Medical Jurisprudence Practice Questions

Q: Which of the following is an indication for a magistrate's inquest?

All of the above. In India, an **Inquest** is a legal inquiry held to determine the cause of death in cases of sudden, suspicious, or unnatural circumstances. Under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), there are two types: Police Inquest (Section 174) and Magistrate Inquest (Section 176). ### **Explanation of the Correct Answer** A **Magistrate Inquest** is conducted by an Executive Magistrate (such as a District Magistrate or Sub-divisional Magistrate). It is mandatory in cases where there is a high suspicion of foul play or where the state/police are themselves under scrutiny. * **Dowry Death (Option A):** Under Section 176(1) CrPC, any death of a woman within 7 years of marriage under suspicious circumstances (often related to dowry) requires a Magistrate Inquest. * **Death in Police Custody (Option B):** To ensure transparency and prevent "custodial torture" cover-ups, deaths occurring in police custody, lock-ups, or during police firing must be investigated by a Magistrate. * **Exhumation (Option C):** The legal process of digging up a buried body for medico-legal examination can only be ordered and supervised by an Executive Magistrate. Since all three scenarios are statutory requirements for a Magistrate Inquest, **Option D** is the correct answer. ### **High-Yield NEET-PG Pearls** * **Police Inquest (Section 174 CrPC):** The most common type of inquest in India, conducted by a police officer (not below the rank of Head Constable). * **Magistrate Inquest (Section 176 CrPC):** Mandatory for: 1. Custodial deaths (Police/Judicial custody). 2. Death due to police firing. 3. Dowry deaths (within 7 years of marriage). 4. Exhumation. 5. Death in Psychiatric Hospitals/Asylums. 6. Admissions of rape in police custody. * **Coroner’s Inquest:** Formerly practiced in Mumbai and Kolkata; it was abolished in India in 1999.

Q: Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines non-offence concerning criminal responsibility?

82. ### Explanation **Correct Answer: A. Section 82 IPC** **Section 82 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** establishes the concept of **"Doli Incapax"** (incapable of committing a crime). It states that nothing is an offence which is done by a child under **seven years of age**. At this age, a child is legally presumed to lack the "mens rea" (guilty mind) or the maturity of understanding required to comprehend the nature and consequences of their conduct. Therefore, they are granted absolute immunity from criminal responsibility. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Option B: Section 182 IPC** – This pertains to providing **false information** to a public servant with the intent to cause them to use their lawful power to the injury of another person. * **Option C: Section 88 IPC** – This covers acts done in **good faith** for a person’s benefit with their consent (e.g., a surgeon performing a high-risk operation to save a patient's life). * **Option D: Section 188 IPC** – This deals with **disobedience** to an order duly promulgated by a public servant (frequently cited during public health emergencies like epidemics). **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Section 83 IPC:** Refers to a child between **7 and 12 years** of age. They have "partial immunity" (**Doli Capax**); criminal responsibility depends on their "attained maturity of understanding" at the time of the act. * **McNaughton’s Rule (Section 84 IPC):** Defines the defense of **insanity**. It states that an act is not an offence if the person, due to "unsoundness of mind," was unable to know the nature of the act or that it was wrong/contrary to law. * **Section 89 IPC:** Acts done in good faith for the benefit of a child (under 12) or insane person, by or by consent of the guardian.

Q: Which of the following is not considered a mode of death?

Shock / Molecular death. ### Explanation In Forensic Medicine, it is crucial to distinguish between the **Modes of Death** and the **Types of Death**. **Why "Molecular Death" is the correct answer:** According to **Bichat’s Rule**, there are three "modes of death" (also known as the **Atria of Death**) which represent the failure of one of the three vital systems: the circulatory, respiratory, or nervous system. **Molecular death** (or cellular death) is not a mode, but a **stage of death**. It refers to the death of individual tissues and cells, occurring 1–2 hours after somatic death. While "Shock" is a clinical state leading to death, in the context of this classic forensic classification, Molecular death is the definitive outlier. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **A. Syncope:** This is a mode of death resulting from the sudden stoppage of the **heart's action** (Circulatory system failure). * **B. Coma:** This is a mode of death resulting from the failure of **brain functions** (Nervous system failure). * **C. Asphyxia:** This is a mode of death resulting from the failure of **respiratory function** (Respiratory system failure). **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Bichat’s Tripod of Life:** Heart (Syncope), Lungs (Asphyxia), and Brain (Coma). If any one stops, the other two follow, leading to **Somatic Death** (Systemic death). * **Somatic vs. Molecular Death:** Somatic death is the cessation of the person as a legal entity; Molecular death is the cessation of cellular metabolism. * **Organ Transplantation:** Organs must be harvested after somatic death but *before* molecular death to remain viable. * **Suspended Animation:** A state where vital signs are so low they cannot be detected clinically (e.g., hypothermia, electrocution); it mimics somatic death but is reversible.

Q: A person who is intoxicated is not considered responsible for his actions under which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

Section 85 IPC. **Explanation:** The correct answer is **Section 85 IPC**, which deals with **Involuntary Intoxication**. **1. Why Section 85 IPC is correct:** Under Section 85, a person is exempted from criminal responsibility if, at the time of the act, they were incapable of knowing the nature of the act or that it was wrong/contrary to law due to intoxication. Crucially, this applies only if the intoxicating substance was administered **without their knowledge or against their will** (Involuntary Intoxication). The law presumes that in such cases, the "mens rea" (guilty mind) is absent. **2. Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 84 IPC:** Deals with **Insanity** (McNaughten’s Rule). It exempts a person of "unsound mind" from criminal liability. While intoxication is a form of temporary insanity, it is specifically categorized under Sections 85 and 86. * **Section 82 IPC:** Deals with **Infancy**. It states that nothing is an offense which is done by a child under **seven years** of age (*Doli incapax*). * **Section 87 IPC:** Deals with **Consent**. It states that an act not intended to cause death or grievous hurt, done by consent (e.g., during sports or medical procedures), is not an offense. **3. High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Section 86 IPC:** Covers **Voluntary Intoxication**. Here, the person is generally held responsible for their actions as if they had the same knowledge as a sober person, though specific "intent" may sometimes be mitigated. * **McNaughten’s Rule:** Is the basis for Section 84 IPC (Legal Insanity). * **Doli Incapax:** Refers to Section 82 (child <7 years); **Section 83** refers to a child between 7–12 years with immature understanding. * **Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur:** Often confused in Jurisprudence questions; it means "the thing speaks for itself" (related to medical negligence).

Q: In civil cases, who decides on conduct money?

Judge. **Explanation:** In medical jurisprudence, **Conduct Money** refers to the fee paid to a witness (usually a doctor) in **civil cases** to cover travel expenses and subsistence during their attendance in court. 1. **Why the Correct Answer (B) is Right:** Under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), the **Judge** has the legal authority to determine the amount of conduct money. When a summons is issued in a civil suit, the party requesting the witness must deposit a sum of money in court. The Judge ensures this amount is sufficient to cover the witness's reasonable expenses for going to and returning from the court, as well as for one day's attendance. 2. **Why Incorrect Options are Wrong:** * **Opposing Party (A):** The opposing party has no legal role in determining the compensation for a witness called by the other side. * **Doctor (C):** While a doctor can request a specific amount based on their status and distance traveled, they cannot "decide" or legally fix the amount; they must accept what the court deems reasonable. * **Witness (D):** Similar to the doctor, a general witness does not have the judicial power to mandate the payment amount. **High-Yield Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Civil vs. Criminal:** Conduct money is paid **only in civil cases**. In criminal cases, the state bears the expense, and no conduct money is paid to the doctor (it is considered a public duty). * **Refusal of Summons:** In a civil case, if conduct money is not paid or is insufficient, a doctor can technically refuse to attend. However, in a criminal case, a doctor **cannot** refuse a summons based on non-payment. * **Court Priority:** If a doctor receives two summons for the same day, the priority is: **Criminal Court > Civil Court** and **Higher Court > Lower Court**.

Question 1

Which of the following is an indication for a magistrate's inquest?

Accepted Answer

All of the above

Answer

Dowry death

Answer

Death in police custody

Answer

Exhumation

Question 2

Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines non-offence concerning criminal responsibility?

Accepted Answer

82

Answer

182

Answer

88

Answer

188

Question 3

Which of the following is not considered a mode of death?

Accepted Answer

Shock / Molecular death

Answer

Syncope

Answer

Coma

Answer

Asphyxia

Question 4

A doctor leaves a swab in the abdomen during surgery. Under which legal doctrine will a suit be filed against him?

Accepted Answer

Res ipsa loquitor

Answer

Criminal negligence

Answer

Civil negligence

Answer

Vicarious liability

Question 5

According to the Delhi Anatomy Act, 1957, after how many hours can a body from a road traffic accident be considered unclaimed?

Accepted Answer

96 hours

Answer

24 hours

Answer

48 hours

Answer

72 hours

Question 6

A person who is intoxicated is not considered responsible for his actions under which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

Accepted Answer

Section 85 IPC

Answer

Section 84 IPC

Answer

Section 82 IPC

Answer

Section 87 IPC

Question 7

A gives birth to a stillborn and conceals the birth by secret disposal of the dead fetus. Which of the following statements is false regarding this situation?

Accepted Answer

The act done by the individual is defined under a specific section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Answer

The offender can be imprisoned for a maximum of 2 years.

Answer

The punishment for this act is defined under Section 318 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Answer

The individual is guilty of an offense.

Question 8

Contributory negligence is related to which of the following rules?

Accepted Answer

Avoidable consequences rule

Answer

Eggshell skull rule

Answer

Master servant rule

Answer

Common knowledge rule

Question 9

If parents or guardian is not available, consent can be taken from a teacher or principal under which legal concept?

Accepted Answer

Loco parentis

Answer

Therapeutic privilege

Answer

Emergency doctrine

Answer

Therapeutic waiver

Question 10

In civil cases, who decides on conduct money?

Accepted Answer

Judge

Answer

Opposing party

Answer

Doctor

Answer

Witness

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

Medical Jurisprudence — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?