A 43-year-old woman is hospitalized for chemotherapy following a local recurrence of breast cancer. Because the tumor responded well to the previous chemotherapy regimen, the ordering physician copies and pastes previous recommendations from her electronic health record into the patient’s new orders. Subsequently, the patient develops drug-related toxicity that prolongs her hospital stay. An investigation into the cause shows that she has lost 8 kg (17.6 lb) since her last chemotherapy course, while her other information in recent notes is identical to the past. Which of the following is the most appropriate recommendation to reduce the recurrence of similar types of errors in the future?

Making copy and paste material readily identifiable

Using copy and paste only for patient demographics

Avoiding copy and paste in electronic health records

Preventing identification of authors

Limiting copy and paste to lengthy progress notes

A longstanding patient of yours has been hospitalized for a week with pneumonia. You have taken care of her while she was in the hospital. At the end of her hospitalization, she tells you how grateful she is for your care and gives you a small gift basket with homemade food, which you accept. However, when you get home, you realize that the basket also contains a $250 gift certificate to an expensive restaurant. Which of the following is an appropriate response to this situation?

Keep the food, but return the gift certificate

Return both the food and gift certificate because it is never acceptable to take gifts from patients

Return the gift certificate for cash, and donate the cash to the hospital's free clinic

Keep both the food and gift certificate

Report the gifts to your hospital ethics committee

A 68-year-old man comes to the physician for a follow-up examination, accompanied by his daughter. Two years ago, he was diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, for which he underwent radiation therapy. He moved to the area 1 month ago to be closer to his daughter but continues to live independently. He was recently diagnosed with osteoblastic metastases to the spine and is scheduled to initiate therapy next week. In private, the patient’s daughter says that he has been losing weight and wetting the bed, and she tearfully asks the physician if his prostate cancer has returned. She says that her father has not spoken with her about his health recently. The patient has previously expressed to the physician that he does not want his family members to know about his condition because they “would worry too much.” Which of the following initial statements by the physician is most appropriate?

“I'm sorry, I can't discuss any information with you without his permission. I recommend that you have an open discussion with your father.”

“As your father's physician, I think that it's important that you know that his prostate cancer has returned. However, we are confident that he will respond well to treatment.”

“It concerns me that he's not speaking openly with you. I recommend that you seek medical power of attorney for your father. Then, we can legally discuss his diagnosis and treatment options together.”

“It’s difficult to deal with parents aging, but I have experience helping families cope. We should sit down with your father and discuss this situation together.”

“Your father is very ill and may not want you to know the details. I can imagine it's frustrating for you, but you have to respect his discretion.”

Which of the following study designs would be most appropriate to investigate the association between electronic cigarette use and the subsequent development of lung cancer?

Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who do not smoke

Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects with lung cancer who did not smoke

Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who smoke normal cigarettes

Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects without lung cancer who smoke

Subjects with lung cancer and subjects without lung cancer

A psychiatrist receives a call from a patient who expresses thoughts of harming his ex-girlfriend. The patient describes a detailed plan to attack her at her workplace. Which of the following represents the psychiatrist's most appropriate legal obligation?

Warn the ex-girlfriend and notify law enforcement

Only notify the patient's family

Maintain patient confidentiality

An 83-year-old man presents to the gastroenterologist to follow-up on results from a biopsy of a pancreatic head mass, which the clinician was concerned could be pancreatic cancer. After welcoming the patient and his wife to the clinic, the physician begins to discuss the testing and leads into delivering the results, which showed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Before she is able to disclose these findings, the patient stops her and exclaims, "Whatever it is, I don't want to know. Please just make me comfortable in my last months alive. I have made up my mind about this." Which of the following is the most appropriate response on the part of the physician?

"If that is your definite wish, then I must honor it"

"The cancer has spread to your liver"

"As a physician, I am obligated to disclose these results to you"

"If you don't know what condition you have, I will be unable to be your physician going forward"

"Please, sir, I strongly urge you to reconsider your decision"

Publication ethics for USMLE Step 2 CK: High-Yield Behavioral Science Lessons

Authorship Criteria - Who Gets Credit

Authorship requires meeting all 4 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria:
- 1. Contribution: Substantial contributions to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data.
- 2. Drafting: Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content.
- 3. Approval: Final approval of the version to be published.
- 4. Accountability: Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring integrity.

⭐ Individuals who contribute but don't meet all 4 criteria (e.g., securing funding, general supervision) should be listed in the acknowledgments, not as authors.

Misconduct - Fakes, Frauds & Phonies

Academic misconduct involves intentional deception or misrepresentation of research data and ideas, undermining the integrity of the scientific record.
Three main types:
- Fabrication: Creating fake data or results and recording or reporting them. Example: Inventing patient data for a clinical trial.
- Falsification: Manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes. This includes changing or omitting data, leading to a misrepresentation of the research. Example: Altering an image to hide an inconvenient finding.
- Plagiarism: Appropriating another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit. Includes self-plagiarism.

⭐ The Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is the U.S. federal body that oversees investigations into research misconduct funded by the Public Health Service (PHS).

Consequences: Can include article retraction, loss of grant funding, and institutional/legal penalties.

Conflicts & Reviews - Keeping It Clean

Conflict of Interest (COI): A situation where a secondary interest (e.g., financial gain, personal relationships) may unduly influence professional judgment concerning a primary interest (e.g., research validity, patient welfare).
- Management: The cornerstone is full disclosure to journals, IRBs, and conference audiences. This allows others to assess potential bias. Further steps may include monitoring or recusal.
Peer Review: The process of subjecting scholarly work to the scrutiny of other experts in the same field to ensure quality, validity, and originality before publication.
- Reviewer Ethics: Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript, provide objective and constructive feedback, and disclose any personal COIs that could bias their review.

⭐ A "significant financial interest" (as per PHS regulations) often involves an aggregated value of >$5,000 from an entity, including salary, consulting fees, and equity interests for the investigator and their immediate family.

Reporting Guidelines - The Right Way to Write

CONSORT: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).
STROBE: Observational Studies (Cohort, Case-Control, Cross-Sectional).
PRISMA: Systematic Reviews & Meta-Analyses.
CARE: Case Reports.
SPIRIT: Study Protocols for clinical trials.
ARRIVE: Animal (Pre-clinical) Studies.

⭐ Following these guidelines improves research transparency and reproducibility, which is essential for evidence-based medicine and is often a prerequisite for publication in major journals.

High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways

Authorship requires substantial contribution to conception, drafting, or final approval.

Gift authorship (honorary) and ghost authorship (uncredited) are unethical.

Plagiarism is copying others' work without attribution; self-plagiarism involves reusing one's own work.

Data fabrication (making up data) and falsification (manipulating data) are major forms of scientific misconduct.

Conflict of interest (financial or otherwise) must always be disclosed to journals and readers.

Duplicate publication, submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals, is prohibited.

Continue reading on Oncourse

CONTINUE READING — FREE

or get the app

App Store|Google Play