Acute Surgical Presentations — MCQs

A 51-year-old man with known gastro-oesophageal reflux disease presents with a 4-hour history of sudden onset severe chest pain radiating to the back. He reports retching and vomiting after a heavy meal. On examination, he is tachycardic at 115 bpm, blood pressure 95/60 mmHg, and has surgical emphysema palpable in the neck. What is the most likely diagnosis?

Q163

A 68-year-old woman presents with a 72-hour history of abdominal distension and vomiting. She has had no flatus or bowel movements for 3 days. Past medical history includes multiple previous caesarean sections. On examination, her abdomen is distended with visible peristalsis, high-pitched tinkling bowel sounds, and a small tender mass in the right groin. What is the most appropriate immediate management?

Q164

Which anatomical feature best explains why pneumoperitoneum may be absent in approximately 10-20% of patients with proven perforated peptic ulcer?

Q165

A 59-year-old man presents with a 24-hour history of progressively worsening central abdominal pain. He has a history of previous open appendicectomy 30 years ago. He describes the pain as initially cramping but now constant. Examination shows moderate distension with generalized tenderness and guarding. CT abdomen shows dilated small bowel loops with transition point in the right lower quadrant, small volume free fluid, and a 'C-shaped' or 'coffee bean' configuration of a loop of small bowel. What finding on CT would most strongly indicate the need for immediate surgical intervention?

Q166

Which of the following clinical features is most specific for differentiating between simple and strangulated small bowel obstruction in the early stages?

Q167

A 44-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus on long-term prednisolone 20 mg daily presents with a 12-hour history of severe generalized abdominal pain. She has been feeling unwell for 3 days with nausea. On examination, she has mild generalized tenderness but no significant guarding or rebound. Temperature is 37.4°C, heart rate 98 bpm. WCC is 9.5 × 10⁹/L, CRP 45 mg/L. CT abdomen shows free intraperitoneal air but minimal fluid and no obvious perforation site. What is the most likely underlying diagnosis?

Q168

What is the definition of 'third space' fluid loss in the context of acute surgical presentations, and which condition is most characteristically associated with massive third spacing?

Q169

A 54-year-old man presents with a 6-hour history of sudden onset severe upper abdominal pain. He has a history of chronic pancreatitis and alcohol excess. On examination, he is tachycardic at 115 bpm, temperature 37.2°C, and has generalized peritonism. Erect chest X-ray shows no free air under the diaphragm. CT abdomen shows extensive free fluid and fat stranding around the pancreas, but no definite perforation. Serum amylase is 245 U/L (normal <100). What is the most likely explanation for the absence of pneumoperitoneum?

Q170

A 67-year-old woman with known colorectal cancer presents with a 48-hour history of abdominal pain, distension, and absolute constipation. CT abdomen shows dilated large bowel proximal to a stenosing lesion in the sigmoid colon with caecal diameter of 10 cm. The caecum appears viable with no free fluid. She is haemodynamically stable. What is the most appropriate initial management?

Acute Surgical Presentations UK Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 161: What is the typical location of maximum tenderness in acute appendicitis according to anatomical landmarks?

A. One-third of the distance from the umbilicus to the anterior superior iliac spine
B. Two-thirds of the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus (Correct Answer)
C. Midpoint between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis
D. At the level of the umbilicus in the right paraumbilical region
E. One hand's breadth above the anterior superior iliac spine

Explanation: ***Two-thirds of the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus*** - This precise anatomical location is known as **McBurney's point**, which consistently overlies the base of the **appendix** in most individuals. - Experiencing maximal tenderness at this specific landmark is a critical clinical sign, highly indicative of **acute appendicitis** due to localized peritoneal inflammation. *One-third of the distance from the umbilicus to the anterior superior iliac spine* - This description reverses the standard anatomical measurement for **McBurney's point**, which is traditionally measured from the **anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS)** towards the umbilicus. - Utilizing this reversed landmark would place the point more medially and superiorly, not accurately representing the common site of appendiceal tenderness. *Midpoint between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis* - This area corresponds to the **suprapubic region**, which is primarily associated with pathology involving the **bladder**, uterus, or other pelvic organs. - Tenderness in this location is not characteristic of the localized right lower quadrant pain typically seen in **acute appendicitis**. *At the level of the umbilicus in the right paraumbilical region* - Early in the course of appendicitis, **visceral pain** can be referred to the **periumbilical region** before inflammation localizes to the parietal peritoneum. - However, maximal tenderness at this level is more common in conditions like **small bowel obstruction** or early mesenteric lymphadenitis, rather than fully localized appendicitis. *One hand's breadth above the anterior superior iliac spine* - This location is too superior and lateral, situating it in the **right flank** or upper quadrant, which is generally above the typical position of the **vermiform appendix**. - Tenderness in this region would more likely suggest conditions such as **renal colic**, **pyelonephritis**, or a high-lying **retrocecal appendix** rather than the classic presentation.

Question 162: A 51-year-old man with known gastro-oesophageal reflux disease presents with a 4-hour history of sudden onset severe chest pain radiating to the back. He reports retching and vomiting after a heavy meal. On examination, he is tachycardic at 115 bpm, blood pressure 95/60 mmHg, and has surgical emphysema palpable in the neck. What is the most likely diagnosis?

A. Acute myocardial infarction
B. Boerhaave syndrome (Correct Answer)
C. Mallory-Weiss tear
D. Aortic dissection
E. Spontaneous pneumothorax

Explanation: ***Boerhaave syndrome***- This condition is the **spontaneous transmural rupture** of the esophagus, classically presenting with **Mackler’s triad**: vomiting, severe chest pain, and **surgical emphysema**.- The palpable **surgical emphysema** in the neck confirms air escaping from the mediastinum, which occurs when a heavy meal and subsequent **retching/vomiting** cause a massive rise in intra-esophageal pressure.*Acute myocardial infarction*- While it presents with sudden chest pain and tachycardia, it is not typically preceded by **forceful retching** or associated with **subcutaneous emphysema**.- **ECG changes** and cardiac biomarkers would be the primary diagnostic markers, rather than signs of air in the soft tissues.*Mallory-Weiss tear*- This involves a **mucosal tear** at the gastro-esophageal junction rather than a full-thickness perforation, usually leading to **haematemesis** (vomiting blood).- It does not cause **mediastinitis** or air leakage into the neck, making the finding of **surgical emphysema** incompatible with this diagnosis.*Aortic dissection*- Characterized by "tearing" chest pain radiating to the back and **hemodynamic instability**, but lacks the specific association with **preceding vomiting**.- Physical examination would more likely reveal **asymmetric pulses** or blood pressure discrepancies between arms rather than **crepitus** in the neck.*Spontaneous pneumothorax*- Presents with sudden chest pain and shortness of breath, but is not usually triggered by **forceful vomiting** after a meal.- While it can cause diminished breath sounds, it would not explain the **surgical emphysema** in the absence of a tracheal or esophageal injury.

Question 163: A 68-year-old woman presents with a 72-hour history of abdominal distension and vomiting. She has had no flatus or bowel movements for 3 days. Past medical history includes multiple previous caesarean sections. On examination, her abdomen is distended with visible peristalsis, high-pitched tinkling bowel sounds, and a small tender mass in the right groin. What is the most appropriate immediate management?

A. Emergency laparotomy with hernia repair (Correct Answer)
B. Nasogastric decompression and attempt manual reduction
C. CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast
D. Water-soluble contrast study to assess for resolution
E. Conservative management with nil by mouth and IV fluids

Explanation: ***Emergency laparotomy with hernia repair***- The presence of a **tender, irreducible mass** in the right groin, combined with signs of **intestinal obstruction** (abdominal distension, vomiting, no flatus/bowel movements, visible peristalsis, high-pitched tinkling bowel sounds), is highly suggestive of a **strangulated hernia**.- This is a true surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention to assess bowel viability, reduce the hernia, and prevent complications such as **necrosis, perforation, and sepsis**.*Nasogastric decompression and attempt manual reduction*- While **nasogastric decompression** is a supportive measure for bowel obstruction, attempting **manual reduction** of a tender, potentially strangulated hernia is strictly **contraindicated**.- Reducing a necrotic loop of bowel back into the abdominal cavity (reduction en masse) can lead to **peritonitis** and severe clinical deterioration.*CT abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast*- Although a CT scan can confirm the diagnosis and assess the extent of bowel ischemia, the clinical presentation of a **tender groin lump** with signs of obstruction is sufficient for a clinical diagnosis of a strangulated hernia and warrants **immediate surgical intervention**.- Delaying surgery for imaging in a patient with suspected strangulation can lead to **irreversible bowel damage** and increased morbidity and mortality.*Water-soluble contrast study to assess for resolution*- This investigation is primarily used for **partial small bowel obstruction** or to predict the resolution of adhesive obstructions, not for a clear mechanical obstruction due to a hernia.- Utilizing a contrast study in a suspected **strangulated hernia** would inappropriately delay definitive, life-saving surgery.*Conservative management with nil by mouth and IV fluids*- Conservative management (often referred to as 'drip and suck') is appropriate for some cases of **adhesive small bowel obstruction** or paralytic ileus.- However, it is insufficient and dangerous for an **obstructed or strangulated hernia**, which is a mechanical obstruction requiring surgical relief to prevent **bowel gangrene** and reduce mortality.

Question 164: Which anatomical feature best explains why pneumoperitoneum may be absent in approximately 10-20% of patients with proven perforated peptic ulcer?

A. The perforation is posterior and retroperitoneal, preventing intraperitoneal air leak
B. The perforation is very small and has been sealed by fibrin deposition before significant air escapes (Correct Answer)
C. The gastric or duodenal contents are primarily liquid without gas, preventing pneumoperitoneum
D. The patient is examined in supine position preventing air from rising to the diaphragm
E. The perforation occurs in patients on proton pump inhibitors who have reduced gastric gas volume

Explanation: ***The perforation is very small and has been sealed by fibrin deposition before significant air escapes***- In approximately 10-20% of cases, the **perforation site** is small and becomes rapidly occluded by **fibrin**, the **omentum**, or adjacent organs like the liver.- This **self-sealing process** prevents a sufficient volume of gas from entering the **peritoneal cavity**, resulting in a negative finding for **pneumoperitoneum** on imaging.*The perforation is posterior and retroperitoneal, preventing intraperitoneal air leak*- While **posterior duodenal ulcers** can perforate into the **retroperitoneum**, the vast majority of symptomatic clinical perforations are **anterior** and intraperitoneal.- Retroperitoneal gas, if present, would still be visible on imaging but would not classicially present as free air under the diaphragm.*The gastric or duodenal contents are primarily liquid without gas, preventing pneumoperitoneum*- The **gastric lumen** almost always contains some volume of **swallowed air** or gas produced by acid catalysis, regardless of the liquid diet.- It only takes a very small volume of gas (as little as 1-2 mL) to be visible as **free air** on a high-quality chest X-ray.*The patient is examined in supine position preventing air from rising to the diaphragm*- While **supine positioning** may hide air under the diaphragm on plain films, **pneumoperitoneum** would still be detectable as the **Rigler sign** or via CT scan.- This is a limitation of the **radiographic technique** rather than an anatomical explanation for the total absence of air leakage.*The perforation occurs in patients on proton pump inhibitors who have reduced gastric gas volume*- **Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)** reduce gastric acid secretion but do not significantly alter the amount of **swallowed atmospheric air** in the stomach.- There is no clinical evidence that **PPI therapy** correlates with a decreased incidence of visible **pneumoperitoneum** in the event of a hollow viscus injury.

Question 165: A 59-year-old man presents with a 24-hour history of progressively worsening central abdominal pain. He has a history of previous open appendicectomy 30 years ago. He describes the pain as initially cramping but now constant. Examination shows moderate distension with generalized tenderness and guarding. CT abdomen shows dilated small bowel loops with transition point in the right lower quadrant, small volume free fluid, and a 'C-shaped' or 'coffee bean' configuration of a loop of small bowel. What finding on CT would most strongly indicate the need for immediate surgical intervention?

A. Presence of small bowel faeces sign proximal to obstruction
B. Small bowel diameter greater than 4 cm
C. Reduced or absent enhancement of the bowel wall with mesenteric swirl sign (Correct Answer)
D. Moderate free fluid in the peritoneal cavity
E. Small bowel wall thickening greater than 3 mm

Explanation: ***Reduced or absent enhancement of the bowel wall with mesenteric swirl sign*** - The **mesenteric swirl sign** is highly indicative of a **volvulus**, leading to a **closed-loop obstruction** and rapid vascular compromise. - **Reduced or absent bowel wall enhancement** on CT is a critical sign of **bowel ischemia or infarction**, which necessitates immediate surgical intervention to prevent necrosis and perforation. *Presence of small bowel faeces sign proximal to obstruction* - This sign indicates **stasis** and undigested contents proximal to the obstruction, often seen in **chronic or prolonged obstructions**. - While confirming obstruction, it does not directly signal acute **bowel ischemia** or an immediate need for surgery. *Small bowel diameter greater than 4 cm* - A dilated small bowel (typically >2.5-3 cm) confirms the presence of an **obstruction**. - However, **bowel dilation** alone does not differentiate between a simple mechanical obstruction and one complicated by **strangulation or ischemia**. *Moderate free fluid in the peritoneal cavity* - **Peritoneal free fluid** can be present in both simple and complicated small bowel obstructions, often due to **venous congestion** or inflammatory exudate. - It is a **non-specific finding** that increases suspicion but is not a definitive indicator of **bowel ischemia** requiring emergency surgery. *Small bowel wall thickening greater than 3 mm* - **Bowel wall thickening** can be caused by **edema**, inflammation, or venous congestion, all of which can occur in both simple and complicated obstructions. - While concerning, it is less specific for irreversible **bowel ischemia** than a lack of enhancement or pneumatosis.

Question 166: Which of the following clinical features is most specific for differentiating between simple and strangulated small bowel obstruction in the early stages?

A. Presence of colicky abdominal pain
B. Persistent localized tenderness with peritonism in a specific area (Correct Answer)
C. Absence of bowel sounds
D. Presence of abdominal distension
E. Elevated white cell count above 15 × 10⁹/L

Explanation: ***Persistent localized tenderness with peritonism in a specific area*** - In the early stages, **localized tenderness** and **peritoneal signs** indicate focal ischemia or necrosis of the bowel wall, which is the hallmark of **strangulation**. - Simple obstruction typically presents with **visceral pain** that is diffuse, whereas focal peritonism suggests an inflammatory response from **compromised blood supply**. *Presence of colicky abdominal pain* - **Colicky pain** is a cardinal feature of both simple and strangulated obstruction due to **hyperperistalsis** early in the disease process. - It cannot be used as a specific differentiator because the intermittent nature of the pain is common to any **mechanical blockage**. *Absence of bowel sounds* - While **absent bowel sounds** (silent abdomen) may occur in late-stage strangulation or ileus, they are not a reliable early specific indicator of **ischemia**. - Simple obstruction often presents with **high-pitched** or 'tinkling' bowel sounds, but their absence is non-specific for the type of obstruction. *Presence of abdominal distension* - **Abdominal distension** is a general sign of intestinal obstruction caused by the accumulation of **gas and fluid** proximal to the site of blockage. - The degree of distension depends more on the **level of the obstruction** (distal vs. proximal) than on whether the bowel is strangulated. *Elevated white cell count above 15 × 10⁹/L* - **Leukocytosis** can suggest strangulation, but it is often a **late finding** and can be elevated in simple obstruction due to dehydration or stress. - A normal white cell count does not reliably rule out **strangulated bowel**, making it less clinically specific than physical exam findings in early stages.

Question 167: A 44-year-old woman with systemic lupus erythematosus on long-term prednisolone 20 mg daily presents with a 12-hour history of severe generalized abdominal pain. She has been feeling unwell for 3 days with nausea. On examination, she has mild generalized tenderness but no significant guarding or rebound. Temperature is 37.4°C, heart rate 98 bpm. WCC is 9.5 × 10⁹/L, CRP 45 mg/L. CT abdomen shows free intraperitoneal air but minimal fluid and no obvious perforation site. What is the most likely underlying diagnosis?

A. Perforated gastric ulcer
B. Perforated colonic diverticulitis
C. Perforated duodenal ulcer
D. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with pneumoperitoneum
E. Perforated small bowel due to lupus vasculitis or ischaemia (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Perforated small bowel due to lupus vasculitis or ischaemia*** - Patients with **Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)** are at significant risk for **mesenteric vasculitis**, which can lead to bowel ischaemia, infarction, and subsequent perforation. - Long-term **corticosteroid use** (prednisolone 20 mg daily) can profoundly **mask the classic peritoneal signs** (guarding, rebound tenderness) and blunt the inflammatory response (relatively normal WCC, mild CRP elevation), even in the presence of free intraperitoneal air, fitting the atypical clinical presentation. *Perforated gastric ulcer* - While **long-term steroids** increase the risk of peptic ulcers, gastric perforations typically cause more localized and severe epigastric pain with more pronounced peritoneal signs. - They also often present with a larger amount of **intraperitoneal fluid** or a more obvious perforation site on CT, which was not described here. *Perforated colonic diverticulitis* - This condition usually presents with **localized pain in the left lower quadrant** and often results in more significant inflammatory changes, abscess formation, or gross fecal contamination on imaging. - The generalized abdominal pain, minimal fluid, and absence of an obvious perforation site on CT are less consistent with a typical diverticular perforation. *Perforated duodenal ulcer* - Duodenal perforations are characterized by a sudden onset of **excruciating upper abdominal pain** and frequently a **board-like rigidity** of the abdomen due to intense chemical peritonitis. - While they cause significant pneumoperitoneum, the presentation of generalized mild tenderness and lack of significant guarding is less typical even with steroid use. *Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis with pneumoperitoneum* - **Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP)** is an infection of ascitic fluid, primarily seen in patients with cirrhosis, and is **not associated with pneumoperitoneum** (free intraperitoneal air). - The presence of **free air on CT abdomen definitively indicates a hollow viscus perforation**, ruling out SBP as the underlying cause for the patient's condition.

Question 168: What is the definition of 'third space' fluid loss in the context of acute surgical presentations, and which condition is most characteristically associated with massive third spacing?

A. Loss of intravascular fluid into the interstitial space; most characteristic in acute pancreatitis
B. Loss of fluid via gastrointestinal tract; most characteristic in bowel obstruction
C. Loss of fluid into non-functional extracellular compartments; most characteristic in acute pancreatitis (Correct Answer)
D. Loss of fluid through evaporation during surgery; most characteristic in emergency laparotomy
E. Loss of intracellular fluid into the extracellular space; most characteristic in sepsis

Explanation: ***Loss of fluid into non-functional extracellular compartments; most characteristic in acute pancreatitis***- **Third space loss** refers to fluid shifting from the functional extracellular fluid (ECF) compartments (intravascular and interstitial) into **non-functional spaces** where it is trapped and unavailable for circulation.- **Acute pancreatitis** is a prime example, causing severe inflammation and increased capillary permeability, leading to massive fluid sequestration into the **retroperitoneum** and **peritoneal cavity**, often necessitating aggressive fluid resuscitation.*Loss of intravascular fluid into the interstitial space; most characteristic in acute pancreatitis*- This definition describes **edema**, which is a shift within the functional extracellular fluid between the intravascular and interstitial spaces, not into a non-functional 'third' space.- While **acute pancreatitis** causes both edema and true third spacing, this option's definition of third spacing is too narrow and inaccurate.*Loss of fluid via gastrointestinal tract; most characteristic in bowel obstruction*- Fluid loss through the gastrointestinal tract (e.g., vomiting, diarrhea) is considered an **external loss** from the body, not a sequestration within a third space.- In **bowel obstruction**, third spacing specifically refers to fluid accumulating *within* the dilated bowel lumen and edematous bowel wall, which is internal and unavailable, not simply lost externally.*Loss of fluid through evaporation during surgery; most characteristic in emergency laparotomy*- **Evaporative loss** is an insensible fluid loss *from* the body surface or exposed organs during surgery, which is distinct from internal fluid sequestration.- While significant in **emergency laparotomy**, it is a direct loss to the environment and does not involve fluid trapping in a non-functional internal compartment.*Loss of intracellular fluid into the extracellular space; most characteristic in sepsis*- This describes a shift between the **intracellular fluid (ICF)** and **extracellular fluid (ECF)** compartments, often seen in cellular injury or altered osmolality.- While **sepsis** causes significant fluid shifts, including capillary leak and generalized edema (interstitial fluid increase), it is not primarily defined by a direct loss of intracellular fluid into a 'third space' compartment, but rather by widespread ECF redistribution and increased permeability.

Question 169: A 54-year-old man presents with a 6-hour history of sudden onset severe upper abdominal pain. He has a history of chronic pancreatitis and alcohol excess. On examination, he is tachycardic at 115 bpm, temperature 37.2°C, and has generalized peritonism. Erect chest X-ray shows no free air under the diaphragm. CT abdomen shows extensive free fluid and fat stranding around the pancreas, but no definite perforation. Serum amylase is 245 U/L (normal <100). What is the most likely explanation for the absence of pneumoperitoneum?

A. There is no perforation and the patient has severe acute pancreatitis with peritonitis from pancreatic enzymes (Correct Answer)
B. Perforation has been sealed by omentum preventing air leak
C. The perforation is retroperitoneal rather than intraperitoneal
D. Free air is present but not visible on plain radiography and would be detected on CT
E. The patient has mesenteric ischaemia rather than perforation

Explanation: ***There is no perforation and the patient has severe acute pancreatitis with peritonitis from pancreatic enzymes***- The clinical presentation of **generalized peritonism** and severe abdominal pain, in a patient with a history of **chronic pancreatitis** and **alcohol excess**, is highly consistent with **severe acute pancreatitis**.- The CT findings of **extensive free fluid** and **fat stranding around the pancreas** with **no definite perforation** and **no free air** strongly support a diagnosis of chemical peritonitis from pancreatic enzyme leakage, rather than a hollow viscus perforation.*Perforation has been sealed by omentum preventing air leak*- While a **sealed perforation** can limit air leakage, the CT scan, which is highly sensitive, showed **no definite perforation** or any localized air, making this unlikely.- Furthermore, a sealed perforation typically leads to **localized peritonism**, whereas the patient presents with **generalized peritonism**.*The perforation is retroperitoneal rather than intraperitoneal*- A **retroperitoneal perforation**, such as from a posterior duodenal ulcer, would typically present with **retroperitoneal gas** on CT, which was not described in this case.- Symptoms would also likely be more localized to the back or flank, rather than the **generalized peritonism** observed.*Free air is present but not visible on plain radiography and would be detected on CT*- The prompt explicitly states that **no free air** was seen on erect chest X-ray AND the **CT abdomen** showed **no definite perforation**.- CT is highly sensitive for detecting **pneumoperitoneum**, even small amounts, making it highly improbable that free air is present but undetected by CT.*The patient has mesenteric ischaemia rather than perforation*- **Mesenteric ischaemia** typically presents with severe pain that is often **out of proportion** to initial physical findings, not necessarily immediate **generalized peritonism**.- The presence of **peripancreatic fat stranding** and **extensive free fluid** on CT, combined with the history of **chronic pancreatitis** and **alcohol excess**, points strongly to a pancreatic etiology rather than primary mesenteric ischaemia.

Question 170: A 67-year-old woman with known colorectal cancer presents with a 48-hour history of abdominal pain, distension, and absolute constipation. CT abdomen shows dilated large bowel proximal to a stenosing lesion in the sigmoid colon with caecal diameter of 10 cm. The caecum appears viable with no free fluid. She is haemodynamically stable. What is the most appropriate initial management?

A. Emergency Hartmann's procedure
B. Endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stent followed by elective resection (Correct Answer)
C. Emergency subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy
D. Emergency sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis
E. Percutaneous caecostomy followed by staged resection

Explanation: ***Endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stent followed by elective resection***- In patients with **malignant large bowel obstruction** who are haemodynamically stable and lack signs of **perforation**, a **self-expanding metal stent (SEMS)** acts as a successful bridge to surgery.- This approach allows for **preoperative optimization**, full staging, and transition from an emergency procedure to an **elective single-stage resection** with primary anastomosis.*Emergency Hartmann's procedure*- This involves **sigmoid resection** and the creation of an **end colostomy**, requiring a second major operation for reversal.- It is associated with higher **morbidity and mortality** compared to elective procedures and is typically reserved for cases with **perforation or peritonitis**.*Emergency subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy*- This procedure is generally indicated for **right-sided obstructions**, synchronous tumors, or when there is **caecal perforation** or necrosis.- Since the **caecum is viable** and the obstruction is distal, such an extensive resection is not the primary choice for stable patients.*Emergency sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis*- Performing a **primary anastomosis** in the setting of an **unprepared, dilated bowel** carries a significantly higher risk of **anastomotic leak**.- Most surgeons avoid this in the emergency setting unless **on-table colonic lavage** is performed, and even then, stenting is the preferred modern bridge.*Percutaneous caecostomy followed by staged resection*- **Percutaneous caecostomy** is a technically difficult procedure that is rarely used in modern surgical practice for **mechanical obstruction**.- It does not address the primary lesion and has been largely superseded by **endoscopic stenting** or formal surgical diversion.

Practice by Chapter

Acute abdomen

Practice Questions

Bowel obstruction

Practice Questions

GI perforation

Practice Questions

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free