Risk, Capacity & Safeguarding — MCQs
On this page
According to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which of the following statements about the statutory principles is correct?
A 53-year-old homeless man with alcohol dependence attends the Emergency Department stating he feels suicidal. He appears intoxicated (smells of alcohol, slurred speech) but is alert and orientated. He has superficial cuts on his wrists from earlier today. He becomes agitated when asked to wait for psychiatric assessment and says he is leaving. What is the most appropriate immediate action?
A 66-year-old man with no cognitive impairment has been diagnosed with advanced motor neurone disease. He has made an advance decision to refuse treatment (ADRT) declining invasive ventilation and artificial nutrition. He now presents with aspiration pneumonia and reduced consciousness (GCS 12/15). His ADRT document is not immediately available. What is the most appropriate management?
A 22-year-old woman presents to her GP three weeks after a relationship breakdown. She reports persistent suicidal thoughts, has researched methods online, and has written goodbye letters to her family but has not yet decided when to act. She lives alone and has stopped attending university. She agrees to further assessment. Which feature most significantly elevates her immediate suicide risk?
A 49-year-old man with alcohol dependence syndrome and Korsakoff's syndrome is admitted with confusion. He requires treatment for pneumonia with intravenous antibiotics. He agrees to treatment but cannot recall the conversation minutes later and repeatedly asks why he is in hospital. Assessment confirms he cannot retain information about his treatment. What is the legal basis for treating his pneumonia?
During a Mental Capacity Act assessment, a 71-year-old man with moderate dementia (MMSE 17/30) is being assessed for capacity to consent to cataract surgery. He can repeat back information about the surgery and its risks but when asked what he wants to do, he states 'Whatever you think is best, doctor'. Despite repeated explanations, he defers all decisions to the medical team. Which stage of the capacity assessment is he failing?
A 35-year-old woman with emotionally unstable personality disorder and recurrent self-harm is assessed following superficial lacerations to her forearms. She reports chronic suicidal thoughts but denies current intent or plans. She has cut herself 'to release tension' approximately weekly for 5 years. She refuses dialectical behaviour therapy, stating previous therapy 'didn't work'. What factor most increases her long-term suicide risk?
A 42-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia presents to the Emergency Department stating he plans to kill himself by jumping in front of a train tonight. He has command hallucinations telling him to do this. He has full insight that these are hallucinations and states 'I know they're not real but I can't cope with them anymore'. He refuses admission and wants to go home. What is the most appropriate immediate management?
A 78-year-old man with severe dementia (MMSE 9/30) requires a feeding gastrostomy. He lacks capacity to decide about this procedure. His daughter, who holds Lasting Power of Attorney for Health and Welfare, requests that the gastrostomy not be inserted as 'he would not want this'. The medical team believes insertion is in his best interests to prevent aspiration and maintain nutrition. What is the most appropriate next step?
During suicide risk assessment, a 55-year-old man with recurrent depression reveals he has stockpiled medication and has a detailed plan. However, he states he will not act on it because of his religious beliefs. Which element of this presentation requires most careful further exploration?
Risk, Capacity & Safeguarding UK Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 91: According to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, which of the following statements about the statutory principles is correct?
- A. A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is proved otherwise on the balance of probabilities
- B. A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because they make an unwise decision (Correct Answer)
- C. Before the act is done, or the decision is made, regard must be had to whether the purpose can be achieved in a way that is more beneficial to the person
- D. Best interests decisions must always prioritise the person's physical health over their wishes
- E. Capacity assessments are diagnosis-specific rather than decision-specific
Explanation: ***A person is not to be treated as unable to make a decision merely because they make an unwise decision***- This reflects **Principle 3** of the **Mental Capacity Act 2005**, emphasizing that personal values or eccentricity do not equate to a lack of capacity.- It protects individuals' **autonomy** by ensuring that healthcare professionals do not override a person's choice simply because they disagree with it.*A person must be assumed to have capacity unless it is proved otherwise on the balance of probabilities*- While **Principle 1** correctly states that capacity must be assumed unless established otherwise, the phrase "on the **balance of probabilities**" refers to the legal standard of proof required, not the direct wording of the principle itself.- The statutory principle focuses on the **presumption of capacity**, with the standard of proof applying to the determination that capacity is absent.*Before the act is done, or the decision is made, regard must be had to whether the purpose can be achieved in a way that is more beneficial to the person*- This statement incorrectly paraphrases **Principle 5**, which actually states that any act done or decision made under the Act must be the **least restrictive** of the person's rights and freedom.- The focus is on preserving the individual's **liberty and autonomy** as much as possible, rather than simply seeking a subjectively
Question 92: A 53-year-old homeless man with alcohol dependence attends the Emergency Department stating he feels suicidal. He appears intoxicated (smells of alcohol, slurred speech) but is alert and orientated. He has superficial cuts on his wrists from earlier today. He becomes agitated when asked to wait for psychiatric assessment and says he is leaving. What is the most appropriate immediate action?
- A. Allow him to leave and provide crisis team contact details
- B. Request security to prevent him leaving while awaiting assessment
- C. Assess capacity and complete psychiatric assessment while he is present (Correct Answer)
- D. Administer sedation to allow safe assessment
- E. Detain under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act
Explanation: ***Assess capacity and complete psychiatric assessment while he is present*** - The immediate priority for a patient expressing **suicidal ideation** and displaying **self-harm** is to determine if they possess the **mental capacity** to make decisions about their care and discharge. - A focused assessment must be conducted to evaluate the **severity of risk** and the impact of **alcohol intoxication** on his cognitive function before deciding on further intervention. *Allow him to leave and provide crisis team contact details* - This action would be **clinically negligent** given the patient's active suicidal ideation and recent self-harm, which indicate a high **immediate risk**. - You cannot safely discharge a patient to a crisis team without first completing a robust **risk assessment** to ensure they are stable enough to remain in the community. *Request security to prevent him leaving while awaiting assessment* - Restraining a patient without first assessing **capacity** or establishing a clear **legal framework** (such as the **Mental Capacity Act**) can be considered **false imprisonment**. - Security should only be used as a last resort if the patient is deemed to lack capacity and there is an **immediate threat** to life or safety. *Administer sedation to allow safe assessment* - **Chemical restraint** or sedation is an invasive intervention that requires either **informed consent** or a clear determination that the patient lacks capacity and it is in their **best interests**. - Sedating an intoxicated patient carries significant medical risks, including **respiratory depression**, and should not be used as a first-line method for clinical assessment. *Detain under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act* - **Section 136** is a police power used to remove someone from a public place to a place of safety; it cannot be applied to a patient who is already in a **hospital setting**. - If detention is necessary within the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation, clinicians should consider **Section 5(2)** (doctor's holding power) or the **Mental Capacity Act** if the patient lacks capacity.
Question 93: A 66-year-old man with no cognitive impairment has been diagnosed with advanced motor neurone disease. He has made an advance decision to refuse treatment (ADRT) declining invasive ventilation and artificial nutrition. He now presents with aspiration pneumonia and reduced consciousness (GCS 12/15). His ADRT document is not immediately available. What is the most appropriate management?
- A. Withhold antibiotics and nutrition until the ADRT is located
- B. Treat with antibiotics and provide nutrition as the ADRT is not available (Correct Answer)
- C. Contact next of kin to confirm the content of the ADRT before treating
- D. Treat with antibiotics but withhold artificial nutrition
- E. Apply to the Court of Protection for an urgent decision
Explanation: ***Treat with antibiotics and provide nutrition as the ADRT is not available*** - In an emergency where a patient lacks **mental capacity** and a valid **Advance Decision to Refuse Treatment (ADRT)** is not immediately available, clinicians must act in the patient's **best interests** to preserve life.- Under the **Mental Capacity Act 2005**, an ADRT for life-sustaining treatment must be **written, signed, and witnessed**; if these cannot be verified immediately, treatment should not be withheld as a delay may cause irreversible harm.*Withhold antibiotics and nutrition until the ADRT is located* - Withholding life-sustaining treatment based on an unverified report of an ADRT is legally risky and could lead to **negligence** or avoidable death.- Clinicians are protected by law when providing **emergency treatment** in the absence of a confirmed, valid, and applicable legal document.*Contact next of kin to confirm the content of the ADRT before treating* - While the **next of kin** can provide helpful context, they do not have the legal authority to consent to or refuse treatment unless they hold **Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA)** for health and welfare.- Seeking information from family should occur simultaneously with treatment, as **clinical stabilization** remains the immediate priority in an acute presentation like aspiration pneumonia.*Treat with antibiotics but withhold artificial nutrition* - Selective treatment is inappropriate because neither the **validity** nor the specific **applicability** of the ADRT to the current clinical scenario can be confirmed without the document.- Artificial nutrition and antibiotics are both considered medical treatments that should be provided in the patient's **best interests** until the legal status of the ADRT is clarified.*Apply to the Court of Protection for an urgent decision* - An application to the **Court of Protection** is generally reserved for cases of significant dispute or long-term care decisions, not for immediate **emergency medical management**.- Doctors have the authority to provide **life-sustaining treatment** in acute situations without a court order when a patient's wishes are not legally established.
Question 94: A 22-year-old woman presents to her GP three weeks after a relationship breakdown. She reports persistent suicidal thoughts, has researched methods online, and has written goodbye letters to her family but has not yet decided when to act. She lives alone and has stopped attending university. She agrees to further assessment. Which feature most significantly elevates her immediate suicide risk?
- A. Living alone with limited social support
- B. Recent relationship breakdown
- C. Preparation activities including writing farewell notes (Correct Answer)
- D. Researching methods online
- E. Duration of suicidal ideation for three weeks
Explanation: ***Preparation activities including writing farewell notes*** - **Final acts** like writing goodbye letters represent a high level of **suicidal intent** and indicate that the patient is transitioning from ideation to action. - These **preparatory behaviors** are among the most significant clinical indicators of an **immediate risk** to life and require urgent psychiatric intervention.*Living alone with limited social support* - **Social isolation** is a known risk factor for suicide, as it reduces the likelihood of intervention by others and increases feelings of **loneliness**. - While it increases long-term vulnerability, it is considered a **background risk factor** rather than an indicator of immediate acute risk.*Recent relationship breakdown* - A major **life stressor** or loss can serve as a potent **trigger** for self-harm and provides the context for the current crisis. - However, the patient's specific **behavioral response** (preparing to end her life) is a more specific marker of risk than the stressor itself.*Researching methods online* - Researching methods is a form of **suicidal planning** and is a serious concern that increases the lethality of a potential attempt. - While it indicates high risk, it is generally considered a step earlier in the pathway compared to performing **irreversible final acts** like writing farewell letters.*Duration of suicidal ideation for three weeks* - Persistent ideation over a period of weeks suggests the distress is not a transient impulse, highlighting the need for **mental health support**. - The **severity and preparation** associated with the ideation are more critical than the specific timeframe in determining the **immediacy of the risk**.
Question 95: A 49-year-old man with alcohol dependence syndrome and Korsakoff's syndrome is admitted with confusion. He requires treatment for pneumonia with intravenous antibiotics. He agrees to treatment but cannot recall the conversation minutes later and repeatedly asks why he is in hospital. Assessment confirms he cannot retain information about his treatment. What is the legal basis for treating his pneumonia?
- A. Section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983
- B. Section 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (acts in connection with care or treatment) (Correct Answer)
- C. Implied consent as he initially agreed
- D. Common law doctrine of necessity
- E. Parens patriae jurisdiction
Explanation: ***Section 5 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (acts in connection with care or treatment)*** - The patient's inability to **retain information** about his treatment, stemming from **Korsakoff's syndrome**, indicates a lack of **mental capacity** for this specific decision. - **Section 5 of the MCA 2005** provides legal authority for healthcare professionals to administer care and treatment to individuals who lack capacity, provided it is in their **best interests**. *Section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983* - This act is primarily used for the **assessment and detention** of individuals with a **mental disorder** for treatment of that disorder, not for unrelated physical conditions like **pneumonia**. - It cannot be used as the legal basis for treating a physical illness unless that illness is directly caused by or part of the mental disorder being treated under the Act. *Implied consent as he initially agreed* - Valid consent requires the individual to have **capacity**, which includes the ability to **retain information** relevant to the decision. - His immediate inability to recall the conversation and repeated questioning indicates he does not possess the capacity to give **valid consent**, rendering the initial agreement legally insufficient. *Common law doctrine of necessity* - In England and Wales, the **Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005)** largely codifies and replaces the common law doctrine of necessity for treating incapacitated adults. - The doctrine of necessity is typically reserved for urgent situations where immediate treatment is required to save life or prevent serious harm, and there is no time to apply the **MCA principles**. *Parens patriae jurisdiction* - This is an **outdated legal concept** where the state acts as a guardian for those unable to care for themselves; it is not the operative legal framework for modern healthcare decisions. - In the UK, decisions for adults lacking capacity are governed by the comprehensive framework of the **Mental Capacity Act 2005**, not this historical doctrine.
Question 96: During a Mental Capacity Act assessment, a 71-year-old man with moderate dementia (MMSE 17/30) is being assessed for capacity to consent to cataract surgery. He can repeat back information about the surgery and its risks but when asked what he wants to do, he states 'Whatever you think is best, doctor'. Despite repeated explanations, he defers all decisions to the medical team. Which stage of the capacity assessment is he failing?
- A. Understanding information relevant to the decision
- B. Retaining information relevant to the decision
- C. Using or weighing information to make a decision (Correct Answer)
- D. Communicating his decision
- E. All stages - he lacks capacity entirely
Explanation: ***Using or weighing information to make a decision***- The **Mental Capacity Act 2005** requires an individual to be able to use and weigh the information to make a choice, which this patient fails to do by deferring to the medical team.- Despite understanding and retaining the facts, the patient cannot apply them to his **personal values** or preferences to arrive at an independent decision regarding his treatment.*Understanding information relevant to the decision*- The patient's ability to **repeat back** information about the surgery and its risks demonstrates that he successfully comprehended the relevant facts.- Failure at this stage would involve an inability to grasp the explanations, even when simplified.*Retaining information relevant to the decision*- The patient was able to hold the information in his mind long enough to **repeat it back**, thus satisfying the retention criterion.- This stage assesses the ability to keep information present in mind for processing and use, which was demonstrated here.*Communicating his decision*- The patient clearly communicated his decision to defer by stating, "**Whatever you think is best, doctor**."- Failure at this stage typically involves an inability to express a decision in any form, not simply a lack of independent choice.*All stages - he lacks capacity entirely*- Capacity is **decision-specific** and **time-specific**, meaning a person may have capacity for some decisions but not others, and it can fluctuate.- The scenario explicitly shows the patient passing the understanding and retaining stages, therefore he is not failing *all* stages.
Question 97: A 35-year-old woman with emotionally unstable personality disorder and recurrent self-harm is assessed following superficial lacerations to her forearms. She reports chronic suicidal thoughts but denies current intent or plans. She has cut herself 'to release tension' approximately weekly for 5 years. She refuses dialectical behaviour therapy, stating previous therapy 'didn't work'. What factor most increases her long-term suicide risk?
- A. Diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder
- B. Frequency of self-harm episodes (Correct Answer)
- C. Previous unsuccessful therapy
- D. Chronic suicidal ideation
- E. Female gender
Explanation: ***Frequency of self-harm episodes***- In patients with **emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD)**, the **frequency and repetition** of self-harm is one of the strongest statistical predictors of eventual completed suicide.- Each repetition increases the longitudinal risk because it provides more opportunities for a **fatal outcome**, whether through intentional escalation or a lethal miscalculation.*Diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder*- While **EUPD** is associated with a higher lifetime risk of suicide compared to the general population, the diagnosis itself is a static factor and less predictive than the frequency of **dangerous behaviors**.- Many individuals with this diagnosis engage in self-harm without ever attempting suicide, making the **pattern of behavior** a more specific indicator.*Previous unsuccessful therapy*- A history of **unsuccessful therapy** suggests a lack of current protective factors and poor engagement, but it is not as strong a predictor as the **repetition** of physical self-injury.- Refusal of **Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT)** complicates management but is considered a secondary risk factor compared to actual **repetitive self-harm**.*Chronic suicidal ideation*- **Chronic suicidal ideation** is common in EUPD and often serves as a baseline status rather than an acute indicator of an impending **fatal attempt**.- While it signifies high distress, the **enactment** of self-harm (the frequency) is a more potent marker for long-term suicide risk than the thoughts alone.*Female gender*- **Female gender** is associated with higher rates of **non-fatal self-harm** episodes, whereas male gender is typically a higher risk factor for **completed suicide**.- Because this patient already belongs to the female demographic, this factor does not contribute to an **increased risk** relative to the other behavioral markers present.
Question 98: A 42-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia presents to the Emergency Department stating he plans to kill himself by jumping in front of a train tonight. He has command hallucinations telling him to do this. He has full insight that these are hallucinations and states 'I know they're not real but I can't cope with them anymore'. He refuses admission and wants to go home. What is the most appropriate immediate management?
- A. Respect his decision as he has capacity due to having insight into his hallucinations
- B. Arrange urgent outpatient crisis team follow-up within 24 hours
- C. Detain under Section 136 of the Mental Health Act
- D. Detain under Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act pending Mental Health Act assessment (Correct Answer)
- E. Detain under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act
Explanation: ***Detain under Section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act pending Mental Health Act assessment***- This patient is in a hospital setting (Emergency Department) and expresses an **immediate, specific, lethal plan for suicide** driven by command hallucinations.- **Section 5(2)** allows a doctor in charge of the patient's treatment to detain a voluntary inpatient for up to **72 hours** to facilitate a formal Mental Health Act assessment when there is an immediate risk to self or others.*Respect his decision as he has capacity due to having insight into his hallucinations*- **Insight into hallucinations** does not automatically confer **mental capacity** for a decision if the mental disorder significantly impairs their ability to make a safe choice, especially concerning imminent self-harm.- The patient's inability to
Question 99: A 78-year-old man with severe dementia (MMSE 9/30) requires a feeding gastrostomy. He lacks capacity to decide about this procedure. His daughter, who holds Lasting Power of Attorney for Health and Welfare, requests that the gastrostomy not be inserted as 'he would not want this'. The medical team believes insertion is in his best interests to prevent aspiration and maintain nutrition. What is the most appropriate next step?
- A. Proceed with gastrostomy insertion as the medical team's view takes precedence
- B. Arrange an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) to represent the patient
- C. Consider the daughter's view as part of best interests decision-making but it is not binding
- D. Accept the daughter's decision as she has legal authority under the LPA (Correct Answer)
- E. Apply to the Court of Protection for a decision
Explanation: ***Accept the daughter's decision as she has legal authority under the LPA*** - A valid **Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA)** for Health and Welfare gives the attorney the same legal authority as the patient to provide or refuse **consent for treatment**. - Since the daughter is making a decision based on the patient's **known wishes**, her refusal is legally binding and must be respected by the medical team. *Proceed with gastrostomy insertion as the medical team's view takes precedence* - The **Mental Capacity Act 2005** dictates that a valid LPA proxy decision carries the same weight as the patient's own decision, meaning the medical team cannot simply override it. - Proceeding against the daughter's refusal without legal justification would constitute **battery** or unlawful treatment. *Arrange an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) to represent the patient* - An **IMCA** is only indicated when a patient lacks capacity and has **no close family or friends** to consult regarding serious medical treatments. - Because the patient has a legally appointed **LPA attorney** and family involved, an IMCA is neither required nor appropriate. *Consider the daughter's view as part of best interests decision-making but it is not binding* - While general family views are considered in **best interest** assessments, an **LPA attorney** has specific legal status that makes their decision binding rather than merely consultative. - This option incorrectly treats a legal proxy as a simple **next of kin** who lacks formal decision-making authority. *Apply to the Court of Protection for a decision* - Recourse to the **Court of Protection** is a final step reserved for situations where there is a **dispute** about the validity of the LPA or if the attorney is clearly not acting in the patient's best interests. - In this scenario, clinical disagreement with a daughter representing her father's prior wishes does not immediately warrant court intervention before respecting the **LPA authority**.
Question 100: During suicide risk assessment, a 55-year-old man with recurrent depression reveals he has stockpiled medication and has a detailed plan. However, he states he will not act on it because of his religious beliefs. Which element of this presentation requires most careful further exploration?
- A. The specific religious beliefs and their strength as a protective factor (Correct Answer)
- B. Whether he has made any preparations such as writing a suicide note
- C. The quantity and type of medication he has stockpiled
- D. His current level of hopelessness about the future
- E. Whether he has shared his suicidal thoughts with family members
Explanation: ***The specific religious beliefs and their strength as a protective factor***- In a patient with a detailed **suicide plan** and **stockpiled means**, assessing the validity and durability of the stated **protective factor** is critical to determining safety.- Clinical exploration must determine if the **religious belief** remains a core conviction or if it is being eroded by the severity of the **depressive episode** and hopelessness.*Whether he has made any preparations such as writing a suicide note*- While writing a **suicide note** indicates high **suicidal intent**, the question already establishes he has a **detailed plan** and has **stockpiled medication**.- This information adds to the risk profile but does not address the crucial conflict between his **intent** and the **religious deterrent** he has identified.*The quantity and type of medication he has stockpiled*- Identifying the **lethality of the means** is a standard part of risk assessment, but the patient has already disclosed the existence of the stockpile.- The primary clinical challenge here is not the **lethality**, but whether he will overcome his **inhibitory factors** (religious beliefs) to use those medications.*His current level of hopelessness about the future*- **Hopelessness** is a major risk factor for suicide, but it is often already implicit in a patient with a **recurrent depression** and a specific plan.- Assessing hopelessness provides background risk, but assessing the **protective factor** provides the immediate clinical data needed for a **management plan**.*Whether he has shared his suicidal thoughts with family members*- Disclosure to family relates to **social support**, which is another protective factor, but the patient specifically highlighted **religion** as his primary deterrent.- In the hierarchy of this clinical interview, investigating the **self-identified reason for living** (religious faith) takes priority over exploring other potential support systems.
Practice by Chapter
Want unlimited practice?
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free