Diagnostic Tests - Numbers Game
- Basis: 2x2 table (Disease vs. Test: TP, FP, FN, TN).
- Sensitivity (Sn): $TP / (TP+FN)$. Detects disease.
- 📌 SNOUT: Sensitive test, Negative result, rules OUT.
- Specificity (Sp): $TN / (TN+FP)$. Confirms absence.
- 📌 SPIN: Specific test, Positive result, rules IN.
- PPV (Positive Predictive Value): $TP / (TP+FP)$. Prob. disease if test +ve. Varies with prevalence.
- NPV (Negative Predictive Value): $TN / (TN+FN)$. Prob. no disease if test -ve. Varies with prevalence.
- Likelihood Ratios (LR): Link pre- to post-test probability.
- LR+: $Sn / (1-Sp)$. >10 strong for disease.
- LR-: $(1-Sn) / Sp$. <0.1 strong against disease.

⭐ Prevalence ↑ → PPV ↑, NPV ↓.
Decision Thresholds - Choice Points
- Critical probability points guiding decisions: withhold action, test, or treat.
- Test Threshold ($T_{test}$):
- If P(Disease) < $T_{test}$: No further testing or treatment. Disease considered ruled out.
- Treatment Threshold ($T_{treat}$):
- If P(Disease) > $T_{treat}$: Initiate treatment empirically. Disease considered ruled in.
- Test-Treat Zone:
- If $T_{test}$ ≤ P(Disease) ≤ $T_{treat}$: Optimal to perform diagnostic testing.
- Influencing factors:
- Disease: Prevalence, severity.
- Test: Accuracy (Sn, Sp), risks, cost.
- Treatment: Efficacy, risks, benefits, cost.
⭐ The treatment threshold ($T_{treat}$) is lowered by ↑disease severity, ↑treatment efficacy, or ↓treatment risk.

Clinical Scores & EBM - Evidence Edge
- Clinical Scores: Objectify risk/diagnosis (e.g., Wells' for DVT/PE, CURB-65 for pneumonia severity).
- Metrics: Sensitivity $TP/(TP+FN)$, Specificity $TN/(TN+FP)$.
- PPV $TP/(TP+FP)$, NPV $TN/(TN+FN)$.
- Likelihood Ratios: $LR+ = Sens/(1-Spec)$; $LR- = (1-Sens)/Spec$.
- EBM: Integrates best evidence, clinical expertise, patient values.
- PICO: Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome.
- Hierarchy (Top to Bottom): Meta-analysis/Systematic Review → RCT → Cohort → Case-Control → Case Series → Expert Opinion.
- Key EBM stat: Number Needed to Treat (NNT) = $1/ARR$.
- 📌 FINER criteria (Research Q): Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant.

⭐ Odds Ratio (OR) is used in case-control studies; Relative Risk (RR) in cohort studies. For rare diseases ($prevalence < 10%$), $OR \approx RR$
Cognitive Biases & SDM - Mind Matters
- Cognitive Biases: Systematic thinking errors impairing clinical judgment.
- Anchoring: Over-relying on initial info.
- Availability: Overestimating based on easily recalled examples.
- Confirmation: Seeking info confirming existing beliefs.
- Premature Closure: Accepting diagnosis early, missing alternatives.
- Framing Effect: Decisions influenced by info presentation.
- Mitigation: Metacognition, checklists, second opinions.
- Shared Decision Making (SDM): Clinicians and patients collaboratively make healthcare decisions.
- Involves discussing options, evidence, benefits/risks.
- Aligns care with patient values and preferences.
- Improves satisfaction and adherence. 📌 Remember "BRAN": Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Nothing.
⭐ SDM is not just an option but an ethical imperative in patient-centered care.
High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways
- Bayes' Theorem is crucial for post-test probability calculation using likelihood ratios.
- Understand Sensitivity (Sn), Specificity (Sp), PPV, and NPV for test interpretation.
- ROC curves help compare diagnostic tests; Area Under Curve (AUC) quantifies overall accuracy.
- Decision analysis often employs decision trees to model choices and potential outcomes.
- The threshold model (test/treat thresholds) guides diagnostic and therapeutic actions.
- Recognize common cognitive biases (e.g., anchoring, availability) that can affect clinical judgment.
- Apply Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) principles, respecting the hierarchy of evidence for decisions.
Continue reading on Oncourse
Sign up for free to access the full lesson, plus unlimited questions, flashcards, AI-powered notes, and more.
CONTINUE READING — FREEor get the app