Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine Practice Questions

Q: Which legal doctrine is described by the phrase "things that speak for themselves"?

Doctrine of res ipsa loquitor. ### Explanation **Correct Answer: A. Doctrine of res ipsa loquitor** The phrase **"Res ipsa loquitor"** is a Latin term meaning **"the thing speaks for itself."** In medical negligence cases, this doctrine is applied when the injury is so obvious that it could not have occurred without negligence, and no further proof is required. For the doctrine to apply, three conditions must be met: 1. The accident must be of a kind that does not ordinarily occur without negligence. 2. The cause/instrumentality must be under the exclusive control of the doctor. 3. There was no contributory negligence by the patient. *Example:* Leaving a surgical mop inside the abdomen or performing surgery on the wrong limb. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **B. Doctrine of respondent superior:** Also known as "Vicarious Liability," it means "let the master answer." It holds the employer (e.g., a hospital owner) responsible for the negligent acts of their employees (e.g., doctors or nurses) committed during their employment. * **C. Doctrine of calculated risk:** This states that a doctor is not liable if they choose a risky procedure because the potential benefit outweighs the risk, provided the patient was informed and the risk was "calculated." * **D. Doctrine of therapeutic misadventure:** This refers to an injury or death resulting from a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure that was performed correctly but led to an unintended, adverse outcome (e.g., an unpredictable anaphylactic reaction to a drug). **NEET-PG High-Yield Pearls:** * **Novus Actus Interveniens:** An intervening act that breaks the chain of causation. * **Volenti non fit injuria:** A person who knowingly and voluntarily risks a danger cannot complain of the resulting injury (basis of Informed Consent). * **Contributory Negligence:** When the patient’s own lack of care contributes to the injury; it is a defense used by doctors to mitigate damages.

Q: Prolonging a person's life through technological means is known as?

Dysthanasia. **Explanation:** The correct answer is **Dysthanasia**. **1. Why Dysthanasia is Correct:** Dysthanasia (from the Greek *dys*, meaning "difficult" or "bad," and *thanatos*, meaning "death") refers to the practice of prolonging the life of a terminally ill patient through aggressive medical technology, even when there is no hope of recovery. It is often described as a "difficult death" or "medical stubbornness," where the focus is on delaying the physiological moment of death rather than ensuring the quality of life. **2. Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Novus actus interveniens:** This is a legal term meaning a "new intervening act." In forensic medicine, it refers to an event that breaks the chain of causation between a defendant's action and the final result (e.g., a patient dying from a surgical mishap rather than the original assault). * **Euthanasia:** Also known as "mercy killing," it is the intentional act of ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. It can be active (administering a lethal dose) or passive (withholding life-sustaining treatment). * **Orthotanasia:** This refers to "allowing a natural death." It involves the withdrawal of disproportionate medical interventions, allowing the dying process to take its natural course while providing palliative care. **3. NEET-PG High-Yield Pearls:** * **Active Euthanasia:** Illegal in India. * **Passive Euthanasia:** Legal in India following the landmark **Common Cause vs. Union of India (2018)** Supreme Court judgment, provided specific guidelines and "Living Wills" are followed. * **Double Effect (Principle of):** Administering drugs (like morphine) to relieve pain, knowing it might incidentally hasten death. This is ethically acceptable if the primary intent is pain relief. * **Brain Stem Death:** The legal definition of death in India under the **THOA Act (1994)**, crucial for organ transplantation.

Q: Who can be considered an expert witness?

All of the above. **Explanation:** In the context of Forensic Medicine and the Indian Evidence Act (Section 45), an **expert witness** is a person who possesses specialized knowledge, skill, or experience in a specific field that is beyond the comprehension of a layperson. When a court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, science, art, or identity of handwriting/finger impressions, the opinions of such experts are relevant facts. 1. **Medical Men:** Doctors are the most common expert witnesses in medico-legal cases. They provide opinions on the cause of death, nature of injuries, insanity, or sexual offenses based on clinical findings and autopsies. 2. **Firearm Experts (Ballistics Experts):** They provide specialized testimony regarding the type of weapon used, the range of fire, and the matching of bullets to specific firearms. 3. **Chemical Examiners:** These experts analyze biological samples (viscera, blood, etc.) for the presence of poisons or drugs, which is crucial in toxicology cases. **Why "All of the above" is correct:** The law does not limit "expertise" to medicine alone. Any individual with specialized technical training—including handwriting experts, finger-print experts, and digital forensic analysts—qualifies as an expert witness under the law. **High-Yield Facts for NEET-PG:** * **Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act:** Defines the admissibility of expert testimony. * **Expert vs. Common Witness:** A common witness (Witness of Fact) testifies only to what they saw, heard, or perceived. An expert witness is allowed to provide **opinions and inferences** based on their specialized knowledge. * **Conduct Money:** The fee paid to a witness (usually in civil cases) to cover travel and expenses for attending court. * **Hostile Witness:** A witness who appears to be suppressing the truth or testifying against the party that called them (Section 154).

Q: Which of the following techniques is based on the principle that a suspect's reaction, if they witness an event, leads to a certain behavioral response?

Polygraph. **Explanation:** The **Polygraph (Lie Detector Test)** is based on the psychosomatic principle that when a person is consciously lying or reacting to a stressful stimulus (like witnessing a crime), their autonomic nervous system triggers a "fight or flight" response. This leads to measurable **behavioral and physiological changes**, such as increased heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and galvanic skin resistance (sweating). The machine records these involuntary reactions when the suspect is presented with specific questions or stimuli related to the event. **Why other options are incorrect:** * **Narcoanalysis & Truth Serum Testing (Options A & C):** These are essentially the same. They involve the intravenous administration of a hypnotic drug (usually **Sodium Amytal** or **Sodium Pentothal**). The goal is to induce a stage of "twilight sleep" where the subject's inhibitions are lowered, making it difficult to maintain a lie. It is not based on physiological reaction to a stimulus but on chemical suppression of the central nervous system. * **Brain Mapping (Option B):** Also known as P300 Brain Fingerprinting, this technique measures **Electroencephalographic (EEG)** waves. It identifies the "P300 wave," which is an electrical emission from the brain that occurs when a person recognizes familiar information. It measures cognitive recognition rather than autonomic behavioral responses. **High-Yield Facts for NEET-PG:** * **Legal Status:** In the landmark *Selvi vs. State of Karnataka (2010)* case, the Supreme Court of India ruled that Narcoanalysis, Polygraph, and Brain Mapping cannot be forcibly conducted as they violate **Article 20(3)** (Right against self-incrimination). * **Polygraph Parameters:** It typically monitors four variables: Respiration, Blood Pressure, Pulse, and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR). * **Drug of Choice for Narcoanalysis:** Sodium Pentothal (Thiopental).

Q: A case of suspected homicide comes to a doctor. He is supposed to inform the police under which section of the CrPC?

39. **Explanation:** In cases of suspected homicide or serious crimes, a doctor (as a citizen) is legally mandated to inform the police. This duty is governed by the **Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)**. **1. Why Option B (Section 39 CrPC) is correct:** Section 39 of the CrPC mandates that **every person** (including medical practitioners) who becomes aware of the commission of, or the intention to commit, certain specified offenses—including **murder (homicide)**, culpable homicide, and crimes against the state—must forthwith give information to the nearest Magistrate or Police Officer. Failure to do so can lead to prosecution under Section 176 or 202 of the IPC. **2. Why other options are incorrect:** * **Section 37 CrPC:** This section states that every person is bound to **assist** a Magistrate or Police Officer when reasonably demanded (e.g., to prevent a breach of peace or an escape). It is about assistance, not the initial reporting of a crime. * **Section 174 CrPC:** This pertains to the **Police Inquest**. It empowers the police to investigate and report on cases of unnatural death (suicide, homicide, accident). * **Section 176 CrPC:** This pertains to the **Magistrate Inquest**. It mandates an inquiry by a Magistrate in specific cases like custodial deaths, rape in custody, or dowry deaths within seven years of marriage. **Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Section 39 CrPC:** Duty of public/doctor to inform police about serious crimes (Homicide). * **Section 40 CrPC:** Duty of village officers/residents to report certain crimes. * **Section 174 CrPC:** Police Inquest (Most common in India). * **Section 176 CrPC:** Magistrate Inquest (Superior to Police Inquest). * **Section 190 IPC:** Relates to the threat of injury to induce a person to refrain from applying for protection.

Q: The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act does not protect acts of termination of pregnancies after which gestational age?

24 weeks. **Explanation:** The **Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Amendment Act, 2021**, revised the upper limit for legal abortion in India. Under this Act, termination is protected up to **24 weeks** for specific categories of women (such as survivors of sexual assault, minors, or those with physical disabilities). Beyond 24 weeks, the Act does not provide general protection unless there are substantial fetal abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board. **Why Option B is Correct:** The statutory limit for "special categories" of women is 24 weeks. Terminating a pregnancy beyond this period without a court order or a Medical Board's approval for fetal anomalies constitutes an offense under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), as it falls outside the protective umbrella of the MTP Act. **Why Other Options are Incorrect:** * **Option A (20 weeks):** This was the upper limit under the original 1971 Act. In the 2021 amendment, this limit was raised to 24 weeks for special categories. * **Options C & D (28 and 30 weeks):** These exceed the legal statutory limit. Termination at this stage is only permissible if a state-level Medical Board confirms "substantial fetal abnormalities" or if it is immediately necessary to save the pregnant woman's life. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** 1. **Opinion Requirement:** Up to 20 weeks, the opinion of **one** Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP) is needed. Between 20–24 weeks, the opinion of **two** RMPs is mandatory. 2. **No Upper Limit:** There is no upper gestational limit for MTP if the termination is necessary due to **substantial fetal abnormalities** (approved by a Medical Board). 3. **Confidentiality:** Breach of a woman's confidentiality regarding MTP is punishable by up to 1 year of imprisonment. 4. **Consent:** Only the consent of the pregnant woman is required (if she is an adult). If she is a minor or mentally ill, consent from the guardian is necessary.

Question 1

Which legal doctrine is described by the phrase "things that speak for themselves"?

Accepted Answer

Doctrine of res ipsa loquitor

Answer

Doctrine of respondent superior

Answer

Doctrine of calculated risk

Answer

Doctrine of therapeutic misadventure

Question 2

Prolonging a person's life through technological means is known as?

Accepted Answer

Dysthanasia

Answer

Novus actus interveniens

Answer

Euthanasia

Answer

Orthotanasia

Question 3

Supreme Court guidelines regarding criminal negligence by a doctor include all of the following EXCEPT:

Accepted Answer

Must be arrested immediately.

Answer

Complaint against the doctor must have prima facie evidence.

Answer

Must obtain an independent opinion from a government doctor.

Answer

Must have prima facie evidence from a competent doctor.

Question 4

Who can be considered an expert witness?

Accepted Answer

All of the above

Answer

Medical men

Answer

Firearm experts

Answer

Chemical examiners

Question 5

Which of the following techniques is based on the principle that a suspect's reaction, if they witness an event, leads to a certain behavioral response?

Accepted Answer

Polygraph

Answer

Narcoanalysis

Answer

Brain mapping

Answer

Truth serum testing

Question 6

Professional secrecy is defined as:

Accepted Answer

An implied term of the contract between a doctor and patient

Answer

A legal responsibility

Answer

An ethical responsibility

Answer

A social responsibility

Question 7

A case of suspected homicide comes to a doctor. He is supposed to inform the police under which section of the CrPC?

Accepted Answer

39

Answer

37

Answer

174

Answer

176

Question 8

Which of the following is NOT true about perjury?

Accepted Answer

Section 191 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) refers to it.

Answer

The punishment for perjury in a court trial case is 7 years.

Answer

It involves the fabrication of evidence.

Answer

The punishment for perjury in all other cases is 3 years.

Question 9

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act does not protect acts of termination of pregnancies after which gestational age?

Accepted Answer

24 weeks

Answer

20 weeks

Answer

28 weeks

Answer

30 weeks

Question 10

A patient with a head injury requires urgent cranial decompression but has no relatives available. What should the doctor do?

Accepted Answer

Operate without formal consent

Answer

Obtain consent from the police

Answer

Wait until relatives can provide consent

Answer

Obtain consent from a magistrate

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?