Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 61: Which of the following sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was decriminalized as per the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017?

A. Section 305
B. Section 306
C. Section 308
D. Section 309 (Correct Answer)

Explanation: **Explanation:** The correct answer is **Section 309 IPC**. **1. Why Section 309 is correct:** Section 309 of the IPC traditionally criminalized "Attempt to Commit Suicide." However, the **Mental Healthcare Act (MHCA), 2017 (Section 115)**, effectively decriminalized it. The underlying medical and legal concept is that any person who attempts suicide is presumed to be under **severe stress** and shall not be tried or punished. Instead, the Act mandates that the government provide care, treatment, and rehabilitation to the individual to reduce the risk of recurrence. **2. Why the other options are incorrect:** * **Section 305:** Deals with **Abetment of suicide of a child or insane person**. This remains a heinous criminal offense punishable by death or life imprisonment. * **Section 306:** Deals with **Abetment of suicide** (general). It remains a non-bailable, cognizable offense for anyone who instigates or provokes another person to commit suicide. * **Section 308:** Deals with **Attempt to commit culpable homicide**. This is a criminal act where an individual attempts to kill another person, which remains strictly punishable. **3. Clinical Pearls & High-Yield Facts for NEET-PG:** * **Presumption of Stress:** Under MHCA 2017, the "burden of proof" has shifted; the state must prove the person was *not* under stress, which is practically impossible in suicide attempts. * **Section 304A IPC:** Often confused with these; it deals with **Medical Negligence** (causing death by a rash or negligent act). * **Section 300 IPC:** Defines Murder. * **Section 302 IPC:** Punishment for Murder. * **Key Distinction:** While Section 309 is decriminalized for the victim, Section 306 (Abetment) is still used to prosecute those who drove the victim to the act.

Question 62: Vitriolage is punished under which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)?

A. Section 294 IPC
B. Section 326A IPC (Correct Answer)
C. Section 354A IPC
D. Section 326B IPC

Explanation: **Explanation:** **Vitriolage** refers to the act of throwing a corrosive substance (acid) on a person with the intent to cause disfigurement, injury, or death. In the context of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), specific amendments were made in 2013 (Criminal Law Amendment Act) to address this heinous crime. * **Section 326A IPC (Correct Answer):** This section specifically deals with causing grievous hurt by use of acid, etc. It prescribes punishment for voluntarily causing permanent or partial damage, deformity, burns, or disfigurement by using acid. The punishment is rigorous imprisonment for a term not less than 10 years, which may extend to life imprisonment, along with a fine. * **Section 326B IPC:** This section pertains to the **attempt** to throw acid. While 326A is for the completed act, 326B punishes the unsuccessful attempt to cause vitriolage. * **Section 294 IPC:** This relates to punishment for obscene acts or songs in public places. * **Section 354A IPC:** This deals with sexual harassment and punishment for sexual harassment. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Common Acids used:** Sulfuric acid (most common), Nitric acid, and Hydrochloric acid. * **First Aid:** Immediate and copious irrigation with water is the most critical step to limit tissue damage. * **Legal Note:** Under the **Justice Verma Committee** recommendations, these specific sections (326A & 326B) were inserted to provide more stringent punishment for acid attacks compared to general "grievous hurt" (Section 320 IPC). * **Dying Declaration:** If a victim of vitriolage is in critical condition, a dying declaration should be recorded as per Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act.

Question 63: Which of the following is not a cognizable offence?

A. Voluntary causing hurt (Correct Answer)
B. Voluntary causing grievous hurt
C. Murder
D. Dowry death

Explanation: In legal medicine, offenses are categorized based on their severity into **Cognizable** and **Non-cognizable** offenses under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). ### 1. Why "Voluntary Causing Hurt" is the Correct Answer **Voluntary causing hurt (IPC Section 323)** is classified as a **Non-cognizable offense**. In such cases, a police officer has no authority to arrest the perpetrator without a warrant and cannot initiate an investigation without an order from a Magistrate. "Hurt" refers to causing bodily pain, disease, or infirmity that does not meet the criteria for "grievous hurt." It is considered a bailable and less severe offense. ### 2. Analysis of Incorrect Options * **Voluntary causing grievous hurt (IPC Section 325/326):** Unlike simple hurt, grievous hurt (e.g., fracture, permanent loss of sight/hearing, or injury endangering life) is a **Cognizable offense**. The police can arrest the accused without a warrant due to the serious nature of the injury. * **Murder (IPC Section 302):** This is the most serious form of culpable homicide. It is a **Cognizable and Non-bailable** offense. * **Dowry death (IPC Section 304B):** Any death of a woman within 7 years of marriage involving cruelty related to dowry is a **Cognizable offense**, allowing for immediate police intervention. ### 3. High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG * **Cognizable Offense:** Serious crimes where police can arrest **without a warrant** (e.g., Rape, Murder, Dowry Death, Grievous Hurt). * **Non-cognizable Offense:** Less serious crimes where a **warrant is mandatory** for arrest (e.g., Simple Hurt, Defamation). * **Grievous Hurt (IPC 320):** Remember the "8 clauses," including permanent disfiguration of the face/head and any pain that prevents the victim from following ordinary pursuits for **20 days**. * **Perjury:** Giving false evidence under oath is a **Non-cognizable** offense.

Question 64: The Sarada Act of 1929 was enacted to abolish:

A. Dowry system
B. Child marriage (Correct Answer)
C. Sati ritual
D. Caste system

Explanation: **Explanation:** The **Sarada Act**, officially known as the **Child Marriage Restraint Act of 1929**, was enacted to abolish the practice of child marriage in India. It was named after its sponsor, Harbilas Sarda. The primary objective was to prevent the physical and psychological complications associated with early marriage and premature cohabitation. **Why the correct answer is right:** From a forensic and social medicine perspective, child marriage was identified as a major cause of high maternal and infant mortality rates. Early pregnancies in adolescent girls lead to complications like cephalopelvic disproportion, obstructed labor, and vesicovaginal fistulae (VVF). The Act initially fixed the age of marriage at 14 for girls and 18 for boys (later amended). **Why the incorrect options are wrong:** * **Dowry system:** Addressed by the **Dowry Prohibition Act of 1961**. * **Sati ritual:** Abolished much earlier by the **Bengal Sati Regulation of 1829** under Lord William Bentinck. * **Caste system:** While various social reforms targeted caste discrimination, the Sarada Act specifically focused on matrimonial age. **High-Yield Facts for NEET-PG:** * **Current Legal Age:** Under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act (2006), the legal age is **18 for females and 21 for males**. * **Medical Significance:** Prevents "Pediatric Pregnancy" and associated risks like Pre-eclampsia and Low Birth Weight (LBW). * **Consummation:** In forensic medicine, the age of consent for sexual intercourse (POCSO Act/IPC 375) is a distinct legal entity (currently 18 years) regardless of marital status.

Question 65: Which section of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) defines perjury?

A. 192
B. 193
C. 191 (Correct Answer)
D. 197

Explanation: **Explanation:** In Forensic Medicine, understanding the legal implications of providing evidence is crucial. **Perjury** refers to the act of willfully giving false evidence under oath or making a false statement when bound by law to state the truth. * **Correct Answer: Section 191 IPC** defines perjury (giving false evidence). It states that anyone legally bound by an oath or an express provision of law to state the truth, who makes a statement they know or believe to be false, is said to give false evidence. * **Option A: Section 192 IPC** deals with **fabricating false evidence**. This involves creating false circumstances or making false entries in books/records with the intent that such evidence may appear in a judicial proceeding to mislead a public servant. * **Option B: Section 193 IPC** prescribes the **punishment for perjury**. It states that whoever intentionally gives or fabricates false evidence shall be punished with imprisonment (up to 7 years for judicial proceedings). * **Option D: Section 197 IPC** relates to issuing or signing a **false certificate**. This is highly relevant to doctors regarding the issuance of false birth, death, or medical certificates. **NEET-PG High-Yield Pearls:** * **Perjury (191)** is the definition; **Punishment (193)** is the consequence. * A doctor can be charged with perjury if they intentionally provide false testimony in a court of law. * **Section 197** is specifically important for medical practitioners regarding "Professional Misconduct" and legal liability for false documentation. * **Hostile Witness:** A witness who willfully gives evidence contrary to their previous statement, often leading to a plea for cross-examination by the party who called them.

Question 66: Who can take a dying declaration?

A. Village headman
B. Doctor
C. Magistrate
D. Any authorized person (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ### Explanation **Dying Declaration (Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act)** is a statement made by a person (oral or written) regarding the cause or circumstances of their death when death is imminent. **1. Why "Any authorized person" is correct:** Legally, there is no absolute rule that only a specific official must record a dying declaration. While a **Magistrate** is the most preferred person (carrying the highest evidentiary value), in emergency situations where a Magistrate is unavailable, **any person**—including a doctor, police officer, village headman, or even a private individual—can record it. The law prioritizes the preservation of the statement before the victim loses consciousness or expires. **2. Why other options are incorrect:** * **Village headman (A), Doctor (B), and Magistrate (C):** While all these individuals *can* record a dying declaration, selecting any one of them exclusively would be incorrect. They are specific subsets of "authorized persons." If a Magistrate is not available, a Doctor is the next best choice; if a Doctor is unavailable, any person present can record it. **3. Clinical Pearls & High-Yield Facts for NEET-PG:** * **Admissibility:** It is based on the maxim *"Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentiri"* (A person will not meet their maker with a lie in their mouth). * **Doctor’s Role:** The most crucial duty of a doctor before recording is to certify that the patient is in a **"fit state of mind"** (compos mentis) to give a statement. * **Corroboration:** A dying declaration recorded by a Magistrate does not require corroboration, but one recorded by others may require it. * **Language:** It should ideally be recorded in the victim's own words. If signs are used (as in the *Queen-Empress vs. Abdullah* case), it is still valid. * **Survival:** If the declarant survives, the statement is no longer a "dying declaration" but can be used as a "former statement" to corroborate or contradict testimony under Sections 157 or 145 of the IEA.

Question 67: A person assaults another. There is no visible injury. Under which section of the Indian Penal Code can the assailant be booked?

A. Section 44 IPC
B. Section 351 IPC (Correct Answer)
C. Section 319 IPC
D. Section 320 IPC

Explanation: ### Explanation **Correct Answer: B. Section 351 IPC** **Why it is correct:** In Forensic Medicine, it is crucial to distinguish between physical contact and the mere threat of it. **Section 351 of the IPC** defines **Assault**. Legally, assault does not require physical contact or a visible injury; it refers to any gesture or preparation that creates a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the victim that criminal force is about to be used against them. Since the question specifies an "assault" with "no visible injury," it falls under this definition. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 44 IPC:** Defines **"Injury"** in a broad legal sense as any harm illegally caused to a person in body, mind, reputation, or property. While relevant to the outcome, it is a definition, not the specific charge for the act of assault. * **Section 319 IPC:** Defines **"Hurt."** To book someone under this section, there must be the causing of bodily pain, disease, or infirmity. Since there is no visible injury or mention of pain/infirmity, this does not apply. * **Section 320 IPC:** Defines **"Grievous Hurt."** This involves specific severe injuries (e.g., permanent loss of sight/hearing, fracture, or danger to life). It is inapplicable here as no injury exists. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Assault (Sec 351):** Apprehension of force (No contact necessary). * **Criminal Force (Sec 350):** Intentional use of force without consent. * **Battery:** A common law term (not explicitly in IPC) referring to the actual physical strike; in India, this is covered under "Hurt" (Sec 319). * **Section 320 IPC (Grievous Hurt):** Remember the **"Rule of 8"** (8 specific clauses), including any injury that causes severe bodily pain or inability to follow ordinary pursuits for **20 days**.

Question 68: All of the following signs confirm the brain death except?

A. Hypothermia (Correct Answer)
B. Absent corneal reflex
C. Dilated and fixed pupils
D. No heart movements

Explanation: **Explanation:** Brain death is the irreversible loss of all functions of the entire brain, including the brainstem. To confirm brain death, certain **pre-requisites** must be met to ensure the condition is not mimicked by reversible factors. **Why Hypothermia is the Correct Answer:** Hypothermia is a **confounder**, not a diagnostic sign. In fact, the presence of hypothermia (core temperature <32°C or 90°F) **precludes** the diagnosis of brain death because it can mimic brain death by causing a reversible state of metabolic depression and coma. Before brain death testing can begin, the patient must be normothermic. Therefore, hypothermia does not confirm brain death; it invalidates the test. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Absent corneal reflex:** This is a clinical sign of brainstem dysfunction. The absence of cranial nerve reflexes (CN V and VII) is a mandatory component of the brain death examination. * **Dilated and fixed pupils:** This indicates the absence of the pupillary light reflex (CN II and III), confirming midbrain failure. * **No heart movements:** While brain death focuses on the neurological state, the cessation of spontaneous respiration and circulation (in the absence of life support) eventually leads to somatic death. In the context of "brain death" protocols, the absence of spontaneous respiratory effort (Apnea test) is the definitive clinical hallmark. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Prerequisites for Brain Death:** Normothermia, absence of sedative/neuromuscular blocking drugs, and absence of severe electrolyte or endocrine disturbances. * **The Apnea Test:** The most important clinical test. A positive test is defined by no respiratory effort despite a $PaCO_2 \geq 60$ mmHg (or 20 mmHg above baseline). * **Confirmatory Tests:** Though diagnosis is primarily clinical, EEG (isoelectric/flat) and Cerebral Angiography (no flow) are used in cases where clinical testing is inconclusive.

Question 69: Which section of the Indian Penal Code deals with the punishment for homosexual acts?

A. 312
B. 375
C. 376
D. 377 (Correct Answer)

Explanation: **Explanation:** **Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** historically deals with "Unnatural Offences." It states that whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman, or animal shall be punished. While the Supreme Court of India (Navtej Singh Johar vs. Union of India, 2018) decriminalized consensual homosexual acts between adults, the section remains on the statute books to prosecute non-consensual acts (sodomy) and bestiality. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 312 IPC:** Pertains to causing miscarriage (criminal abortion). It prescribes punishment for voluntarily causing a woman with child to miscarry, unless done in good faith to save her life. * **Section 375 IPC:** Defines the offence of **Rape**. It lists the specific criteria and circumstances under which sexual intercourse is considered rape. * **Section 376 IPC:** Prescribes the **Punishment for Rape**. It is often tested alongside 375; remember that 375 is the definition, while 376 is the penal provision. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Navtej Singh Johar Case (2018):** The landmark judgment that read down Section 377, decriminalizing consensual private sexual acts between same-sex adults. * **Medical Examination:** In cases of alleged sodomy (under 377), look for the **"Duck-bill shape"** of the anus, loss of sphincter tone, and presence of lubricant or DNA evidence. * **Age of Consent:** Following the POCSO Act and Criminal Law Amendment Act 2013, the age of consent for sexual activities in India is **18 years**. Any act below this age is prosecuted under POCSO, regardless of Section 377 or 375.

Question 70: Postponement of hanging in a pregnant lady due to her condition falls under which section of the CrPC?

A. Section 416 (Correct Answer)
B. Section 417
C. Section 300
D. Section 312

Explanation: **Explanation:** **Section 416 of the CrPC** (Code of Criminal Procedure) specifically mandates that if a woman sentenced to death is found to be pregnant, the High Court shall order the execution of the sentence to be **postponed**, and may, if it thinks fit, commute the sentence to imprisonment for life. The underlying ethical principle is that the unborn fetus is an innocent life and should not be punished for the crimes of the mother. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Section 417 CrPC:** Deals with the power of the government to appoint a place of imprisonment for persons convicted by a court. It is unrelated to pregnancy or capital punishment. * **Section 300 IPC:** Defines **Murder**. (Note: IPC sections deal with the definition and punishment of crimes, whereas CrPC sections deal with the legal procedures). * **Section 312 IPC:** Pertains to **causing miscarriage** (criminal abortion). It states that whoever voluntarily causes a woman with child to miscarry shall be punished, unless it was done in good faith to save the mother's life. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Verification of Pregnancy:** Before executing a death sentence on a female, a medical examination is mandatory. If pregnancy is suspected, the execution must be stayed until the High Court decides on postponement or commutation. * **Section 53 CrPC:** Examination of the accused by a medical practitioner at the request of a police officer. * **Section 54 CrPC:** Mandatory medical examination of an arrested person. * **Section 174 CrPC:** Police inquiry and report on suicide/unnatural deaths (Inquest). * **Section 176 CrPC:** Magistrate Inquest (mandatory in cases of custodial death, dowry death, or death in police firing).

Practice by Chapter

Medical Jurisprudence Fundamentals

Practice Questions

Medical Ethics Principles

Practice Questions

Consent in Medical Practice

Practice Questions

Confidentiality and Privacy

Practice Questions

Medical Negligence

Practice Questions

Professional Misconduct

Practice Questions

Rights and Duties of Medical Practitioners

Practice Questions

Consumer Protection Laws

Practice Questions

Medical Documentation

Practice Questions

Expert Witness Testimony

Practice Questions

Ethical Dilemmas in Medicine

Practice Questions

International Medical Ethics Codes

Practice Questions

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free