Fluid given in first 8 hours to a 28 years old woman with 50 kg weight having burns on both lower limbs?
Which of the following is not true about resuscitation in burns patients?
A lady with 50% TBSA burn with involvement of dermis and subcutaneous tissue came to the emergency department. The burns will be classified as:
Parkland's formula is used to calculate the fluid replacement to be given in the first 24 hours in a case of deep burns. What is the Parkland formula?
Escharotomies are required in which degree/type of burns:
Curling ulcer is seen in:
In an accident involving potential cervical spine damage, the first line of management is:
A 17-year-old boy is admitted to the hospital after a road traffic accident. Per abdomen examination is normal. After adequate resuscitation, his pulse rate is 80/min and BP is 110/70 mm Hg. Abdominal CT reveals a laceration in the left lobe of the liver extending from the dome more than half way through the parenchyma. Appropriate management at this time would be:
In which of the following conditions is neurosurgery not indicated?
All of the following are causes of death in burn patients except
Explanation: ***3600 ml*** - Both lower limbs account for **36% TBSA deep burns** (18% for each leg). Using the Parkland formula (4mL x Body weight (kg) x %TBSA burned) gives 4mL x 50kg x 36% = **7200 mL total fluid** for the first 24 hours. - Half of the total fluid (7200 mL / 2 = 3600 mL) should be administered in the **first 8 hours** following the burn injury. *950 ml* - This amount is significantly less than the calculated fluid requirement for a patient with deep burns over 36% TBSA, which would lead to **under-resuscitation** and potential burn shock. - Inadequate fluid resuscitation can result in **organ hypoperfusion** and increased mortality in burn patients. *1900 ml* - While a substantial amount, 1900 mL is still less than half of the calculated 24-hour fluid requirement, meaning this would still lead to **under-resuscitation** in the critical initial 8-hour window. - This represents roughly a quarter of the total 24-hour fluid, which is insufficient for the **initial rapid fluid shift** seen in severe burns. *7400 ml* - This amount represents more than the entire 24-hour fluid requirement according to the Parkland formula (7200 mL). Administering this much fluid in the first 8 hours would lead to **over-resuscitation**. - **Over-resuscitation (fluid creep)** can cause complications such as pulmonary edema, abdominal compartment syndrome, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Explanation: ***Quantity of crystalloid needed is calculated using the Parkland formula - 6 mL/kg body weight per % of the total body surface area burnt.*** - The **Parkland formula** is **4 mL/kg/%TBSA burned**, not 6 mL/kg/%TBSA. This formula is used to calculate the total fluid needed in the first 24 hours (half in the first 8 hours, remaining half in the next 16 hours). - This incorrect statement makes this the correct answer to the "not true" question. - The correct formula helps estimate intravenous fluid requirements to maintain adequate organ perfusion and prevent burn shock. *Target mean arterial pressure in resuscitation is 60 mmHg.* - This statement is TRUE. The target mean arterial pressure (MAP) in burn resuscitation is usually **60-70 mmHg** in adults to ensure adequate organ perfusion. - A MAP of ≥60 mmHg is the standard threshold for maintaining perfusion to vital organs during resuscitation. *Ringer's lactate is the preferred crystalloid solution.* - This statement is TRUE. **Ringer's lactate (Hartmann's solution)** is the preferred crystalloid for burn resuscitation due to its balanced electrolyte composition. - It closely mimics extracellular fluid and helps prevent hyperchloremic acidosis that can occur with large volumes of normal saline. *Fluid shift from intravascular to extravascular compartment in the burns patient is maximum in the first 24 hours.* - This statement is TRUE. The peak period for **capillary leak** and fluid shift into the extravascular space occurs within the first 8-24 hours post-burn. - This massive fluid shift leads to edema formation and is the reason aggressive fluid resuscitation is needed during this critical period.
Explanation: ***3rd degree burn*** - **Third-degree burns** involve the entire thickness of the skin (dermis and epidermis) and often extend into the **subcutaneous tissue**, muscle, or bone. - These burns typically appear dry, leathery, and often lack pain sensation due to nerve destruction. *2nd degree superficial* - **Superficial second-degree burns** involve the epidermis and the superficial part of the dermis, often presenting with **blisters** and painful, red, moist skin. - They do not extend to the subcutaneous tissue, which is a key feature of the burn described. *2nd degree deep* - **Deep second-degree burns** involve the epidermis and deeper layers of the dermis, but not the entire dermis or subcutaneous tissue. - While they can be less painful and appear dry, the involvement of **subcutaneous tissue** pushes the classification to third-degree. *1st degree* - **First-degree burns** only affect the epidermis, causing redness and pain but **no blistering** or damage to deeper layers. - These are typically sunburns or minor scalds and do not involve the dermis or subcutaneous tissue.
Explanation: ***TBSA x weight in kg x 4*** - Parkland's formula calculates the **total fluid replacement during the first 24 hours** post-burn as 4 mL of Ringer's Lactate per kilogram of body weight per percentage of **total body surface area (TBSA)** burned. - Half of the calculated volume is administered within the first 8 hours, and the remaining half over the next 16 hours. *TBSA x weight in kg x 2* - This value represents half of the recommended fluid volume using the Parkland formula, and would be insufficient for total 24-hour resuscitation. - Inadequate fluid resuscitation can lead to **burn shock**, characterized by hypoperfusion and organ dysfunction. *TBSA x weight in kg x 3* - This multiplier falls short of the recommended 4 mL/kg/TBSA for comprehensive fluid resuscitation in adults. - Using this formula could result in undertreatment, potentially compromising tissue perfusion and increasing the risk of complications. *TBSA x weight in kg* - This formula represents one-fourth of the recommended fluid volume according to the Parkland formula. - This significantly inadequate fluid replacement would lead to severe **hypovolemia**, organ failure, and a very poor prognosis.
Explanation: ***3rd degree (full thickness)*** - **Full-thickness burns** destroy all layers of the skin, including nerve endings, making the burn site **insensate** and forming a tough, non-elastic eschar. - This **rigid eschar** can impair circulation, especially in circumferential burns, and restrict ventilation in thoracic burns, necessitating **escharotomies** to relieve pressure and restore blood flow or breathing. *1st degree* - **First-degree burns** only affect the epidermis, causing redness and mild pain without blistering; they do not form a constricting eschar. - These burns heal spontaneously within a few days and do not require surgical intervention like **escharotomies**. *Electrical* - **Electrical burns** can cause deep tissue damage and internal organ injury, but the primary concern is often cardiac arrhythmias and deep tissue necrosis rather than a constricting eschar that requires escharotomy. - While they can lead to full-thickness skin damage, **escharotomy** is performed if a full thickness burn with constricting eschar. The primary reason for escharotomy is the nature of the burn not its cause. *2nd degree superficial* - **Superficial partial-thickness burns** involve the epidermis and superficial dermis, causing blisters, pain, and redness, but the skin remains pliable and does not form a constricting eschar. - These burns typically heal without scarring and do not require **escharotomies**.
Explanation: ***Burn*** - **Curling's ulcer** is a type of acute peptic ulcer that can develop in the **duodenum** in patients suffering from severe burns. - It is believed to be caused by **ischemia** due to reduced plasma volume and systemic vasoconstriction following the burn injury, leading to decreased blood flow to the gastrointestinal tract. *Corticosteroids* - Corticosteroid use can increase the risk of **peptic ulcer disease** by impairing mucosal defense and inhibiting prostaglandin synthesis. - However, the ulcers associated with corticosteroids are not specifically termed Curling's ulcers; this term is reserved for ulcers caused by severe burns. *TPN* - Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) itself does not directly cause specific ulcers like Curling's ulcers. - Complications of TPN can include issues like **cholestasis** or **catheter-related infections**, but not acute stress ulcers. *Head injury* - Acute gastric ulcers that can develop after a severe head injury or other central nervous system trauma are known as **Cushing's ulcers**. - These ulcers are thought to be caused by **increased vagal stimulation** and excessive gastric acid secretion.
Explanation: ***Correct: Maintain airway*** - In trauma management, the **ATLS protocol** follows the **A-B-C-D-E** approach where **Airway is the first priority** - In suspected cervical spine injury, airway management is performed **with concurrent cervical spine protection** (using jaw thrust maneuver instead of head tilt-chin lift) - A compromised airway leads to death within minutes, making it the **immediate first-line intervention** - **Cervical spine stabilization is performed simultaneously** during airway assessment and management, not as a separate preceding step - The correct approach: **"Airway with cervical spine protection"** - both are done together, but airway assessment/management takes priority *Incorrect: Stabilize the cervical spine* - While **cervical spine stabilization** is critical and must be maintained throughout trauma management, it is **not performed before airway assessment** - Manual inline stabilization and cervical collar application are done **during** airway management, not before it - ATLS teaches that C-spine protection is **integrated into** airway management, not a separate first step *Incorrect: X-ray* - **X-ray** is a diagnostic tool performed after initial stabilization and resuscitation - Imaging is part of the **secondary survey**, not primary trauma management - Never delay life-saving interventions for diagnostic studies *Incorrect: Turn head to side* - **Turning the head** is absolutely contraindicated in suspected cervical spine injury - Any movement can convert an unstable fracture into a **complete spinal cord injury** - If airway management is needed, use **jaw thrust** or **chin lift without head tilt**
Explanation: ***Conservative treatment*** - The patient is **hemodynamically stable** after resuscitation, with normal vital signs (pulse 80/min, BP 110/70 mm Hg), and his abdominal exam is normal despite a liver laceration. - A laceration extending more than halfway through the left hepatic lobe represents a **Grade III liver injury**. In hemodynamically stable patients, non-operative management is the preferred approach for most blunt liver injuries, including Grade III injuries, with success rates exceeding 90%. - Conservative management includes **serial clinical monitoring**, hemoglobin checks, and repeat imaging if needed, with intervention only if the patient deteriorates. *Abdominal exploration and packing of hepatic wounds* - This aggressive approach is typically reserved for patients with **hemodynamic instability** due to ongoing hemorrhage from liver trauma or those who fail non-operative management. - Perihepatic packing is a damage control technique for severe, uncontrolled bleeding, but it is not indicated for a stable patient as it comes with risks including **infection**, abdominal compartment syndrome, and the need for re-operation. *Abdominal exploration and ligation of left hepatic artery* - Hepatic artery ligation is a measure used to control **severe arterial bleeding** from hepatic injuries, usually via angioembolization (preferred) or surgical ligation in highly unstable patients after other methods have failed. - While the liver has a dual blood supply (hepatic artery and portal vein), this intervention carries risks of hepatic **necrosis** and abscess formation, which are unwarranted in a stable patient suitable for conservative management. *Left hepatectomy* - **Resective surgery** like hepatectomy is indicated for severe and complex liver injuries involving massive tissue destruction, complete devascularization, or injuries to major intrahepatic vessels causing persistent hemorrhage despite other interventions. - This patient's stable hemodynamics make major surgical resection unnecessary and inappropriate, as hepatectomy carries significant **morbidity and mortality** (10-20% mortality rate for major hepatic resections in trauma).
Explanation: ***Diffuse axonal injury (DAI)*** - Neurosurgery is generally **not indicated** for diffuse axonal injury because the primary damage involves widespread shearing of axons throughout the white matter, rather than a focal, surgically accessible lesion. - Management of DAI is primarily **supportive**, focusing on managing intracranial pressure and optimizing cerebral perfusion, as there is no specific surgical intervention to reverse the axonal damage. *Subdural hematoma (SDH)* - Surgical intervention, such as a **craniotomy** or **burr hole drainage**, is often indicated for acute or subacute subdural hematomas, especially when they are large, causing mass effect, or leading to neurological deterioration. - The goal of surgery is to **evacuate the blood clot** and relieve pressure on the brain. *Epidural hematoma (EDH)* - **Epidural hematomas** are typically surgical emergencies that require urgent craniotomy for evacuation of the hematoma to relieve pressure on the brain. - This is due to their rapid development and tendency to cause significant **mass effect** and brain herniation. *Intracerebral hemorrhage* - Neurosurgery may be indicated for certain types of **intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH)**, particularly those that are superficial, large, causing significant mass effect, or located in a surgically accessible area. - The decision for surgery often depends on the **size and location of the bleed**, the patient's neurological status, and the risk of further deterioration.
Explanation: ***Hyponatremia*** - While **hyponatremia** can occur in burn patients due to fluid shifts or inappropriate ADH secretion, it is rarely a direct cause of death on its own. - Severe hyponatremia would typically need to be profound and uncorrected to be lethal, and other major burn complications are more immediate and common causes of mortality. *ARDS* - **Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)** is a severe and common complication in burn patients, often due to smoke inhalation injury or systemic inflammation. - It leads to profound **hypoxemia** and is a significant cause of mortality in both early and late stages of burn care. *Sepsis* - **Sepsis** is a leading cause of death in burn patients, especially with extensive burns, due to the loss of skin barrier function and increased susceptibility to infection. - The systemic inflammatory response and subsequent **multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS)** are often fatal. *Shock* - **Hypovolemic shock** is a prominent cause of early death in severely burned patients due to massive fluid loss from the burn wound. - Other forms of shock, such as **distributive (septic) shock**, can also occur later and contribute significantly to overall mortality.
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free