Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Hospice eligibility and services. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 1: A 67-year-old patient comes to the physician because of a 4-month history of weight loss, chest pain, dry cough, and shortness of breath on exertion. He worked as a shipbuilder for 45 years and is now retired. Since the death of his wife 2 years ago, he has lived with his daughter. He has never smoked. His temperature is 38.1°C (100.6°F), pulse is 85/min, and blood pressure is 134/82 mm Hg. Fine, end-inspiratory rales are heard at the left lung base; breath sounds are absent at the right lung base. A CT scan of the chest shows pleural thickening and a right hemothorax. Thoracocentesis confirms the diagnosis of mesothelioma. The patient and his family are informed about the poor prognosis of this condition and that the mean survival time is 1 year. The patient states that he wishes to receive radiation. He would also like to receive home hospice care but is unsure whether his health insurance would cover the costs. The patient's son, who has been assigned power of attorney, does not agree with this decision. The patient does not have a living will but states that if his heart stops beating, he wants to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Which of the following disqualifies the patient from receiving hospice care?
- A. The son's objection
- B. His life expectancy
- C. Lack of living will
- D. Uncertain coverage by health insurance
- E. Wish for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (Correct Answer)
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Wish for cardiopulmonary resuscitation***
- **Hospice care** focuses on **palliative care** and comfort for patients with a **terminal illness** and a prognosis of **six months or less**, aiming to ensure a peaceful death, free from aggressive life-sustaining treatments.
- Requesting **cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)** contradicts the philosophy of hospice care, as CPR is an **aggressive medical intervention** intended to prolong life, which is against the principles of hospice.
*The son's objection*
- The patient, being of **sound mind** and having the capacity to make his own medical decisions, has the right to choose hospice care regardless of his son's preferences.
- The **power of attorney** (POA) only becomes active if the patient is **incapacitated** and unable to make decisions for himself; since he is deemed capable, his wishes take precedence.
*His life expectancy*
- A mean survival time of **1 year** with mesothelioma makes the patient eligible for hospice care, as hospice typically requires a prognosis of **six months or less** if the disease runs its expected course.
- Even with a prognosis slightly over six months, patients can still qualify for hospice if their condition is expected to **decline** and meet the six-month criterion over time.
*Lack of living will*
- While a **living will** (advance directive) is beneficial for documenting end-of-life wishes, its absence does **not disqualify** a patient from receiving hospice care.
- A patient can still make their wishes known verbally or through other legal documents, and hospice will honor those preferences as long as the patient is **competent**.
*Uncertain coverage by health insurance*
- **Health insurance coverage** is an administrative and financial issue, not a clinical criterion for hospice eligibility.
- Many insurance plans, including **Medicare** and **Medicaid**, cover hospice care, and financial concerns should be addressed but do not medically disqualify a patient.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 2: A 72-year-old woman with metastatic ovarian cancer is brought to the physician by her son because she is in immense pain and cries all the time. On a 10-point scale, she rates the pain as an 8 to 9. One week ago, a decision to shift to palliative care was made after she failed to respond to 2 years of multiple chemotherapy regimens. She is now off chemotherapy drugs and has been in hospice care. Current medications include 2 mg morphine intravenously every 2 hours and 650 mg of acetaminophen every 4 to 6 hours. The son is concerned because he read online that increasing the dose of morphine would endanger her breathing. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Counsel patient and continue same opioid dose
- B. Increase dosage of morphine (Correct Answer)
- C. Change morphine to a non-opioid analgesic
- D. Initiate palliative radiotherapy
- E. Initiate cognitive behavioral therapy
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Increase dosage of morphine***
- The patient is experiencing severe, **uncontrolled pain** (8-9/10), indicating her current morphine dose is inadequate. In palliative care, the goal is to provide maximum comfort, and **opioid dose escalation** is appropriate to achieve this.
- While respiratory depression is a concern with opioids, in patients with chronic pain who are already on opioids, **tolerance to respiratory depressant effects** develops more quickly than tolerance to analgesic effects. Careful titration and monitoring can safely increase pain relief.
*Counsel patient and continue same opioid dose*
- The patient's pain is severe and unmanaged, so simply counseling her without addressing the **inadequate analgesia** would be inappropriate and unethical.
- Continuing the same dose would perpetuate her suffering, as the current regimen is clearly **insufficient for pain control**.
*Change morphine to a non-opioid analgesic*
- For severe cancer pain (8-9/10), **non-opioid analgesics** alone are typically ineffective.
- Switching to a non-opioid would likely lead to even poorer pain control and increased suffering, as opioids are the **cornerstone of severe cancer pain management**.
*Initiate palliative radiotherapy*
- While **radiotherapy** can be effective for localized pain caused by bone metastases, its onset of action is not immediate, and the primary issue here is urgent, **uncontrolled systemic pain**.
- It is not an appropriate initial step for immediate pain relief in a patient already in hospice with widespread metastatic disease and severe current pain.
*Initiate cognitive behavioral therapy*
- **Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)** can be a useful adjunct in chronic pain management to help with coping strategies and psychological distress.
- However, it does not directly address the severe, acute physical pain the patient is experiencing and is not a substitute for **pharmacological pain control** in this context.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 3: An otherwise healthy 67-year-old woman comes to your clinic after being admitted to the hospital for 2 weeks after breaking her hip. She has not regularly seen a physician for the past several years because she has been working hard at her long-time job as a schoolteacher. You wonder if she has not been taking adequate preventative measures to prevent osteoporosis and order the appropriate labs. Although she is recovering from surgery well, she is visibly upset because she is worried that her hospital bill will bankrupt her. Which of the following best describes her Medicare coverage?
- A. Medicare Part C will cover the majority of drug costs during her inpatient treatment.
- B. Medicare Part A will cover the majority of her hospital fees, including inpatient drugs and lab tests. (Correct Answer)
- C. Medicare is unlikely to cover the cost of her admission because she has not been paying her premium.
- D. Medicare Part B will cover the majority of her hospital fees, including inpatient drugs and lab tests.
- E. Medicare Part D will cover the cost of drugs during her inpatient treatment.
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Medicare Part A will cover the majority of her hospital fees, including inpatient drugs and lab tests.***
* **Medicare Part A** is hospital insurance and covers **inpatient hospital stays**, skilled nursing facility care, hospice care, and some home health care. This includes services received during an inpatient stay such as drugs, lab tests, and surgery.
* Given her 2-week hospital stay for a broken hip, which resulted in surgery and ongoing recovery, Part A would be the primary payer for the majority of these costs.
*Medicare Part C will cover the majority of drug costs during her inpatient treatment.*
* **Medicare Part C**, also known as **Medicare Advantage**, is an alternative to original Medicare provided by private companies, often including Part A, B, and D benefits.
* While Part C plans can cover drug costs, **inpatient drugs** administered during a hospital stay are typically covered under **Part A**, not a separate drug plan, if the patient is using original Medicare. If she has a Part C plan, it would integrate these benefits.
*Medicare is unlikely to cover the cost of her admission because she has not been paying her premium.*
* Medicare Part A is generally **premium-free** for most individuals who have paid Medicare taxes through their employment for at least 10 years (or 40 quarters).
* Given her long career as a schoolteacher, it is highly likely she would qualify for premium-free Part A, making this statement incorrect.
*Medicare Part B will cover the majority of her hospital fees, including inpatient drugs and lab tests.*
* **Medicare Part B** is medical insurance and covers **doctor's services**, outpatient care, medical supplies, and preventive services.
* While it covers some outpatient lab tests and physician services received during an inpatient stay, it does not cover the primary costs of **inpatient hospital fees** or drugs administered during an inpatient stay, which fall under Part A.
*Medicare Part D will cover the cost of drugs during her inpatient treatment.*
* **Medicare Part D** is prescription drug coverage provided by private companies and covers **outpatient prescription drugs**.
* Medications administered to an **inpatient** during a hospital stay (i.e., when she is admitted) are typically covered under **Medicare Part A**, not Part D.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 4: A 31-year-old physician notices that her senior colleague has been arriving late for work for the past 2 weeks. The colleague recently lost his wife to cancer and has been taking care of his 4 young children. Following the death of his wife, the department chair offered him extended time off, but he declined. Resident physicians have noted and discussed some recent changes in this colleague, such as missed clinic appointments, 2 intra-operative errors, and the smell of alcohol on his breath on 3 different occasions. Which of the following is the most appropriate action by the physician regarding her colleague?
- A. Inform the local Physician Health Program (Correct Answer)
- B. Alert the State Licensing Board
- C. Confront the colleague in private
- D. Contact the colleague's friends and family
- E. Advise resident physicians to report future misconduct to the department chair
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Inform the local Physician Health Program***
- The colleague is exhibiting signs of impairment (missed appointments, intra-operative errors, alcohol on breath) due to personal distress. A Physician Health Program (PHP) is designed to assist impaired physicians with rehabilitation and monitoring while maintaining confidentiality and protecting patient safety.
- While patient safety is paramount, escalating directly to a more punitive body like the State Licensing Board without first seeking confidential, supportive assistance from a PHP is often not the most appropriate initial step for a colleague.
*Alert the State Licensing Board*
- Reporting directly to the State Licensing Board is typically reserved for severe, unaddressed impairment or misconduct that poses an immediate, undeniable threat to public safety and is not being managed through other channels.
- This option is generally more punitive and less focused on rehabilitation compared to a PHP, and can have more drastic consequences for the physician's career without first attempting a supportive, rehabilitative approach.
*Confront the colleague in private*
- While well-intentioned, a direct confrontation by a junior colleague may not be effective given the severity of the colleague's issues (grief, potential substance abuse, patient safety concerns). The colleague may deny the problem or become defensive.
- This approach lacks the formal support, resources, and confidentiality offered by a PHP, which is better equipped to handle sensitive situations involving physician impairment.
*Contact the colleague's friends and family*
- Contacting the colleague's personal network is generally not an appropriate professional action. It violates the colleague's privacy and professional boundaries.
- This action does not directly address the professional implications of the colleague's impairment or his ability to practice safely.
*Advise resident physicians to report future misconduct to the department chair*
- While the department chair should eventually be involved if the issue is not resolved, advising residents to report future misconduct is a passive approach that delays immediate action.
- The colleague's current behavior (intra-operative errors, alcohol) already constitutes a significant concern for patient safety, requiring more immediate and direct intervention than simply waiting for future incidents.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 5: A terminally ill patient with advanced cancer requests that no resuscitation be performed in the event of cardiac arrest. The patient is mentally competent and has completed advance directives. A family member later demands full resuscitation efforts. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
- A. Honor the patient's DNR (Correct Answer)
- B. Obtain court order
- C. Follow the family's wishes
- D. Consult ethics committee
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Honor the patient's DNR***
- The patient is **mentally competent** and has legally documented their wishes through **advance directives** (DNR), which must be respected.
- A competent patient's right to **autonomy** in making decisions about their medical care takes precedence over the wishes of family members.
*Obtain court order*
- Seeking a court order is **unnecessary** and **inappropriate** when a competent patient's wishes are clearly documented in advance directives.
- This option would cause **undue delay** and legal entanglement, potentially going against the patient's immediate medical needs and preferences.
*Follow the family's wishes*
- Following the family's wishes would **override the patient's autonomy** and legally binding advance directives.
- The family's emotional distress does not negate the patient's right to determine their own medical care, especially when they are competent.
*Consult ethics committee*
- While an ethics committee can be helpful in complex cases with **unclear directives** or patient capacity issues, it's not the first step here.
- The patient's competence and clear advance directives make the decision straightforward; a committee consultation could cause delay and unnecessary burden.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 6: A 72-year-old man is brought to the emergency department from hospice. The patient has been complaining of worsening pain over the past few days and states that it is no longer bearable. The patient has a past medical history of pancreatic cancer which is being managed in hospice. The patient desires no "heroic measures" to be made with regards to treatment and resuscitation. His temperature is 98.8°F (37.1°C), blood pressure is 107/68 mmHg, pulse is 102/min, respirations are 22/min, and oxygen saturation is 99% on room air. Physical exam reveals an uncomfortable elderly man who experiences severe pain upon abdominal palpation. Laboratory values reveal signs of renal failure, liver failure, and anemia. Which of the following is the best next step in management?
- A. Ketorolac and fentanyl
- B. Ketorolac
- C. Morphine (Correct Answer)
- D. No intervention warranted
- E. Morphine and fentanyl patch
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Morphine***
- This patient is in **hospice** with **acute, unbearable pain** requiring **immediate relief** in the emergency department. **Intravenous or subcutaneous morphine** is the **best next step** as it provides **rapid onset of analgesia** (within 5-10 minutes for IV, 15-30 minutes for SC).
- In the **ED setting**, the priority is to achieve **immediate pain control** for this acute exacerbation. Once stabilized, a comprehensive long-acting regimen can be coordinated with hospice, but the question asks for the **best next step**, which is immediate-acting opioid administration.
- Morphine is appropriate despite renal failure in end-of-life care where **comfort is the primary goal**. Doses may need adjustment, but pain relief takes precedence in hospice patients.
*Ketorolac and fentanyl*
- **Ketorolac (NSAID)** is **contraindicated** in patients with **renal failure** and carries risk of **gastrointestinal bleeding**, especially concerning in advanced cancer with anemia.
- While fentanyl is appropriate for pain management, a **fentanyl patch** takes **12-24 hours** to reach therapeutic levels and is unsuitable for **acute pain** requiring immediate relief.
*Ketorolac*
- **Ketorolac (NSAID)** is contraindicated due to **renal failure** and would be insufficient for severe cancer-related pain.
- NSAIDs are generally avoided in hospice patients with multi-organ dysfunction and do not provide adequate analgesia for unbearable pain.
*Morphine and fentanyl patch*
- While this represents a comprehensive pain management approach, it is **not the best next step** in the **emergency department** for **acute pain**.
- **Fentanyl patches** have a **delayed onset** (12-24 hours to reach steady state) and are designed for **chronic, stable pain management**, not acute exacerbations.
- The immediate priority is rapid pain relief with short-acting opioids; long-acting formulations should be coordinated with hospice after acute stabilization.
*No intervention warranted*
- This is **unethical and inappropriate** given the patient's explicit complaint of unbearable pain.
- **Comfort and symptom management** are the primary objectives of hospice care, making pain relief an absolute necessity.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 7: A 76-year-old woman is brought to the physician by her daughter for evaluation of progressive cognitive decline and a 1-year history of incontinence. She was diagnosed with dementia, Alzheimer type, 5 years ago. The daughter has noticed that in the past 2 years, her mother has had increasing word-finding difficulties and forgetfulness. She was previously independent but now lives with her daughter and requires assistance with all activities of daily living. Over the past year, she has had decreased appetite, poor oral intake, and sometimes regurgitates her food. During this time, she has had a 12-kg (26-lb) weight loss. She was treated twice for aspiration pneumonia and now her diet mainly consists of pureed food. She has no advance directives and her daughter says that when her mother was independent the patient mentioned that she would not want any resuscitation or life-sustaining measures if the need arose. The daughter wants to continue taking care of her mother but is concerned about her ability to do so. The patient has hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Current medications include amlodipine and atorvastatin. Vital signs are within normal limits. She appears malnourished but is well-groomed. The patient is oriented to self and recognizes her daughter by name, but she is unaware of the place or year. Mini-Mental State Examination score is 17/30. Physical and neurologic examinations show no other abnormalities. A complete blood count and serum concentrations of creatinine, urea nitrogen, TSH, and vitamin B12 levels are within the reference range. Her serum albumin is 3 g/dL. Urinalysis shows no abnormalities. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Prescribe oxycodone
- B. Short-term rehabilitation
- C. Home hospice care (Correct Answer)
- D. Inpatient palliative care
- E. Evaluation for alternative methods of feeding
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Home hospice care***
- This patient exhibits advanced **dementia** with significant decline in function, frequent aspiration events, and substantial **weight loss**, indicating a prognosis of less than six months. **Hospice care** focuses on comfort and dignity during the end-of-life stage.
- The daughter's recollection of the patient's wishes to avoid life-sustaining measures, combined with the current medical complexity and poor prognosis, supports the transition to **hospice services** to manage symptoms and provide support to both the patient and family.
*Prescribe oxycodone*
- There is no mention of pain in the patient’s presentation; therefore, prescribing an **opioid** like oxycodone is not indicated and could cause adverse effects such as **sedation** and **constipation**, which would further complicate her care.
- While patients with advanced dementia may experience pain, it must be assessed and confirmed before prescribing **analgesics**.
*Short-term rehabilitation*
- Given the patient's advanced dementia, severe functional decline, recurrent aspiration pneumonia, and malnourishment, **short-term rehabilitation** to improve functional status is unlikely to be effective.
- The patient's underlying condition is progressive and irreversible, making restoration of independent function an unrealistic goal.
*Inpatient palliative care*
- While **palliative care** focuses on symptom management and quality of life, **inpatient palliative care** is typically reserved for patients with severe symptoms requiring constant medical attention that cannot be managed at home.
- In this case, the patient's symptoms, while serious, appear amenable to management in a home setting with the comprehensive support offered by **hospice**.
*Evaluation for alternative methods of feeding*
- In advanced dementia, **percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube feeding** does not improve survival, reduce aspiration risk, or enhance quality of life.
- Given the patient's advanced stage of disease and the recalled wishes to avoid life-sustaining measures, initiating **artificial feeding** would be contrary to comfort-focused care.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 8: A 72-year-old man presents to the emergency department with chest pain and shortness of breath. An EKG demonstrates an ST elevation myocardial infarction, and he is managed appropriately. The patient suffers from multiple comorbidities and was recently hospitalized for a myocardial infarction. The patient has a documented living will, which specifies that he does wish to receive resuscitative measures and blood products but refuses intubation in any circumstance. The patient is stabilized and transferred to the medical floor. On day 2, the patient presents with ventricular fibrillation and a resuscitative effort occurs. He is successfully resuscitated, but his pulmonary parameters warrant intervention and are acutely worsening. The patient's wife, son, and daughter are present and state that the patient should be intubated. The patient's prognosis even with intubation is very poor. Which of the following describes the best course of action?
- A. Intubate the patient - the family is representing the patient's most recent and accurate wishes
- B. Consult the hospital ethics committee
- C. Do not intubate the patient given his living will (Correct Answer)
- D. Intubate the patient - a patient's next of kin take precedence over a living will
- E. Do not intubate the patient as his prognosis is poor even with intubation
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Do not intubate the patient given his living will***
- A **living will** or **advance directive** is a legally binding document that outlines a patient's wishes regarding medical treatment, including refusal of specific interventions like intubation.
- When the patient is **competent**, their stated wishes are paramount; when they are **incapacitated**, their advance directive becomes the primary guide for care decisions.
*Intubate the patient - the family is representing the patient's most recent and accurate wishes*
- While family input is valuable, a **legally executed living will** takes precedence over family opinions, especially when there's a conflict regarding specific life-sustaining treatments like intubation.
- There is no evidence presented that the patient has **revoked or updated** his living will.
*Consult the hospital ethics committee*
- While an ethics committee can provide guidance in complex cases, the patient's living will provides **clear instructions** that should be followed directly, making an immediate ethics committee consultation less necessary for this specific decision.
- The primary role of the ethics committee is to address **ambiguity or conflict** in patient care, which is not present regarding the patient's explicit refusal of intubation.
*Intubate the patient - a patient's next of kin take precedence over a living will*
- This statement is incorrect; a **valid living will** *takes precedence* over the wishes of the next of kin when the patient is unable to express their current desires.
- The next of kin's role is to act as a **surrogate decision-maker** only when a patient lacks capacity and has no advance directive that covers the specific situation.
*Do not intubate the patient as his prognosis is poor even with intubation*
- While a **poor prognosis** can be a factor in end-of-life discussions, the primary reason for not intubating in this scenario is the patient's explicit refusal documented in his **living will**, not solely the prognosis.
- Relying *only* on prognosis without considering the patient's prior stated wishes can undermine **patient autonomy**.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 9: An 85-year-old man with terminal stage colon cancer formally designates his best friend as his medical durable power of attorney. After several courses of chemotherapy and surgical intervention, the patient’s condition does not improve, and he soon develops respiratory failure. He is then placed on a ventilator in a comatose condition. His friend with the medical power of attorney tells the care provider that the patient would not want to be on life support. The patient’s daughter disputes this and says that her father needs to keep receiving care, in case there should be any possibility of recovery. Additionally, there is a copy of the patient’s living will in the medical record which states that, if necessary, he should be placed on life support until full recovery. Which of the following is the most appropriate course of action?
- A. Withdraw the life support since the patient’s chances of recovery are very low
- B. Contact other family members to get their input for the patient
- C. Act according to the patient’s living will
- D. The durable medical power of attorney’s decision should be followed. (Correct Answer)
- E. Follow the daughter’s decision for the patient
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***The durable medical power of attorney's decision should be followed***
- The patient designated his friend as his **durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOA)**, giving him legal authority to make medical decisions when the patient cannot communicate.
- While the living will states life support "until full recovery," the patient has **terminal stage colon cancer** - full recovery is **medically impossible**. The living will's condition cannot be fulfilled.
- When advance directive language is ambiguous or cannot be applied to actual clinical circumstances, the **DPOA's interpretive authority** is essential. The DPOA is expected to apply the patient's values to the real situation.
- The DPOA states the patient would not want to be on life support - this reflects the patient's **values and wishes** as understood by his chosen decision-maker, applied to the actual terminal situation.
- This honors both **patient autonomy** (through his chosen proxy) and the reality that advance directives cannot anticipate every clinical scenario.
*Act according to the patient's living will*
- While a living will expresses patient wishes, it states life support should continue "**until full recovery**" - but the patient has terminal cancer with no possibility of recovery.
- Literal adherence to an advance directive whose conditions are **medically impossible** does not serve the patient's true interests or autonomy.
- Living wills and DPOAs work **together** - the DPOA interprets and applies the living will to actual circumstances, especially when literal application is impossible or the situation wasn't anticipated.
*Withdraw the life support since the patient's chances of recovery are very low*
- While this may align with the DPOA's interpretation of the patient's wishes, unilateral physician decision-making without following the proper **decision-making hierarchy** is inappropriate.
- The physician should work **with the DPOA** rather than make independent decisions about life support withdrawal.
*Contact other family members to get their input for the patient*
- The patient **legally designated** his friend as DPOA, indicating his trust in this person's judgment over family members.
- While family input can be valuable, seeking additional opinions when there is a **legally appointed decision-maker** undermines the patient's explicit choice.
- The daughter has no legal standing to override the DPOA's decisions.
*Follow the daughter's decision for the patient*
- The daughter was **not designated** as the healthcare decision-maker; the friend was explicitly chosen as DPOA.
- Following the daughter's wishes would **violate** the patient's autonomous choice of decision-maker.
- Family relationship alone does not override a formal DPOA designation.
Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG Question 10: A 67-year-old man presents to the emergency department following an episode of chest pain and a loss of consciousness. The patient is in critical condition and his vital signs are rapidly deteriorating. It is known that the patient is currently undergoing chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The patient is accompanied by his wife, who wants the medical staff to do everything to resuscitate the patient and bring him back. The patient also has 2 daughters, who are on their way to the hospital. The patient’s written advance directive states that the patient does not wish to be resuscitated or have any sort of life support. Which of the following is the appropriate course of action?
- A. Consult a judge
- B. Respect the patient’s advance directive orders (Correct Answer)
- C. Contact the patient’s siblings or other first-degree relatives
- D. Take into account the best medical decision made by the physician for the patient
- E. Respect the wife’s wishes and resuscitate the patient
Hospice eligibility and services Explanation: ***Respect the patient’s advance directive orders***
- **Advance directives** legally document a patient's wishes regarding medical treatment, including end-of-life care, and must be honored if the patient is unable to make decisions.
- The patient's previously expressed autonomous decision, through a **written advance directive**, carries legal and ethical precedence over the wishes of family members or medical staff.
*Consult a judge*
- Consulting a judge is typically reserved for situations where there is **ambiguity or dispute** regarding the interpretation of an advance directive, or when no advance directive exists and family members disagree.
- In this case, the **written advance directive is clear**, making judicial intervention unnecessary.
*Contact the patient’s siblings or other first-degree relatives*
- Although family input can be valuable in some medical decisions, it does not **override a legally binding advance directive** made by the patient.
- The **patient's own wishes** are paramount, especially when clearly documented.
*Take into account the best medical decision made by the physician for the patient*
- While physicians provide medical expertise, patient **autonomy and established advance directives** take precedence over a physician's "best medical decision," especially regarding resuscitation.
- The physician's role here is to **implement the patient's documented wishes**, not to countermand them.
*Respect the wife’s wishes and resuscitate the patient*
- The wife's wishes, while important for emotional support, **do not legally or ethically supersede** the patient's explicit, written advance directive regarding resuscitation.
- Honoring the wife's request would violate the patient's **right to self-determination** and their previously stated wishes.
More Hospice eligibility and services US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
