Medical Jurisprudence Practice Questions

Q: In civil cases, conduct money is decided by:

Judge. ***Judge*** - In legal proceedings, the **Judge** holds the authority to determine and order the amount of **conduct money** to be paid. - **Conduct money** is an allowance paid to a witness for their reasonable travel expenses and loss of earnings incurred due to attending court. *Doctor* - A **doctor's** role is primarily focused on medical assessment and treatment, and they have no authority over legal financial matters like **conduct money**. - While a doctor might be a witness, they do not decide the compensation for their own or other witnesses' attendance. *Witness* - A **witness** is an individual who provides testimony or evidence in court and is typically the recipient of **conduct money**, not the decider. - They can submit claims for expenses, but the final decision on the amount rests with the court. *Lawyer* - A **lawyer** represents clients and can advise on legal matters, including the right to claim **conduct money**, but they do not make the final determination. - The lawyer's role is to advocate for their client's interests, which might include seeking an order for **conduct money** from the court.

Q: Plaintiff is a person who:

Files a case in civil court. ***Files a case in civil court*** - A **plaintiff** is the party who initiates a lawsuit (a civil case) before a court. - They are the party seeking **legal remedy** or damages from another party (the defendant). *Gives judgment* - The act of "giving judgment" is reserved for the **judge** or the **court**, not a plaintiff. - A judge presides over legal proceedings and **makes legal determinations**. *Acts as defender* - The party against whom a lawsuit is brought is called the **defendant**, not the plaintiff. - A defender's role is to **contest the claims** made by the plaintiff. *Same as public prosecutor* - A **public prosecutor** represents the state or government in criminal proceedings, initiating charges against individuals for alleged crimes. - A **plaintiff** initiates civil actions between private parties, seeking compensation or other civil remedies, not criminal conviction.

Q: According to JJ Act 2000, a juvenile is a boy and girl respectively less than:

18 and 18. ***18 and 18*** - As per the **Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000**, a juvenile (or child) is defined uniformly as an individual who has not completed 18 years of age, regardless of gender. - This definition ensures that both boys and girls under 18 years old receive the same protections and care under the juvenile justice system. *16 and 18* - This option reflects an outdated or incorrect understanding of the **Juvenile Justice Act, 2000**, which specifically establishes a single age limit for both genders. - Prior to the 2000 Act and its subsequent amendments, some laws might have had different age limits for boys and girls, but the JJ Act 2000 unified this to 18 for both. *14 and 16* - This option refers to age limits that are significantly lower than those established by the **Juvenile Justice Act, 2000**, which aims to protect individuals up to the age of 18. - These ages do not correspond to the legal definition of a juvenile under the specified Act. *18 and 21* - While 18 is the correct upper age limit for both boys and girls under the **Juvenile Justice Act, 2000**, the age of 21 is typically associated with the legal age of adulthood for certain rights and responsibilities, not for defining a juvenile under this act. - The JJ Act focuses on protecting children up to 18, not distinguishing adulthood beyond that for juvenile purposes.

Q: Transplantation of Human Organs Act was passed in:

1994. ***1994*** - The **Transplantation of Human Organs Act (THOA)** was enacted by the Indian Parliament in **1994**. - This act provides legal guidelines for organ donation and transplantation in India, aiming to prevent illegal organ trafficking. *1996* - This year is incorrect; the Transplantation of Human Organs Act was passed earlier than **1996**. - No significant amendments or new acts related to organ transplantation occurred in **1996**. *2000* - This year is incorrect; the primary organ transplantation legislation was not established in **2000**. - The act was already in force by **2000**, having been passed several years prior. *2002* - This year is incorrect; the initial act for organ transplantation was not passed in **2002**. - While amendments and updates to THOA have occurred over time, the foundational act was not from **2002**.

Q: A doctor is involved in a medico-legal case concerning medical negligence that comes before a First Class Magistrate. What are the maximum sentencing powers of a First Class Magistrate in such cases involving medical professionals?

Fine upto 10,000 and 3 years imprisonment. ***Fine upto 10,000 and 3 years imprisonment*** - Under the **Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) 1973** as it stood in 2014, a **First Class Magistrate** had the power to impose a maximum fine of **Rs. 10,000** and imprisonment for up to **three years**. - This was the **correct answer for NEET-PG 2014** when this question was asked. - **Note:** The CrPC was subsequently amended, and as of 2018, First Class Magistrates can impose imprisonment up to **5 years** for certain offenses under Section 29. However, this question reflects the legal provisions applicable at the time of the examination. *Unlimited fine and 7 years imprisonment* - **Unlimited fines** and **seven years of imprisonment** exceed the powers of a First Class Magistrate under the CrPC. - Such extensive sentencing powers are reserved for **Sessions Courts** or higher judiciary for more serious offenses. *Fine upto 10,000 and 5 years imprisonment* - While this option reflects the **current law** (post-2018 amendment to Section 29 CrPC), it was **incorrect in 2014** when this question was set. - At the time of NEET-PG 2014, the maximum imprisonment term for a First Class Magistrate was **three years**, not five. *Fine upto 3000 and 5 years imprisonment* - The **fine of Rs. 3000** underestimates the maximum fine that could be imposed by a First Class Magistrate, which was **Rs. 10,000** even in 2014. - The **five-year imprisonment** term was also incorrect for the 2014 examination period.

Q: In the court of law, the act of a witness giving false evidence after taking an oath is punishable under:

193 IPC. ***193 IPC*** - **Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** specifically deals with the punishment for giving **false evidence** in a judicial proceeding. - This section outlines that any person who intentionally gives false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding, or fabricates false evidence for the purpose of being used in any stage of a judicial proceeding, shall be punished. *192 IPC* - **Section 192 IPC** defines what constitutes **"fabricating false evidence."** - While fabricating false evidence is a prerequisite for some offenses related to false evidence, Section 192 itself defines the act, but does not prescribe the punishment for giving false evidence after taking an oath in court. *191 IPC* - **Section 191 IPC** defines what constitutes **"giving false evidence."** - It explains that consciously making a statement which is false, and which a person either knows or believes to be false, or does not believe to be true, while legally bound by oath or by any express provision of law to state the truth, is considered giving false evidence, but does not prescribe the punishment. *197 IPC* - **Section 197 IPC** deals with **issuing or signing a false certificate**, not the act of a witness giving false evidence under oath in court. - This section punishes someone who issues or signs any certificate required by law, knowing or believing it to be false, in any material point.

Q: Which legal doctrine allows inference of negligence from the circumstances of an incident when the event would not normally occur without negligence?

Res ipsa loquitur. ***Res ipsa loquitur*** - This Latin phrase means "**the thing speaks for itself**," allowing a court to infer **negligence** when an accident occurs under circumstances where it wouldn't normally happen without someone's carelessness. - It shifts the burden of proof to the defendant to show they were not negligent, often applied in cases where the defendant had exclusive control over the instrument that caused the injury. *Civil negligence* - This is a general term referring to a failure to exercise the **standard of care** that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation, leading to harm. - It encompasses a broader category of negligent acts in civil law, but does not specifically describe the doctrine of inferring negligence from the event itself without direct evidence of a specific act of negligence. *Professional negligence* - This refers to a breach of the **standard of care** owed by a professional (e.g., doctor, lawyer, accountant) to their client, resulting in harm. - It requires proving that the professional failed to act with the degree of skill and learning commonly applied by members of their profession. *Criminal negligence* - This involves **gross deviation** from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe, often with reckless disregard for human life or safety, leading to criminal prosecution. - While it involves negligence, its focus is on the criminal intent or extreme culpability and the resulting criminal penalties, distinct from inferring fault in a civil context.

Q: In the context of domestic violence, if a woman is assaulted by her husband, which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is he likely to be charged under?

Sec. 498-A IPC. ***Sec. 498-A IPC*** - This section specifically deals with **cruelty by husband or relatives of husband** towards a woman, encompassing both mental and physical torture. - An assault by a husband on his wife in the context of **domestic violence** falls directly under the ambit of this provision, as it addresses habitual cruelty and harassment. - While specific assault provisions (like Sec. 323, 324 IPC) may also be invoked, **Sec. 498-A is the primary section** used in domestic violence cases as it makes the offense **cognizable, non-bailable, and non-compoundable**. - This section was specifically enacted to address the unique nature of matrimonial cruelty and domestic abuse. *Sec. 304-A IPC* - This section pertains to **causing death by negligence**, which involves acts resulting in death without an intention to kill but due to a rash or negligent act. - It would not apply to a direct assault by a husband on his wife, as such an act would typically involve intent or knowledge, or fall under other specific assault provisions. *Sec. 304-B IPC* - This section deals with **dowry death**, which occurs when the death of a woman is caused by burns or bodily injuries, or occurs otherwise than under normal circumstances, within seven years of her marriage, and it is shown that she was subjected to cruelty for dowry demand. - While related to domestic violence, it specifically requires a **fatal outcome within seven years of marriage** linked to dowry demands, not just a non-fatal assault. *Sec. 504 IPC* - This section addresses **intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace**, where the insult is likely to cause the person to break the public peace or commit an offense. - While an assault could be preceded by an insult, Section 504 specifically targets the insult and its potential to provoke, not the act of **physical assault** itself.

Q: Minimum age for giving consent for organ donation in India is?

18 years. ***18 years*** - In India, an individual must be at least **18 years of age** to legally give consent for organ donation. - This age aligns with the legal age of **majority**, where individuals are considered competent to make independent decisions regarding their bodies and medical procedures. *16 years* - While 16 years is the age of consent for other medical procedures in some contexts, it is **not the minimum age for organ donation** in India. - Consent for organ donation is a significant legal and ethical matter requiring full adult capacity. *21 years* - The minimum age for organ donation in India is **not 21 years**. - This age is typically associated with other legal rights or responsibilities, but not specifically with organ donation consent. *No age limit* - This option is incorrect as there are **strict age limits** for giving consent for organ donation. - A lack of age limit would imply that minors or individuals without legal capacity could consent, which is not permitted.

Q: Under which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the adulteration of drugs addressed?

Section 274. ***Section 274*** - This section of the IPC specifically deals with the **adulteration of drugs**. - It penalizes those who adulterate any drug or medicinal preparation in such a manner as to lessen its efficacy or change its operation, or to make it noxious, intending that it shall be sold or used for medicinal purposes as if it had not been so adulterated. *Section 271* - This section pertains to **disobedience to quarantine rule**. - It addresses cases where an individual knowingly disobeys any rule made for keeping any vessel in a state of quarantine, or for regulating intercourse with places infected with any infectious disease. *Section 272* - This section deals with the **adulteration of food or drink intended for sale**. - It punishes individuals who adulterate any article of food or drink, intending to sell it or knowing it is likely to be sold as food or drink, thereby making it noxious or less fit for consumption. *Section 273* - This section addresses the **sale of noxious food or drink**. - It penalizes individuals who sell, or offer for sale, any article of food or drink which has been rendered or has become noxious, knowing that it is noxious, or having reason to believe that it is noxious, for human consumption.

Question 1

In civil cases, conduct money is decided by:

Accepted Answer

Judge

Answer

Doctor

Answer

Witness

Answer

Lawyer

Question 2

Plaintiff is a person who:

Accepted Answer

Files a case in civil court

Answer

Gives judgment

Answer

Acts as defender

Answer

Same as public prosecutor

Question 3

According to JJ Act 2000, a juvenile is a boy and girl respectively less than:

Accepted Answer

18 and 18

Answer

16 and 18

Answer

14 and 16

Answer

18 and 21

Question 4

Transplantation of Human Organs Act was passed in:

Accepted Answer

1994

Answer

1996

Answer

2000

Answer

2002

Question 5

A doctor is involved in a medico-legal case concerning medical negligence that comes before a First Class Magistrate. What are the maximum sentencing powers of a First Class Magistrate in such cases involving medical professionals?

Accepted Answer

Fine upto 10,000 and 3 years imprisonment

Answer

Unlimited fine and 7 years imprisonment

Answer

Fine upto 10,000 and 5 years imprisonment

Answer

Fine upto 3000 and 5 years imprisonment

Question 6

In the court of law, the act of a witness giving false evidence after taking an oath is punishable under:

Accepted Answer

193 IPC

Answer

191 IPC

Answer

192 IPC

Answer

197 IPC

Question 7

Which legal doctrine allows inference of negligence from the circumstances of an incident when the event would not normally occur without negligence?

Accepted Answer

Res ipsa loquitur

Answer

Civil negligence

Answer

Professional negligence

Answer

Criminal negligence

Question 8

In the context of domestic violence, if a woman is assaulted by her husband, which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is he likely to be charged under?

Accepted Answer

Sec. 498-A IPC

Answer

Sec. 304-A IPC

Answer

Sec. 304-B IPC

Answer

Sec. 504 IPC

Question 9

Minimum age for giving consent for organ donation in India is?

Accepted Answer

18 years

Answer

16 years

Answer

21 years

Answer

No age limit

Question 10

Under which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) is the adulteration of drugs addressed?

Accepted Answer

Section 274

Answer

Section 271

Answer

Section 272

Answer

Section 273

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?