of the following is NOT true about gang rape?
- A. Sexual intercourse by one person (Correct Answer)
- B. Sexual intercourse by two persons
- C. Sexual intercourse by three persons
- D. Sexual intercourse by many persons
Explanation: **Explanation:** The concept of **Gang Rape** is defined under **Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** (now corresponding to Section 70 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - BNS). **1. Why Option A is the Correct Answer:** By definition, gang rape occurs when an offense of sexual assault is committed by **one or more persons acting in furtherance of a common intention**. However, the legal threshold for "gang" involvement requires a group. If a sexual assault is committed by a **single individual** acting alone, it is classified as "Rape" under Section 375 IPC, not "Gang Rape." Therefore, "sexual intercourse by one person" is the statement that is NOT true regarding the definition of gang rape. **2. Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Options B, C, and D:** These are all technically true in the context of gang rape. According to the law, if a group of persons (two, three, or many) acts with common intention, and even if only one of them commits the physical act of penetration, **all persons** in that group are deemed guilty of gang rape. **3. High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Section 376D IPC:** Deals specifically with the punishment for gang rape (Imprisonment for not less than 20 years, extending to life). * **Common Intention:** The presence of "common intention" is the legal cornerstone of gang rape; every member of the group is held equally liable regardless of who performed the act. * **Age of Consent:** Post the 2018 Amendment, the punishment for gang rape of a girl under 12 years (Section 376DB) or 16 years (Section 376DA) includes the possibility of the death penalty. * **Medical Examination:** In cases of multiple assailants, the forensic expert must look for "patterned injuries" and collect separate DNA evidence (semen/swabs) to identify the number of perpetrators.
Question 9: In case of a rape victim, within how many days should a vaginal swab be taken?
- A. 2 days
- B. 3 days (Correct Answer)
- C. 4 days
- D. 7 days
Explanation: **Explanation:** The collection of forensic evidence in sexual assault cases is time-sensitive. The correct answer is **3 days (72 hours)** because this is the maximum duration for which motile and non-motile spermatozoa can typically be reliably recovered from the vaginal vault. * **Why 3 days is correct:** Spermatozoa survive in the acidic environment of the vagina for a limited period. While motile sperm usually disappear within 6–12 hours, non-motile sperm can be detected for up to 3 days (72 hours). Beyond this window, enzymatic degradation and vaginal discharge make recovery highly unlikely. * **Why A (2 days) is incorrect:** While swabs taken at 48 hours are highly likely to yield evidence, the forensic window extends further to 72 hours. * **Why C & D (4 & 7 days) are incorrect:** By day 4, the likelihood of finding intact spermatozoa in the vagina is negligible. However, it is important to note that sperm can survive longer in other sites (e.g., up to 5 days in the cervical mucus or 24 hours in the rectum/mouth). **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** 1. **Sperm Survival Times:** * **Vagina:** 3 days (72 hours). * **Cervix:** Up to 5 days. * **Mouth:** 6 hours. * **Anus/Rectum:** 24 hours. 2. **Acid Phosphatase:** This enzyme (secreted by the prostate) is a marker for semen. It remains detectable in the vagina for about **24 hours**. 3. **Florence Test & Barberio Test:** These are preliminary chemical tests used to detect semen (Florence detects choline; Barberio detects spermine). 4. **DNA Profiling:** This is the gold standard for identification and should be attempted even if the 72-hour window has passed, as epithelial cells may still be present.
Question 10: A pregnant female dies during an illegal abortion. Under which section of the Indian Penal Code can the doctor be punished?
- A. Section 303 IPC
- B. Section 316 IPC
- C. Section 314 IPC (Correct Answer)
- D. Section 315 IPC
Explanation: ### Explanation **Correct Answer: C. Section 314 IPC** **Why it is correct:** Section 314 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) specifically deals with **death caused by an act done with intent to cause miscarriage**. If a woman dies during an illegal abortion, the person performing the act is liable under this section. * If the act is done **without the woman's consent**, the punishment is more severe (imprisonment for life). * Even if the act is done **with consent**, but results in death, it remains a punishable offense under Section 314 because the intent was to cause an illegal miscarriage. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 303 IPC:** This formerly dealt with the punishment for murder by a life-convict (declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in *Mithu vs. State of Punjab*). * **Section 315 IPC:** This pertains to an act done with the **intent to prevent a child being born alive** or to cause it to die after birth. It focuses on the fate of the infant, not the death of the mother. * **Section 316 IPC:** This deals with causing the **death of a quick unborn child** (late-term fetus) by an act amounting to culpable homicide. It focuses on the death of the fetus when the mother survives. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Section 312 IPC:** Punishment for causing miscarriage (with consent). * **Section 313 IPC:** Causing miscarriage **without** woman’s consent. * **MTP Act (1971):** Provides legal immunity to doctors if the abortion is performed under specific criteria (e.g., danger to mother's life, fetal anomalies) at registered centers. * **Commonest cause of death in illegal abortion:** Septicemia (delayed) or Air Embolism/Hemorrhage (immediate).
Want unlimited practice?
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free