A 5-year-old child is brought to the emergency department after being hit by a motor vehicle on the way to school. According to paramedics, the child's right leg was severely crushed in the accident. After evaluation, the physician recommends immediate limb-saving surgery to preserve the leg and prevent complications. However, the parents refuse to consent to the surgery. They explain that they heard about a similar case where a child died after limb-saving surgery, and they believe the procedure might lead to amputation or death. Despite the physician's explanation that the surgery is intended to save the limb, the parents remain adamant in their refusal. What is the next best step?
AContact the next of kin
BAsk for a court order
CTake into account the child’s wishes
DTake the parents' wishes into account
EInform the hospital Ethics Committee, state authority, and child protective services, and obtain a court order to proceed with treatment
A 19-year-old man presents to an orthopedic surgeon to discuss repair of his torn anterior cruciate ligament. He suffered the injury during a college basketball game 1 week ago and has been using a knee immobilizer since the accident. His past medical history is significant for an emergency appendectomy when he was 12 years of age. At that time, he said that he never wanted to have surgery again. At this visit, the physician explains the procedure to him in detail including potential risks and complications. The patient acknowledges and communicates his understanding of both the diagnosis as well as the surgery and decides to proceed with the surgery in 3 weeks. Afterward, he signs a form giving consent for the operation. Which of the following statements is true about this patient?
AHe cannot provide consent because he lacks capacity
BHe has the right to revoke his consent at any time
CHis parents also need to give consent to this operation
DHe did not need to provide consent for this procedure since it is obviously beneficial
EHis consent is invalid because his decision is not stable over time
A 32-year-old man visits his primary care physician for a routine health maintenance examination. During the examination, he expresses concerns about not wanting to become a father. He has been sexually active and monogamous with his wife for the past 5 years, and they inconsistently use condoms for contraception. He tells the physician that he would like to undergo vasectomy. His wife is also a patient under the care of the physician and during her last appointment, she expressed concerns over being prescribed any drugs that could affect her fertility because she would like to conceive soon. Which of the following is the most appropriate action by the physician regarding this patient's wish to undergo vasectomy?
AExplain the procedure's benefits, alternatives, and potential complications
BRefer the patient to a psychotherapist to discuss his reluctance to have children
CDiscourage the patient from undergoing the procedure because his wife wants children
DInsist that the patient returns with his wife to discuss the risks and benefits of the procedure together
ECall the patient's wife to obtain her consent for the procedure
+ 7 more in the PDF
Browse all chapters