Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Cognitive biases in differential construction. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 1: A group of neurologists develop a new blood test for Alzheimer's. They are optimistic about the test, as they have found that for any given patient, the test repeatedly produces very similar results. However, they find that the new test results are not necessarily consistent with the gold standard of diagnosis. How would this new test most accurately be described?
- A. Valid and reliable
- B. Reliable (Correct Answer)
- C. Valid
- D. Biased
- E. Neither valid nor reliable
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Reliable***
- The test produces **similar results repeatedly** upon repeated measures, indicating high **reliability** or **precision**.
- Reliability refers to the **consistency** of a measure, even if it is not accurate.
*Valid and reliable*
- While the test is **reliable**, it is explicitly stated that the results are **not consistent with the gold standard**, meaning it lacks **validity**.
- A test must be both **consistent** (reliable) and **accurate** (valid) to be described as valid and reliable.
*Valid*
- **Validity** refers to the **accuracy** of a test, or how well it measures what it is supposed to measure.
- The test is explicitly stated to **not be consistent with the gold standard**, indicating a lack of agreement with the true measure of Alzheimer's.
*Biased*
- **Bias** refers to a **systematic error** in measurement that can lead to consistently high or low results compared to the true value.
- While the test might be biased due to its lack of consistency with the gold standard, "biased" is not the most accurate single descriptor of its measurement properties given the information provided.
*Neither valid nor reliable*
- The test is described as producing **very similar results repeatedly**, which directly indicates it has **high reliability**.
- Therefore, stating it is neither valid nor reliable is incorrect, as it possesses reliability.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 2: A 33-year-old man is brought by ambulance to the emergency room after being a passenger in a motor vehicle accident. An empty bottle of whiskey was found in his front seat, and the patient admits to having been drinking all night. He has multiple lacerations and bruising on his face and scalp and a supportive cervical collar is placed. He is endorsing a significant headache and starts vomiting in the emergency room. His vitals, however, are stable, and he is transported to the CT scanner. While there, he states that he does not want to have a CT scan and asks to be released. What is the most appropriate course of action?
- A. Have the patient fill the appropriate forms and discharge against medical advice
- B. Explain to him that he is intoxicated and cannot make health care decisions, continue as planned (Correct Answer)
- C. Release the patient as requested
- D. Agree to not do the CT scan
- E. Call security
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Explain to him that he is intoxicated and cannot make health care decisions, continue as planned***
- The patient's **intoxication** (empty whiskey bottle, admitted drinking all night) and **head injury symptoms** (headache, vomiting after MVA) suggest he lacks the capacity to make informed medical decisions.
- When a patient lacks capacity, the medical team has an ethical and legal obligation to act in their **best interest**, which includes performing necessary diagnostic tests like a CT scan to rule out serious intracranial injuries.
*Have the patient fill the appropriate forms and discharge against medical advice*
- Discharging a patient against medical advice requires they have the **full capacity** to understand the risks and benefits of their decision, which is compromised by intoxication and head trauma.
- Doing so without ensuring capacity places the patient at significant risk and could have **legal implications** for the healthcare provider and institution.
*Release the patient as requested*
- Releasing an intoxicated patient with a potential **head injury** into the community is medically negligent and highly dangerous given the risk of worsening neurological status.
- Such an action disregards the principle of **beneficence** and the duty to prevent harm, especially when capacity is in question.
*Agree to not do the CT scan*
- Refusing a necessary diagnostic test like a **CT scan** for a patient with head trauma and altered mental status (due to intoxication) can lead to missed diagnoses of life-threatening conditions like intracranial hemorrhage.
- This decision would allow the patient to leave without proper assessment, potentially jeopardizing their life and violating the standard of care to **stabilize** and **diagnose**.
*Call security*
- While security might be needed if the patient becomes disruptive or aggressive, simply calling security without attempting to explain the situation or assess capacity doesn't address the primary medical and ethical dilemma.
- The immediate priority is to ensure the patient's well-being and assess their cognitive ability to make choices, with security being a secondary measure for **safety** if necessary.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 3: A researcher is trying to determine whether a newly discovered substance X can be useful in promoting wound healing after surgery. She conducts this study by enrolling the next 100 patients that will be undergoing this surgery and separating them into 2 groups. She decides which patient will be in which group by using a random number generator. Subsequently, she prepares 1 set of syringes with the novel substance X and 1 set of syringes with a saline control. Both of these sets of syringes are unlabeled and the substances inside cannot be distinguished. She gives the surgeon performing the surgery 1 of the syringes and does not inform him nor the patient which syringe was used. After the study is complete, she analyzes all the data that was collected and performs statistical analysis. This study most likely provides which level of evidence for use of substance X?
- A. Level 3
- B. Level 1 (Correct Answer)
- C. Level 4
- D. Level 5
- E. Level 2
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Level 1***
- The study design described is a **randomized controlled trial (RCT)**, which is considered the **highest level of evidence (Level 1)** in the hierarchy of medical evidence.
- Key features like **randomization**, **control group**, and **blinding (double-blind)** help minimize bias and strengthen the validity of the findings.
*Level 2*
- Level 2 evidence typically comprises **well-designed controlled trials without randomization** (non-randomized controlled trials) or **high-quality cohort studies**.
- While strong, they do not possess the same level of internal validity as randomized controlled trials.
*Level 3*
- Level 3 evidence typically includes **case-control studies** or **cohort studies**, which are observational designs and carry a higher risk of bias compared to RCTs.
- These studies generally do not involve randomization or intervention assignment by the researchers.
*Level 4*
- Level 4 evidence is usually derived from **case series** or **poor quality cohort and case-control studies**.
- These studies provide descriptive information or investigate associations without strong control for confounding factors.
*Level 5*
- Level 5 evidence is the **lowest level of evidence**, consisting of **expert opinion** or **animal research/bench research**.
- This level lacks human clinical data or systematic investigative rigor needed for higher evidence levels.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 4: A 25-year-old man comes to the physician for severe back pain. He describes the pain as shooting and stabbing. On a 10-point scale, he rates the pain as a 9 to 10. The pain started after he lifted a heavy box at work; he works at a supermarket and recently switched from being a cashier to a storekeeper. The patient appears to be in severe distress. Vital signs are within normal limits. On physical examination, the spine is nontender without paravertebral muscle spasms. Range of motion is normal. A straight-leg raise test is negative. After the physical examination has been completed, the patient asks for a letter to his employer attesting to his inability to work as a storekeeper. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
- A. “Yes. Since work may worsen your condition, I would prefer that you stay home a few days. I will write a letter to your employer to explain the situation.”
- B. You say you are in severe pain. However, the physical examination findings do not suggest a physical problem that can be addressed with medications or surgery. I'd like to meet on a regular basis to see how you're doing.
- C. I understand that you are uncomfortable, but the findings do not match the severity of your symptoms. Let's talk about the recent changes at your job. (Correct Answer)
- D. The physical exam findings do not match your symptoms, which suggests a psychological problem. I would be happy to refer you to a mental health professional.
- E. The physical exam findings suggest a psychological rather than a physical problem. But there is a good chance that we can address it with cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***"I understand that you are uncomfortable, but the findings do not match the severity of your symptoms. Let's talk about the recent changes at your job."***
- This response acknowledges the patient's reported discomfort while gently highlighting the **discrepancy between symptoms and objective findings**, which is crucial in cases of suspected **somatoform or functional pain**.
- It also opens communication about potential **psychosocial stressors** related to his job change, which could be contributing to his symptoms, without dismissing his pain or making a premature diagnosis.
*"You say you are in severe pain. However, the physical examination findings do not suggest a physical problem that can be addressed with medications or surgery. I'd like to meet on a regular basis to see how you're doing."*
- While this option correctly identifies the lack of physical findings, it can be perceived as dismissive of the patient's pain, potentially damaging the **physician-patient relationship**.
- Suggesting regular meetings without a clear plan for addressing his immediate concerns or exploring underlying issues might not be the most effective initial approach.
*“Yes. Since work may worsen your condition, I would prefer that you stay home a few days. I will write a letter to your employer to explain the situation.”*
- This response would **validate the patient's claim of severe pain** without objective evidence, potentially reinforcing illness behavior and avoiding addressing the underlying issue.
- Providing a doctor's note for inability to work without a clear diagnostic basis or understanding of the pain's origin is **medically inappropriate** and could set a precedent for future such requests.
*"The physical exam findings do not match your symptoms, which suggests a psychological problem. I would be happy to refer you to a mental health professional."*
- Directly labeling the problem as "psychological" can be **stigmatizing and alienating** to the patient, leading to distrust and resistance to care.
- While a psychological component might be present, immediately referring to mental health without further exploration of the patient's situation or current stressors is premature and lacks empathy.
*"The physical exam findings suggest a psychological rather than a physical problem. But there is a good chance that we can address it with cognitive-behavioral therapy."*
- Similar to the previous option, explicitly stating a "psychological problem" can be **stigmatizing**.
- Jumping directly to recommending **cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)** without a comprehensive discussion and patient buy-in is premature and may lead to non-compliance.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 5: Two studies are reviewed for submission to an oncology journal. In Study A, a novel MRI technology is evaluated as a screening tool for ovarian cancer. The authors find that the mean survival time is 4 years in the control group and 10 years in the MRI-screened group. In Study B, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and a novel antidepressant are used to treat patients with comorbid pancreatic cancer and major depression. Patients receiving the new drug are told that they are expected to have quick resolution of their depression, while those who do not receive the drug are not told anything about their prognosis. Which of the following describes the likely type of bias in Study A and Study B?
- A. Latency Bias; Golem effect
- B. Confounding; Golem effect
- C. Lead time bias; Golem effect
- D. Lead time bias; Pygmalion effect (Correct Answer)
- E. Latency bias; Pygmalion effect
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Lead time bias; Pygmalion effect***
- In Study A, the MRI technology detects ovarian cancer earlier, artificially making the survival time appear longer simply due to earlier diagnosis, not necessarily improved outcomes, which is characteristic of **lead time bias**.
- In Study B, the patients receiving the new drug are told to expect quick resolution of their depression, leading to increased expectation of improvement, which describes the **Pygmalion effect** (a form of observer-expectancy effect where higher expectations lead to increased performance).
*Latency Bias; Golem effect*
- **Latency bias** refers to a delay in the manifestation of an outcome, which is not the primary issue in Study A's screening context.
- The **Golem effect** is a form of negative self-fulfilling prophecy where lower expectations placed upon individuals by superiors/researchers lead to poorer performance, which is opposite to what is described in Study B.
*Confounding; Golem effect*
- **Confounding** occurs when an unmeasured third variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, distorting the observed relationship; while confounding is common, the scenario in Study A specifically points to a screening effect on survival time.
- As mentioned, the **Golem effect** refers to negative expectations leading to poorer outcomes, which is not present in Study B.
*Lead time bias; Golem effect*
- **Lead time bias** correctly identifies the issue in Study A, as explaining the apparently longer survival as a result of earlier detection.
- However, the **Golem effect** incorrectly describes the scenario in Study B, where positive expectations are given, not negative ones.
*Latency bias; Pygmalion effect*
- **Latency bias** is not the primary bias described in Study A; the immediate impact of early detection on survival statistics points to lead time bias.
- The **Pygmalion effect** correctly describes the bias in Study B, where positive expectations from the researchers influence patient outcomes.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 6: A pharmaceutical corporation is developing a research study to evaluate a novel blood test to screen for breast cancer. They enrolled 800 patients in the study, half of which have breast cancer. The remaining enrolled patients are age-matched controls who do not have the disease. Of those in the diseased arm, 330 are found positive for the test. Of the patients in the control arm, only 30 are found positive. What is this test’s sensitivity?
- A. 330 / (330 + 30)
- B. 330 / (330 + 70) (Correct Answer)
- C. 370 / (30 + 370)
- D. 370 / (70 + 370)
- E. 330 / (400 + 400)
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***330 / (330 + 70)***
- **Sensitivity** measures the proportion of actual **positives** that are correctly identified as such.
- In this study, there are **400 diseased patients** (half of 800). Of these, 330 tested positive (true positives), meaning 70 tested negative (false negatives). So sensitivity is **330 / (330 + 70)**.
*330 / (330 + 30)*
- This calculation represents the **positive predictive value**, which is the probability that subjects with a positive screening test truly have the disease. It uses **true positives / (true positives + false positives)**.
- It does not correctly calculate **sensitivity**, which requires knowing the total number of diseased individuals.
*370 / (30 + 370)*
- This expression is attempting to calculate **specificity**, which is the proportion of actual negatives that are correctly identified. It would be **true negatives / (true negatives + false positives)**.
- However, the numbers used are incorrect for specificity in this context given the data provided.
*370 / (70 + 370)*
- This formula is an incorrect combination of values and does not represent any standard epidemiological measure like **sensitivity** or **specificity**.
- It is attempting to combine false negatives (70) and true negatives (370 from control arm) in a non-standard way.
*330 / (400 + 400)*
- This calculation attempts to divide true positives by the total study population (800 patients).
- This metric represents the **prevalence of true positives within the entire study cohort**, not the test's **sensitivity**.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 7: A study is conducted in a hospital to estimate the prevalence of handwashing among healthcare workers. All of the hospital staff members are informed that the study is being conducted for 1 month, and the study method will be a passive observation of their daily routine at the hospital. A total of 89 medical staff members give their consent for the study, and they are followed for a month. This study could most likely suffer from which of the following biases?
- A. Attrition bias
- B. Hawthorne effect (Correct Answer)
- C. Confounding bias
- D. Berksonian bias
- E. Observer-expectancy bias
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Hawthorne effect***
- This bias occurs when individuals modify their behavior in response to being **observed** or knowing they are part of a study. In this scenario, healthcare workers, knowing they are being observed for handwashing, are likely to wash their hands more frequently than usual.
- The intent of the study is to estimate the **prevalence** of handwashing; however, the observed rates will be artificially inflated due to the subjects' awareness of being studied, leading to an inaccurate estimate.
*Attrition bias*
- **Attrition bias** arises when there is **differential loss to follow-up** between study groups, which can lead to biased results.
- This study design involves observing a defined group for a month, but there's no indication of loss of participants or differential dropout from specific intervention or control groups.
*Confounding bias*
- **Confounding bias** occurs when an unmeasured or uncontrolled factor (a **confounder**) is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, distorting the true association.
- While confounding is a common bias in observational studies, the primary issue described here is the direct impact of observation on behavior, not an unmeasured external variable influencing both the behavior and its measurement.
*Berksonian bias*
- **Berksonian bias** (or admission rate bias) is a type of selection bias that occurs in case-control studies when hospital-based controls or cases are used, and the probability of being admitted to the hospital is influenced by both the exposure and the disease itself.
- This study is a **prevalence study** involving direct observation of healthcare workers, not a case-control study, making Berksonian bias irrelevant.
*Observer-expectancy bias*
- **Observer-expectancy bias** occurs when the **researcher's expectations** or beliefs influence their observations or interpretation of data.
- The scenario describes the participants (healthcare workers) changing their behavior due to being observed, not the observer's expectations influencing the recorded data, which would be the **Hawthorne effect**.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 8: A 27-year-old woman is brought to the physician by her parents because they are concerned about her mood. They say that she has “not been herself” since the death of her friend, who was killed 3 weeks ago when the fighter jet he piloted was shot down overseas. She says that since the incident, she feels sad and alone. She reports having repeated nightmares about her friend's death. Her appetite has decreased, but she is still eating regularly and is otherwise able to take care of herself. She does not leave her home for any social activities and avoids visits from friends. She went back to work after taking 1 week off after the incident. Her vital signs are within normal limits. Physical examination shows no abnormalities. On mental status examination, she appears sad, has a full range of affect, and is cooperative. In addition to taking measures to evaluate this patient's anxiety, which of the following is the most appropriate statement by the physician at this time?
- A. I can see that you have gone through a lot recently, but I think that your reaction is especially severe and has persisted for longer than normal. Would you be open to therapy or medication to help you manage better?
- B. I am worried that you may be having an abnormally severe reaction to what is an understandably stressful event. I recommend attending behavioral therapy sessions to help you deal with this challenge.
- C. Your grief over the loss of your friend appears to have a negative effect on your social and functional capabilities. I recommend starting antidepressants to help you deal with this challenge.
- D. I'm so sorry, but the loss of loved ones is a part of life. Let's try to find better ways for you to deal with this event.
- E. I understand that the sudden loss of your friend has affected you deeply. Sometimes in situations like yours, people have thoughts that life is not worth living; have you had such thoughts? (Correct Answer)
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***I understand that the sudden loss of your friend has affected you deeply. Sometimes in situations like yours, people have thoughts that life is not worth living; have you had such thoughts?***
- This statement empathetically acknowledges the patient's grief while **directly assessing for suicidal ideation**, which is crucial in any evaluation of a patient experiencing significant emotional distress, especially after a recent loss.
- The patient's presentation, including sadness, social withdrawal, decreased appetite, and nightmares, is consistent with **grief**, but the physician must rule out more severe conditions like **major depressive disorder (MDD)**, for which suicidal thoughts are a key diagnostic criterion and safety concern.
*I can see that you have gone through a lot recently, but I think that your reaction is especially severe and has persisted for longer than normal. Would you be open to therapy or medication to help you manage better?*
- This statement is somewhat judgmental ("especially severe and has persisted for longer than normal") for a patient only three weeks out from a traumatic loss, which could invalidate her feelings.
- While therapy or medication might be considered, it's generally too early to classify her normal grief response as an abnormal or prolonged reaction without first screening for immediate safety concerns like suicidal ideation.
*I am worried that you may be having an abnormally severe reaction to what is an understandably stressful event. I recommend attending behavioral therapy sessions to help you deal with this challenge.*
- Similar to the previous option, labeling her reaction as "abnormally severe" at this early stage (3 weeks post-loss) can be perceived as invalidating and may make the patient less open to further discussion or treatment.
- Recommending therapy without first assessing for suicidal ideation or a more comprehensive diagnostic evaluation is premature and misses a critical screening step.
*Your grief over the loss of your friend appears to have a negative effect on your social and functional capabilities. I recommend starting antidepressants to help you deal with this challenge.*
- While her social and functional capabilities are affected, grief is a normal human response, and recommending antidepressants after only 3 weeks post-loss, without a full psychiatric evaluation or ruling out suicidal ideation, is often premature.
- **Antidepressants** are typically considered for **MDD** or **prolonged grief disorder**, usually after a longer period (e.g., 6 months for adults) or if symptoms are markedly severe and debilitating, especially with an immediate safety concern.
*I'm so sorry, but the loss of loved ones is a part of life. Let's try to find better ways for you to deal with this event.*
- This statement, particularly "the loss of loved ones is a part of life," can come across as dismissive and insensitive to the patient's individual pain and trauma.
- It minimizes her experience and does not create an empathetic environment necessary for a patient to open up about potentially sensitive topics, such as suicidal thoughts.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 9: A 77-year-old female comes to a medical school's free clinic for follow-up examination after a urinary tract infection (UTI) and is seen by a fourth year medical student. The clinic serves largely uninsured low-income patients in a New York City neighborhood with a large African American and Latino population. Two weeks ago, the patient was treated in the local emergency department where she presented with altered mental state and dysuria. The medical student had recently read about a study that described a strong relationship between cognitive impairment and UTI hospitalization risk (RR = 1.34, p < 0.001). The attending physician at the medical student's free clinic is also familiar with this study and tells the medical student that the study was conducted in a sample of upper middle class Caucasian patients in the Netherlands. The attending states that the results of the study should be interpreted with caution. Which of the following concerns is most likely underlying the attending physician's remarks?
- A. Confounding bias
- B. Selection bias
- C. Poor reliability
- D. Low internal validity
- E. Low external validity (Correct Answer)
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Low external validity***
- **External validity** refers to the generalizability of study findings to other populations, settings, or times.
- The findings from a study of **upper-middle-class Caucasian patients in the Netherlands** may not apply to low-income African American and Latino patients in New York City due to socioeconomic, genetic, and environmental differences, leading to low external validity.
*Confounding bias*
- **Confounding bias** occurs when an unobserved variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, distorting their true relationship.
- While confounding can affect internal validity, the attending's concern is specifically about the applicability of the findings to a different population, not the initial study's internal integrity.
*Selection bias*
- **Selection bias** arises when the study participants are not representative of the target population, often leading to systematic differences between groups.
- While the *initial study* might have had its own selection bias if its sample wasn't representative of the Netherlands population, the attending's concern relates to applying its findings to a *different* population.
*Poor reliability*
- **Reliability** refers to the consistency or reproducibility of a measurement or study result over time or across different observers.
- This concern is about the generalizability of the findings to a different population, not whether the initial study's measurements or results were inconsistent.
*Low internal validity*
- **Internal validity** refers to the extent to which a study establishes a cause-and-effect relationship between the intervention/exposure and the outcome within its own sample.
- The attending's concern is not that the study itself was poorly conducted or failed to demonstrate a true association within its *own* population, but rather that its findings may not hold true for *other* populations.
Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG Question 10: A 57-year-old man presents to the emergency department for weight loss and abdominal pain. The patient states that he has felt steadily more fatigued over the past month and has lost 22 pounds without effort. Today, he fainted prompting his presentation. The patient has no significant past medical history. He does have a 33 pack-year smoking history and drinks 4 to 5 alcoholic drinks per day. His temperature is 99.5°F (37.5°C), blood pressure is 100/58 mmHg, pulse is 100/min, respirations are 17/min, and oxygen saturation is 98% on room air. On physical exam, you see a patient who is very thin and appears to be pale. Stool fecal occult blood testing is positive. A CT scan of the abdomen is performed demonstrating a mass in the colon with multiple metastatic lesions scattered throughout the abdomen. The patient is informed of his diagnosis of metastatic colon cancer. When the patient conveys the information to his family he focuses his efforts on discussing the current literature in the field and the novel therapies that have been invented. He demonstrates his likely mortality outcome which he calculated using the results of a large multi-center study. Which of the following is this patient most likely demonstrating?
- A. Intellectualization (Correct Answer)
- B. Dissociation
- C. Rationalization
- D. Optimism
- E. Pessimism
Cognitive biases in differential construction Explanation: ***Intellectualization***
- This defense mechanism involves **focusing on the intellectual aspects** of a stressful situation, using logical reasoning and factual analysis to avoid experiencing distressing emotions.
- The patient demonstrates this by discussing **literature, novel therapies, and mortality statistics** regarding his metastatic colon cancer.
*Dissociation*
- **Dissociation** involves a mental process that causes a lack of connection in a person's thoughts, memory, and sense of identity.
- This patient is actively engaging with the information, not disconnecting from it.
*Rationalization*
- **Rationalization** is creating logical but false explanations for unacceptable thoughts, feelings, or behaviors to justify them.
- The patient is not trying to justify his actions or feelings, but rather to understand his disease intellectually.
*Optimism*
- **Optimism** is a disposition to look on the favorable side of events or conditions and to expect the most favorable outcome.
- While hope for novel therapies could be seen as optimistic, his detailed calculation of mortality outcomes is a realistic, rather than purely optimistic, approach.
*Pessimism*
- **Pessimism** is a tendency to see the worst aspect of things or believe that the worst will happen.
- The patient is engaging with the facts of his diagnosis, even calculating his mortality outcome, which is not necessarily a pessimistic but rather a realistic and intellectual approach.
More Cognitive biases in differential construction US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.