Chapter·BiostatisticsStudy Design

Longitudinal vs cross-sectional approachesDownloads

10Questions
10Flashcards
2Tables & Flowcharts

Study Materials

Practice

Sample Questions

1

A study is funded by the tobacco industry to examine the association between smoking and lung cancer. They design a study with a prospective cohort of 1,000 smokers between the ages of 20-30. The length of the study is five years. After the study period ends, they conclude that there is no relationship between smoking and lung cancer. Which of the following study features is the most likely reason for the failure of the study to note an association between tobacco use and cancer?

ALate-look bias

BLatency period

CConfounding

DEffect modification

EPygmalion effect

2

Researchers are studying the effects of a new medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. A randomized group of 100 subjects is given the new medication 1st for 2 months, followed by a washout period of 2 weeks, and then administration of the gold standard medication for 2 months. Another randomized group of 100 subjects is given the gold standard medication 1st for 2 months, followed by a washout period of 2 weeks, and then administration of the new medication for 2 months. What is the main disadvantage of this study design?

AHawthorne effect

BIncreasing selection bias

CIncreasing confounding bias

DDecreasing power

ECarryover effect

3

An 8-year-old boy is brought to the physician by his mother for a well-child examination at a clinic for low-income residents. Although her son's elementary school offers free afterschool programming, her son has not been interested in attending. Both the son's maternal and paternal grandmothers have major depressive disorder. The mother is curious about the benefits of afterschool programming and asks for the physician's input. Which of the following statements best addresses the potential benefits of afterschool programming for this child?

AHigh-quality afterschool programming would decrease this patient's risk of developing major depressive disorder.

BHigh-quality afterschool programming for low-income 8-year-olds may correlate with decreased ADHD risk in adults.

CHigh-quality afterschool programming has a greater effect on reducing psychotic disorder risk in adults than bipolar disorder risk.

DHigh-quality afterschool programming has a greater effect on reducing ADHD risk in adults than major depressive disorder risk.

EThe patient's family history of psychiatric illness prevents any potential benefits from afterschool programming.

+ 7 more in the PDF

More Study Design downloads

Browse all chapters

View all