Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine Practice Questions

Q: Boys over 16 years who are too difficult to be handled in a certified school or have misbehaved there are sent to a:

Borstal. ***Borstal*** - **Borstals** were institutions designed specifically for the detention and rehabilitation of young male offenders (typically 16-21 years), particularly those who were deemed too difficult for other juvenile facilities like certified schools. - They aimed to provide a structured environment with education, vocational training, and discipline for older adolescents involved in crime. - **Note:** Borstals were British colonial-era institutions; in modern Indian juvenile justice system (JJ Act 2015), the equivalent would be **Special Homes** for children in conflict with law aged 16-18 years. *Remand home* - A **remand home** (now called **Observation Home** under JJ Act 2015) is a temporary facility where children or young people are kept while awaiting trial or further placement decisions. - It is not intended for long-term rehabilitation of difficult offenders, but rather for short-term care (maximum 6 months) and assessment. *Foster home* - A **foster home** is a family-based setting that provides care for children who cannot live with their biological parents, often due to neglect, abuse, or family crisis. - It is a welfare placement focusing on stable, family-like environments under the care and protection provisions, and not for juvenile offenders deemed too difficult for certified schools. *Any of the above* - This option is incorrect because the question specifies a particular type of institution for older, difficult-to-handle boys beyond certified schools. - Each of the other options serves a distinct purpose within the juvenile justice or welfare system, and only Borstal (historically) was specifically designed for this category of offenders.

Q: Leaving (or forgetting) an instrument or sponge in the abdomen of the patient during a surgery and closing the operation is -

Civil negligence. ***Civil Negligence*** - Leaving a surgical instrument or sponge inside a patient's body is a classic example of **medical negligence** falling under **civil tort law** and constitutes a breach of duty of care. - This is a **"never event"** or **sentinel event** that falls under the doctrine of **Res Ipsa Loquitur** ("the thing speaks for itself"), where negligence is self-evident. - Such cases are typically handled through **civil medical malpractice suits** seeking compensation for damages, unless death occurs with gross negligence warranting criminal proceedings. - The surgeon has failed to exercise the **standard of care** expected (proper sponge/instrument count), leading to patient harm and liability for damages. *Contributory Negligence* - **Contributory negligence** occurs when the patient's own actions contribute to their injury, reducing the defendant's liability. - This does not apply here as the patient is **completely passive** during surgery under anesthesia and has no role in the surgical error. *Corporate Negligence* - **Corporate negligence** refers to the hospital or healthcare institution's failure to maintain proper systems, policies, staffing, or oversight. - While the hospital may share **vicarious liability** for inadequate surgical protocols or counting systems, the primary responsibility lies with the **individual surgeon's negligence**. *Criminal Negligence* - **Criminal negligence** (under **Sec 304A IPC** - causing death by rash or negligent act) requires proof of **gross negligence** with reckless disregard causing death or grievous harm. - While leaving an instrument is serious negligence, it is primarily a **civil matter** unless it results in death with proven gross recklessness, which would then attract criminal liability. - The act alone, without fatal consequences and extreme recklessness, does not automatically constitute criminal negligence.

Q: Voyeurism is punished under

354 C IPC. ***Correct Option C - 354 C IPC*** - **Section 354C of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)** specifically addresses **voyeurism**, defining it as observing or capturing the image of a woman engaging in a private act where she would reasonably expect privacy. - This section was introduced to tackle the issue of non-consensual viewing or recording of women in private settings. - Voyeurism is punishable with **imprisonment up to 3 years or fine or both** for the first conviction, and up to **7 years with fine** for subsequent convictions. *Incorrect Option A - 354 A IPC* - **Section 354A of the IPC** penalizes **sexual harassment** and includes acts like physical contact and advances involving unwelcome and explicit sexual overtures, or a demand or request for sexual favours. - This section focuses on direct physical or verbal forms of harassment, not the act of secretly observing. *Incorrect Option D - 354 B IPC* - **Section 354B of the IPC** pertains to **assault or use of criminal force to disrobe a woman** or compelling her to be naked. - This deals with a more aggressive and direct form of offence involving physical action to undress a woman, which is distinct from voyeurism. *Incorrect Option D - 354 D IPC* - **Section 354D of the IPC** deals with **stalking**, which involves repeatedly following, contacting, or attempting to contact a person despite clear indications of disinterest. - While related to offences against women, it does not specifically pertain to voyeurism.

Q: Which legal doctrine is most commonly applied in cases of surgical negligence?

Res ipsa loquitur. ***Res ipsa loquitur*** - This doctrine, meaning "the thing speaks for itself," is often applied when the injury is of such a nature that it **would not ordinarily occur without negligence**, and the defendant was in exclusive control of the instrument or process causing the injury. - In surgical negligence, it is used when the injury is **outside the scope of expected surgical risks** and suggests negligence even without direct proof, e.g., leaving a surgical tool inside a patient. *Contributory negligence* - This doctrine applies when the **plaintiff's own actions contributed** to their injury, potentially barring or reducing their recovery. - It is rarely applied in surgical negligence cases because the patient is typically under anesthesia and **cannot contribute to the negligence** during the actual procedure. *Respondent superior* - This doctrine holds an employer **responsible for the actions of their employees** performed within the scope of employment. - While relevant if a hospital is sued for the negligence of an employed surgeon, it establishes **vicarious liability** rather than proving the negligence itself. *Criminal negligence* - This refers to a **gross deviation from the standard of care** that results in harm, often involving a reckless disregard for human life or safety, and is prosecuted by the state. - Surgical negligence cases are predominantly **civil lawsuits** seeking monetary damages for injury, not criminal charges.

Q: Abandoning a child is punishable by imprisonment for up to

7 years. ***7 years*** - Under **Section 317 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC)**, any person who exposes or leaves a child under the age of twelve years, with the intention of wholly abandoning such child, is liable to imprisonment for up to **seven years**, or fine, or both. - This punishment reflects the severe nature of abandoning a dependent, vulnerable child to potential harm or neglect. *5 years* - While some offenses carry a five-year imprisonment term, **child abandonment** is specifically addressed with a more severe penalty due to the significant risk to the child's life and well-being. - There is no specific provision in the **Indian Penal Code** that sets a five-year maximum for the offense of child abandonment as described. *4 years* - A four-year imprisonment term is not the legally stipulated maximum for the offense of **child abandonment** under the relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code. - This duration is inadequate to reflect the gravity of intentional abandonment of a young child. *2 years* - A two-year prison sentence is significantly less than the maximum penalty for child abandonment, which is considered a serious crime. - Such a short sentence would not align with the intent of discouraging actions that put children at extreme risk.

Q: For medical termination of pregnancy, consent is given by-

Concerned lady. ***Concerned lady*** - For a medical termination of pregnancy, **informed consent** must be given directly by the woman seeking the procedure. - This upholds her **autonomy** and right to make decisions regarding her own body and healthcare. *Guardian* - A guardian's consent is typically required only if the woman is a **minor** or is otherwise **legally incapacitated** and unable to provide consent herself. - In most cases, an adult woman is presumed to be competent to consent for her own medical procedures. *Husband of the lady* - The husband's consent is **not legally required** for a medical termination of pregnancy, as it is the woman's fundamental right to decide. - Requiring a husband's consent would infringe upon the woman's **bodily autonomy** and reproductive rights. *Both husband and wife* - While open communication with a spouse is often encouraged, **joint consent** from both the husband and wife is not a legal prerequisite for a medical termination of pregnancy. - The ultimate decision-making authority rests solely with the **pregnant woman**.

Q: Doctor or nurse disclosing the identity of a rape victim is punishable under the following section of IPC?

Section 228A. ***Section 228A IPC*** - This section of the Indian Penal Code specifically deals with the **disclosure of the identity of a victim of rape and certain sexual offenses** (Sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB, 376E). - Making public the name or any matter that can reveal the identity of a rape victim by **any person, including doctors and nurses**, is a punishable offense. - **Punishment**: Imprisonment up to **2 years** and fine. - **Exception**: Disclosure is permitted only to authorized persons like police officers for investigation purposes. - **Important**: This is now covered under **Section 72 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023**, which replaced the IPC. *Section 224A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - It does not relate to offenses concerning privacy or the identity of sexual assault victims. *Section 226A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - It does not pertain to the confidentiality of victims of sexual offenses. *Section 222A* - This is **not a valid or recognized provision** within the Indian Penal Code. - There is no such specific section addressing disclosure of victim identity in the IPC.

Q: After the death of the 78-year-old male patient in a hospital, who was suffering from COPD, his relatives entered the hospital with heavy sharp weapons and damaged the hospital property and started abusing and beating the doctor as well as his staff. Violence against a medical practitioner is considered as:

Cognizable and non-bailable offense. ***Cognizable and non-bailable offense*** - Violence against medical practitioners, especially when involving **damage to property** and **physical assault**, is generally classified as a **cognizable offense**. This means police can arrest without a warrant. - Such acts are also considered **non-bailable offenses** due to their serious nature, requiring a court order for bail. *Non-cognizable and non-bailable offense* - This option is incorrect because the described acts of **physical assault** and severe **property damage** against medical professionals are not typically classified as non-cognizable. - A non-cognizable offense would mean police cannot make an arrest without a warrant, which is not the case for such violent acts. *Non-cognizable and bailable offense* - This is incorrect as the level of violence and property destruction described makes it a serious matter, which would not be a **non-cognizable** offense. - Additionally, such serious acts are almost universally treated as **non-bailable** due to their potential harm to public safety and order. *Cognizable and bailable offense* - While violence against medical practitioners is indeed a **cognizable offense**, allowing for immediate police intervention, it is typically **not bailable**. - The severity of the crime, involving assault and significant damage, usually warrants a court's decision on bail rather than being granted as a matter of right.

Q: What is not true about valid consent -

Use technical jargon. ***Use technical jargon*** - Valid consent requires information to be communicated in **plain language** that the patient can easily understand. - Using **technical jargon** can obscure critical details and prevent the patient from making an informed decision, thereby invalidating consent. - This statement is **NOT true** about valid consent, making it the correct answer to this negation question. *True information to be given freely* - This statement is **true** about valid consent; patients must receive accurate and complete information about their treatment options, risks, and benefits. - The information must be provided without coercion, allowing the patient to make an uninfluenced decision. *Obtained in presence of two witnesses* - While witnesses may be used, particularly in sensitive situations or for patients with impaired capacity, it is **not a universal requirement** for valid consent in India. - The primary focus is on the patient's comprehension and voluntary agreement, not the number of witnesses present. - Valid consent can be obtained without witnesses in most medical situations. *Should not be obtained with force, fear or fraud* - This statement is **true** about valid consent; consent must be given **voluntarily** and without any form of coercion, threats, or deception. - Any element of force, fear, or fraud invalidates the consent process, as it removes the patient's autonomy and free will.

Q: Failure of the administrators of the hospital to provide adequate facilities comes under

Corporate negligence. ***Corporate negligence*** - This doctrine holds the hospital itself responsible for specific duties owed to the patient, rather than just the actions of its employees. - Failure to provide **adequate facilities** or proper equipment falls under the hospital's direct responsibility for patient care. *Composite negligence* - This refers to a situation where the negligence of two or more people directly causes damage or injury to a third person. - It involves multiple parties acting negligently, contributing to a single outcome, which is not the case when a hospital fails to provide facilities. *Therapeutic misadventure* - This term is used to describe an **unintended and undesired outcome** that occurs during a medical or surgical procedure. - It typically refers to an adverse event during treatment that is not due to negligence. *Contributory negligence* - This occurs when the **plaintiff's own negligence contributed** to their injury, even if the defendant was also negligent. - It implies the patient's actions played a role in the harm, which is distinct from a hospital failing to provide facilities.

Question 1

Boys over 16 years who are too difficult to be handled in a certified school or have misbehaved there are sent to a:

Accepted Answer

Borstal

Answer

Any of the above

Answer

Remand home

Answer

Foster home

Question 2

Leaving (or forgetting) an instrument or sponge in the abdomen of the patient during a surgery and closing the operation is -

Accepted Answer

Civil negligence

Answer

Corporate negligence

Answer

Contributory negligence

Answer

Criminal negligence

Question 3

Voyeurism is punished under

Accepted Answer

354 C IPC

Answer

354 D IPC

Answer

354 A IPC

Answer

354 B IPC

Question 4

Which legal doctrine is most commonly applied in cases of surgical negligence?

Accepted Answer

Res ipsa loquitur

Answer

Contributory negligence

Answer

Respondent superior

Answer

Criminal negligence

Question 5

Abandoning a child is punishable by imprisonment for up to

Accepted Answer

7 years

Answer

5 years

Answer

4 years

Answer

2 years

Question 6

For medical termination of pregnancy, consent is given by-

Accepted Answer

Concerned lady

Answer

Guardian

Answer

Husband of the lady

Answer

Both husband and wife

Question 7

Doctor or nurse disclosing the identity of a rape victim is punishable under the following section of IPC?

Accepted Answer

Section 228A

Answer

Section 224A

Answer

Section 226A

Answer

Section 222A

Question 8

After the death of the 78-year-old male patient in a hospital, who was suffering from COPD, his relatives entered the hospital with heavy sharp weapons and damaged the hospital property and started abusing and beating the doctor as well as his staff. Violence against a medical practitioner is considered as:

Accepted Answer

Cognizable and non-bailable offense

Answer

Non-cognizable and non-bailable offense

Answer

Non-cognizable and bailable offense

Answer

Cognizable and bailable offense

Question 9

What is not true about valid consent -

Accepted Answer

Use technical jargon

Answer

True information to be given freely

Answer

Obtained in presence of two witnesses

Answer

Should not be obtained with force, fear or fraud

Question 10

Failure of the administrators of the hospital to provide adequate facilities comes under

Accepted Answer

Corporate negligence

Answer

Composite negligence

Answer

Therapeutic misadventure

Answer

Contributory negligence

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?