General Surgery — MCQs

A 32-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with a 14-hour history of right iliac fossa pain. On examination, she has tenderness with guarding in the right iliac fossa. Her temperature is 37.9°C, heart rate 92 bpm, and blood pressure 128/76 mmHg. Blood tests show WCC 13.2 × 10⁹/L and CRP 45 mg/L. CT abdomen demonstrates a dilated appendix with periappendiceal fat stranding. What is the mechanism by which appendiceal obstruction typically leads to the development of acute appendicitis?

Q114

A 46-year-old man presents to the emergency department with a 36-hour history of right iliac fossa pain, fever, and anorexia. His white cell count is 15.2 × 10⁹/L and CRP is 78 mg/L. CT scan confirms acute appendicitis with no evidence of perforation or abscess. He has a history of severe penicillin allergy (anaphylaxis). He undergoes emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Which antibiotic regimen would be most appropriate for prophylaxis and treatment in this patient?

Q115

A 66-year-old man with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who underwent prophylactic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis 15 years ago presents for routine surveillance. Flexible sigmoidoscopy identifies more than 20 adenomatous polyps throughout the rectal segment, with several polyps >10 mm in size. Biopsies show low-grade dysplasia. What is the most appropriate management?

Q116

What is the approximate lifetime risk of developing appendicitis in the general population?

Q117

A 58-year-old woman undergoes colonoscopy for investigation of iron deficiency anaemia. A 25 mm pedunculated polyp is identified in the ascending colon and removed en-bloc using a snare. Histopathology shows a tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia and a small focus of adenocarcinoma invading into the superficial submucosa (Haggitt level 2). The lateral and deep margins are clear by 3 mm. Lymphovascular invasion is not identified. What is the most appropriate management?

Q118

A 54-year-old man presents to the surgical outpatient clinic with a 3-month history of a painless left groin swelling. On examination with the patient standing, there is a 4 cm × 3 cm swelling below and medial to the pubic tubercle that is irreducible but not tender. The swelling does not extend into the scrotum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

Q119

A 27-year-old woman who is 20 weeks pregnant presents with a 24-hour history of right-sided abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. On examination, she has tenderness in the right upper quadrant and right flank. Temperature is 37.6°C. Blood tests show WBC 14.5 × 10⁹/L (normal for pregnancy), CRP 45 mg/L. Urinalysis is negative. Obstetric examination is normal with appropriate fetal heart sounds. What is the most appropriate next investigation to establish the diagnosis?

Q120

A 50-year-old man undergoes elective laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair for a symptomatic right indirect inguinal hernia. During creation of the preperitoneal space, the peritoneum is inadvertently breached. The surgeon notices bowel visible through the defect. What is the most appropriate management of this complication?

General Surgery UK Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 111: What is the recommended duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for a patient with stage III (T3 N1 M0) colon cancer following curative resection with clear margins?

A. 3 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX
B. 6 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX (Correct Answer)
C. 12 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX
D. 3 months of FOLFOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine maintenance
E. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated for stage III disease

Explanation: ***6 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX***- For **stage III (node-positive)** colon cancer, the standard duration of adjuvant chemotherapy remains **6 months** to maximize overall and disease-free survival.- This regimen, using either **capecitabine** monotherapy or combination **FOLFOX**, aims to eliminate micrometastatic disease following curative resection.*3 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX*- While the **IDEA collaboration** suggests 3 months may be non-inferior for **low-risk stage III (T1-3 N1)** disease, 6 months remains the established standard for general stage III disease.- Shorter durations are primarily considered to reduce the risk of **oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy** in specific subgroups.*12 months of capecitabine or FOLFOX*- Prolonging adjuvant chemotherapy to 12 months provides no additional survival benefit and significantly increases cumulative **toxicity**.- Clinical trials have demonstrated that efficacy plateaus and leads to unacceptable **neurological and hematological side effects** beyond 6 months.*3 months of FOLFOX followed by 3 months of capecitabine maintenance*- This sequential approach is not a standard evidence-based protocol for the adjuvant treatment of **colon cancer**.- Standard protocols involve consistent use of the same regimen (either **FOLFOX** or **CAPOX**) throughout the treatment duration to maintain therapeutic intensity.*Adjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated for stage III disease*- Adjuvant chemotherapy is **strongly indicated** for all stage III colon cancer patients as it significantly reduces the high risk of **recurrence** associated with nodal involvement.- Omitting treatment in stage III disease is only considered if the patient has extreme **co-morbidities** or a very limited life expectancy that outweighs treatment benefits.

Question 112: During an elective open right inguinal hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique in a 52-year-old man, which anatomical structure forms the floor of the inguinal canal and is at risk of injury during dissection?

A. External oblique aponeurosis
B. Transversalis fascia and conjoint tendon (Correct Answer)
C. Internal oblique muscle
D. Iliopubic tract
E. Lacunar ligament

Explanation: ***Transversalis fascia and conjoint tendon*** - The **posterior wall** or floor of the inguinal canal is primarily formed by the **transversalis fascia** throughout its length and reinforced medially by the **conjoint tendon**. - During a **Lichtenstein repair**, this floor is the site of dissection where the **prosthetic mesh** is secured to prevent recurrence. *External oblique aponeurosis* - This structure forms the **anterior wall** of the inguinal canal along its entire length. - In surgery, it must be incised to expose the **spermatic cord** and the canal contents, representing the roof/front rather than the floor. *Internal oblique muscle* - This muscle contributes to the **roof** (superior wall) of the canal as it arches over the cord structures. - Medially, its fibers fuse with the transversus abdominis to form the **conjoint tendon**, but the muscle itself is not the primary floor. *Iliopubic tract* - This is a thickened band of **transversalis fascia** that runs deep and parallel to the **inguinal ligament**. - While it marks the inferior margin of the **deep inguinal ring**, it is more significant in **laparoscopic repairs** than as the primary floor in open surgery. *Lacunar ligament* - This is a triangular extension of the **inguinal ligament** that forms the medial boundary of the **femoral canal**. - It is located at the **medial corner** of the inguinal floor but does not constitute the floor of the inguinal canal itself.

Question 113: A 32-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with a 14-hour history of right iliac fossa pain. On examination, she has tenderness with guarding in the right iliac fossa. Her temperature is 37.9°C, heart rate 92 bpm, and blood pressure 128/76 mmHg. Blood tests show WCC 13.2 × 10⁹/L and CRP 45 mg/L. CT abdomen demonstrates a dilated appendix with periappendiceal fat stranding. What is the mechanism by which appendiceal obstruction typically leads to the development of acute appendicitis?

A. Arterial thrombosis causing ischaemic necrosis of the appendiceal wall
B. Bacterial translocation through intact mucosa into the submucosa
C. Increased intraluminal pressure leading to venous and lymphatic obstruction (Correct Answer)
D. Direct extension of caecal inflammation into the appendix
E. Spasm of the appendiceal sphincter causing proximal dilatation

Explanation: ***Increased intraluminal pressure leading to venous and lymphatic obstruction***- Luminal obstruction, often by a **fecolith** or **lymphoid hyperplasia**, causes the continued secretion of mucus to accumulate, significantly increasing the pressure within the narrow appendiceal lumen.- This elevated intraluminal pressure compromises the low-pressure **venous and lymphatic drainage**, leading to congestion, edema, and subsequent **mucosal ischemia** and bacterial proliferation.*Arterial thrombosis causing ischaemic necrosis of the appendiceal wall*- Arterial thrombosis leading to **ischaemic necrosis** is a late complication of sustained venous congestion and high intraluminal pressure, not the initial trigger for acute appendicitis.- Primary arterial occlusion as the sole initiating event is rare and typically signifies a more advanced, potentially **gangrenous** stage of the disease.*Bacterial translocation through intact mucosa into the submucosa*- Bacterial invasion and translocation into the submucosa primarily occur **after mucosal integrity has been compromised** by ischemia and inflammation.- Acute appendicitis is fundamentally initiated by **mechanical obstruction** and its sequelae, rather than a spontaneous bacterial invasion through an initially healthy mucosal barrier.*Direct extension of caecal inflammation into the appendix*- This mechanism describes **secondary appendicitis** or periappendicitis, which is inflammation extending from an adjacent source, such as in **Crohn's disease** or pelvic inflammatory disease.- Typical acute appendicitis is a **primary process** arising from within the appendix due to internal luminal obstruction, rather than external inflammatory spread.*Spasm of the appendiceal sphincter causing proximal dilatation*- There is no anatomically or functionally recognized **appendiceal sphincter** that controls flow or can induce obstruction through spasm.- Obstruction in acute appendicitis is almost invariably **mechanical**, caused by physical blockages like fecoliths, rather than a functional neuromuscular spasm.

Question 114: A 46-year-old man presents to the emergency department with a 36-hour history of right iliac fossa pain, fever, and anorexia. His white cell count is 15.2 × 10⁹/L and CRP is 78 mg/L. CT scan confirms acute appendicitis with no evidence of perforation or abscess. He has a history of severe penicillin allergy (anaphylaxis). He undergoes emergency laparoscopic appendicectomy. Which antibiotic regimen would be most appropriate for prophylaxis and treatment in this patient?

A. Intravenous metronidazole and gentamicin (Correct Answer)
B. Intravenous vancomycin and ciprofloxacin
C. Intravenous cefuroxime and metronidazole
D. Oral co-amoxiclav post-operatively
E. Intravenous meropenem

Explanation: ***Intravenous metronidazole and gentamicin*** - In patients with a history of **anaphylaxis** to penicillin, this combination provides excellent coverage against **Gram-negative aerobes** (gentamicin) and **anaerobes** (metronidazole) common in acute appendicitis. - **Gentamicin** is an aminoglycoside, and **metronidazole** is a nitroimidazole; both classes have no significant cross-reactivity with penicillin, making this a safe and effective choice. *Intravenous vancomycin and ciprofloxacin* - **Vancomycin** primarily targets **Gram-positive bacteria** (e.g., MRSA) and is not indicated for the typical Gram-negative and anaerobic pathogens of uncomplicated appendicitis. - While **ciprofloxacin** offers Gram-negative coverage, this regimen critically lacks adequate **anaerobic coverage**, which is essential in managing appendicitis. *Intravenous cefuroxime and metronidazole* - **Cefuroxime** is a cephalosporin, and despite being a different class of beta-lactam, there is a risk of **cross-reactivity** in patients with a severe **penicillin allergy (anaphylaxis)**. - Guidelines generally advise against using any beta-lactam, including cephalosporins, in cases of documented severe penicillin allergy due to this risk. *Oral co-amoxiclav post-operatively* - **Co-amoxiclav** contains **amoxicillin**, a penicillin-class antibiotic, which is an absolute contraindication for a patient with a history of **anaphylaxis** to penicillin. - Post-operative oral antibiotics might be considered for some conditions, but initial prophylaxis and treatment for acute appendicitis require **intravenous administration** for rapid and reliable systemic levels. *Intravenous meropenem* - **Meropenem** is a carbapenem, another class of **beta-lactam** antibiotics, and, like cephalosporins, carries a risk of **cross-hypersensitivity** in patients with severe penicillin allergy. - It is a very broad-spectrum antibiotic, often reserved for resistant infections or complicated cases, and is an **overkill** for uncomplicated acute appendicitis, even in the setting of penicillin allergy.

Question 115: A 66-year-old man with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who underwent prophylactic total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis 15 years ago presents for routine surveillance. Flexible sigmoidoscopy identifies more than 20 adenomatous polyps throughout the rectal segment, with several polyps >10 mm in size. Biopsies show low-grade dysplasia. What is the most appropriate management?

A. Increase surveillance sigmoidoscopy frequency to every 3 months with polypectomy of larger polyps
B. Completion proctectomy with end ileostomy (Correct Answer)
C. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) ablation of all visible polyps with surveillance in 6 months
D. Commence COX-2 inhibitor therapy (celecoxib) to reduce polyp burden
E. Arrange genetic counselling and defer treatment until high-grade dysplasia develops

Explanation: ***Completion proctectomy with end ileostomy*** - In **Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)**, a rectal remnant after an **ileorectal anastomosis (IRA)** requires definitive surgery if the polyp burden becomes unmanageable, defined as more than **20 adenomas** or polyps >10 mm. - **Completion proctectomy** is the most appropriate management here because the high number and large size of the polyps significantly increase the risk of **rectal cancer** progression despite the absence of high-grade dysplasia. *Increase surveillance sigmoidoscopy frequency to every 3 months with polypectomy of larger polyps* - This approach is insufficient because the **rectal polyp burden** (>20 polyps and >10 mm) exceeds the threshold for safe endoscopic control and reliable surveillance. - Frequent procedures carry a cumulative risk of complications and do not eliminate the high risk of **malignant transformation** in an unmanageable rectal segment. *Argon plasma coagulation (APC) ablation of all visible polyps with surveillance in 6 months* - **APC ablation** is difficult for large polyps (>10 mm) and does not provide tissue for pathological confirmation, potentially missing **occult cancer**. - Relying on ablation alone is not recommended when the **adenoma density** is high, as it cannot reliably clear the rectum in a patient with **FAP**. *Commence COX-2 inhibitor therapy (celecoxib) to reduce polyp burden* - While **celecoxib** can reduce the number and size of polyps in **FAP**, it is not a primary treatment for a rectal segment that already meets criteria for **surgical resection**. - Pharmacotherapy is best used as an adjunct to surveillance in low-burden cases and cannot substitute for **proctectomy** in the presence of large, numerous adenomas. *Arrange genetic counselling and defer treatment until high-grade dysplasia develops* - Waiting for **high-grade dysplasia** is hazardous in FAP because the risk of developing **invasive carcinoma** is extremely high once the polyp burden reaches this level. - While **genetic counseling** is standard for FAP patients, surgical intervention must be based on clinical and endoscopic findings to prevent cancer development.

Question 116: What is the approximate lifetime risk of developing appendicitis in the general population?

A. 2-3%
B. 7-8% (Correct Answer)
C. 15-17%
D. 25-28%
E. 35-40%

Explanation: ***7-8%*** - The **lifetime risk** of developing appendicitis is estimated to be approximately **7-8%** in the general population across industrialized nations. - This makes appendicitis one of the most common causes of **acute abdominal pain** requiring emergency surgery. *2-3%* - This range is significantly lower than the **epidemiological data** suggests for the general population. - Such a low percentage does not account for the high frequency of **appendectomy** being one of the most common surgical emergencies globally. *15-17%* - This value overestimates the actual **incidence of appendicitis**, though it may sometimes be confused with higher rates of **incidental appendectomy** during other abdominal surgeries. - Standard surgical literature identifies the peak incidence during the **second and third decades** of life within the 7-8% total risk bracket. *25-28%* - This figure is incorrectly high and would imply that more than 1 in 4 people develop **acute appendicitis**, which is not supported by hospital admission data. - Such high percentages are not reflective of the **prevalence** seen in most developed or developing healthcare systems. *35-40%* - This is an extreme outlier and significantly exceeds the known **life-table analysis** for inflammatory disease of the appendix. - Claiming a risk of nearly **40%** would misrepresent the clinical reality of **acute abdominal pain** presentations.

Question 117: A 58-year-old woman undergoes colonoscopy for investigation of iron deficiency anaemia. A 25 mm pedunculated polyp is identified in the ascending colon and removed en-bloc using a snare. Histopathology shows a tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia and a small focus of adenocarcinoma invading into the superficial submucosa (Haggitt level 2). The lateral and deep margins are clear by 3 mm. Lymphovascular invasion is not identified. What is the most appropriate management?

A. Adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine for 6 months
B. CT staging followed by right hemicolectomy if no distant metastases are present
C. Right hemicolectomy due to the presence of invasive adenocarcinoma
D. Repeat colonoscopy in 3 months to assess the polypectomy site for residual disease
E. Colonoscopic surveillance at 1 year as the polyp was completely excised with clear margins (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Colonoscopic surveillance at 1 year as the polyp was completely excised with clear margins*** - This **malignant polyp** exhibits low-risk features including **Haggitt level 2** invasion (confined to the polyp neck), a **clear margin >1 mm**, and no **lymphovascular invasion**. - With these favorable histopathological criteria, the risk of **lymph node metastasis** is low (<5%), making endoscopic excision curative and follow-up **colonoscopic surveillance** at 1 year the appropriate management. *Adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine for 6 months* - **Adjuvant chemotherapy** is not indicated for **Stage I colon cancer** (T1N0), as the survival benefit typically does not outweigh the significant toxicity risks. - Localized invasive adenocarcinoma with low-risk features, completely resected endoscopically, requires **surveillance**, not **systemic therapy**. *CT staging followed by right hemicolectomy if no distant metastases are present* - Surgery (like a **right hemicolectomy**) is generally reserved for **high-risk malignant polyps**, such as those with **poor differentiation**, **positive margins**, **lymphovascular invasion**, or deeper **submucosal invasion (Haggitt level 3-4)**. - Given the **low-risk features** of this pedunculated polyp, the risk of **nodal involvement** is extremely low, thus making major surgical resection unnecessary. *Right hemicolectomy due to the presence of invasive adenocarcinoma* - The simple presence of **adenocarcinoma** does not automatically mandate surgery if it is limited to the superficial submucosa of a **pedunculated polyp** with favorable features. - Management decisions are guided by **Haggitt classification**, **margin status**, and other risk factors; for **Haggitt level 2** and clear margins, endoscopic resection is curative. *Repeat colonoscopy in 3 months to assess the polypectomy site for residual disease* - A **3-month repeat colonoscopy** is typically recommended for **sessile polyps** removed via **piecemeal resection** or when there's concern for incomplete excision. - Since this was a **pedunculated polyp** removed **en-bloc** with clear margins and low-risk features, standard surveillance at **1 year** is the appropriate guideline-directed interval.

Question 118: A 54-year-old man presents to the surgical outpatient clinic with a 3-month history of a painless left groin swelling. On examination with the patient standing, there is a 4 cm × 3 cm swelling below and medial to the pubic tubercle that is irreducible but not tender. The swelling does not extend into the scrotum. What is the most likely diagnosis?

A. Direct inguinal hernia
B. Indirect inguinal hernia
C. Femoral hernia (Correct Answer)
D. Saphena varix
E. Inguinal lymphadenopathy

Explanation: ***Femoral hernia***- The swelling's location **below and medial to the pubic tubercle** is highly characteristic of a femoral hernia, which protrudes through the femoral canal.- Femoral hernias are notoriously prone to being **irreducible** and have a higher risk of strangulation due to the narrow, rigid confines of the femoral canal. The description of an irreducible, painless swelling fits this well, and its lack of scrotal extension differentiates it from an indirect inguinal hernia.*Direct inguinal hernia*- These hernias typically appear **above and medial to the pubic tubercle**, emerging through Hesselbach's triangle.- Direct hernias are generally **reducible** and rarely become incarcerated or strangulated compared to femoral hernias.*Indirect inguinal hernia*- Indirect inguinal hernias originate at the **deep inguinal ring** and often extend **into the scrotum** along the spermatic cord, which is not described in this case.- While they can be irreducible, their location is typically **above and medial to the pubic tubercle**, unlike the described swelling.*Saphena varix*- A saphena varix is a dilation of the great saphenous vein that typically presents as a soft, compressible swelling with a **cough impulse** or **thrill**.- It is characteristically **reducible** and disappears on lying flat, which contradicts the described irreducibility.*Inguinal lymphadenopathy*- Inguinal lymphadenopathy usually presents as **multiple, discrete, firm nodes**, often tender if inflamed, rather than a single 4x3 cm irreducible mass.- Swollen lymph nodes are usually a secondary sign of an **infection or malignancy** elsewhere in the lower limb or perineum, and their irreducibility without tenderness for 3 months doesn't fit the typical presentation of a simple inflammatory process.

Question 119: A 27-year-old woman who is 20 weeks pregnant presents with a 24-hour history of right-sided abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. On examination, she has tenderness in the right upper quadrant and right flank. Temperature is 37.6°C. Blood tests show WBC 14.5 × 10⁹/L (normal for pregnancy), CRP 45 mg/L. Urinalysis is negative. Obstetric examination is normal with appropriate fetal heart sounds. What is the most appropriate next investigation to establish the diagnosis?

A. Abdominal ultrasound focusing on the right upper quadrant and flank
B. CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast but without oral contrast
C. MRI abdomen and pelvis without gadolinium contrast (Correct Answer)
D. Diagnostic laparoscopy to directly visualize the appendix
E. Serial clinical examination with repeat inflammatory markers in 6 hours

Explanation: ***MRI abdomen and pelvis without gadolinium contrast***- In pregnant patients with suspected **appendicitis**, especially with atypical pain location (RUQ/flank due to uterine displacement), **MRI** is the preferred imaging modality if ultrasound is inconclusive or the clinical suspicion remains high.- MRI provides excellent soft-tissue contrast and high diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis while avoiding **ionizing radiation**, making it safe for the **fetus**. Gadolinium is typically avoided in pregnancy unless absolutely necessary.*Abdominal ultrasound focusing on the right upper quadrant and flank*- While often a first-line investigation, ultrasound's **sensitivity for appendicitis decreases significantly in advanced pregnancy** due to displacement of the appendix by the **gravid uterus** and difficulty in visualization.- Focussing only on RUQ and flank might miss the appendix if it's in an unusual location, and its diagnostic yield for appendicitis in this specific population is limited.*CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast but without oral contrast*- **CT scans involve ionizing radiation**, which carries risks to the developing **fetus**, and should generally be avoided in pregnant patients unless other modalities are non-diagnostic and the clinical need is urgent and outweighs the risks.- Although highly accurate for appendicitis, the principle of **ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)** for radiation exposure prioritizes MRI over CT in pregnancy for non-emergent or non-life-threatening conditions.*Diagnostic laparoscopy to directly visualize the appendix*- **Diagnostic laparoscopy is an invasive surgical procedure** with inherent risks of anesthesia and surgery to both the mother and the fetus, including preterm labor or fetal injury.- Imaging is the primary diagnostic step to confirm appendicitis and avoid **negative appendectomies**, which are associated with increased maternal and fetal morbidity during pregnancy.*Serial clinical examination with repeat inflammatory markers in 6 hours*- Given the acute presentation, tenderness, and elevated CRP, delaying definitive diagnosis with **expectant management** increases the risk of **appendiceal perforation**, which carries significant risks of **fetal loss** and maternal sepsis.- While WBC count can be physiologically elevated in pregnancy, the combination of symptoms and elevated CRP warrants prompt imaging to rule out an acute surgical emergency.

Question 120: A 50-year-old man undergoes elective laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair for a symptomatic right indirect inguinal hernia. During creation of the preperitoneal space, the peritoneum is inadvertently breached. The surgeon notices bowel visible through the defect. What is the most appropriate management of this complication?

A. Convert immediately to open anterior approach via inguinal incision
B. Close the peritoneal defect with sutures or clips and continue with TEP repair if space can be maintained (Correct Answer)
C. Abandon the procedure and reschedule for open repair after healing
D. Convert to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair to allow better visualization
E. Insert a drain into the peritoneal cavity and continue with the repair

Explanation: ***Close the peritoneal defect with sutures or clips and continue with TEP repair if space can be maintained*** - A **peritoneal breach** is a common intraoperative complication in **TEP repair**; if small, it can be managed by immediate closure to maintain the working **preperitoneal space**. - Closing the defect prevents **pneumoperitoneum**, which causes the peritoneum to bulge toward the surgeon and collapse the working cavity. *Convert immediately to open anterior approach via inguinal incision* - Immediate conversion is unnecessary and avoids the benefits of **minimally invasive surgery** unless there is severe injury or inability to complete the repair. - Conversion is generally a **last resort** after laparoscopic alternatives, like TAPP, have been considered or attempted. *Abandon the procedure and reschedule for open repair after healing* - Abandoning the procedure for a simple **peritoneal tear** is inappropriate management for a routine surgical complication. - Rescheduling increases patient morbidity and delays treatment for a condition that can be managed **intraoperatively**. *Convert to transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair to allow better visualization* - Conversion to **TAPP** is a secondary strategy used only if the preperitoneal space cannot be maintained or if the tear is too large to close easily. - While a valid alternative, the first step is to attempt **primary closure** of the defect to salvage the original TEP approach. *Insert a drain into the peritoneal cavity and continue with the repair* - Inserting a drain does not address the primary issue of **gas entry** into the peritoneal cavity and subsequent loss of work space visualization. - High-flow gas would continue to enter the peritoneum, and a drain is not a substitute for **mechanical closure** of the peritoneal defect.

Practice by Chapter

Appendicitis

Practice Questions

Colorectal cancer

Practice Questions

Hernias

Practice Questions

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free