Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Transport of critically ill children. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 1: A newborn male is evaluated one minute after birth. He was born at 38 weeks gestation to a 28-year-old gravida 3 via vaginal delivery. The patient’s mother received sporadic prenatal care, and the pregnancy was complicated by gestational diabetes. The amniotic fluid was clear. The patient’s pulse is 70/min, and his breathing is irregular with a slow, weak cry. He whimpers in response to a soft pinch on the thigh, and he has moderate muscle tone with some flexion of his extremities. His body is pink and his extremities are blue. The patient is dried with a warm towel and then placed on his back on a flat warmer bed. His mouth and nose are suctioned with a bulb syringe.
Which of the following is the best next step in management?
- A. Supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes
- B. Chest compressions and bag-mask ventilation
- C. Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation
- D. Intravenous epinephrine and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes
- E. Positive pressure ventilation and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes (Correct Answer)
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Positive pressure ventilation and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes***
- The newborn's **heart rate is 70/min**, which is below the target of >100/min that warrants **positive pressure ventilation (PPV)**. His irregular breathing and central cyanosis (pink body, blue extremities indicate acrocyanosis, but the overall picture suggests a need for support), along with the low heart rate, indicate inadequate respiratory effort and circulation.
- After initial steps (drying, stimulating, suctioning), if the heart rate remains below 100/min or the infant has gasping/apnea, PPV should be initiated immediately. Reassessing the **Apgar score at 5 minutes** is standard practice.
*Supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes*
- While supplemental oxygen is important, **nasal cannula** provides low-flow oxygen and is insufficient for a newborn with a heart rate of 70/min and irregular breathing. This patient requires more robust respiratory support.
- Oxygen supplementation alone would not address the inadequate respiratory effort and bradycardia to the necessary extent.
*Chest compressions and bag-mask ventilation*
- **Chest compressions** are indicated when the heart rate is below 60/min despite adequate positive pressure ventilation for at least 30 seconds.
- In this case, the heart rate is 70/min, so chest compressions are not yet indicated. The priority is to establish effective ventilation.
*Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation*
- **Endotracheal intubation** is considered if PPV via bag-mask is ineffective, if prolonged resuscitation is anticipated, or if meconium aspiration is present.
- This is a more invasive step and not the immediate next step when PPV can be initiated first to improve heart rate and respiration.
*Intravenous epinephrine and reassessment of Apgar score at 5 minutes*
- **Intravenous epinephrine** is administered only if the heart rate remains below 60/min despite 30 seconds of effective positive pressure ventilation and 60 seconds of effective chest compressions.
- The current heart rate is 70/min, and the prior steps of resuscitation have not yet included effective PPV for the required duration, so epinephrine is not yet indicated.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 2: An 8-year-old boy and his 26-year-old babysitter are brought into the emergency department with severe injuries caused by a motor vehicle accident. The child is wheeled to the pediatric intensive care unit with a severe injury to his right arm, as well as other external and internal injuries. He is hemorrhaging and found to be hemodynamically unstable. He subsequently requires transfusion and surgery, and he is currently unconscious. The pediatric trauma surgeon evaluates the child’s arm and realizes it will need to be amputated at the elbow. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action to take with regards to the amputation?
- A. Obtain an emergency court order from a judge to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm
- B. Find the child’s parents to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm
- C. Amputate the child’s arm at the elbow joint (Correct Answer)
- D. Wait for the child’s babysitter to recover from her injuries to obtain her consent to amputate the child’s arm
- E. Wait for the child to gain consciousness to obtain his consent to amputate his arm
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Amputate the child’s arm at the elbow joint***
- In an emergency situation where a child's life is at risk and a procedure is immediately necessary to save their life or prevent significant harm, **implied consent** allows for medical intervention without explicit parental consent. The child's **hemodynamic instability** and **severe hemorrhage** indicate an immediate threat to life.
- The decision to amputate to save the child's life is a **medically necessary emergency intervention**. Waiting for consent would cause a dangerous delay.
*Obtain an emergency court order from a judge to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- While court orders can be used in cases of parental refusal or unavailability for non-emergency procedures, the **urgent nature** of this life-threatening situation precludes waiting for a court order.
- The delay in obtaining a court order could significantly worsen the child's prognosis or lead to death.
*Find the child’s parents to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- Although parental consent is generally required for minors, the child's **critical condition** and **hemodynamic instability** mean delaying life-saving treatment to locate parents would be medically irresponsible.
- The principle of **beneficence** (acting in the best interest of the patient) and avoiding harm takes precedence in this emergency.
*Wait for the child’s babysitter to recover from her injuries to obtain her consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- A babysitter is generally not legally authorized to provide consent for major medical procedures for a child, especially an amputation.
- Even if the babysitter had some form of temporary custody, her own injury makes her an unreliable source of consent, and the delay would be critical.
*Wait for the child to gain consciousness to obtain his consent to amputate his arm*
- An 8-year-old child is generally not considered mature enough to provide **informed consent** for such a major medical decision.
- The child is **unconscious and hemodynamically unstable**, making it impossible to obtain consent and dangerously delaying a life-saving procedure.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 3: A 35-year-old man is brought into the emergency department by emergency medical services with his right hand wrapped in bloody bandages. The patient states that he is a carpenter and was cutting some wood for a home renovation project when he looked away and injured one of his digits with a circular table saw. He states that his index finger was sliced off and is being brought in by his wife. On exam, his vitals are within normal limits and stable, and he is missing part of his second digit on his right hand distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint. How should the digit be transported to the hospital for the best outcome?
- A. In a sterile plastic bag wrapped in saline moistened gauze on ice (Correct Answer)
- B. In a sterile bag of tap water
- C. In the pocket of a coat or a jacket
- D. Wrapped in a towel
- E. In a sterile plastic bag wrapped in saline moistened gauze
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***In a sterile plastic bag wrapped in saline moistened gauze on ice***
- The amputated digit should be wrapped in **saline-moistened gauze** to prevent tissue desiccation and then placed in a **sterile plastic bag**.
- This bag should then be placed on **ice** (indirect contact) to cool the tissue and minimize ischemic damage, preserving viability for potential re-implantation.
*In a sterile bag of tap water*
- Placing the digit directly in **tap water** can cause significant cellular damage due to osmotic differences, leading to cell lysis and making re-implantation less successful.
- Tap water is also not sterile, increasing the risk of **infection** for the amputated part.
*In the pocket of a coat or a jacket*
- Transporting the digit in a pocket provides no **temperature control** or **sterility**, leading to rapid tissue degradation and increased risk of bacterial contamination.
- This method offers no protection against **trauma or loss** of the amputated part.
*Wrapped in a towel*
- Wrapping the digit in a towel alone does not provide adequate **sterility** or **moisture**, leading to tissue desiccation and increased contamination risk.
- A towel offers no means of **cooling** the tissue, which is crucial for preserving cell viability.
*In a sterile plastic bag wrapped in saline moistened gauze*
- While wrapping in **saline-moistened gauze** and a sterile bag is a good start, the absence of **cooling** (ice) significantly reduces the time window for successful re-implantation.
- Without cooling, the **metabolic rate** of the tissue remains high, accelerating ischemic damage and tissue death.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 4: A 16-month-old male patient, with no significant past medical history, is brought into the emergency department for the second time in 5 days with tachypnea, expiratory wheezes and hypoxia. The patient presented to the emergency department initially due to rhinorrhea, fever and cough. He was treated with nasal suctioning and discharged home. The mother states that, over the past 5 days, the patient has started breathing faster with chest retractions. His vital signs are significant for a temperature of 100.7 F, respiratory rate of 45 and oxygen saturation of 90%. What is the most appropriate treatment for this patient?
- A. Albuterol, ipratropium and IV methylprednisolone
- B. IV cefotaxime and IV vancomycin
- C. Intubation and IV cefuroxime
- D. Humidified oxygen, racemic epinephrine and intravenous (IV) dexamethasone
- E. Nasal suctioning, oxygen therapy and IV fluids (Correct Answer)
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Nasal suctioning, oxygen therapy and IV fluids***
- This patient's presentation with rhinorrhea, fever, cough, tachypnea, expiratory wheezes, and hypoxia, particularly a 16-month-old, strongly suggests **bronchiolitis**, likely caused by **RSV**.
- Management of bronchiolitis is primarily **supportive care**, including maintaining airway patency via nasal suctioning, providing oxygen for hypoxia, and ensuring adequate hydration with IV fluids.
*Albuterol, ipratropium and IV methylprednisolone*
- **Bronchodilators** like albuterol and ipratropium are generally **not recommended** for routine management of bronchiolitis due to lack of consistent efficacy in infants.
- **Corticosteroids** (e.g., methylprednisolone) are also **not routinely indicated** for bronchiolitis and have not been shown to improve outcomes.
*IV cefotaxime and IV vancomycin*
- These are **broad-spectrum antibiotics** used to treat **bacterial infections**, such as severe pneumonia or sepsis.
- The clinical presentation is more consistent with a **viral respiratory infection** (bronchiolitis), and there is no evidence of a bacterial co-infection or sepsis.
*Intubation and IV cefuroxime*
- **Intubation** is an invasive procedure reserved for patients with impending respiratory failure and is not indicated at this stage given the current oxygen saturation of 90% with supportive measures.
- **Cefuroxime** is an antibiotic, and like other antibiotics, is not indicated for a viral illness like bronchiolitis.
*Humidified oxygen, racemic epinephrine and intravenous (IV) dexamethasone*
- **Racemic epinephrine** may be considered for severe bronchiolitis with significant bronchospasm, but its use is not routine and its efficacy is debated.
- **IV dexamethasone** is a corticosteroid, which is not recommended for routine bronchiolitis management. Humidified oxygen is helpful, but the overall regimen is not standard for bronchiolitis.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 5: A 3-week-old boy is brought to the emergency department by his parents because of a 3-day history of progressive lethargy and difficulty feeding. He was born at term and did not have difficulty feeding previously. His temperature is 39.4°C (103°F), pulse is 220/min, respirations are 45/min, and blood pressure is 50/30 mm Hg. Pulse oximetry on 100% oxygen shows an oxygen saturation of 97%. Examination shows dry mucous membranes, delayed capillary refill time, and cool skin with poor turgor. Despite multiple attempts by the nursing staff, they are unable to establish peripheral intravenous access. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Intraosseous cannulation (Correct Answer)
- B. Ultrasound-guided antecubital vein cannulation
- C. Internal jugular vein cannulation
- D. Intramuscular epinephrine
- E. Rapid sequence intubation
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Intraosseous cannulation***
- This infant is in **pediatric septic shock** with signs of **poor perfusion** (delayed capillary refill, cool skin, poor turgor, hypotension) and **difficulty obtaining peripheral intravenous access**.
- **Intraosseous (IO) access** is recommended in pediatric emergencies when IV access cannot be established rapidly, providing a route for fluids, medications, and blood products.
*Ultrasound-guided antecubital vein cannulation*
- While ultrasound can improve success rates for peripheral IVs, the **critical condition** of this infant necessitates immediate vascular access, making IO a faster and more reliable option when peripheral attempts fail.
- Delaying definitive fluid resuscitation and medication administration to attempt a more technically challenging peripheral IV could worsen the patient's outcome.
*Internal jugular vein cannulation*
- **Central venous access (e.g., internal jugular)** is a more invasive and time-consuming procedure with higher risks (e.g., pneumothorax) and is not the first-line access in an emergent, unstable pediatric patient due to the time constraint.
- **IO access** is a quicker and safer route for immediate life-saving interventions in pediatric emergencies.
*Intramuscular epinephrine*
- **Intramuscular epinephrine** is primarily used for the treatment of **anaphylaxis** or in certain cardiac arrest algorithms, neither of which is the primary concern here.
- This patient is in septic shock requiring fluid resuscitation and likely antibiotics, which cannot be adequately delivered via intramuscular injection.
*Rapid sequence intubation*
- While intubation might be considered if the patient's respiratory status deteriorates further or for airway protection, the **immediate priority** is to address the **shock** and **poor perfusion** through vascular access and fluid resuscitation.
- **Intubation** alone will not correct the underlying circulatory collapse and shock state.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 6: A 27-year-old man presents to the emergency department after being hit by a car while riding his bike. The patient was brought in with his airway intact, vitals stable, and with a C-collar on. Physical exam is notable for bruising over the patient’s head and a confused man with a Glasgow coma scale of 11. It is noticed that the patient has a very irregular pattern of breathing. Repeat vitals demonstrate his temperature is 97.5°F (36.4°C), blood pressure is 172/102 mmHg, pulse is 55/min, respirations are 22/min and irregular, and oxygen saturation is 94% on room air. Which of the following interventions are most likely to improve this patient's vital signs?
- A. Head elevation, sedation, hypertonic saline, hypoventilation
- B. Lower head, sedation, hypertonic saline, hypoventilation
- C. Head elevation, sedation, mannitol, hyperventilation (Correct Answer)
- D. Head elevation, norepinephrine, mannitol, hyperventilation
- E. Lower head, sedation, hypertonic saline, hyperventilation
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Head elevation, sedation, mannitol, hyperventilation***
- This patient presents with signs of **increased intracranial pressure (ICP)**, indicated by **Cushing's triad** (hypertension, bradycardia, irregular respirations) and a decreased Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) after head trauma. **Head elevation** to 30 degrees promotes venous outflow from the brain, reducing ICP.
- **Sedation** lowers metabolic demand and reduces agitation, which can otherwise increase ICP. **Mannitol** is an osmotic diuretic that rapidly draws fluid from the brain, decreasing cerebral edema. **Hyperventilation** temporarily reduces ICP by causing cerebral vasoconstriction through decreased pCO2.
*Head elevation, sedation, hypertonic saline, hypoventilation*
- While **head elevation**, **sedation**, and **hypertonic saline** (an alternative osmotic agent to mannitol) are appropriate for ICP management, **hypoventilation** would increase pCO2, causing cerebral vasodilation and worsening ICP.
- The combination of effective and ineffective ICP-reducing strategies makes this an incorrect option.
*Lower head, sedation, hypertonic saline, hypoventilation*
- **Lowering the head** would impede venous drainage from the brain and increase ICP, which is detrimental in this scenario.
- As mentioned, **hypoventilation** is contraindicated as it exacerbates cerebral edema and elevated ICP.
*Head elevation, norepinephrine, mannitol, hyperventilation*
- While **head elevation**, **mannitol**, and **hyperventilation** are appropriate, **norepinephrine** is primarily used to treat hypotension and maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) if blood pressure is dangerously low.
- In this case, the patient is hypertensive (**blood pressure 172/102 mmHg**), so norepinephrine would further increase blood pressure and ICP.
*Lower head, sedation, hypertonic saline, hyperventilation*
- **Lowering the head** is contraindicated as it directly increases ICP by hindering venous outflow from the brain.
- Although **sedation**, **hypertonic saline**, and **hyperventilation** are useful for ICP control, the incorrect positioning makes this option less suitable.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 7: A 54-year-old woman comes to the emergency department because of two episodes of bright red blood per rectum within the past day. She has a history of migraine, which is treated prophylactically with verapamil. She appears well and is hemodynamically stable. Cardiac exam reveals a regular heart rate without any murmurs or gallops. Lungs are clear to auscultation. Her abdomen is mildly tender without rebound or guarding. Digital rectal examination shows fresh blood on the glove. Laboratory studies show:
Hemoglobin 10.4 g/dL
Leukocyte count 5,000/mm3
Platelet count 175,000/mm3
Partial thromboplastin time 35 seconds
Serum
Na+ 140 mEq/L
K+ 3.7 mEq/L
Cl- 101 mEq/L
HCO3- 25 mEq/L
Mg2+ 1.8 mEq/L
A routine ECG shows a heart rate of 75/min, a normal axis, PR interval of 280 ms, QRS interval of 80 ms with a QRS complex following each p wave, and no evidence of ischemic changes. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management with respect to this patient's cardiovascular workup?
- A. Observation (Correct Answer)
- B. Atropine therapy
- C. Synchronized cardioversion
- D. Metoprolol therapy
- E. Pacemaker placement
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Observation***
- The patient is currently **hemodynamically stable** despite the prolonged PR interval, indicating that the **first-degree AV block** is not causing immediate compromise.
- Continuation of **verapamil** (a calcium channel blocker) for migraine prophylaxis is the likely cause of the prolonged PR interval; however, in the absence of symptoms attributable to the AV block, observation is appropriate.
*Atropine therapy*
- **Atropine** is used to increase heart rate in **symptomatic bradycardia** or higher-degree AV blocks (second or third-degree) if the patient is unstable.
- This patient is **hemodynamically stable** with a heart rate of 75/min and has only a first-degree AV block, making atropine unnecessary.
*Synchronized cardioversion*
- **Synchronized cardioversion** is reserved for **unstable tachyarrhythmias** or some unstable bradyarrhythmias not responsive to chemical therapy.
- The patient's heart rate is 75/min, and she has **no evidence of an arrhythmia** requiring cardioversion; her prolonged PR interval is a conduction delay, not an arrhythmia.
*Metoprolol therapy*
- **Metoprolol** is a beta-blocker that would **further slow AV nodal conduction** and could potentially worsen the first-degree AV block or precipitate a higher-degree block.
- It is contraindicated as a treatment for AV block and would exacerbate the underlying issue caused by verapamil.
*Pacemaker placement*
- **Pacemaker placement** is considered for **symptomatic second-degree or third-degree AV block**, or in some cases of first-degree AV block if it progresses to a higher degree and causes severe symptoms.
- This patient has a **first-degree AV block** and is **asymptomatic** and **hemodynamically stable**, thus a pacemaker is not indicated at this time.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 8: A 14-year-old girl presents to the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain. She was watching a movie 3 hours prior to presentation when she developed severe non-radiating right lower quadrant pain. The pain has worsened since it started. She also had non-bloody non-bilious emesis 1 hour ago and continues to feel nauseated. Her temperature is 101°F (38.3°C), blood pressure is 130/90 mmHg, pulse is 110/min, and respirations are 22/min. On exam, she has rebound tenderness at McBurney point and a positive Rovsing sign. She is stabilized with intravenous fluids and pain medication and is taken to the operating room to undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy. While in the operating room, the circulating nurse leads the surgical team in a time out to ensure that introductions are made, the patient’s name and date of birth are correct, antibiotics have been given, and the surgical site is marked appropriately. This process is an example of which of the following human factor engineering elements?
- A. Forcing function
- B. Safety culture
- C. Simplification
- D. Standardization (Correct Answer)
- E. Resilience engineering
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Standardization***
- The surgical **time-out** is a prime example of **standardization** in healthcare, as it involves a prescribed, uniform procedure followed in every surgery to enhance safety.
- It ensures critical safety checks—like patient identification, site marking, and antibiotic administration—are consistently performed, thus reducing variability and the potential for errors.
*Forcing function*
- A **forcing function** is a design element that makes it impossible to commit an error, such as a specific connector shape that prevents incorrect device attachment.
- The time-out, while a critical safeguard, still relies on human compliance and does not physically prevent an error from occurring if the steps are not followed.
*Safety culture*
- **Safety culture** refers to the shared beliefs, values, and attitudes that employees have about safety within an organization.
- While a time-out contributes to a strong safety culture, it is a specific process or tool, not the overarching culture itself.
*Simplification*
- **Simplification** aims to reduce complexity in a process to minimize cognitive load and potential for error.
- The time-out adds a structured step rather than simplifying an existing process; its purpose is to ensure all necessary checks are systematically completed.
*Resilience engineering*
- **Resilience engineering** focuses on an organization's ability to anticipate, cope with, and recover from failures, maintaining stability in the face of disruptions.
- While the time-out promotes safety, it primarily addresses error prevention rather than the broader organizational capacity to adapt and recover from system failures.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 9: A boy with diabetic ketoacidosis is admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit for closer monitoring. Peripheral venous access is established. He is treated with IV isotonic saline and started on an insulin infusion. This patient is at the highest risk for which of the following conditions in the next 24 hours?
- A. Cerebral edema (Correct Answer)
- B. Intrinsic kidney injury
- C. Cognitive impairment
- D. Hyperkalemia
- E. Deep venous thrombosis
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Cerebral edema***
- **Cerebral edema** is a severe and potentially fatal complication of **diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)** treatment, particularly in children.
- It results from a rapid decrease in serum osmolality during treatment, causing water to shift into brain cells.
*Intrinsic kidney injury*
- While dehydration in DKA can lead to **prerenal acute kidney injury**, **intrinsic kidney injury** is less common as an acute risk directly from DKA treatment in the first 24 hours.
- Initial fluid resuscitation often improves renal perfusion, reducing the risk of intrinsic damage unless other predisposing factors are present.
*Cognitive impairment*
- Cognitive impairment after DKA is more commonly observed in the long term, potentially due to recurrent episodes or severe DKA with cerebral edema.
- It is not the most immediate and highest risk acute complication in the short-term (next 24 hours).
*Hyperkalemia*
- Patients with DKA typically present with **hyperkalemia** due to acidosis and insulin deficiency, which resolves with insulin therapy as potassium shifts back into cells.
- The more immediate risk during treatment, especially after initial fluid resuscitation and insulin, is **hypokalemia**, not hyperkalemia, due to the intracellular shift of potassium.
*Deep venous thrombosis*
- **Dehydration** and **hyperviscosity** associated with DKA can increase the risk of **thrombosis**, but **deep venous thrombosis** is not the highest or most immediate acute risk in the next 24 hours.
- **Cerebral edema** is a more specific and life-threatening complication directly related to the treatment of DKA in children.
Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG Question 10: A 2-year-old girl is brought to the emergency department after swallowing a button battery that was lying on the table 1 hour ago. She has no shortness of breath or chest discomfort. Her pulse is 112/min and respirations are 30/min. Pulse oximetry on room air shows an oxygen saturation of 98%. Physical examination shows no abnormalities. An x-ray of the chest shows the battery lodged in the esophagus at the level of T2. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Removal of the battery with magnet and nasogastric tube
- B. Administer syrup of ipecac
- C. Administer chelation therapy
- D. Endoscopic removal of the battery (Correct Answer)
- E. Reassurance and observation
Transport of critically ill children Explanation: ***Endoscopic removal of the battery***
- A button battery lodged in the esophagus is a **medical emergency** requiring prompt removal due to the risk of **corrosive injury, perforation, and fistula formation**.
- **Endoscopic removal** allows direct visualization and controlled extraction, minimizing further damage.
*Removal of the battery with magnet and nasogastric tube*
- While magnets can be used for foreign body removal in some cases, a **nasogastric tube is not an appropriate tool for safely extracting a button battery from the esophagus**.
- This method poses a risk of further trauma to the esophageal wall or dislodging the battery into the airway.
*Administer syrup of ipecac*
- **Syrup of ipecac induces emesis**, which is contraindicated here as it could lead to further esophageal damage, aspiration, or lodging the battery elsewhere in the GI tract.
- Its use for ingested foreign bodies is generally **discouraged**.
*Administer chelation therapy*
- **Chelation therapy is used for heavy metal poisoning**, such as lead or mercury, not for the direct removal of an ingested foreign body like a battery.
- The primary concern with button batteries is **local corrosive injury**, not systemic toxicity from metal absorption (unless it perforates).
*Reassurance and observation*
- This approach is dangerously inappropriate for an esophageal button battery, as **damage can occur within hours**, leading to strictures, perforation, and even death.
- Immediate intervention is crucial, even if the patient appears asymptomatic initially.
More Transport of critically ill children US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
