Medical Jurisprudence Practice Questions

Q: In criminal cases, while serving the summons, by whom is the conduct money paid?

No conduct money is given. In medical jurisprudence, **conduct money** refers to the fee paid to a witness to cover travel and subsistence expenses when they are summoned to testify in a court of law. ### **Explanation of the Correct Answer** In **Criminal Cases**, no conduct money is paid to the witness (including doctors) by any party. This is because, in criminal proceedings, it is considered the legal and moral duty of every citizen to assist the State in the administration of justice. The witness is expected to appear in court upon receiving a summons, and their expenses are technically borne by the State (reimbursed later as per government scales), but no advance payment is provided at the time of serving the summons. ### **Analysis of Incorrect Options** * **A & B (Complainant/Opposite Party):** In **Civil Cases**, the party that calls the witness is responsible for paying conduct money at the time the summons is served. If the money is not paid, the witness can refuse to attend. However, this rule does not apply to criminal cases. * **C (The Judge):** The judiciary issues the summons but does not personally provide conduct money. ### **High-Yield NEET-PG Pearls** * **Civil Cases:** Conduct money **is paid** at the time of serving the summons by the party calling the witness. * **Criminal Cases:** Conduct money **is NOT paid** at the time of serving. * **Priority of Summons:** If a doctor receives a summons from both a Civil and a Criminal court for the same day, they must attend the **Criminal Court** first. * **Court Hierarchy:** If summons are from two courts of the same category, the one from the **Higher Court** takes precedence. If both are of equal status, the one **received first** is attended. * **Section 174 IPC:** Failure to attend court after receiving a summons is a punishable offense.

Q: According to common medical ethics, for which of the following certificates should a doctor NOT accept fees?

A death certificate. ### Explanation **Correct Option: B (A death certificate)** In medical ethics and jurisprudence, a doctor is legally and ethically bound to issue a **Death Certificate** (Medical Certificate of Cause of Death - MCCD) free of charge. This is because certifying the cause of death is considered a statutory duty of the attending physician toward the state. Charging a fee for this document is considered unethical and is prohibited under the Indian Medical Council (Professional Conduct, Etiquette, and Ethics) Regulations. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **A. A government employee:** Doctors are entitled to charge for medical certificates required for leave, fitness, or insurance purposes, regardless of the patient's employment status, unless the doctor is a government medical officer performing official duties. * **C. A patient with poor financial status:** While a doctor may choose to waive fees on humanitarian grounds (pro bono), there is no legal or ethical prohibition against charging for a certificate based solely on the patient's financial status. * **D. A psychiatric patient:** The nature of the illness does not exempt a patient from the standard fee structure for medical documentation or certification. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Statutory Duty:** Issuing certificates for birth and death are legal obligations. Failure to do so can lead to legal penalties. * **Retention of Records:** According to NMC guidelines, doctors must maintain a register of all certificates issued and keep copies for at least **3 years**. * **Professional Misconduct:** Issuing a false medical certificate is a form of professional misconduct and can lead to the removal of the doctor's name from the Medical Register (Erasure). * **The "Rule of Three":** A certificate should be simple, contain only facts observed by the doctor, and be issued only to the person examined.

Q: According to the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, what is the punishment for a doctor found guilty?

2 to 5 years imprisonment. **Explanation:** The **Transplantation of Human Organs Act (THOA), 1994**, was enacted to regulate the removal, storage, and transplantation of human organs and to prevent commercial dealings. **Why Option C is Correct:** Under **Section 18** of the Act, any registered medical practitioner who conducts or assists in the removal of a human organ without following the prescribed procedures is liable for punishment. The Act specifically mandates an imprisonment term of **2 to 5 years** and a fine which may extend to ₹10,000 (for the first offense). Additionally, the doctor's name is reported to the State Medical Council for appropriate action, including removal from the register for a period of three years for the first offense and permanently for subsequent offenses. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Options A & B:** These are incorrect as the law views illegal organ transplantation as a serious felony; hence, the minimum threshold for imprisonment is set at 2 years to act as a deterrent. * **Option D:** While punishments for "commercial dealings" (selling organs) were increased to 5–10 years in the 2011 Amendment, the standard punishment for a doctor violating procedural norms under the original framework remains 2 to 5 years. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Brain Stem Death:** THOA 1994 was the first Indian law to legally recognize "Brain Stem Death," allowing for cadaveric organ donation. * **Authorization Committee:** Any living donor transplant between non-near relatives must be cleared by the Authorization Committee to rule out commercial motives. * **Near Relatives:** Defined by the Act as mother, father, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, and spouse. * **2011 Amendment:** Increased the punishment for illegal organ trade to 5–10 years and fines up to ₹20 lakhs to ₹1 crore.

Q: The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act was passed in which year?

1971. **Explanation:** The **Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act** was enacted by the Indian Parliament in **1971** (Option A) and came into force on April 1, 1972. This landmark legislation was introduced to provide a legal framework for the termination of certain pregnancies by registered medical practitioners, primarily to reduce maternal mortality resulting from illegal and unsafe abortions. **Analysis of Options:** * **Option A (1971):** The correct year of enactment. It legalized abortion in India under specific medical, humanitarian, and social grounds. * **Option B (1976):** This year is significant for the **42nd Amendment** of the Constitution but is unrelated to the MTP Act. * **Option C (1982):** No major medico-legal act regarding reproductive rights was passed this year. * **Option D (1988):** While there were minor administrative rules updated around this time, the primary Act remains the 1971 version. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Recent Amendment (2021):** The upper gestation limit for termination was increased from 20 to **24 weeks** for specific categories of women (survivors of sexual assault, minors, etc.). * **Opinion Requirement:** One RMP is required for termination up to 20 weeks; two RMPs are required for 20–24 weeks. * **Confidentiality:** The name and particulars of the woman must not be revealed except to a person authorized by law; violation is punishable by up to 1 year of imprisonment. * **Consent:** Only the woman's consent is required if she is above 18 years of age. If she is a minor or mentally ill, consent from the guardian is mandatory.

Q: Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines 'oath'?

Section 51 IPC. **Explanation:** **Correct Answer: C. Section 51 IPC** In the context of Medical Jurisprudence, an **oath** is a solemn affirmation substituted by law for an oath, made by a person who is legally bound to state the truth. **Section 51 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** specifically defines 'oath'. In a court of law, a medical witness is required to take an oath before testifying to ensure the legal sanctity of the evidence provided. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 40 IPC:** Defines the term **'Offence'**. It denotes a thing made punishable by the IPC or any special or local law. * **Section 44 IPC:** Defines **'Injury'**. This is a high-yield section for NEET-PG, defining injury as any harm illegally caused to a person in body, mind, reputation, or property. * **Section 178 IPC:** Deals with the **punishment** for refusing to bind oneself by an oath or affirmation when duly required by a public servant. It is a procedural consequence, not the definition. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Perjury (Section 191 IPC):** Giving false evidence under oath is defined here. The punishment for perjury is under **Section 193 IPC** (up to 7 years imprisonment). * **Section 52 IPC:** Defines **'Good Faith'** (essential for medical negligence defense). * **Hostile Witness:** A witness who willfully gives testimony contrary to their previous statement or the interests of the party that called them. * **Documentary Evidence:** Under Section 3 of the Indian Evidence Act, medical certificates and reports are considered documentary evidence.

Q: Which constitutional provision allows for forced feeding of individuals on a hunger strike?

Article 21. **Explanation:** **Correct Option: A (Article 21)** Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the **"Right to Life and Personal Liberty."** In the context of medical jurisprudence and forensic medicine, the judiciary has interpreted the "Right to Life" to include the state's duty to preserve life. When an individual on a hunger strike reaches a clinical state where their life is in imminent danger (e.g., loss of consciousness or impending organ failure), the state is legally empowered to intervene with **forced feeding** (nasogastric or parenteral) to prevent death. This is based on the principle that the right to life is "inalienable" and does not include the right to die. **Incorrect Options:** * **Article 35:** Relates to the power of Parliament to legislate on Fundamental Rights; it has no direct bearing on medical intervention or hunger strikes. * **Article 48:** A Directive Principle of State Policy (DPSP) concerning the organization of agriculture and animal husbandry. * **Article 52:** Simply states that "There shall be a President of India." **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Ethical Conflict:** Forced feeding creates a conflict between the **Principle of Beneficence** (acting in the patient's best interest to save life) and the **Principle of Autonomy** (respecting the patient's refusal of treatment). * **World Medical Association (WMA):** The **Declaration of Tokyo** states that doctors should not participate in forced feeding of prisoners who are capable of forming an unimpaired judgment. However, Indian law prioritizes Article 21 to prevent suicide. * **Legal Status:** Attempt to commit suicide was previously punishable under **Section 309 IPC**, though its application is now limited by the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.

Question 1

Drugs prescribed by registered medical practitioners mostly fall under which class of drugs?

Accepted Answer

Schedule H

Answer

Schedule X

Answer

Schedule S

Answer

Schedule P

Question 2

In criminal cases, while serving the summons, by whom is the conduct money paid?

Accepted Answer

No conduct money is given

Answer

The complainant

Answer

The opposite party

Answer

The judge

Question 3

What is the maximum amount of compensation that can be granted by the state commission under the Consumer Protection Act?

Accepted Answer

1 crore rupees

Answer

20 lakh rupees

Answer

50 lakh rupees

Answer

2 crore rupees

Question 4

According to common medical ethics, for which of the following certificates should a doctor NOT accept fees?

Accepted Answer

A death certificate

Answer

A government employee

Answer

A patient with poor financial status

Answer

A psychiatric patient

Question 5

According to the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994, what is the punishment for a doctor found guilty?

Accepted Answer

2 to 5 years imprisonment

Answer

Less than 1 year imprisonment

Answer

Less than 2 years imprisonment

Answer

More than 5 years imprisonment

Question 6

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act was passed in which year?

Accepted Answer

1971

Answer

1976

Answer

1982

Answer

1988

Question 7

Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines 'oath'?

Accepted Answer

Section 51 IPC

Answer

Section 40 IPC

Answer

Section 44 IPC

Answer

Section 178 IPC

Question 8

Which constitutional provision allows for forced feeding of individuals on a hunger strike?

Accepted Answer

Article 21

Answer

Article 35

Answer

Article 48

Answer

Article 52

Question 9

Privileged communication among the following are all except?

Accepted Answer

Bus driver suffering from hepatitis A

Answer

In court of law when asked by judge

Answer

Information on communicable diseases

Answer

In case of suspected crime

Question 10

Contributory negligence is by the part of:

Accepted Answer

Both

Answer

Doctor

Answer

Patient

Answer

Paramedics

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?