Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

Medical Jurisprudence Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 201: Magistrate inquest is not needed in which of the following circumstances?

A. Homicide (Correct Answer)
B. Exhumation
C. Police custody death
D. Dowry death

Explanation: **Explanation:** In India, an inquest is a legal inquiry held to determine the cause of death in cases of sudden, suspicious, or unnatural deaths. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), there are two types: **Police Inquest (Section 174 CrPC)** and **Magistrate Inquest (Section 176 CrPC)**. **Why Homicide is the correct answer:** Homicide is a criminal offense where the investigation is primarily the responsibility of the police. According to **Section 174 CrPC**, a Police Inquest is conducted in the majority of unnatural deaths, including accidents, suicides, and homicides. A Magistrate Inquest is not mandatory for a routine homicide unless it falls under the specific categories mentioned in Section 176. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Police Custody Death (Option C):** Under Section 176(1A) CrPC, a Magistrate Inquest is mandatory for any death occurring in police or judicial custody to ensure transparency and prevent custodial torture. * **Dowry Death (Option D):** If a woman dies within 7 years of marriage under suspicious circumstances (Section 304B IPC), a Magistrate Inquest is mandatory to investigate potential foul play by the husband or in-laws. * **Exhumation (Option B):** The digging out of a buried body for post-mortem examination can only be ordered by and must be conducted in the presence of an Executive Magistrate. **High-Yield NEET-PG Pearls:** * **Magistrate Inquest (Section 176 CrPC)** is mandatory in: 1. Death in police/judicial custody. 2. Death due to police firing. 3. Death in a psychiatric hospital/protective home. 4. Dowry deaths (within 7 years of marriage). 5. Exhumation. * **Police Inquest (Section 174 CrPC)** is the most common type of inquest in India. * In India, the **Executive Magistrate** (e.g., Collector, SDO, Tahsildar) usually conducts the inquest, but for custodial deaths, a **Judicial Magistrate** is required.

Question 202: A man was abducted from his home, and his son subsequently claimed rights to his father’s property. As per Section 111 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), until when is the son not entitled to claim inheritance?

A. 10 years
B. 5 years
C. 7 years (Correct Answer)
D. 6 years

Explanation: ***7 years*** - Section 111 of the **Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)** (previously Sec 108 of the Indian Evidence Act) establishes the presumption of death after a person has not been heard of for **seven years**. - Inheritance claims based on the father's presumed death cannot be entertained until this mandated **seven-year period** has elapsed, as the person is legally presumed alive until then. *5 years* - This period is insufficient under the BSA to raise a legal **presumption of death** necessary for transferring property rights. - The minimum statutory period required for shifting the burden of proof regarding the existence of the missing person is longer than **five years**. *6 years* - Although close, **six years** does not meet the legal threshold established by **Section 111 of the BSA** for the presumption of death. - The burden of proof remains on the party asserting the death until the full **seven-year period** is completed. *10 years* - This duration exceeds the statutory period required; the courts can legally presume death and allow inheritance claims after the mandatory **seven years**. - Waiting **10 years** is unnecessary, as the right to claim inheritance based on presumed death arises immediately after the completion of the **seven-year requirement**.

Question 203: A doctor receives two summons, one to appear in court in a murder case and another to provide expert medical opinion. Which of the following should the doctor prioritise?

A. Appearance in the murder case (Correct Answer)
B. The summon received first
C. Appearance for providing medical expert opinion
D. None of the above

Explanation: ***Appearance in the murder case*** - **Criminal cases, especially serious offenses like murder, take priority over civil matters** - Murder cases involve Section 302 IPC (serious criminal offense) and require immediate judicial attention - Courts give precedence to criminal proceedings over routine civil/administrative matters - The doctor has a legal obligation to prioritize serious criminal cases as they involve matters of justice and public interest *The summon received first* - Priority is NOT determined by chronological order of receipt - The nature and gravity of the case determines priority, not the timing of summons *Appearance for providing medical expert opinion* - This is likely a civil or routine administrative matter - While important, it takes lower priority compared to serious criminal cases like murder - Can typically be rescheduled more easily than criminal proceedings **Legal Principle:** In medical jurisprudence, when multiple summons are received, priority is given based on the gravity of the case: **Criminal cases > Civil cases**, and within criminal cases, serious offenses like murder take precedence over minor offenses.

Question 204: A married female died under unnatural circumstances within 3 years of marriage. Her father filed a report to police and inquiry will be done under which section?

A. 116 BNS & 194 BNSS
B. 194 BNSS/174 CrPC
C. 106 BNS & 194 BNSS
D. 196 BNSS/176 CrPC (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***196 BNSS/176 CrPC*** - This section (formerly **176 CrPC**, now **196 BNSS**) mandates a **Magistrate Inquiry** when a married woman dies under suspicious circumstances (e.g., unnatural death, suicide, accidental death) within **seven years** of marriage. - Since the death occurred within 3 years and was reported by the father as suspicious, a compulsory inquiry by an Executive Magistrate is legally required under this provision. *194 BNSS/174 CrPC* - This section (formerly **174 CrPC**, now **194 BNSS**) deals with the general procedure for **Police Inquest** (investigation into unnatural deaths). - While the police inquiry starts under 194 BNSS, it is insufficient alone; the death of a married woman within seven years necessitates the mandatory higher inquiry by a Magistrate specified under 196 BNSS. *116 BNS & 194 BNSS* - **116 BNS** (Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita) pertains to the criminal offense of **abetment of offenses punishable with imprisonment for life or imprisonment**, which relates to the crime, not the procedural inquiry into the death. - Pairing a substantive criminal law section (116 BNS) with a procedural section (194 BNSS - Police Inquest) does not accurately describe the specific mandatory inquiry process required for this suspicious death. *106 BNS & 194 BNSS* - **106 BNS** (Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita) deals with the offense where an act is done without the intention to cause death or grievous hurt, but is likely to cause death, known as **culpable homicide not amounting to murder**, which is unrelated to the inquiry itself. - This combination incorrectly merges a substantive criminal offense and the investigation procedure, failing to identify the mandatory Magisterial Inquiry section (196 BNSS).

Question 205: A villager was assaulted by 4-5 people & brought to hospital in serious condition. His dying declaration needs to be recorded in hospital. Who is the MOST PREFERRED authority to record this declaration?

A. Doctor
B. Hospital administration
C. Police officer
D. Magistrate (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Magistrate*** - Under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, a **Judicial Magistrate** is the **most preferred authority** to record a dying declaration to ensure impartiality and high evidential value in court. - The magistrate's recording carries the highest legal weight as it prevents future scrutiny regarding coercion, fabrication, or undue influence. - This is the gold standard for dying declarations in Indian medico-legal practice. *Doctor* - A doctor can record a dying declaration when a magistrate is unavailable, but this is a **secondary option**. - The doctor's primary role is certifying the patient's **mental competence** and **fitness** to make the declaration, both before and after recording. - While legally valid, doctor-recorded declarations may face more scrutiny in court compared to magistrate-recorded ones. *Police officer* - A police officer can record a dying declaration when neither a magistrate nor doctor is available, making it a **tertiary option**. - Police-recorded declarations often face the most scrutiny in court due to concerns about potential bias or influence. - The investigating officer should ideally avoid recording to maintain investigation integrity. *Hospital administration* - Hospital administration has **no legal authority** to record dying declarations. - Administrative staff lack the legal standing and training required for this medico-legal procedure. - Only magistrates, doctors, or police officers are recognized authorities under Indian law.

Question 206: A forensic expert received a summons from the district court to record his evidence in a criminal case, but two days prior, he already received a summons for a civil case in the same district court for the same date. What should the doctor do?

A. Attend the court for the criminal case. (Correct Answer)
B. Attend the court for which the summons came first.
C. Do not attend either court.
D. Inform both courts and wait.

Explanation: ***Attend the court for the criminal case.***- In India, under the law of evidence and procedure, **criminal cases** are always given priority over **civil cases** when there are conflicting summons for the same date, even if the civil summons was received earlier.- The expert must attend the criminal proceedings and inform the civil court immediately in writing regarding the conflict and the legally mandated priority of the **criminal summons**.*Inform both courts and wait.*- Simply notifying both courts without making a decision on attendance is insufficient and represents a failure to comply with the legal obligation to prioritize the more serious case (**criminal proceeding**).- This action risks being held in **contempt of court** or attracting fines, as the expert is legally required to attend the proceeding of higher precedence.*Attend the court for which the summons came first.*- Priority in attending court is determined by the **nature of the case** (criminal taking precedence over civil), not by the **chronology** (the date the summons was received).- A criminal case deals with matters of public interest and potential loss of liberty, giving it inherent precedence over a civil dispute.*Do not attend either court.*- Failing to attend court after being served a legitimate summons (subpoena) constitutes professional misconduct and **contempt of court**.- The expert must prioritize and attend one court, usually the **criminal trial**, and seek valid authorization or exemption from the other.

Question 207: A case of death of a married female within 3 years of marriage was reported. Inquest is done by?

A. Police
B. Judicial
C. Coroner
D. Magistrate (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Magistrate*** - According to **Section 176 of the CrPC**, an inquest by a **Judicial or Executive Magistrate** is mandatory in cases where a woman dies within **seven years** of marriage under suspicious circumstances, including potential dowry death or cruelty. - The death of a married female within 3 years falls under this mandatory period, requiring a **Magisterial Inquest** to ensure a thorough, unbiased investigation into the cause, especially regarding **dowry harassment**. *Incorrect: Judicial* - While a **Judicial Magistrate** can conduct the inquest under CrPC Section 176, the term is too specific, as often an **Executive Magistrate** is appointed for this role, making 'Magistrate' the more comprehensive correct answer. - The primary distinguishing feature is the mandatory involvement of either **Executive or Judicial Magistrate** to oversee the investigation. *Incorrect: Police* - A Police Inquest (under **CrPC Section 174**) is generally the default for unnatural deaths, but it is **not sufficient** alone for deaths occurring within seven years of marriage due to the high suspicion of cruelty or dowry demand. - The police conduct the initial collection of evidence, but the crucial formal investigation in these specific cases is mandated to be supervised or conducted by a **Magistrate**. *Incorrect: Coroner* - The **Coroner system** is largely historic or limited to only a few metropolitan areas (like Mumbai and Kolkata) in India; it is not the universally mandated authority for inquests under Indian law. - The legal framework covering suspicious deaths of married women requires investigation by the **Police** (Section 174) and subsequent, mandatory inquest by the **Magistrate** (Section 176).

Question 208: A public witness of the incident is asked to attend the court and record his evidence. Which type of evidence is provided by the witness to the court?

A. Circumstantial evidence
B. Subpoena
C. Oral evidence (Correct Answer)
D. Hearsay evidence

Explanation: ***Oral evidence***- This is testimony given verbally by a witness under **oath or affirmation** in court, based on their personal knowledge and direct observation of the facts of the case.- As the individual is a direct public witness of the incident, their statement recorded in court constitutes direct or **oral evidence**.*Hearsay evidence*- This refers to evidence based on what the witness heard from someone else, rather than what they personally observed, making it generally **inadmissible** in court proceedings.- Since the witness directly observed the incident, their evidence is a primary account, not a secondary or **hearsay** report.*Subpoena*- A **subpoena** is a legal document or writ issued by the court ordering a witness to appear in court or produce specific documents.- It is an **instrument of summons** compelling the attendance of the witness, not the actual type of evidence delivered by them.*Circumstantial evidence*- This is indirect evidence that requires the court to draw inferences from facts to establish the conclusion (e.g., establishing **motive or opportunity**).- The witness is providing a statement based on what they *saw*, which is direct evidence, not evidence relying on secondary inference or **circumstantial facts**.

Question 209: Inquest in a case of custodial death is handled by

A. Police inspector
B. Superintendent of Police
C. Executive magistrate (Correct Answer)
D. Jail superintendent

Explanation: ***Executive magistrate***- In India, an inquest in a case of **custodial death** (death in police lock-up or judicial custody/jail) is mandatory and must be conducted by a **Judicial Magistrate or an Executive Magistrate** under Section 176(1A) of the CrPC.- This requirement ensures the investigation is independent and impartial, reducing potential cover-up by the police or prison authorities.*Police inspector*- The **Police inspector** conducts inquests only for deaths that are suspicious, unnatural, or suicidal (Section 174 CrPC), but not for custodial deaths.- An inquest into a custodial death must be conducted by an authority outside the police establishment to ensure **transparency and accountability**.*Jail superintendent*- The **Jail superintendent** is the administrative head of the prison facility where the death occurred and cannot conduct the inquest due to inherent **conflict of interest**.- Their role is limited to immediately reporting the death to the appropriate Executive Magistrate or Judicial Magistrate, as mandated by law.*Superintendent of Police*- The **Superintendent of Police (SP)** is part of the police hierarchy and therefore not designated to conduct an inquest into a **custodial death**, as the investigation must be external to the involved agency.- The SP's authority is usually related to supervising police investigations, not conducting the specific **magisterial or judicial inquiry** required in these sensitive cases.

Question 210: Who orders the autopsy in the case of a Road Traffic Accident (RTA)?

A. A. Forensic expert
B. B. Police (Correct Answer)
C. C. Lawyer
D. D. Forensic doctor

Explanation: **B. Police** - In cases of Road Traffic Accidents (RTAs) and other **medico-legal deaths**, the **police** are typically responsible for ordering an autopsy. - This is because the death is suspicious and may involve criminal investigation, requiring formal authorization from law enforcement to establish the cause and manner of death. *A. Forensic expert* - A **forensic expert** performs the autopsy but does not have the authority to order it. - Their role is to conduct the examination and provide expert findings to the investigating authorities. *C. Lawyer* - A **lawyer** may be involved in the legal proceedings related to the RTA but does not have the authority to order an autopsy. - Their role is to represent clients and use the autopsy findings as evidence in court. *D. Forensic doctor* - A **forensic doctor** (or forensic pathologist) is the medical professional who conducts the autopsy. - They do not initiate the autopsy themselves but perform it upon the request of authorized parties, such as the police or a medical examiner/coroner.

Practice by Chapter

Legal Systems and Medical Practice

Practice Questions

Civil and Criminal Liability

Practice Questions

Medical Certificates and Reports

Practice Questions

MCI Code of Ethics

Practice Questions

Medical Registration Acts

Practice Questions

Human Organ Transplantation Acts

Practice Questions

Mental Health Legislation

Practice Questions

Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act

Practice Questions

PCPNDT Act

Practice Questions

Human Rights in Medical Practice

Practice Questions

Legal Aspects of Medical Records

Practice Questions

Medicolegal Case Management

Practice Questions

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free