Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Sepsis bundles and quality metrics. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 1: A 27-year-old male presents to the emergency department after being brought in from a house fire. The patient has extensive burns covering his body and is conscious but in severe pain. The patient has a past medical history notable for marijuana use. He is not currently on any medications. Physical exam is notable for extensive burns covering the patient's back, chest, thighs, and legs. The patient's oropharynx reveals no signs of damage or extensive smoke inhalation. The patient is breathing on his own and has normal breath sounds bilaterally. His temperature is 99.5°F (37.5°C), pulse is 145/min, blood pressure is 100/70 mmHg, respirations are 27/min, and oxygen saturation is 93% on room air. Which of the following interventions is most likely to reduce mortality in this patient?
- A. Topical antibiotics
- B. IV fluids (Correct Answer)
- C. Oxygen administration
- D. Oral antibiotics
- E. Normal saline soaked dressings
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***IV fluids***
- Due to **extensive burns**, patients experience significant fluid shifts and loss, leading to a risk of **hypovolemic shock**. IV fluid resuscitation is crucial to maintain **circulatory volume** and prevent organ hypoperfusion.
- The patient's **tachycardia** (pulse 145/min) and **hypotension** (BP 100/70 mmHg) with extensive burns indicate significant fluid deficits, making immediate and aggressive IV fluid resuscitation the most critical intervention to reduce mortality.
*Topical antibiotics*
- While important for preventing **burn wound infection**, topical antibiotics are a secondary concern after initial resuscitation, especially in the context of acute hemodynamic instability.
- They do not address the immediate systemic compromise from **fluid loss** and **shock**.
*Oxygen administration*
- The patient's oxygen saturation is 93% on room air, and there are **no signs of smoke inhalation** or airway damage, making immediate oxygen administration less critical than fluid resuscitation for mortality reduction.
- While supportive, it does not address the primary threat of **hypovolemic shock** from massive fluid shifts.
*Oral antibiotics*
- Similar to topical antibiotics, oral antibiotics are used to prevent or treat **burn wound infections** but are not an immediate life-saving intervention for acute burn shock.
- They are typically reserved for bacterial prophylaxis or treatment if an infection is suspected later.
*Normal saline soaked dressings*
- These dressings can help with initial burn care by cooling the burn and providing some pain relief, but they do **not address the systemic fluid loss** and hemodynamic instability.
- They are part of local wound management but are not the primary intervention to prevent **mortality in severe burns**.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 2: A 53-year-old diabetic man with cellulitis of the right lower limb presents to the emergency department because of symptoms of fever and chills. His pulse is 122/min, the blood pressure is 76/50 mm Hg, the respirations are 26/min, and the temperature is 40.0°C (104.0°F). His urine output is < 0.5mL/kg/h. He has warm peripheral extremities. The hemodynamic status of the patient is not improving in spite of the initiation of adequate fluid resuscitation. He is admitted to the hospital. Which of the following is the most likely laboratory profile?
- A. WBC count: 11,670/mm3; low CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 0.9 mmol/L
- B. WBC count: 1234/mm3; high CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 1.6 mmol/L
- C. WBC count: 16,670/mm3; low CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 2.2 mmol/L (Correct Answer)
- D. WBC count: 6670/mm3; low CVP; blood culture: gram-positive bacteremia; blood lactate level: 1.1 mmol/L
- E. WBC count: 8880/mm3; high CVP; blood culture: gram-positive bacteremia; blood lactate level: 2.1 mmol/L
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***WBC count: 16,670/mm3; low CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 2.2 mmol/L***
- This profile aligns with **septic shock** driven by gram-negative bacteria, presenting with **tachycardia**, **hypotension**, **fever**, and **poor urine output** despite fluid resuscitation.
- A **high WBC count** (leukocytosis), **low CVP** (due to vasodilation and relative hypovolemia), **gram-negative bacteremia** (common in severe sepsis), and **elevated lactate** (indicating tissue hypoperfusion) are characteristic findings.
*WBC count: 11,670/mm3; low CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 0.9 mmol/L*
- While most components suggest sepsis (WBC count and low CVP), a **lactate level of 0.9 mmol/L** is within the normal range, contradicting the severe hypoperfusion and shock observed in the patient.
- The patient's presentation with **hypotension** unresponsive to fluids and **oliguria** strongly indicates significant tissue hypoperfusion, which would typically result in a higher lactate.
*WBC count: 1234/mm3; high CVP; blood culture: gram-negative bacteremia; blood lactate level: 1.6 mmol/L*
- A **WBC count of 1234/mm3 (leukopenia)** is an atypical response for severe infection and sepsis; often, sepsis presents with leukocytosis.
- A **high CVP** indicates fluid overload or cardiac dysfunction, which is not consistent with the initial low blood pressure and the need for fluid resuscitation seen in distributive shock.
*WBC count: 6670/mm3; low central venous pressure (CVP); blood culture: gram-positive bacteremia; blood lactate level: 1.1 mmol/L*
- A **WBC count of 6670/mm3** is within the normal range and does not reflect an adequate inflammatory response to severe infection and shock.
- A **normal lactate level (1.1 mmol/L)** does not support the clinical picture of shock and tissue hypoperfusion despite the presence of gram-positive bacteremia.
*WBC count: 8880/mm3; high CVP; blood culture: gram-positive bacteremia; blood lactate level: 2.1 mmol/L*
- A **WBC count of 8880/mm3** is normal, which is unlikely in a severe sepsis presentation.
- A **high CVP** is not consistent with the distributive shock state where there is often relative hypovolemia and vasodilation leading to low CVP.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 3: A 38-year-old female presents to the emergency room with fevers, fatigue, and anorexia for over a month. Past medical history includes mild mitral valve prolapse. She underwent an uncomplicated tooth extraction approximately 6 weeks ago. Her vital signs include a temperature of 100.8 F, pulse of 83, blood pressure of 110/77, and SpO2 of 97% on room air. On exam, you note a grade III/VI holosystolic murmur at the apex radiating to the axilla as well as several red, painful nodules on her fingers. Which of the following is the next best course of action?
- A. Blood cultures are not needed. Start empiric antibiotics
- B. Start anticoagulation with heparin
- C. Consult cardiothoracic surgery for mitral valve replacement
- D. Obtain blood cultures x3 sites over 24 hours and start antibiotics after culture results are available
- E. Obtain blood cultures x3 sites over 1 hour and start empiric antibiotics (Correct Answer)
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Obtain blood cultures x3 sites over 1 hour and start empiric antibiotics***
- The patient's presentation with **fever, fatigue, anorexia, new murmur, and painful finger nodules (Osler's nodes)** after a recent dental procedure strongly suggests **infective endocarditis**. Prompt initiation of **empiric antibiotics** after obtaining adequate blood cultures is crucial to improve outcomes and prevent further complications like septic emboli or valvular damage.
- Obtaining **multiple blood cultures rapidly (e.g., three sets over 1 hour)** from different sites maximizes the chance of isolating the causative organism before antibiotics are given, enabling targeted therapy later, while minimizing delay to treatment.
*Blood cultures are not needed. Start empiric antibiotics*
- **Blood cultures are essential** for diagnosing infective endocarditis, identifying the causative organism, and guiding appropriate antibiotic therapy. Skipping blood cultures could lead to inappropriate antibiotic selection and treatment failure.
- While empiric antibiotics are warranted, they should always be initiated **after blood cultures** have been drawn to avoid sterilizing the blood and making microbial identification difficult.
*Start anticoagulation with heparin*
- **Anticoagulation is generally contraindicated** in infective endocarditis due to the increased risk of hemorrhagic complications, especially in cases of septic emboli to the brain.
- While patients with endocarditis can form vegetations that may embolize, the risks of **bleeding outweigh the benefits** of routine anticoagulation.
*Consult cardiothoracic surgery for mitral valve replacement*
- While **mitral valve prolapse** is a risk factor for endocarditis and severe valvular damage may eventually require surgery, primary management involves **antibiotic therapy**.
- Surgical intervention is typically reserved for cases with **severe valvular regurgitation/stenosis leading to heart failure**, uncontrolled infection despite antibiotics, or recurrent emboli, and is not the immediate next step.
*Obtain blood cultures x3 sites over 24 hours and start antibiotics after culture results are available*
- Waiting for **24 hours to collect blood cultures** would significantly delay the initiation of antibiotics, which is dangerous in a potentially life-threatening infection like endocarditis.
- Delaying antibiotics until **culture results are available** could take several days, leading to worsening infection, organ damage, and increased mortality. **Empiric antibiotics** must be started promptly after initial blood collection.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 4: A 62-year-old man is brought to the emergency department from a senior-care facility after he was found with a decreased level of consciousness and fever. His personal history is relevant for colorectal cancer that was managed with surgical excision of the tumor. Upon admission, he is found to have a blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg, a pulse of 102/min, a respiratory rate of 20/min, and a body temperature 38.8°C (101.8°F). There is no rash on physical examination; he is found to have neck rigidity, confusion, and photophobia. There are no focal neurological deficits. A head CT is normal without mass or hydrocephalus. A lumbar puncture was performed and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is sent to analysis while ceftriaxone and vancomycin are started. Which of the following additional antimicrobials should be added in the management of this patient?
- A. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX)
- B. Ampicillin (Correct Answer)
- C. Amphotericin
- D. Meropenem
- E. Clindamycin
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Ampicillin***
- This patient is a 62-year-old, indicating an increased risk for **Listeria monocytogenes** meningitis, which is typically susceptible to ampicillin.
- Given his age and presentation with **meningeal signs** and fever, empirical coverage for Listeria with ampicillin is crucial, especially before CSF culture results are known.
*Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX)*
- While TMP-SMX can cover Listeria, it is generally considered a **second-line agent** for severe infections like meningitis due to slower bactericidal activity and potential for higher rates of treatment failure compared to ampicillin.
- Ampicillin is the **preferred first-line treatment** for Listeria meningitis unless there is a specific contraindication.
*Amphotericin*
- Amphotericin is an **antifungal agent** used for fungal meningitis.
- Although fungemia can occur in immunocompromised individuals or those with indwelling catheters, the initial presentation with bacterial meningitis symptoms and absence of specific risk factors for fungal infection do not support its empirical use.
*Meropenem*
- Meropenem is a **carbapenem** with a broad spectrum of activity, including many gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, and some anaerobes.
- While it has good CNS penetration and could cover some organisms like penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae or gram-negative rods, it is not the primary empirical choice specifically for **Listeria monocytogenes**, and there's no indication for its broad-spectrum coverage over standard empirical therapy currently.
*Clindamycin*
- Clindamycin is primarily active against **gram-positive bacteria**, especially anaerobes and some staphylococci and streptococci.
- It has **poor penetration into the CNS** and is therefore not effective for meningitis treatment, especially for common bacterial pathogens or Listeria.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 5: A 14-year-old girl presents to the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain. She was watching a movie 3 hours prior to presentation when she developed severe non-radiating right lower quadrant pain. The pain has worsened since it started. She also had non-bloody non-bilious emesis 1 hour ago and continues to feel nauseated. Her temperature is 101°F (38.3°C), blood pressure is 130/90 mmHg, pulse is 110/min, and respirations are 22/min. On exam, she has rebound tenderness at McBurney point and a positive Rovsing sign. She is stabilized with intravenous fluids and pain medication and is taken to the operating room to undergo a laparoscopic appendectomy. While in the operating room, the circulating nurse leads the surgical team in a time out to ensure that introductions are made, the patient’s name and date of birth are correct, antibiotics have been given, and the surgical site is marked appropriately. This process is an example of which of the following human factor engineering elements?
- A. Forcing function
- B. Safety culture
- C. Simplification
- D. Standardization (Correct Answer)
- E. Resilience engineering
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Standardization***
- The surgical **time-out** is a prime example of **standardization** in healthcare, as it involves a prescribed, uniform procedure followed in every surgery to enhance safety.
- It ensures critical safety checks—like patient identification, site marking, and antibiotic administration—are consistently performed, thus reducing variability and the potential for errors.
*Forcing function*
- A **forcing function** is a design element that makes it impossible to commit an error, such as a specific connector shape that prevents incorrect device attachment.
- The time-out, while a critical safeguard, still relies on human compliance and does not physically prevent an error from occurring if the steps are not followed.
*Safety culture*
- **Safety culture** refers to the shared beliefs, values, and attitudes that employees have about safety within an organization.
- While a time-out contributes to a strong safety culture, it is a specific process or tool, not the overarching culture itself.
*Simplification*
- **Simplification** aims to reduce complexity in a process to minimize cognitive load and potential for error.
- The time-out adds a structured step rather than simplifying an existing process; its purpose is to ensure all necessary checks are systematically completed.
*Resilience engineering*
- **Resilience engineering** focuses on an organization's ability to anticipate, cope with, and recover from failures, maintaining stability in the face of disruptions.
- While the time-out promotes safety, it primarily addresses error prevention rather than the broader organizational capacity to adapt and recover from system failures.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 6: A 68-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department by ambulance after she was found down by her daughter. She lives alone in her apartment so it is unclear when she began to develop symptoms. Her medical history is significant for cardiac arrhythmias, diabetes, pericarditis, and a stroke 2 years ago. On presentation her temperature is 98.1°F (36.7°C), blood pressure is 88/51 mmHg, pulse is 137/min, and respirations are 18/min. On physical exam her skin is cold and clammy. If special tests were obtained, they would reveal dramatically decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, increased systemic vascular resistance, and mildly decreased cardiac output. Which of the following treatments would most directly target the cause of this patient's low blood pressure?
- A. Vasopressors
- B. Intravenous fluids (Correct Answer)
- C. Antibiotic administration
- D. Relieve obstruction
- E. Intravenous inotropes
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Intravenous fluids***
- The patient exhibits signs of **hypovolemic shock**, including **hypotension** (BP 88/51 mmHg), **tachycardia** (pulse 137/min), and **cold, clammy skin**. The dramatically decreased **pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)** indicates low preload, which is characteristic of hypovolemia.
- Administration of intravenous fluids directly addresses the underlying cause of this patient's low blood pressure by increasing intravascular volume, thereby improving **cardiac preload** and ultimately **cardiac output** and blood pressure.
*Vasopressors*
- While vasopressors can temporarily increase blood pressure by causing **vasoconstriction**, they do not address the root cause of hypovolemic shock, which is insufficient circulating blood volume.
- Using vasopressors without adequate fluid resuscitation in hypovolemic shock can lead to further **organ hypoperfusion** due to increased afterload on an already compromised heart.
*Antibiotic administration*
- Although the patient's presentation with hypotension and tachycardia could raise suspicion for **sepsis**, there is no explicit evidence of infection presented (e.g., fever, focal source).
- The **decreased PCWP** points more strongly towards hypovolemic shock rather than septic shock, where PCWP can be variable or even normal/elevated.
*Relieve obstruction*
- Obstruction, such as in **cardiac tamponade** or **pulmonary embolism**, can cause obstructive shock, which presents with hypotension.
- However, the dramatically **decreased PCWP** is not typically seen in obstructive shock, where PCWP would likely be normal or elevated due to impedance to cardiac filling or outflow.
*Intravenous inotropes*
- **Inotropes** like dobutamine increase myocardial contractility and are primarily indicated in **cardiogenic shock** or severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction to improve cardiac output.
- While cardiac output is mildly decreased, the primary issue is reduced preload as indicated by the very low PCWP, making fluid resuscitation a more appropriate initial step than directly increasing contractility.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 7: A previously healthy 17-year-old boy is brought to the emergency department because of fever, nausea, and myalgia for the past day. His temperature is 39.5°C (103.1°F), pulse is 112/min, and blood pressure is 77/55 mm Hg. Physical examination shows scattered petechiae over the anterior chest and abdomen. Blood culture grows an organism on Thayer-Martin agar. Which of the following virulence factors of the causal organism is most likely responsible for the high mortality rate associated with it?
- A. Immunoglobulin A protease
- B. Lipooligosaccharide (Correct Answer)
- C. Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1
- D. Lipoteichoic acid
- E. Erythrogenic exotoxin A
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Lipooligosaccharide***
- The patient's presentation with **fever**, **hypotension**, and **petechiae**, along with a positive blood culture on Thayer-Martin agar, points to **meningococcemia** caused by *Neisseria meningitidis*.
- **Lipooligosaccharide (LOS)** acts as an **endotoxin**, triggering an excessive inflammatory response that leads to widespread vascular damage, **capillary leakage**, and **septic shock**, accounting for the high mortality.
*Immunoglobulin A protease*
- While *N. meningitidis* produces **IgA protease** to cleave secretory IgA and evade host defenses on mucosal surfaces, this factor is primarily involved in colonization and initial invasion rather than the systemic severity and mortality of septic shock.
- Its role is to help the bacteria **adhere and penetrate** host mucous membranes, but it does not directly cause the shock and petechiae seen in this severe presentation.
*Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1*
- **Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1)** is a **superantigen** produced by *Staphylococcus aureus* that causes **toxic shock syndrome**, which can present with fever, rash, and hypotension.
- However, the organism grown on **Thayer-Martin agar** is characteristic of *Neisseria meningitidis*, not *Staphylococcus aureus*.
*Lipoteichoic acid*
- **Lipoteichoic acid** is a major component of the cell wall of **Gram-positive bacteria**, acting as a potent proinflammatory molecule and contributing to septic shock in those infections.
- *Neisseria meningitidis* is a **Gram-negative bacterium**, and therefore does not possess lipoteichoic acid.
*Erythrogenic exotoxin A*
- **Erythrogenic exotoxin A** is primarily produced by ***Streptococcus pyogenes*** and is responsible for the characteristic rash of **scarlet fever**.
- While *S. pyogenes* can cause invasive infections, the clinical picture and the specific growth on **Thayer-Martin agar** are not consistent with streptococcal infection.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 8: A 38-year-old previously healthy woman develops septic shock from necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremity. Despite three debridements, broad-spectrum antibiotics (vancomycin, meropenem, clindamycin), IVIG, and aggressive critical care support, she develops refractory shock requiring norepinephrine 1.2 mcg/kg/min, vasopressin 0.04 units/min, and epinephrine 0.1 mcg/kg/min. Lactate is 15 mmol/L. Surgical team recommends hemipelvectomy as last option for source control. Family is devastated. ICU team notes SOFA score of 18. Synthesize an approach to management and decision-making.
- A. Transfer to ECMO center for consideration of VA-ECMO as bridge to hemipelvectomy
- B. Multidisciplinary meeting with surgery, ICU, palliative care, and family to discuss realistic outcomes, quality of life, and patient values before decision (Correct Answer)
- C. Continue medical management for 24 hours and proceed with hemipelvectomy only if shock improves
- D. Decline surgery based on futility given SOFA score >15 and initiate comfort care
- E. Proceed with hemipelvectomy immediately as only chance for survival with informed consent from family
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Multidisciplinary meeting with surgery, ICU, palliative care, and family to discuss realistic outcomes, quality of life, and patient values before decision***
- In high-acuity cases with refractory shock and high **SOFA scores (>15)**, shared decision-making is essential to align surgical intervention with the patient’s **goals of care**.
- This approach ensures that the **prognosis**, which carries a high risk of mortality and morbidity from **hemipelvectomy**, is transparently communicated by the entire medical team.
*Transfer to ECMO center for consideration of VA-ECMO as bridge to hemipelvectomy*
- **VA-ECMO** is generally not indicated in septic shock with refractory vasoplegia and severe multi-organ failure as it doesn't solve the **source control** issue.
- The logistics and physiological stress of a transfer in the setting of **1.2 mcg/kg/min norepinephrine** would be highly unstable and likely fatal.
*Continue medical management for 24 hours and proceed with hemipelvectomy only if shock improves*
- Delaying source control in **necrotizing fasciitis** while shock is worsening usually leads to death, as medical management alone cannot overcome the focus of infection.
- Waiting for improvement in the setting of a **lactate of 15 mmol/L** and triple vasopressors is unrealistic without definitive surgical intervention.
*Decline surgery based on futility given SOFA score >15 and initiate comfort care*
- While the **SOFA score** indicates a very high mortality risk, unilateral physician declaration of **medical futility** is ethically complex and can damage family trust.
- Comfort care should remain a possibility, but first requires a thorough **interdisciplinary discussion** to ensure legal and ethical standards are met.
*Proceed with hemipelvectomy immediately as only chance for survival with informed consent from family*
- Performing such a **mutilating surgery** without a detailed discussion of the expected **quality of life** and long-term functional loss is poor surgical practice.
- Immediate surgery without addressing the massive **operative mortality** risk ignores the patient's potential preference for a dignified death over a futile procedure.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 9: A 52-year-old woman with septic shock from intra-abdominal infection undergoes emergency exploratory laparotomy for perforated diverticulitis with fecal peritonitis. Surgery reveals extensive contamination requiring damage control approach. Postoperatively, she requires norepinephrine 0.8 mcg/kg/min plus vasopressin 0.04 units/min, has lactate of 8.5 mmol/L, temperature 35.2°C, INR 2.8, pH 7.18, and base deficit -12. Planned return to OR is in 48 hours. Evaluate the priority interventions to optimize outcome.
- A. Immediate return to OR for definitive repair and anastomosis
- B. Start therapeutic hypothermia and delay reoperation until hemodynamically stable off vasopressors
- C. Initiate high-dose vasopressors to maintain MAP >75 mmHg and early enteral nutrition
- D. Administer massive transfusion protocol and emergency re-exploration within 6 hours
- E. Aggressive rewarming, correction of coagulopathy, ongoing resuscitation, and source control at planned reoperation (Correct Answer)
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Aggressive rewarming, correction of coagulopathy, ongoing resuscitation, and source control at planned reoperation***
- This patient presents with the **lethal triad** (coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia) in the setting of **septic shock**, necessitating physiologic stabilization before definitive surgery.
- The gold standard for **damage control** is to stabilize the patient in the ICU by correcting **base deficit**, improving **lactate clearance**, and restoring normal temperature and coagulation parameters.
*Immediate return to OR for definitive repair and anastomosis*
- Attempting **definitive repair** or anastomosis in an unstable patient with fecal peritonitis and high-dose **vasopressor requirements** carries a prohibited risk of dehiscence and death.
- Surgery should be limited to **staged re-intervention** only after the metabolic and physiologic insults have been partially reversed.
*Start therapeutic hypothermia and delay reoperation until hemodynamically stable off vasopressors*
- **Hypothermia** is a component of the lethal triad that worsens **coagulopathy** by inhibiting the clotting cascade; metabolic rewarming is required, not cooling.
- While stability is the goal, waiting to be completely off vasopressors might dangerously delay **source control** if the infection is driving the shock.
*Initiate high-dose vasopressors to maintain MAP >75 mmHg and early enteral nutrition*
- Focus should be on **volume resuscitation** and reversing tissue hypoxia (lactate) rather than solely escalating vasopressors, which can cause **mesenteric ischemia**.
- **Early enteral nutrition** is contraindicated in the immediate postoperative phase of an open abdomen with significant **hemodynamic instability** and high pressor requirements.
*Administer massive transfusion protocol and emergency re-exploration within 6 hours*
- **Massive transfusion protocol** is typically reserved for active, uncontrolled hemorrhage, whereas this patient primarily requires reversal of **septic shock** and metabolic derangements.
- **Re-exploration within 6 hours** is too early for a damage control patient who has not yet been adequately rewarmed or had their **acidosis** corrected.
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG Question 10: A 70-year-old man with recently diagnosed small cell lung cancer presents with septic shock from pneumonia. After initial resuscitation, he requires norepinephrine 0.6 mcg/kg/min and has a lactate of 7.8 mmol/L. His SOFA score is 14. The family requests 'everything be done,' but the patient had previously told his oncologist he would not want prolonged intensive care if his cancer prognosis was poor. Staging shows extensive-stage disease. The ICU team debates goals of care. What represents the most ethically appropriate approach to decision-making?
- A. Continue maximum therapy per family wishes as they are legal decision-makers
- B. Obtain ethics consultation to overrule family wishes based on futility
- C. Arrange urgent palliative care consultation and family meeting to discuss patient's previously expressed wishes and realistic prognosis (Correct Answer)
- D. Continue current therapy for 72 hours then reassess based on clinical trajectory
- E. Transition to comfort care based on poor oncologic prognosis and high SOFA score
Sepsis bundles and quality metrics Explanation: ***Arrange urgent palliative care consultation and family meeting to discuss patient's previously expressed wishes and realistic prognosis***
- The most ethically sound approach is to use **substituted judgment**, which prioritizes the patient's **previously expressed wishes** about avoiding prolonged intensive care.
- A **multidisciplinary family meeting** helps reconcile medical reality with patient values, ensuring informed **shared decision-making** rather than a unilateral or discordant approach.
*Continue maximum therapy per family wishes as they are legal decision-makers*
- While families are **surrogate decision-makers**, their role is to advocate for what the **patient would want**, not their own personal desires.
- Blindly following "everything be done" ignores the patient's prior statement to his oncologist and risks providing **non-beneficial treatment**.
*Obtain ethics consultation to overrule family wishes based on futility*
- The term **medical futility** is often controversial; ethics consultations are designed to **mediate conflicts** rather than simply provide a mechanism to overrule families.
- Unilateral decisions should only follow exhaustive attempts at **communication and mediation**, which have not yet occurred in this case.
*Continue current therapy for 72 hours then reassess based on clinical trajectory*
- A "time-limited trial" is a valid tool but fails to address the immediate ethical conflict regarding the **patient's autonomous refusal** of prolonged care.
- This approach may unnecessarily prolong the dying process and ignore the **prognostic alignment** required between the oncology and ICU teams.
*Transition to comfort care based on poor oncologic prognosis and high SOFA score*
- Clinicians should not unilaterally transition to **comfort care** without discussing the patient's prognosis and values with the family/surrogates first.
- While the **high SOFA score** and extensive cancer indicate a poor prognosis, the process must respect the legal and ethical requirements of **informed consent and withdrawal of care**.
More Sepsis bundles and quality metrics US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
