Core Principles - The Belmont Trio
Established by the Belmont Report, this framework guides US human research ethics.
- Respect for Persons: Treat individuals as autonomous agents.
- Requires robust informed consent: full disclosure, comprehension, and voluntary participation.
- Mandates special protections for those with diminished autonomy (e.g., children, prisoners, cognitively impaired).
- Beneficence: An obligation to "do no harm" (non-maleficence) and to maximize benefits while minimizing risks.
- Justice: Fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of research.
- Demands equitable selection of subjects, preventing exploitation of vulnerable groups.
⭐ Vulnerable populations (e.g., children, prisoners, pregnant women) lack full autonomy and require additional protections to prevent coercion or undue influence.

Informed Consent - Getting the Nod
-
Core Principle: An ongoing, voluntary dialogue ensuring participants understand a study's purpose, procedures, potential risks, benefits, and alternatives before agreeing. It is a process, not a single event.
-
Pillars of Valid Consent:
- Disclosure: Imparting all relevant information. 📌 Mnemonic: BRAIN (Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Indications, Nature of procedure).
- Understanding: Ensuring the participant comprehends the information; requires clear, jargon-free language.
- Capacity: The individual's ability to make an autonomous, rational decision.
- Voluntariness: Freedom from coercion or undue influence.
-
Exceptions in Research:
- Waiver of consent is possible for minimal-risk research via IRB approval.
- Emergency research has strict, narrow exceptions.
⭐ For minors, obtain informed consent from parents/guardians and assent (affirmative agreement) from the child, typically if aged >7 years.
Institutional Review Board - The Ethics Police
- Formal committee that approves, monitors, and reviews biomedical and behavioral research involving humans.
- Primary mandate: Protect the rights, safety, and welfare of human research subjects.
- Composition: Minimum 5 members with diverse backgrounds (scientific, non-scientific, and community members).
- Reviews protocols for ethical concerns, risk-benefit analysis, and informed consent procedures.
⭐ To ensure a balanced perspective, the IRB must include at least one non-scientist and one member unaffiliated with the institution.
Vulnerable Subjects - Handle With Care
- Require extra protections against coercion or undue influence; the IRB must implement additional safeguards.
- Key populations include:
- Children & minors
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates
- Cognitively impaired or educationally/economically disadvantaged individuals
- 📌 For children, obtain parental/guardian permission AND the child's own assent (agreement), if they are capable (e.g., age >7).
- For prisoners, incentives must not be coercive (e.g., suggesting parole).
⭐ For research involving children, both parental permission and child assent are ethically required. Assent is the child's affirmative agreement, not just a failure to object.
High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways
- Informed consent is mandatory; subjects must be competent and understand the study.
- Beneficence (do good) and non-maleficence (do no harm) are paramount.
- Justice requires fair selection of subjects, avoiding exploitation of vulnerable populations.
- Autonomy respects a patient's right to make their own decisions about participation.
- All research requires Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval to protect human subjects.
- Confidentiality of patient data must be maintained throughout the study.
Continue reading on Oncourse
Sign up for free to access the full lesson, plus unlimited questions, flashcards, AI-powered notes, and more.
CONTINUE READING — FREEor get the app