Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Consent for minors and adolescents. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 1: A 5-year-old child is brought to the emergency department after being hit by a motor vehicle on the way to school. According to paramedics, the child's right leg was severely crushed in the accident. After evaluation, the physician recommends immediate limb-saving surgery to preserve the leg and prevent complications. However, the parents refuse to consent to the surgery. They explain that they heard about a similar case where a child died after limb-saving surgery, and they believe the procedure might lead to amputation or death. Despite the physician's explanation that the surgery is intended to save the limb, the parents remain adamant in their refusal. What is the next best step?
- A. Contact the next of kin
- B. Ask for a court order
- C. Take into account the child’s wishes
- D. Take the parents' wishes into account
- E. Inform the hospital Ethics Committee, state authority, and child protective services, and obtain a court order to proceed with treatment (Correct Answer)
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Inform the hospital Ethics Committee, state authority, and child protective services, and obtain a court order to proceed with treatment***
- When parents refuse **life-saving or limb-saving treatment** for a child, and the medical team believes the treatment is in the child's best interest, the case becomes a legal and ethical concern requiring immediate institutional and legal intervention.
- The appropriate response involves **multiple parallel actions**: contacting the hospital **Ethics Committee** for guidance, notifying **Child Protective Services (CPS)** for suspected medical neglect, and seeking a **court order** to authorize treatment.
- This comprehensive approach protects the child's welfare while respecting legal procedures. **Medical neglect** constitutes a form of child abuse, and the state has parens patriae authority to protect minor citizens when parents' decisions threaten serious harm.
- In true life-threatening emergencies where delay would cause death or serious harm, physicians may proceed under emergency doctrine, but for urgent situations allowing time for legal process, a court order should be obtained.
*Contact the next of kin*
- While contacting other family members might provide support or alternative perspectives, it does not address the immediate legal and ethical obligations when parents refuse medically necessary care.
- The parents are the legal guardians, and their refusal necessitates formal institutional and legal intervention rather than informal family consultation.
*Ask for a court order*
- While obtaining a **court order** is essential when parental consent is refused for necessary treatment, this option alone is incomplete.
- The most appropriate immediate response involves the **comprehensive institutional approach**: simultaneously engaging the Ethics Committee for guidance, notifying CPS for child protection, and initiating the legal process for court authorization.
- This multi-pronged approach ensures all stakeholders are involved and the child's interests are protected through proper channels.
*Take into account the child's wishes*
- A 5-year-old child lacks the **developmental capacity and legal standing** for informed consent regarding complex medical procedures.
- While assent from older minors (typically 7+ years) may be considered for less critical decisions, a 5-year-old's wishes regarding limb-saving surgery are not determinative.
- The focus must remain on the child's **best medical interest** as determined by medical professionals and legal frameworks, not the child's limited understanding at this developmental stage.
*Take the parents' wishes into account*
- While parental autonomy in medical decision-making is generally respected, this principle has limits when parental decisions would result in **significant harm, neglect, or death** to the child.
- When parents refuse **medically indicated, life-saving, or limb-saving treatment**, their decision can and should be legally challenged through appropriate institutional and judicial channels to protect the child's welfare.
- The state's interest in protecting children overrides parental preferences when those preferences threaten serious harm.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 2: A 17-year-old girl makes an appointment with her pediatrician because she is concerned that she may have gotten a sexually transmitted infection. Specifically, she had unprotected sex two weeks ago and has since been experiencing painful urination and abdominal pain. Laboratory tests confirm a diagnosis of Chlamydial infection. At this point, the girl says that she wants to personally give permission to be treated rather than seek consent from her parents because they do not know that she is in a relationship. She also asks that the diagnosis not be reported to anyone. What should the physician do with regards to these two patient requests?
- A. Contact her parents as well as report to public health agencies
- B. Do not contact her parents but do report to public health agencies (Correct Answer)
- C. Contact her parents but do not report to public health agencies
- D. Do not contact her parents and do not report to public health agencies
- E. Choose based on the physician's interpretation of the patient's best interests
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Do not contact her parents but do report to public health agencies***
- Minors can consent to **STI treatment** without parental involvement under **emancipated minor doctrines** or specific state laws concerning reproductive health and STIs, ensuring access to care.
- Physicians are legally obligated to report **Chlamydia infection** to public health authorities to prevent further spread and ensure partner notification, adhering to public health mandates.
*Contact her parents as well as report to public health agencies*
- Contacting her parents against her wishes would violate the minor's right to **confidentiality in STI treatment**, which is often protected by law to encourage minors to seek care.
- While reporting to public health agencies is correct, parental notification without consent is generally not required for STI treatment in minors.
*Contact her parents but do not report to public health agencies*
- Not reporting the Chlamydia infection to public health authorities would be a **breach of mandatory reporting laws** for STIs, which are crucial for public health surveillance and control.
- Contacting her parents inappropriately overrides her **right to confidential medical care** for STIs, which is legally protected for minors in many jurisdictions.
*Do not contact her parents and do not report to public health agencies*
- Failing to report the Chlamydia infection violates **public health mandates** for STI surveillance and control, potentially hindering efforts to track and prevent disease spread.
- While not contacting parents is often appropriate for STI treatment in minors, not reporting the diagnosis is a significant **legal and ethical lapse** from a public health perspective.
*Choose based on the physician's interpretation of the patient's best interests*
- While physician judgment is important, the decisions regarding **minor consent for STI treatment** and **mandatory public health reporting** are often governed by specific laws and ethical guidelines that supersede individual interpretation.
- The "best interests" framework is typically applied when there are no clear legal mandates, but in cases of STIs, specific legal precedents guide the physician's actions.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 3: A 16-year-old girl comes to the physician for a regular health visit. She feels healthy. She lives with her parents at home. She says that the relationship with her parents has been strained lately because they ""do not approve"" of her new boyfriend. She recently became sexually active with her boyfriend and requests a prescription for an oral contraception. She does not want her parents to know. She smokes half-a-pack of cigarettes per day and does not drink alcohol. She appears well-nourished. Physical examination shows no abnormalities. Urine pregnancy test is negative. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Recommend an oral contraceptive pill
- B. Discuss all effective contraceptive options (Correct Answer)
- C. Conduct HIV screening
- D. Inform patient that her smoking history disqualifies her for oral contraceptives
- E. Ask patient to obtain parental consent before discussing any contraceptive options
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Discuss all effective contraceptive options***
- It is crucial to discuss all available and **effective contraceptive options** with the patient, including their benefits, risks, and suitability for her lifestyle, before recommending a specific method.
- This ensures **informed consent** and shared decision-making, empowering the patient to choose the best method for her needs.
*Recommend an oral contraceptive pill*
- Recommending only one method without discussing alternatives limits the patient's choices and does not provide a **comprehensive approach** to contraception.
- While oral contraceptives are effective, other methods like **long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs)** may be more suitable or preferred by the patient.
*Conduct HIV screening*
- While **HIV screening** is important for sexually active individuals, it is not the immediate next step in management when the patient's primary concern is contraception.
- Addressing the patient's immediate request for contraception takes precedence, though **STI/HIV counseling** should be part of comprehensive sexual health discussions.
*Inform patient that her smoking history disqualifies her for oral contraceptives*
- A smoking history in adolescent patients **does not automatically disqualify** them from all types of oral contraceptives, especially progestin-only pills.
- The risk of **thromboembolism** with combined oral contraceptives is increased in smokers over 35, but a 16-year-old's risk needs careful assessment and discussion, not an outright disqualification.
*Ask patient to obtain parental consent before discussing any contraceptive options*
- In many jurisdictions, including the US, minors have the right to **confidential reproductive healthcare services**, including contraception, without parental consent.
- Requiring parental consent would violate her **confidentiality rights** and could deter her from seeking necessary care, potentially leading to unintended pregnancy.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 4: An 8-year-old boy and his 26-year-old babysitter are brought into the emergency department with severe injuries caused by a motor vehicle accident. The child is wheeled to the pediatric intensive care unit with a severe injury to his right arm, as well as other external and internal injuries. He is hemorrhaging and found to be hemodynamically unstable. He subsequently requires transfusion and surgery, and he is currently unconscious. The pediatric trauma surgeon evaluates the child’s arm and realizes it will need to be amputated at the elbow. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action to take with regards to the amputation?
- A. Obtain an emergency court order from a judge to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm
- B. Find the child’s parents to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm
- C. Amputate the child’s arm at the elbow joint (Correct Answer)
- D. Wait for the child’s babysitter to recover from her injuries to obtain her consent to amputate the child’s arm
- E. Wait for the child to gain consciousness to obtain his consent to amputate his arm
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Amputate the child’s arm at the elbow joint***
- In an emergency situation where a child's life is at risk and a procedure is immediately necessary to save their life or prevent significant harm, **implied consent** allows for medical intervention without explicit parental consent. The child's **hemodynamic instability** and **severe hemorrhage** indicate an immediate threat to life.
- The decision to amputate to save the child's life is a **medically necessary emergency intervention**. Waiting for consent would cause a dangerous delay.
*Obtain an emergency court order from a judge to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- While court orders can be used in cases of parental refusal or unavailability for non-emergency procedures, the **urgent nature** of this life-threatening situation precludes waiting for a court order.
- The delay in obtaining a court order could significantly worsen the child's prognosis or lead to death.
*Find the child’s parents to obtain consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- Although parental consent is generally required for minors, the child's **critical condition** and **hemodynamic instability** mean delaying life-saving treatment to locate parents would be medically irresponsible.
- The principle of **beneficence** (acting in the best interest of the patient) and avoiding harm takes precedence in this emergency.
*Wait for the child’s babysitter to recover from her injuries to obtain her consent to amputate the child’s arm*
- A babysitter is generally not legally authorized to provide consent for major medical procedures for a child, especially an amputation.
- Even if the babysitter had some form of temporary custody, her own injury makes her an unreliable source of consent, and the delay would be critical.
*Wait for the child to gain consciousness to obtain his consent to amputate his arm*
- An 8-year-old child is generally not considered mature enough to provide **informed consent** for such a major medical decision.
- The child is **unconscious and hemodynamically unstable**, making it impossible to obtain consent and dangerously delaying a life-saving procedure.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 5: A 29-year-old man is admitted to the emergency department following a motorcycle accident. The patient is severely injured and requires life support after splenectomy and evacuation of a subdural hematoma. Past medical history is unremarkable. The patient’s family members, including wife, parents, siblings, and grandparents, are informed about the patient’s condition. The patient has no living will and there is no durable power of attorney. The patient must be put in an induced coma for an undetermined period of time. Which of the following is responsible for making medical decisions for the incapacitated patient?
- A. The spouse (Correct Answer)
- B. An older sibling
- C. Physician
- D. Legal guardian
- E. The parents
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***The spouse***
- In the absence of a **living will** or **durable power of attorney**, the law typically designates the **spouse** as the primary decision-maker for an incapacitated patient.
- This hierarchy is established to ensure decisions are made by the individual most intimately connected and presumed to understand the patient's wishes.
*An older sibling*
- Siblings are generally further down the **hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers** than a spouse or parents.
- They would typically only be considered if higher-priority family members are unavailable or unwilling to make decisions.
*Physician*
- The physician's role is to provide medical care and guidance, not to make medical decisions for an incapacitated patient when family surrogates are available.
- Physicians only make decisions in **emergency situations** when no surrogate is immediately available and treatment is immediately necessary to save the patient's life or prevent serious harm.
*Legal guardian*
- A legal guardian is usually appointed by a **court** when there is no appropriate family member available or when there is a dispute among family members.
- In this scenario, with a spouse and other close family members present, a legal guardian would not be the first choice.
*The parents*
- While parents are close family members, they are typically considered **secondary to the spouse** in the hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers for an adult patient.
- They would usually only be the decision-makers if the patient were unmarried or the spouse were unavailable.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 6: A 4-month-old girl is brought to the pediatric walk-in clinic by her daycare worker with a persistent diaper rash. The daycare worker provided documents to the clinic receptionist stating that she has the authority to make medical decisions when the child’s parents are not available. The patient’s vital signs are unremarkable. She is in the 5th percentile for height and weight. Physical examination reveals a mildly dehydrated, unconsolable infant in a soiled diaper. No signs of fracture, bruising, or sexual trauma. The clinician decides to report this situation to the department of social services. Which of the following is the most compelling deciding factor in making this decision?
- A. There is sufficient evidence to have the child removed from her parent’s home
- B. The daycare worker failed to report the neglect
- C. The daycare worker has paperwork authorizing the physician to report
- D. Physicians are mandated to report (Correct Answer)
- E. Physical abuse suspected
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Physicians are mandated to report***
- All states have **mandated reporting laws** for child abuse and neglect, requiring healthcare professionals to report suspected cases.
- The findings of **malnutrition** (5th percentile for height and weight), **dehydration**, and **persistent diaper rash with a soiled diaper** despite being in daycare raise suspicion for neglect, obligating the physician to report.
*There is sufficient evidence to have the child removed from her parent’s home*
- While the presented signs suggest potential neglect, the decision to remove a child from their home is made by **Child Protective Services (CPS)** or a court, not the reporting physician.
- The physician's role is to **report suspicion**, allowing the relevant authorities to investigate and determine the appropriate action.
*The daycare worker failed to report the neglect*
- The daycare worker *did* bring the child to the clinic due to the persistent diaper rash, which suggests an attempt to address the child's condition.
- While daycare workers are often mandated reporters themselves, their failure to report does not negate the physician's independent and **primary responsibility** to report once neglect is suspected.
*The daycare worker has paperwork authorizing the physician to report*
- The paperwork provided by the daycare worker refers to authorization for **medical decision-making** when parents are unavailable, not explicit authorization for the physician to report suspected neglect.
- The physician's duty to report stems from **state laws** and ethical obligations, not from authorization by a third party.
*Physical abuse suspected*
- The physical examination specifically states **"No signs of fracture, bruising, or sexual trauma,"** ruling out direct physical or sexual abuse as the primary concern.
- The findings (malnutrition, dehydration, persistent diaper rash, soiled diaper) are more indicative of **neglect** rather than active physical abuse.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 7: A 15-year-old teenager presents to the emergency department via emergency medical service (EMS) after a motor vehicle accident. The patient is in critical condition and is hemodynamically unstable. It becomes apparent that the patient may require a blood transfusion, and the parents are approached for consent. They are Jehovah’s Witnesses and deny the blood transfusion, saying it is against their beliefs. However, the patient insists that she wants the transfusion if it will save her life. Despite the patient’s wishes, the parents remain steadfast in their refusal to allow the transfusion. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action?
- A. Obtain a court order to give blood products. (Correct Answer)
- B. Give the patient the blood transfusion.
- C. Give intravenous fluids to attempt to stabilize the patient.
- D. Do not give blood transfusion due to the parents’ refusal.
- E. Consult the hospital ethics committee.
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Obtain a court order to give blood products.***
- In situations where a minor's life is at risk and parents refuse life-saving treatment, seeking a **court order** is the most appropriate action to protect the child's best interests.
- This step allows the medical team to proceed with the necessary treatment despite parental objections, balancing the parents' religious freedom with the state's interest in protecting children.
*Give the patient the blood transfusion.*
- Directly proceeding with the transfusion without legal intervention against parental wishes for a minor could lead to **legal ramifications** and accusations of battery or lack of informed consent.
- While the patient expresses a wish for the transfusion, due to her minor status, parental consent or a court order is generally required before proceeding against parental refusal.
*Give intravenous fluids to attempt to stabilize the patient.*
- While supportive measures like **intravenous fluids** are important, they may not be sufficient to stabilize a hemodynamically unstable patient requiring a blood transfusion.
- Delaying definitive, necessary treatment in a critical situation can worsen the patient's condition and is not a substitute for addressing the need for blood products.
*Do not give blood transfusion due to the parents’ refusal.*
- Refusing to provide life-saving treatment to a minor when a less invasive alternative is unavailable, solely based on parental religious beliefs and despite the child's expressed wishes, could be considered **medical neglect** and runs contrary to the medical obligation to preserve life.
- Even if the parents are steadfast, the healthcare team has an ethical and legal obligation to advocate for the minor's well-being, especially when the minor explicitly requests the treatment.
*Consult the hospital ethics committee.*
- While an **ethics committee** consultation is valuable for complex ethical dilemmas, it is typically a time-consuming process that may not be feasible for a critically ill, hemodynamically unstable patient requiring immediate intervention.
- In urgent, life-threatening situations involving minors, the immediate priority is to secure the necessary treatment, often through direct legal channels, rather than waiting for an ethics committee review.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 8: A 32-year-old man visits his primary care physician for a routine health maintenance examination. During the examination, he expresses concerns about not wanting to become a father. He has been sexually active and monogamous with his wife for the past 5 years, and they inconsistently use condoms for contraception. He tells the physician that he would like to undergo vasectomy. His wife is also a patient under the care of the physician and during her last appointment, she expressed concerns over being prescribed any drugs that could affect her fertility because she would like to conceive soon. Which of the following is the most appropriate action by the physician regarding this patient's wish to undergo vasectomy?
- A. Explain the procedure's benefits, alternatives, and potential complications (Correct Answer)
- B. Refer the patient to a psychotherapist to discuss his reluctance to have children
- C. Discourage the patient from undergoing the procedure because his wife wants children
- D. Insist that the patient returns with his wife to discuss the risks and benefits of the procedure together
- E. Call the patient's wife to obtain her consent for the procedure
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Explain the procedure's benefits, alternatives, and potential complications***
- The physician's primary ethical obligation is to the individual patient, ensuring informed consent for any medical procedure. Providing comprehensive information about **vasectomy benefits, alternatives, and risks** allows the patient to make an autonomous decision.
- While patient-physician confidentiality generally prohibits disclosing specific details of one spouse's medical history to the other, the general knowledge that his wife desires children creates an important backdrop for the discussion. It is the patient's responsibility to consider this and convey this information to his wife.
*Refer the patient to a psychotherapist to discuss his reluctance to have children*
- It is **not appropriate** to assume the patient has a psychological issue solely based on his desire for a vasectomy, even with his wife's conflicting wishes. This action could be seen as judgmental and dismissive of the patient's autonomy.
- A patient's preference for sterilization, even if contrary to a partner's desires, does not inherently indicate a need for psychiatric evaluation unless there are other concerning psychological symptoms.
*Discourage the patient from undergoing the procedure because his wife wants children*
- **Discouraging** the patient based on his wife's wishes infringes upon the patient's **autonomy and reproductive rights**. The physician's role is to provide information and support the patient's informed decisions, not to act as a relationship counselor or impose personal values.
- Medical decisions, especially concerning fertility, are deeply personal, and a physician should not pressure a patient into a decision they do not want based on a partner's separate, yet relevant, wishes.
*Insist that the patient returns with his wife to discuss the risks and benefits of the procedure together*
- While open communication between spouses about reproductive decisions is beneficial, **insisting** on the wife's presence for the consultation undermines the patient's **confidentiality and individual autonomy**. The patient has the right to make medical decisions independently.
- The physician should encourage the patient to discuss this with his wife, but it is ultimately the patient's decision whether to involve her in the consultation for his procedure.
*Call the patient's wife to obtain her consent for the procedure*
- This action would be a **breach of patient confidentiality**. The physician cannot disclose information about the patient's decision or medical discussions with a third party, even a spouse, without the patient's explicit consent.
- A spouse's consent is **not legally or ethically required** for an individual to undergo a vasectomy in most jurisdictions, as it is a decision pertaining to the individual's body and reproductive rights.
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 9: A healthy, 16-year-old girl is brought in by her mother for a wellness visit. During the appointment, the patient’s mother brings up concerns about her daughter’s acne. The patient has had acne for 2 years. She washes her face twice a day with benzoyl peroxide and has been on doxycycline for 2 months with only mild improvement. The patient does not feel that the acne is related to her menstrual cycles. The patient’s mother states she does well in school and is the captain of the junior varsity cross-country team. She is worried that the acne is starting to affect her daughter’s self-esteem. The patient states that prom is coming up, and she is considering not going because she hates taking pictures. Upon physical exam, there are multiple open and closed comedones and scattered, red nodules on the patient’s face with evidence of scarring. The patient’s mother says her neighbor’s son tried isotretinoin and wants to know if that may work for her daughter. While talking about the risk factors for isotretinoin, you mention that patient will need to be on 2 forms of birth control. The mother asks, “Is that really necessary? We are a very religious family and my daughter knows our household rule about no sex before marriage.” Which of the following is the next step in management?
- A. Have the patient take a pregnancy test to prove abstinence
- B. Ask the mother to leave the room before talking to the patient about her sexual activity (Correct Answer)
- C. Talk to patient and mother about patient’s sexual activity, since parental permission is needed for isotretinoin
- D. Prescribe the isotretinoin as the patient does not need additional contraception if she is abstinent
- E. Prescribe the isotretinoin after giving the patient a handout about birth control methods
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***Ask the mother to leave the room before talking to the patient about her sexual activity***
- This respects the **adolescent's right to confidentiality** and allows for a candid discussion about sensitive topics like sexual activity and contraception
- A **16-year-old** has the right to private discussions about reproductive health matters, regardless of parental presence
- The **iPLEDGE program** requires comprehensive counseling about contraception for all females of childbearing potential, which is best accomplished in a private setting
- This approach balances the need to respect parental involvement while protecting the minor's confidentiality on sensitive health matters
*Have the patient take a pregnancy test to prove abstinence*
- While a pregnancy test is necessary before starting isotretinoin, it does not confirm or prove abstinence
- This is not the appropriate first step in addressing the mother's concerns or the patient's need for contraception counseling
- iPLEDGE guidelines require monthly negative pregnancy tests but also mandate contraception counseling regardless of pregnancy test results
*Talk to patient and mother about patient's sexual activity, since parental permission is needed for isotretinoin*
- Discussing sexual activity with both the patient and mother present **violates adolescent confidentiality** and may prevent honest disclosure
- Many states allow **mature minors** to consent to contraceptive services without parental involvement
- This approach could damage the therapeutic relationship and compromise the patient's willingness to share sensitive information
*Prescribe the isotretinoin as the patient does not need additional contraception if she is abstinent*
- This is incorrect as the **FDA-mandated iPLEDGE program** requires all females of childbearing potential to use two forms of contraception, regardless of stated abstinence
- The program makes no exception for patients claiming abstinence due to the **extreme teratogenicity** of isotretinoin
- Bypassing this requirement would violate federal regulations and expose the patient to risk of severe congenital malformations if pregnancy occurs
*Prescribe the isotretinoin after giving the patient a handout about birth control methods*
- Simply providing a handout is insufficient for effective contraception counseling required by the **iPLEDGE program**
- The patient needs detailed, private counseling to understand contraceptive options, the risks of isotretinoin, and to ensure adherence
- This approach fails to address the confidentiality issue raised by the mother's presence
Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG Question 10: A 15-year-old girl comes to the physician for a routine health maintenance examination. She recently became sexually active with her boyfriend and requests a prescription for an oral contraception. She lives with her parents. She has smoked half a pack of cigarettes daily for the past 2 years. Physical examination shows no abnormalities. A urine pregnancy test is negative. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
- A. I would recommend performing a Pap smear, since you have become sexually active.
- B. I would need your parent's permission before I can provide information about contraceptive therapy.
- C. I would like to discuss the various contraceptive options that are available. (Correct Answer)
- D. I cannot prescribe oral contraceptives if you are currently a smoker.
- E. I would recommend a multiphasic combination of ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate.
Consent for minors and adolescents Explanation: ***I would like to discuss the various contraceptive options that are available.***
- This response is appropriate because it respects the patient's autonomy and initiates an open discussion about her needs while ensuring she receives comprehensive information.
- A thorough discussion of **contraceptive options** allows the physician to assess the patient's individual risk factors, lifestyle, and preferences before prescribing, which is crucial given her age and smoking history.
*I would recommend performing a Pap smear, since you have become sexually active.*
- While a Pap smear is important for sexually active individuals, it is generally recommended from **age 21** regardless of sexual activity, or **3 years after sexual debut** for immunocompromised individuals or those with a history of cervical dysplasia, not immediately for a 15-year-old.
- Focusing solely on a Pap smear at this juncture **defers the patient's primary concern** of contraception and may unnecessarily cause anxiety.
*I would need your parent's permission before I can provide information about contraceptive therapy.*
- In many jurisdictions, including numerous US states, minors have the right to **confidential access to contraception** without parental consent.
- Requiring parental permission would be a barrier to care and may violate the patient's **confidentiality** and **autonomy** regarding reproductive health.
*I cannot prescribe oral contraceptives if you are currently a smoker.*
- While smoking is a **contraindication for combined oral contraceptives (COCs)** in women over 35, and a relative contraindication for younger smokers, it is not an absolute contraindication for all forms of hormonal contraception.
- This statement prematurely closes the discussion on **all contraceptive options**, including progestin-only pills or long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), which would be safer choices for a young smoker.
*I would recommend a multiphasic combination of ethinyl estradiol and norgestimate.*
- Prescribing a specific combined oral contraceptive immediately without a full discussion of risks, benefits, and alternatives is **premature and potentially unsafe** given her smoking history.
- **Combined oral contraceptives** containing estrogen generally carry an increased risk of **thromboembolism** in smokers, especially those over 35, making a thorough assessment and alternative consideration essential for this 15-year-old.
More Consent for minors and adolescents US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
