Rights and Duties of Medical Practitioners — MCQs
Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) addresses the issue of medical negligence?
False about MTP is -
Medical etiquette is related to:
The onus of proof in civil negligence case against a doctor lies with:
A patient died during surgery. The relatives allege that death was due to negligence, According to a recent Supreme Court judgment, doctor can be charged for Medical Negligence under section 304-A, only if:
McNaughton's rule relates to?
A doctor is not held guilty of negligence if
In civil negligence, onus of proof lies on -
Death of a patient due to an unintentional act by a doctor, staff or hospital is
Which article of the Indian Constitution allows the state to intervene in cases of hunger strikes to protect the right to life?
Rights and Duties of Medical Practitioners Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Question 1: Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) addresses the issue of medical negligence?
- A. Section 304A of IPC (Correct Answer)
- B. Section 299 of IPC
- C. Section 304 of IPC
- D. Section 302 of IPC
Explanation: ***Section 304A of IPC*** - This section deals with **causing death by negligence** and is the primary section under which cases of medical negligence resulting in death are prosecuted. - It prescribes punishment for acts that cause death through a rash or negligent act not amounting to **culpable homicide**. *Section 299 of IPC* - This section defines **culpable homicide**, which involves causing death with the intention of causing death or bodily injury likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death. - This is a more severe charge than negligence and typically does not apply to cases of medical negligence unless there was clear intent or gross reckless disregard for life. *Section 304 of IPC* - This section deals with the **punishment for culpable homicide not amounting to murder**. - It applies when the act falls under the definition of culpable homicide (Section 299) but does not meet the criteria for murder (Section 300). *Section 302 of IPC* - This section addresses the **punishment for murder**, which is the most severe form of unlawful killing. - Murder involves specific intentions or knowledge, as described in Section 300, and is not relevant to medical negligence cases.
Question 2: False about MTP is -
- A. Requires opinion of at least two registered medical practitioners when pregnancy exceeds 12 weeks
- B. Consent of husband is must (Correct Answer)
- C. >16 weeks, hysterotomy can be done
- D. Illegal if >20 weeks of pregnancy
Explanation: ***Consent of husband is must*** - The **Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act** (amended in 2021) in India explicitly states that **only the consent of the pregnant woman** is required for an abortion. - The husband's consent is **not legally necessary** and cannot be a barrier to accessing MTP services. - **This statement is FALSE**, making it the correct answer to this negation question. *Requires opinion of at least two registered medical practitioners when pregnancy exceeds 12 weeks* - This statement is **TRUE**; for pregnancies between **12 and 20 weeks**, the opinion of **two registered medical practitioners** is required. - For pregnancies between **20 and 24 weeks**, two registered medical practitioners are required for specific vulnerable categories of women. *>16 weeks, hysterotomy can be done* - **Hysterotomy** is a surgical procedure similar to a mini-C-section, used in specific cases for MTP, often in later gestations or when other methods are contraindicated. - While exact gestational limits vary by clinical judgment and local regulations, it is indeed a method considered for **later second-trimester terminations**, including those beyond 16 weeks, under proper medical indication. - **This statement is TRUE**. *Illegal if >20 weeks of pregnancy* - This statement was largely true under the **MTP Act of 1971**, which set the upper limit for MTP at 20 weeks. - However, the **MTP (Amendment) Act of 2021** has expanded this limit, allowing termination up to **24 weeks for specific categories of women** and in cases of substantial fetal abnormalities, there is **no upper gestational limit** for termination. - **This statement is now FALSE** as per the 2021 amendments, though it requires contextual understanding.
Question 3: Medical etiquette is related to:
- A. Legal obligations of doctors
- B. Professional guidelines for doctors
- C. Courtesy observed between doctors (Correct Answer)
- D. Ethical principles guiding doctors
Explanation: ***Courtesy observed between doctors*** - **Medical etiquette** refers to the code of conduct and conventional rules governing **professional courtesy and behavior between medical practitioners**. - It encompasses the proper way doctors should interact with their **professional colleagues**, including referral practices, respecting each other's patients, and maintaining professional dignity. - This is the classical and specific definition of medical etiquette as taught in forensic medicine and medical jurisprudence. *Professional guidelines for doctors* - This term is **too broad and vague** as it could encompass ethics, etiquette, legal obligations, and clinical protocols. - While etiquette is part of professional conduct, this option lacks the specificity that defines medical etiquette as **interpersonal courtesy among doctors**. *Legal obligations of doctors* - These relate to **medical jurisprudence** and include legally binding duties like maintaining confidentiality, obtaining informed consent, and following medicolegal procedures. - Legal obligations are enforced by law, whereas etiquette deals with **conventional professional courtesy**, not legal mandates. *Ethical principles guiding doctors* - **Medical ethics** encompasses broader moral principles like beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice. - Ethics provides the philosophical and moral framework for medical practice, while etiquette is specifically about **conventional rules of professional behavior and courtesy** between doctors.
Question 4: The onus of proof in civil negligence case against a doctor lies with:
- A. Hospital administration
- B. Patient (Correct Answer)
- C. Doctor
- D. Medical board
Explanation: ***Patient*** - In civil negligence cases, the **plaintiff** (the patient, in this context) bears the **onus of proof**, meaning they must demonstrate that the doctor was negligent. - The patient must establish **duty of care**, **breach of that duty**, **causation** of injury due to the breach, and actual **damages**. *Hospital administration* - The hospital administration might be named as a co-defendant, but the primary burden of proving negligence against the doctor still rests with the patient. - Their liability would usually be **vicarious** (for the actions of employees) or for institutional failures, not for proving individual doctor negligence. *Doctor* - The doctor is the **defendant** in a civil negligence case and is presumed innocent until proven otherwise. - The doctor's role is to **defend** against the allegations, not to prove their own innocence of negligence. *Medical board* - A medical board is a **regulatory body** responsible for licensing and discipline, not for adjudicating civil negligence claims. - They conduct investigations into professional misconduct, but this is separate from the **burden of proof** in a civil lawsuit.
Question 5: A patient died during surgery. The relatives allege that death was due to negligence, According to a recent Supreme Court judgment, doctor can be charged for Medical Negligence under section 304-A, only if:
- A. There is corporate negligence
- B. Negligence is from inadvertent error
- C. There is gross negligence (Correct Answer)
- D. It falls under the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur
Explanation: ***There is gross negligence*** - A doctor can be charged with medical negligence under **Section 304-A** of the IPC only if there is evidence of **gross negligence** or recklessness. - This implies a high degree of carelessness or an extreme departure from the recognized standards of medical practice, indicating a **want of due care and caution**. *There is corporate negligence* - **Corporate negligence** refers to the liability of a hospital or healthcare organization for failing to provide appropriate care, which is distinct from individual criminal liability of a doctor under Section 304-A. - While corporate negligence can lead to civil actions, it does not directly lead to **criminal charges** against an individual doctor under Section 304-A. *Negligence is from inadvertent error* - An **inadvertent error** or a mere mistake, without gross negligence, typically does not warrant criminal prosecution under Section 304-A of the IPC. - This section requires a higher degree of culpability than simple negligence for criminal charges. *It falls under the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur* - The doctrine of **Res Ipsa Loquitur** ("the thing speaks for itself") is primarily used in **civil cases** to infer negligence when the cause of harm is clearly within the defendant's control and would not typically occur without negligence. - While it can help establish negligence in civil proceedings, it is generally **not sufficient** on its own to establish the gross negligence required for criminal charges under Section 304-A.
Question 6: McNaughton's rule relates to?
- A. Medical negligence
- B. Criminal responsibility of insane (Correct Answer)
- C. Inquest
- D. Professional secrecy
Explanation: ***Criminal responsibility of insane*** - **McNaughton's rule** (also spelled M'Naghten rule) is a legal test for criminal insanity, stating that a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity if, at the time of committing the act, they were suffering from a **defect of reason, from disease of the mind**, as not to know the nature and quality of the act they were doing, or if they did know it, that they did not know what they were doing was wrong. - This rule establishes the criteria for determining whether an individual's mental state at the time of a crime exempts them from **criminal responsibility**. *Medical negligence* - **Medical negligence** involves a healthcare professional's failure to provide care that meets the accepted standard, resulting in harm to a patient. - This concept is governed by principles such as the **Bolam test** or the **Bolitho test** in various jurisdictions, not McNaughton's rule. *Inquest* - An **inquest** is a judicial inquiry to ascertain the facts concerning an incident, especially a death, often conducted by a coroner. - It focuses on determining the **cause of death** and the circumstances surrounding it, not on the criminal responsibility of an accused. *Professional secrecy* - **Professional secrecy** (or confidentiality) refers to the ethical and legal obligation of professionals, including medical practitioners, to protect sensitive information shared by their clients or patients. - This principle is governed by **ethical codes** and **data protection laws**, not by McNaughton's rule.
Question 7: A doctor is not held guilty of negligence if
- A. He has not obtained informed consent from patient
- B. He has exercised reasonable care and skill (Correct Answer)
- C. Others suffer disease from his patient
- D. He fails to give proper instructions
Explanation: ***He has exercised reasonable care and skill*** - A doctor is not held guilty of **negligence** if they have acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art (**Bolam test**). - This implies employing the **degree of care, diligence, and skill** that a reasonably competent practitioner would use under similar circumstances. *He has not obtained informed consent from patient* - Failure to obtain **informed consent** can lead to liability for **battery** (unlawful touching) or negligence, especially if the patient can prove they would not have undergone the procedure had they been properly informed of the risks. - Ethical and legal standards mandate that patients provide **voluntary, informed consent** before medical interventions. *Others suffer disease from his patient* - A doctor's primary responsibility is to their patient; however, there are situations where a **duty to warn** third parties exists, especially in cases of foreseeable harm from a communicable disease or dangerous psychiatric patient. - Failure to warn when such a **duty is established** could lead to negligence claims if specific harm to identifiable third parties occurs. *He fails to give proper instructions* - Providing **clear and adequate post-operative or post-treatment instructions** is a fundamental part of a doctor's duty of care. - Failure to give proper instructions can result in **patient harm** and can be grounds for a negligence claim if it leads to complications or a poor outcome.
Question 8: In civil negligence, onus of proof lies on -
- A. Police not below the level of sub inspector
- B. Judicial first degree magistrate
- C. Patients (Correct Answer)
- D. Doctor
Explanation: ***Patients*** - In civil negligence cases, the **onus of proof** (burden of proof) generally lies with the **plaintiff**, who is the patient (or their legal representatives) alleging negligence. - The patient must demonstrate that the doctor owed a **duty of care**, breached that duty, and this breach directly caused their **injury** or harm. *Police not below the level of sub inspector* - The police are primarily involved in **criminal investigations** and maintaining law and order, not typically in initiating civil negligence claims or bearing the burden of proof in such cases. - Their role in medical matters would usually be restricted to investigating potential **criminal acts**, such as severe assault or malpractice leading to death, rather than civil negligence. *Judicial first degree magistrate* - A magistrate is a **judicial officer** who presides over minor legal proceedings and preliminary matters, primarily in criminal cases. - Magistrates are members of the judiciary and are responsible for **adjudicating** cases, not for initiating or proving negligence claims themselves. *Doctor* - While the doctor is the **defendant** in a medical negligence case, they do not bear the initial **onus of proof** to show they were not negligent. - The doctor may have to present evidence to **rebut** the patient's claims, but the primary burden remains on the patient to establish negligence.
Question 9: Death of a patient due to an unintentional act by a doctor, staff or hospital is
- A. Diminished liability
- B. Therapeutic privilege
- C. Vicarious liability
- D. Therapeutic misadventure (Correct Answer)
Explanation: ***Therapeutic misadventure*** - This term refers to an **unintentional or unexpected complication or death** that occurs during appropriate medical treatment, despite the absence of negligence. - It acknowledges that medical interventions carry inherent risks and that adverse outcomes can occur even when healthcare providers act reasonably and skillfully. *Diminished liability* - This concept typically arises in **criminal law**, referring to a partial defense that may reduce the degree of criminal responsibility due to mental impairment. - It does not apply to situations involving unintentional harm or death during medical treatment in the absence of negligence. *Therapeutic privilege* - This is a legal doctrine allowing a physician to **withhold information** from a patient if disclosure would likely cause significant harm to the patient. - It is unrelated to unintentional adverse outcomes or death in the context of medical treatment. *Vicarious liability* - This legal doctrine holds one party (e.g., a hospital or employer) responsible for the actions of another (e.g., a doctor or employee), especially when the latter is acting within the scope of their employment. - While a hospital might be vicariously liable for a doctor's negligence, the term itself describes the *type* of liability, not the unintentional adverse event itself.
Question 10: Which article of the Indian Constitution allows the state to intervene in cases of hunger strikes to protect the right to life?
- A. Article 21 (Correct Answer)
- B. Article 35
- C. Article 48
- D. Article 52
Explanation: ***Article 21*** - This article guarantees the **right to life and personal liberty**, a fundamental right that the state is obligated to protect. - The Supreme Court has interpreted this right to include the right to a dignified life, which obliges the state to intervene to prevent self-harm, such as in cases of a **prolonged hunger strike**. *Article 35* - This article deals with the **power of Parliament to make laws** to give effect to certain provisions of Part III (Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution. - It does not directly provide a right to life or allow for state intervention in hunger strikes based on this right. *Article 48* - This article is part of the **Directive Principles of State Policy** and deals with the organization of **agriculture and animal husbandry**. - It focuses on promoting modern and scientific methods for these sectors and does not relate to the right to life or hunger strikes. *Article 52* - This article states that there shall be a **President of India**. - It defines the office of the President and does not relate to fundamental rights or state intervention in cases of hunger strikes.
Want unlimited practice?
Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.
Start For Free