Patient-Specific Instrumentation

On this page

Patient-Specific Instrumentation - Tailored Tools

  • Custom-made surgical guides/jigs derived from patient's preoperative CT/MRI scans.
  • Aims: Enhance accuracy of implant placement, alignment, and surgical workflow.
  • Workflow: Imaging → 3D reconstruction → PSI design (CAD) → 3D printing → Sterilization → Intraoperative use.
  • Advantages: Precise bone cuts, potentially ↓ OR time, simplified instrumentation.
  • Applications: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), complex osteotomies.

⭐ PSI aims to accurately replicate the preoperatively planned component position and mechanical axis alignment.

PSI Workflow - Scan to Plan

  • Goal: Create patient-matched surgical guides for precise bone cuts & implant placement.

  • Sequence:

  • Key Advantage: Aims for ↑ accuracy & efficiency in surgery.

⭐ PSI demonstrates improved accuracy in achieving planned component alignment in arthroplasty (e.g., TKA).

PSI Applications - Joint-Specific Solutions

  • Knee Arthroplasty (TKA/UKA):
    • Patient-specific femoral & tibial cutting jigs.
    • Goal: Accurate bone resections, optimal implant alignment (mechanical axis, rotation).
    • Potential for reduced surgical time & blood loss.
    • Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) Workflow for TKA
  • Hip Arthroplasty (THA):
    • Custom guides for acetabular cup placement (target inclination & anteversion).
    • Assistance with femoral neck cut, stem sizing, and version.
    • Aims for accurate leg length & offset restoration.
  • Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA/RSA):
    • Glenoid-specific guides for precise component version & inclination.
    • Humeral osteotomy guides for accurate resection.
    • Enhanced baseplate screw trajectory in RSA.

⭐ PSI significantly improves the accuracy of achieving the planned component position in TKA, especially for femoral rotation and tibial slope.

PSI Pros & Cons - Gains vs. Gotchas

FeatureGains (Pros)Gotchas (Cons)
Accuracy↑ Implant precision, alignment; custom fitPotential registration errors; imaging quality dependent
EfficiencyPotentially ↓ OR time, ↓ blood loss, fewer instrumentsLearning curve; extensive pre-op planning time
Cost↑ Initial cost (guides, software, imaging); accessibility
Radiation↑ CT exposure for pre-operative planning
ComplexityAids severe deformities, revision arthroplastyManufacturing lead time; not universally applicable
OutcomesImproved kinematics; potentially ↑ implant longevityMixed evidence on clear long-term superiority vs. standard

PSI Evidence - Proof & Potential

  • Efficacy: Mixed. Some studies show ↑ alignment accuracy (TKA/THA); others find no significant clinical outcome difference vs. conventional.
  • Outcomes vs. Conventional:
    • Alignment: Potential for ↑ accuracy (e.g., tibial slope, femoral rotation).
    • Operative Time: Variable; may ↓ with experience.
    • Blood Loss: Often ↓.
    • Functional Scores: Largely comparable long-term.
  • Future Potential:
    • Enhanced precision in complex cases (e.g., deformities).
    • Integration with robotics & AI.
    • Cost reduction needed for wider adoption.

⭐ PSI aims to reduce outliers in component placement, potentially enhancing implant survivorship.

High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways

  • Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) uses custom-made surgical guides based on preoperative imaging (CT/MRI).
  • Aims to enhance accuracy of bone cuts and implant placement, especially in TKA and THA.
  • Facilitates precise execution of the preoperative surgical plan intraoperatively.
  • Potential benefits: improved limb alignment, reduced outliers, and potentially shorter OR time.
  • Reduces reliance on conventional jigs and manual referencing of anatomical landmarks.
  • 3D-printed guides are a common form of PSI, translating virtual plans to reality.

Practice Questions: Patient-Specific Instrumentation

Test your understanding with these related questions

Most common bone for which nailing is done

1 of 5

Flashcards: Patient-Specific Instrumentation

1/5

Intertrochanteric fracture of the femur is best treated by _____

TAP TO REVEAL ANSWER

Intertrochanteric fracture of the femur is best treated by _____

proximal femoral nail

browseSpaceflip

Enjoying this lesson?

Get full access to all lessons, practice questions, and more.

Start Your Free Trial