International Medical Ethics Codes — MCQs
A GSP4 woman comes for routine sonography for the first time. She has four daughters and expresses a desire for a boy this time, asking for sex determination. To abide by ethical guidelines, what should you do?
Doctor or nurse disclosing the identity of a rape victim is punishable under the following section of IPC?
Res ipsa loquitur is?
All are true about dying declaration except
What ethical statement regarding therapeutic abortion was made in the Declaration of Oslo by the World Medical Association in 1970?
India is a country with different cultures and diverse languages. Which steps should a physician take to address the patient for better outcomes? 1. Insist on good communication 2. Insist on communication only via an interpreter 3. Treat them regardless of their cultural perceptions 4. The physician should consider the patient's religion and cultural perception Select the correct combination:
Declaration of Oslo deals with:
Which disease was removed from active WHO surveillance requirements following its global eradication?
A terminally ill patient with advanced cancer requests that no resuscitation be performed in the event of cardiac arrest. The patient is mentally competent and has completed advance directives. A family member later demands full resuscitation efforts. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
A 23-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with acute alcohol intoxication. Her blood alcohol level is 280 mg/dL. She becomes increasingly agitated and attempts to leave against medical advice. Which of the following determines her capacity to refuse treatment?
International Medical Ethics Codes Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1: A GSP4 woman comes for routine sonography for the first time. She has four daughters and expresses a desire for a boy this time, asking for sex determination. To abide by ethical guidelines, what should you do?
- A. Check routine ANC and sex for developmental abnormalities and do not reveal gender to the patient (Correct Answer)
- B. Check routine ANC and sex for developmental abnormalities and do reveal gender to the patient
- C. Do reveal gender if a girl
- D. Check only routine ANC, do not check sex
Explanation: ***Check routine ANC and sex for developmental abnormalities and do not reveal gender to the patient*** - It is **illegal** and **unethical** to reveal the sex of the fetus in many countries, including India, to prevent **sex-selective abortions**. - The primary purpose of a routine antenatal ultrasound is to assess fetal **health** and **developmental abnormalities**, not to determine sex for parental preference. *Check routine ANC and sex for developmental abnormalities and do reveal gender to the patient* - Revealing the gender to the patient directly facilitates **sex-selective abortion**, which is medically unethical and illegal due to the potential for harm to the fetus and society. - This practice would violate the **Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PCPNDT) Act** in India, which prohibits gender determination. *Do reveal gender if a girl* - Revealing the gender, regardless of whether it is a boy or a girl, can lead to **gender-biased selective abortions**, particularly in cultures with a strong preference for male offspring. - This action undermines the ethical principles of **non-maleficence** and **justice** by potentially facilitating harm based on gender preference. *Check only routine ANC, do not check sex* - While the primary focus is routine antenatal care, avoiding the assessment of fetal sex entirely could lead to **missing potential developmental abnormalities** that might be identifiable through observation of external genitalia. - A thorough ultrasound examination routinely includes a visual check of fetal anatomy, which can incidentally reveal gender, but this information should not be shared with the parents for selection purposes.
Question 2: Doctor or nurse disclosing the identity of a rape victim is punishable under the following section of IPC?
- A. Section 224A
- B. Section 226A
- C. Section 222A
- D. Section 228A (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Section 228A IPC*** - This section of the Indian Penal Code specifically deals with the **disclosure of the identity of a victim of rape and certain sexual offenses** (Sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB, 376E). - Making public the name or any matter that can reveal the identity of a rape victim by **any person, including doctors and nurses**, is a punishable offense. - **Punishment**: Imprisonment up to **2 years** and fine. - **Exception**: Disclosure is permitted only to authorized persons like police officers for investigation purposes. - **Important**: This is now covered under **Section 72 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023**, which replaced the IPC. *Section 224A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - It does not relate to offenses concerning privacy or the identity of sexual assault victims. *Section 226A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - It does not pertain to the confidentiality of victims of sexual offenses. *Section 222A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - There is no such specific section addressing disclosure of victim identity in the IPC.
Question 3: Res ipsa loquitur is?
- A. Oral evidence
- B. Fact speaks for itself (Correct Answer)
- C. Medical maloccurrence
- D. Common knowledge
Explanation: ***Fact speaks for itself*** - **Res ipsa loquitur** is a legal doctrine meaning "the thing speaks for itself," implying that the very nature of an accident or injury suggests negligence. - This doctrine is applied when an injury typically would not occur without **negligence**, and the defendant had exclusive control over the instrumentality causing the injury. *Oral evidence* - **Oral evidence** refers to testimony given verbally in court by a witness. - While evidence is presented in court, "res ipsa loquitur" is a principle of inference, not a specific type of evidence. *Medical maloccurrence* - A **medical maloccurrence** is an undesirable or unexpected outcome in medical treatment that may or may not be due to negligence. - It describes an event, whereas "res ipsa loquitur" is a legal principle used to infer negligence. *Common knowledge* - **Common knowledge** refers to facts or information that are generally known by the public. - While the application of "res ipsa loquitur" might sometimes rely on common sense, it is a specific legal doctrine, not just a general acknowledgment of common facts.
Question 4: All are true about dying declaration except
- A. Cross examination permitted (Correct Answer)
- B. Practiced in India
- C. Oath is not needed
- D. Made to Judicial Magistrate Or Medical officer
Explanation: ***Cross-examination permitted*** - A **dying declaration** is an exception to the hearsay rule, and the declarant (the dying person) is **not available for cross-examination**, as they are deceased. - The principle is based on the belief that a dying person would not lie, thus making cross-examination unnecessary for truthfulness in this context. *Practiced in India* - Dying declarations are indeed a recognized and practiced form of evidence in **Indian law**, specifically under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. - They are considered a significant piece of evidence in criminal proceedings, especially in cases of murder or culpable homicide. *Oath is not needed* - A dying declaration does **not require an oath** to be administered to the declarant at the time of making the statement. - The belief that a person on the verge of death would speak the truth, known as the maxim **"nemo moriturus praesumitur mentiri"** (no one about to die is presumed to lie), substitutes the need for an oath. *Made to Judicial Magistrate Or Medical officer* - While a dying declaration can be made to **anyone**, including ordinary citizens, statements recorded by a **Judicial Magistrate** or a **Medical Officer** are generally given higher evidentiary value due to their impartiality and official capacity. - A medical officer can attest to the declarant's **mental fitness** at the time of making the statement, which is crucial for its admissibility.
Question 5: What ethical statement regarding therapeutic abortion was made in the Declaration of Oslo by the World Medical Association in 1970?
- A. Hunger and health rights
- B. Prohibition of torture and inhumane treatment
- C. Ethical guidelines for medical research
- D. Ethical considerations for therapeutic abortion (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Ethical considerations for therapeutic abortion*** - The **Declaration of Oslo (1970)** specifically addressed the ethical principles surrounding **therapeutic abortion**, outlining the physician's role and responsibilities. - This declaration provided guidance on situations where a medical practitioner might consider ending a pregnancy to protect the **life or health of the mother**. *Hunger and health rights* - While important ethical considerations, these topics are primarily addressed in other declarations and international human rights instruments, not specifically the **Declaration of Oslo on therapeutic abortion**. - The focus of the Oslo Declaration was narrowly on the **ethical dilemmas surrounding pregnancy termination**. *Prohibition of torture and inhumane treatment* - This ethical statement is primarily associated with documents like the **Declaration of Tokyo (1975)**, which explicitly addresses the physician's role in preventing and condemning torture, not therapeutic abortion. - The content of the Oslo Declaration is distinct from discussions of torture and inhumane treatment. *Ethical guidelines for medical research* - Ethical guidelines for medical research, especially involving human subjects, are primarily covered by documents like the **Declaration of Helsinki (1964)**, not the Declaration of Oslo. - These two declarations serve different purposes and address distinct ethical domains.
Question 6: India is a country with different cultures and diverse languages. Which steps should a physician take to address the patient for better outcomes? 1. Insist on good communication 2. Insist on communication only via an interpreter 3. Treat them regardless of their cultural perceptions 4. The physician should consider the patient's religion and cultural perception Select the correct combination:
- A. 1,4 (Correct Answer)
- B. 1,2
- C. 2,3
- D. 3,4
Explanation: ***1,4*** - **Good communication** is paramount in healthcare, especially in a diverse country like India, to ensure **patient understanding**, **adherence** to treatment plans, and overall patient satisfaction. - Considering a patient's **religion and cultural perceptions** allows the physician to tailor treatment and communication in a sensitive and **respectful manner**, fostering trust and better **health outcomes**. *1,2* - While good communication (1) is vital, **insisting solely on an interpreter** (2) may not always be feasible or necessary, particularly if the physician and patient share a common language or if the patient prefers direct communication. This can also disrupt the flow of rapport building. - **Over-reliance on interpreters** can sometimes lead to misinterpretations or loss of non-verbal cues if the interpreter is not trained in medical interpretation. *2,3* - **Insisting only on an interpreter** (2) can be restrictive and may compromise direct patient-physician rapport, as discussed above. - **Treating patients regardless of their cultural perceptions** (3) is an ethnocentric approach that can lead to mistrust, non-adherence, and ultimately **poor health outcomes** as it disregards the patient's beliefs and values regarding health and illness. *3,4* - **Treating patients regardless of their cultural perceptions** (3) can result in a lack of understanding and non-adherence if the treatment conflicts with the patient's deeply held beliefs. - While considering religion and cultural perception (4) is crucial, this option includes an incorrect approach (3) that can undermine patient care.
Question 7: Declaration of Oslo deals with:
- A. Therapeutic abortion (Correct Answer)
- B. Human experiments
- C. Right to death
- D. Organ donation
Explanation: ***Therapeutic abortion*** - The **Declaration of Oslo** was adopted by the World Medical Association (WMA) in 1970 to address the ethical considerations surrounding **therapeutic abortion**. - It provides guidelines for physicians when faced with a mother's request for the **termination of pregnancy**, particularly concerning the physician's right to *conscientious objection* and the necessity of referral to another qualified medical practitioner. *Right to death* - This concept, often associated with debates around **euthanasia** or physician-assisted suicide, is not the primary focus of the Declaration of Oslo. - Ethical guidelines on the right to death are typically covered by other declarations and policies, such as the WMA's statement on **euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide**. *Human experiments* - **Human experimentation** is primarily addressed by the **Declaration of Helsinki**, another key ethical document by the World Medical Association. - The Declaration of Helsinki focuses on ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, including informed consent and protection of vulnerable populations. *Organ donation* - **Organ donation** is an ethical issue addressed by various national laws and international guidelines, but it is not the subject of the **Declaration of Oslo**. - Ethical considerations in organ donation often involve donor consent, organ allocation, and preventing commercialization.
Question 8: Which disease was removed from active WHO surveillance requirements following its global eradication?
- A. Guinea worm
- B. Typhoid
- C. HIV/AIDS
- D. Smallpox (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Smallpox*** - Smallpox was **globally eradicated** in 1980 through a concerted vaccination effort, making it the first human disease eradicated. - Due to its eradication, it has been **removed from active WHO surveillance requirements** as it no longer poses a threat to public health. *Guinea worm* - While significant progress has been made in Guinea worm eradication, it has **not yet been fully eradicated**, with a few endemic areas remaining. - It is currently still subject to **active surveillance efforts** by the WHO to monitor progress towards elimination. *Typhoid* - Typhoid is caused by *Salmonella Typhi* and remains a significant public health issue, especially in areas with poor sanitation. - It is a **notifiable disease** and continuously monitored by the WHO and national health agencies, especially with concerns about **antimicrobial resistance**. *HIV/AIDS* - HIV/AIDS is a **global pandemic** with ongoing high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide, particularly in certain regions. - It is under **intensive surveillance and control programs** by the WHO, given its significant global health burden and lack of a definitive cure or vaccine for complete eradication.
Question 9: A terminally ill patient with advanced cancer requests that no resuscitation be performed in the event of cardiac arrest. The patient is mentally competent and has completed advance directives. A family member later demands full resuscitation efforts. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
- A. Honor the patient's DNR (Correct Answer)
- B. Obtain court order
- C. Follow the family's wishes
- D. Consult ethics committee
Explanation: ***Honor the patient's DNR*** - The patient is **mentally competent** and has legally documented their wishes through **advance directives** (DNR), which must be respected. - A competent patient's right to **autonomy** in making decisions about their medical care takes precedence over the wishes of family members. *Obtain court order* - Seeking a court order is **unnecessary** and **inappropriate** when a competent patient's wishes are clearly documented in advance directives. - This option would cause **undue delay** and legal entanglement, potentially going against the patient's immediate medical needs and preferences. *Follow the family's wishes* - Following the family's wishes would **override the patient's autonomy** and legally binding advance directives. - The family's emotional distress does not negate the patient's right to determine their own medical care, especially when they are competent. *Consult ethics committee* - While an ethics committee can be helpful in complex cases with **unclear directives** or patient capacity issues, it's not the first step here. - The patient's competence and clear advance directives make the decision straightforward; a committee consultation could cause delay and unnecessary burden.
Question 10: A 23-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with acute alcohol intoxication. Her blood alcohol level is 280 mg/dL. She becomes increasingly agitated and attempts to leave against medical advice. Which of the following determines her capacity to refuse treatment?
- A. Age of the patient
- B. Family's wishes
- C. Blood alcohol level
- D. Understanding of risks and benefits (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Understanding of risks and benefits*** - A patient's capacity to refuse treatment is primarily determined by their **ability to understand the nature of their condition**, the proposed treatment, and the **potential risks and benefits** of both accepting and refusing treatment. - Even with intoxication, if a patient can demonstrate this understanding, they technically have the capacity to make decisions, though the intoxication itself often impairs this ability. - Capacity assessment includes four key elements: understanding information, appreciating how it applies to their situation, reasoning through options, and communicating a choice. *Age of the patient* - While age is a factor in pediatric care (requiring parental consent for minors), for adults, it does not solely determine capacity; an adult of any age can be deemed to lack capacity for various reasons. - The patient's age (23 years old) indicates she is legally an adult, but it does not automatically confer or deny treatment capacity, which is assessed based on mental status. *Family's wishes* - Family wishes are important for patients who **lack decision-making capacity** and have no advance directives, but they do not override the decisions of a fully capacitated patient. - In situations where capacity is questionable, family input might be considered, but the direct assessment of the patient's understanding remains paramount. *Blood alcohol level* - A high blood alcohol level strongly suggests impaired judgment and cognitive function, making it a red flag for potential lack of capacity, but it is not a direct measure of capacity itself. - Some individuals may maintain a degree of understanding even with high levels, so a direct assessment of their comprehension is still necessary, not just assuming based on the level alone.
Want unlimited practice?
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free