A 68-year-old man is being evaluated in your radiation oncology clinic for treatment of a solid tumor. Your hospital has just purchased a new proton beam purported to deliver targeted radiation with fewer side effects than traditional radiation therapy. The patient expresses strong interest in receiving proton beam therapy, and you feel that he may have a better outcome with this new treatment modality. Later that day, an executive from the patient's insurance company calls to tell you that proton beam therapy will cost the company (but not the patient) a much larger amount of money than traditional therapy. They are willing to pay for proton beam therapy, but request that you convince the patient to undergo traditional therapy instead. You have a longstanding relationship with this insurance company as well as this particular executive. How should you proceed?
ATell the patient that proton beam therapy will not be covered by his insurance company, so you will need to proceed with traditional radiation therapy
BDiscuss the issue of cost to the insurer with your patient, relaying the company's request to him without making further commentary or recommendation
CCall your hospital's ethics committee for a formal consultation
DProceed with proton beam therapy as discussed at your patient's appointment
EDiscuss the issue of cost to the insurer with your patient, pointing out that keeping his insurance company happy may make them more likely to cover additional treatments in the future
A 52-year-old man with stage IV melanoma comes to the physician with his wife for a routine follow-up examination. He was recently diagnosed with new bone and brain metastases despite receiving aggressive chemotherapy but has not disclosed this to his wife. He has given verbal consent to discuss his prognosis with his wife and asks the doctor to inform her of his condition because he does not wish to do so himself. She is tearful and has many questions about his condition. Which of the following would be the most appropriate statement by the physician to begin the interview with the patient's wife?
AHave you discussed a living will or goals of care together?
BWe should talk about how we can manage his symptoms with additional chemotherapy.
CWhy do you think your husband has not discussed his medical condition with you?
DWhat is your understanding of your husband's current condition?
EYour husband has end-stage cancer, and his prognosis is poor.
A 19-year-old man presents to an orthopedic surgeon to discuss repair of his torn anterior cruciate ligament. He suffered the injury during a college basketball game 1 week ago and has been using a knee immobilizer since the accident. His past medical history is significant for an emergency appendectomy when he was 12 years of age. At that time, he said that he never wanted to have surgery again. At this visit, the physician explains the procedure to him in detail including potential risks and complications. The patient acknowledges and communicates his understanding of both the diagnosis as well as the surgery and decides to proceed with the surgery in 3 weeks. Afterward, he signs a form giving consent for the operation. Which of the following statements is true about this patient?
AHe cannot provide consent because he lacks capacity
BHe has the right to revoke his consent at any time
CHis parents also need to give consent to this operation
DHe did not need to provide consent for this procedure since it is obviously beneficial
EHis consent is invalid because his decision is not stable over time
+ 7 more in the PDF
Browse all chapters