Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Clinical decision rules. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 1: A 67-year-old woman presents with right leg pain and swelling of 5 days’ duration. She has a history of hypertension for 15 years and had a recent hospitalization for pneumonia. She had been recuperating at home but on beginning to mobilize and walk, the right leg became painful and swollen. Her temperature is 37.1°C (98.7°F), the blood pressure is 130/80 mm Hg, and the pulse is 75/min. On physical examination, the right calf is 4 cm greater in circumference than the left when measured 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity. Dilated superficial veins are present on the right foot and the right leg is slightly redder than the left. There is some tenderness on palpation in the popliteal fossa behind the knee. Which of the following is the best initial step in the management of this patient’s condition?
- A. International normalized ratio (INR)
- B. Thrombophilia screen
- C. Wells’ clinical probability tool (Correct Answer)
- D. Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast
- E. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Wells' clinical probability tool***
- The patient presents with classic signs and symptoms of **deep vein thrombosis (DVT)**, including unilateral leg pain and swelling, dilated superficial veins, and tenderness. The Wells' clinical probability tool helps stratify the risk of DVT, guiding further diagnostic testing.
- Using this validated clinical decision rule for risk assessment is the **best initial step** to determine the likelihood of DVT before proceeding with imaging studies (compression ultrasound) or D-dimer testing.
- Based on the Wells' score, patients are categorized as low, moderate, or high probability, which then directs appropriate diagnostic testing and potential empiric anticoagulation.
*International normalized ratio (INR)*
- **INR** is used to monitor the effectiveness of **warfarin** therapy, an anticoagulant, and to assess liver function.
- It is not an initial diagnostic tool for DVT; rather, it is used **after a DVT diagnosis** has been made and anticoagulation with warfarin has been initiated.
*Thrombophilia screen*
- A **thrombophilia screen** investigates underlying genetic or acquired clotting disorders.
- This is typically performed **after a DVT diagnosis** in younger patients, those with recurrent DVT, or those with a family history of thrombosis, not as an initial diagnostic step unless there is strong suspicion for an underlying clotting disorder.
*Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast*
- A **CT with contrast** (specifically **CT venography**) can diagnose DVT, but it is not the **first-line imaging modality** for suspected DVT because of radiation exposure and contrast risks.
- **Compression ultrasonography** is generally the preferred initial imaging study for DVT, especially after a risk assessment using the Wells' score.
*Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)*
- The **aPTT** is a measure of the intrinsic and common pathways of coagulation and is used to monitor **unfractionated heparin** therapy.
- It is not an initial diagnostic test for DVT; like INR, it is used **after diagnosis** for monitoring anticoagulant treatment.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 2: You are reading through a recent article that reports significant decreases in all-cause mortality for patients with malignant melanoma following treatment with a novel biological infusion. Which of the following choices refers to the probability that a study will find a statistically significant difference when one truly does exist?
- A. Type II error
- B. Type I error
- C. Confidence interval
- D. p-value
- E. Power (Correct Answer)
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Power***
- **Power** is the probability that a study will correctly reject the null hypothesis when it is, in fact, false (i.e., will find a statistically significant difference when one truly exists).
- A study with high power minimizes the risk of a **Type II error** (failing to detect a real effect).
*Type II error*
- A **Type II error** (or **beta error**) occurs when a study fails to reject a false null hypothesis, meaning it concludes there is no significant difference when one actually exists.
- This is the **opposite** of what the question describes, which asks for the probability of *finding* a difference.
*Type I error*
- A **Type I error** (or **alpha error**) occurs when a study incorrectly rejects a true null hypothesis, concluding there is a significant difference when one does not actually exist.
- This relates to the **p-value** and the level of statistical significance (e.g., p < 0.05).
*Confidence interval*
- A **confidence interval** provides a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to lie with a certain degree of confidence (e.g., 95%).
- It does not directly represent the probability of finding a statistically significant difference when one truly exists.
*p-value*
- The **p-value** is the probability of observing data as extreme as, or more extreme than, that obtained in the study, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
- It is used to determine statistical significance, but it is not the probability of detecting a true effect.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 3: A 25-year-old man comes to the physician for severe back pain. He describes the pain as shooting and stabbing. On a 10-point scale, he rates the pain as a 9 to 10. The pain started after he lifted a heavy box at work; he works at a supermarket and recently switched from being a cashier to a storekeeper. The patient appears to be in severe distress. Vital signs are within normal limits. On physical examination, the spine is nontender without paravertebral muscle spasms. Range of motion is normal. A straight-leg raise test is negative. After the physical examination has been completed, the patient asks for a letter to his employer attesting to his inability to work as a storekeeper. Which of the following is the most appropriate response?
- A. “Yes. Since work may worsen your condition, I would prefer that you stay home a few days. I will write a letter to your employer to explain the situation.”
- B. You say you are in severe pain. However, the physical examination findings do not suggest a physical problem that can be addressed with medications or surgery. I'd like to meet on a regular basis to see how you're doing.
- C. I understand that you are uncomfortable, but the findings do not match the severity of your symptoms. Let's talk about the recent changes at your job. (Correct Answer)
- D. The physical exam findings do not match your symptoms, which suggests a psychological problem. I would be happy to refer you to a mental health professional.
- E. The physical exam findings suggest a psychological rather than a physical problem. But there is a good chance that we can address it with cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***"I understand that you are uncomfortable, but the findings do not match the severity of your symptoms. Let's talk about the recent changes at your job."***
- This response acknowledges the patient's reported discomfort while gently highlighting the **discrepancy between symptoms and objective findings**, which is crucial in cases of suspected **somatoform or functional pain**.
- It also opens communication about potential **psychosocial stressors** related to his job change, which could be contributing to his symptoms, without dismissing his pain or making a premature diagnosis.
*"You say you are in severe pain. However, the physical examination findings do not suggest a physical problem that can be addressed with medications or surgery. I'd like to meet on a regular basis to see how you're doing."*
- While this option correctly identifies the lack of physical findings, it can be perceived as dismissive of the patient's pain, potentially damaging the **physician-patient relationship**.
- Suggesting regular meetings without a clear plan for addressing his immediate concerns or exploring underlying issues might not be the most effective initial approach.
*“Yes. Since work may worsen your condition, I would prefer that you stay home a few days. I will write a letter to your employer to explain the situation.”*
- This response would **validate the patient's claim of severe pain** without objective evidence, potentially reinforcing illness behavior and avoiding addressing the underlying issue.
- Providing a doctor's note for inability to work without a clear diagnostic basis or understanding of the pain's origin is **medically inappropriate** and could set a precedent for future such requests.
*"The physical exam findings do not match your symptoms, which suggests a psychological problem. I would be happy to refer you to a mental health professional."*
- Directly labeling the problem as "psychological" can be **stigmatizing and alienating** to the patient, leading to distrust and resistance to care.
- While a psychological component might be present, immediately referring to mental health without further exploration of the patient's situation or current stressors is premature and lacks empathy.
*"The physical exam findings suggest a psychological rather than a physical problem. But there is a good chance that we can address it with cognitive-behavioral therapy."*
- Similar to the previous option, explicitly stating a "psychological problem" can be **stigmatizing**.
- Jumping directly to recommending **cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)** without a comprehensive discussion and patient buy-in is premature and may lead to non-compliance.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 4: A medical research study is beginning to evaluate the positive predictive value of a novel blood test for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The diagnostic arm contains 700 patients with NHL, of which 400 tested positive for the novel blood test. In the control arm, 700 age-matched control patients are enrolled and 0 are found positive for the novel test. What is the PPV of this test?
- A. 400 / (400 + 0) (Correct Answer)
- B. 700 / (700 + 300)
- C. 400 / (400 + 300)
- D. 700 / (700 + 0)
- E. 700 / (400 + 400)
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***400 / (400 + 0) = 1.0 or 100%***
- The **positive predictive value (PPV)** is calculated as **True Positives / (True Positives + False Positives)**.
- In this scenario, **True Positives (TP)** are the 400 patients with NHL who tested positive, and **False Positives (FP)** are 0, as no control patients tested positive.
- This gives a PPV of 400/400 = **1.0 or 100%**, indicating that all patients who tested positive actually had the disease.
*700 / (700 + 300)*
- This calculation does not align with the formula for PPV based on the given data.
- The denominator `(700+300)` suggests an incorrect combination of various patient groups.
*400 / (400 + 300)*
- The denominator `(400+300)` incorrectly includes 300, which is the number of **False Negatives** (patients with NHL who tested negative), not False Positives.
- PPV focuses on the proportion of true positives among all positive tests, not all diseased individuals.
*700 / (700 + 0)*
- This calculation incorrectly uses the total number of patients with NHL (700) as the numerator, rather than the number of positive test results in that group.
- The numerator should be the **True Positives** (400), not the total number of diseased individuals.
*700 / (400 + 400)*
- This calculation uses incorrect values for both the numerator and denominator, not corresponding to the PPV formula.
- The numerator 700 represents the total number of patients with the disease, not those who tested positive, and the denominator incorrectly sums up values that don't represent the proper PPV calculation.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 5: A student health coordinator plans on leading a campus-wide HIV screening program that will be free for the entire undergraduate student body. The goal is to capture as many correct HIV diagnoses as possible with the fewest false positives. The coordinator consults with the hospital to see which tests are available to use for this program. Test A has a sensitivity of 0.92 and a specificity of 0.99. Test B has a sensitivity of 0.95 and a specificity of 0.96. Test C has a sensitivity of 0.98 and a specificity of 0.93. Which of the following testing schemes should the coordinator pursue?
- A. Test A on the entire student body followed by Test B on those who are positive
- B. Test A on the entire student body followed by Test C on those who are positive
- C. Test C on the entire student body followed by Test B on those who are positive
- D. Test C on the entire student body followed by Test A on those who are positive (Correct Answer)
- E. Test B on the entire student body followed by Test A on those who are positive
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Test C on the entire student body followed by Test A on those who are positive***
- To "capture as many correct HIV diagnoses as possible" (maximize true positives), the initial screening test should have the **highest sensitivity**. Test C has the highest sensitivity (0.98).
- To "capture as few false positives as possible" (maximize true negatives and confirm diagnoses), the confirmatory test should have the **highest specificity**. Test A has the highest specificity (0.99).
*Test A on the entire student body followed by Test B on those who are positive*
- Starting with Test A (sensitivity 0.92) would miss more true positive cases than starting with Test C (sensitivity 0.98), failing the goal of **capturing as many cases as possible**.
- Following with Test B (specificity 0.96) would result in more false positives than following with Test A (specificity 0.99).
*Test A on the entire student body followed by Test C on those who are positive*
- This scheme would miss many true positive cases initially due to Test A's lower sensitivity compared to Test C.
- Following with Test C would introduce more false positives than necessary, as it has a lower specificity (0.93) than Test A (0.99).
*Test C on the entire student body followed by Test B on those who are positive*
- While Test C is a good initial screen for its high sensitivity, following it with Test B (specificity 0.96) is less optimal than Test A (specificity 0.99) for minimizing false positives in the confirmation step.
- This combination would therefore yield more false positives in the confirmatory stage than using Test A.
*Test B on the entire student body followed by Test A on those who are positive*
- Test B has a sensitivity of 0.95, which is lower than Test C's sensitivity of 0.98, meaning it would miss more true positive cases at the initial screening stage.
- While Test A provides excellent specificity for confirmation, the initial screening step is suboptimal for the goal of capturing as many diagnoses as possible.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 6: An orthopaedic surgeon at a local community hospital has noticed that turnover times in the operating room have been unnecessarily long. She believes that the long wait times may be due to inefficient communication between the surgical nursing staff, the staff in the pre-operative area, and the staff in the post-operative receiving area. She believes a secure communication mobile phone app would help to streamline communication between providers and improve efficiency in turnover times. Which of the following methods is most appropriate to evaluate the impact of this intervention in the clinical setting?
- A. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle (Correct Answer)
- B. Failure modes and effects analysis
- C. Standardization
- D. Forcing function
- E. Root cause analysis
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle***
- The **Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle** is a structured, iterative model used for continuous improvement in quality and efficiency, making it ideal for evaluating the impact of a new intervention like a communication app.
- This cycle allows for small-scale testing of changes, observation of results, learning from the observations, and refinement of the intervention before full implementation.
*Failure modes and effects analysis*
- **Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)** is a prospective method to identify potential failures in a process, predict their effects, and prioritize actions to prevent them.
- While useful for process improvement, FMEA is typically performed *before* implementing a change to identify risks, rather than to evaluate the impact of an already implemented intervention.
*Standardization*
- **Standardization** involves creating and implementing consistent processes or protocols to reduce variability and improve reliability.
- While the communication app might contribute to standardization, standardization itself is a *method of improvement* rather than a method for *evaluating the impact* of an intervention.
*Forcing function*
- A **forcing function** is a design feature that physically prevents an error from occurring, making it impossible to complete a task incorrectly.
- An app that streamlines communication does not act as a forcing function, as it facilitates a process rather than physically preventing an incorrect action.
*Root cause analysis*
- **Root cause analysis (RCA)** is a retrospective method used to investigate an event that has already occurred (e.g., an adverse event) to identify its underlying causes.
- This method is used *after* a problem has manifested to understand *why* it happened, not to evaluate the *impact* of a new intervention designed to prevent future problems.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 7: A 78-year-old woman is brought to the emergency ward by her son for lethargy and generalized weakness. The patient speaks in short utterances and does not make eye contact with the provider or her son throughout the interview and examination. You elicit that the patient lives with her son and daughter-in-law, and she reports vague weakness for the last couple days. The emergency room provider notices 3-4 healing bruises on the patient's upper extremities; otherwise, examination is not revealing. Routine chemistries and blood counts are unremarkable; non-contrast head CT demonstrates normal age-related changes. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- A. Ask the patient's son to leave the room (Correct Answer)
- B. Question the patient's son regarding the home situation
- C. Call Adult Protective Services to report the patient's son
- D. Perform lumbar puncture
- E. Question the patient regarding abuse or neglect
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Ask the patient's son to leave the room***
- The patient's **lethargy**, **non-engagement**, and **healing bruises** raise strong suspicions for elder abuse or neglect. Removing the son allows for a private interview, which is crucial for her to feel safe enough to disclose information.
- In situations of suspected abuse, it is paramount to prioritize the **patient's safety and ability to speak freely** without the presence of the suspected abuser.
*Question the patient's son regarding the home situation*
- Questioning the son directly at this point may escalate the situation or make the patient even less likely to disclose abuse, as she is likely **frightened or coerced**.
- This step is premature and should only occur after a private interview with the patient, and potentially with the involvement of Protective Services.
*Call Adult Protective Services to report the patient's son*
- While reporting to **Adult Protective Services** is a critical step if abuse is confirmed, it is not the immediate first action until a private interview with the patient has been conducted to gather more information.
- Making a report without attempting to speak with the patient alone first can hinder the investigation and potentially jeopardize her safety if the abuser is alerted prematurely.
*Perform lumbar puncture*
- A lumbar puncture is an invasive procedure generally performed to diagnose **central nervous system infections** or **inflammatory conditions**.
- There are no clinical indications (e.g., fever, meningeal signs, focal neurological deficits) to suggest a need for a lumbar puncture, especially given the history and physical findings that point towards abuse.
*Question the patient regarding abuse or neglect*
- While it's important to question the patient about abuse, it must be done in a **safe and private environment** where she feels comfortable speaking freely.
- Questioning her while the suspected abuser (her son) is present would likely yield unhelpful responses due to fear or intimidation, as seen by her lack of eye contact and short utterances.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 8: A 65-year-old man is admitted to the hospital because of a 1-month history of fatigue, intermittent fever, and weakness. Results from a peripheral blood smear taken during his evaluation are indicative of possible acute myeloid leukemia. Bone marrow aspiration and subsequent cytogenetic studies confirm the diagnosis. The physician sets aside an appointed time-slot and arranges a meeting in a quiet office to inform him about the diagnosis and discuss his options. He has been encouraged to bring someone along to the appointment if he wanted. He comes to your office at the appointed time with his daughter. He appears relaxed, with a full range of affect. Which of the following is the most appropriate opening statement in this situation?
- A. Your lab reports show that you have an acute myeloid leukemia
- B. What is your understanding of the reasons we did bone marrow aspiration and cytogenetic studies? (Correct Answer)
- C. You must be curious and maybe even anxious about the results of your tests.
- D. I may need to refer you to a blood cancer specialist because of your diagnosis. You may need chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which we are not equipped for.
- E. Would you like to know all the details of your diagnosis, or would you prefer I just explain to you what our options are?
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***"What is your understanding of the reasons we did bone marrow aspiration and cytogenetic studies?"***
- This **open-ended question** allows the patient to express their current knowledge and perceptions, which helps the physician tailor the discussion.
- It establishes a **patient-centered approach**, respecting the patient's existing understanding and preparing them for further information.
*"You must be curious and maybe even anxious about the results of your tests."*
- While empathic, this statement makes an **assumption about the patient's feelings** rather than inviting them to share their own.
- It is often better to ask directly or use more open-ended questions that allow the patient to express their true emotions, especially given their **relaxed demeanor**.
*"I may need to refer you to a blood cancer specialist because of your diagnosis. You may need chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which we are not equipped for.”"*
- This statement immediately introduces **overwhelming and potentially alarming information** (referral, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) without first establishing the diagnosis or assessing the patient's readiness to receive it.
- It prematurely jumps to treatment and logistics, potentially causing **unnecessary distress** before the patient has processed the core diagnosis.
*"Would you like to know all the details of your diagnosis, or would you prefer I just explain to you what our options are?""*
- While it attempts to assess the patient's preference for information, this question is a **closed-ended "either/or" choice** that might limit the patient's ability to express nuanced needs.
- It also prematurely introduces the idea of "options" without first explaining the diagnosis in an understandable context.
*"Your lab reports show that you have an acute myeloid leukemia"*
- This is a **direct and blunt delivery of a serious diagnosis** without any preparatory context or assessment of the patient's existing knowledge or emotional state.
- Delivering such news abruptly can be shocking and overwhelming, potentially **hindering effective communication** and rapport building.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 9: A 27-year-old woman presents to her primary care physician for minor aches and pains in her bones and muscles. She states that these symptoms have persisted throughout her entire life but have worsened recently when she moved to attend college. The patient is physically active, and states that she eats a balanced diet. She is currently a full-time student and is sexually active with 1 partner. She states that she has been particularly stressed lately studying for final exams and occasionally experiences diarrhea. She has been taking acyclovir for a dermatologic herpes simplex virus infection with minimal improvement. On physical exam, the patient exhibits 4/5 strength in her upper and lower extremities, and diffuse tenderness over her limbs that is non-specific. Laboratory values are ordered as seen below:
Serum:
Na+: 144 mEq/L
Cl-: 102 mEq/L
K+: 4.7 mEq/L
HCO3-: 24 mEq/L
Ca2+: 5.0
Urea nitrogen: 15 mg/dL
Glucose: 81 mg/dL
Creatinine: 1.0 mg/dL
Alkaline phosphatase: 225 U/L
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST, GOT): 11 U/L
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT, GPT): 15 U/L
Which of the following is most likely associated with this patient’s presentation?
- A. Vitamin D deficiency (Correct Answer)
- B. Fibromyalgia
- C. Primary hyperparathyroidism
- D. Chronic fatigue syndrome
- E. Systemic lupus erythematosus
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Correct: Vitamin D deficiency***
- The patient presents with the **classic biochemical findings of vitamin D deficiency**: **severe hypocalcemia (Ca2+ 5.0 mg/dL, normal 8.5-10.5)** and **elevated alkaline phosphatase (225 U/L)**.
- **Clinical features of osteomalacia** are present: diffuse bone and muscle pain, proximal muscle weakness (4/5 strength in extremities), and bone tenderness—all consistent with bone demineralization and secondary myopathy.
- **Risk factor identified**: Recent move to college may represent lifestyle changes including reduced sun exposure, dietary changes, or increased indoor time studying.
- The elevated alkaline phosphatase reflects increased osteoblastic activity attempting to compensate for undermineralized bone matrix.
- Severe vitamin D deficiency also impairs immune function, which may explain the herpes simplex infection with poor response to acyclovir.
*Incorrect: Chronic fatigue syndrome*
- Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a **diagnosis of exclusion** characterized by persistent unexplained fatigue for at least 6 months with **normal laboratory findings**.
- This patient has **significant biochemical abnormalities** (severe hypocalcemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase) that exclude CFS and point to a specific metabolic disorder.
- CFS does not cause hypocalcemia, elevated alkaline phosphatase, or objective muscle weakness on examination.
*Incorrect: Fibromyalgia*
- While fibromyalgia presents with widespread musculoskeletal pain, it is characterized by **normal laboratory studies** including normal calcium and alkaline phosphatase.
- The patient's severe hypocalcemia and elevated alkaline phosphatase exclude fibromyalgia as the primary diagnosis.
- Fibromyalgia typically requires identification of specific tender points on examination, which are not described here.
*Incorrect: Systemic lupus erythematosus*
- SLE typically presents with **multisystem involvement** including malar rash, photosensitivity, serositis, nephritis, and hematologic abnormalities.
- Laboratory findings would show **positive autoantibodies** (ANA, anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith), not isolated hypocalcemia with elevated alkaline phosphatase.
- The patient's normal liver and kidney function, absence of systemic features, and specific biochemical pattern do not support SLE.
*Incorrect: Primary hyperparathyroidism*
- Primary hyperparathyroidism is defined by **hypercalcemia** with elevated or inappropriately normal PTH levels.
- This patient has **severe hypocalcemia (Ca2+ 5.0)**, which is the **opposite** of what occurs in hyperparathyroidism.
- The biochemical pattern (low calcium, high alkaline phosphatase) is consistent with hypoparathyroidism or vitamin D deficiency, not hyperparathyroidism.
Clinical decision rules US Medical PG Question 10: A 64-year-old female presents to her primary care physician for an annual checkup. She states that her health is adequate, but she has not been doing well since her husband died last year. She is able to get by but admits to having trouble caring for herself, cooking, cleaning, and paying her bills. The patient complains of diffuse muscle aches and pains. She has a past medical history of anxiety and seasonal affective disorder. She is not currently taking any medications. On physical exam, you note a gaunt woman with a depressed affect. You note that her body mass index (BMI) and height have both decreased since her last annual visit. On physical exam, her cardiac, pulmonary, and abdominal exams are within normal limits. Lab work is drawn and is as follows:
Serum:
Na+: 135 mEq/L
K+: 3.7 mEq/L
Cl-: 100 mEq/L
HCO3-: 23 mEq/L
Urea nitrogen: 7 mg/dL
Glucose: 70 mg/dL
Creatinine: 0.8 mg/dL
Ca2+: 8.0 mg/dL
Mg2+: 1.5 mEq/L
Parathyroid hormone: 855 pg/mL
Alkaline phosphatase: 135 U/L
Phosphorus: 2.6 mg/dL
Hemoglobin: 14 g/dL
Hematocrit: 36%
Platelet count: 187,000/mm^3
Leukocyte count: 4,700/mm^3
What is the most likely diagnosis?
- A. Hyperparathyroidism
- B. Osteoporosis
- C. Clinical malnutrition
- D. Osteopenia
- E. Osteomalacia (Correct Answer)
Clinical decision rules Explanation: ***Osteomalacia***
- This patient presents with **diffuse muscle aches and pains**, decreased BMI and height, and laboratory findings of **low calcium (8.0 mg/dL)**, **low phosphorus (2.6 mg/dL)**, and **elevated PTH (855 pg/mL)** and **alkaline phosphatase (135 U/L)**. These are classic signs of osteomalacia, which is often caused by **vitamin D deficiency** leading to impaired bone mineralization.
- The patient's inability to care for herself, cook, and clean following her husband's death may suggest **poor nutritional intake**, increasing her risk for vitamin D deficiency.
*Hyperparathyroidism*
- While **elevated PTH** is present, primary hyperparathyroidism typically causes **hypercalcemia**, not the hypocalcemia seen in this patient.
- Secondary hyperparathyroidism can occur in osteomalacia, but it is a compensatory response to low calcium and vitamin D, not the primary diagnosis.
*Osteoporosis*
- Osteoporosis is characterized by **reduced bone density** and increased fracture risk, but it does **not typically involve abnormal calcium, phosphorus, or PTH levels** in this pattern.
- The diffuse muscle aches and pains (myopathy) are more indicative of osteomalacia.
*Clinical malnutrition*
- While the patient exhibits signs of **malnutrition (decreased BMI, poor self-care)**, this is a contributing factor to the underlying bone disease, not the definitive diagnosis explaining the specific biochemical abnormalities.
- Malnutrition can predispose to osteomalacia due to **insufficient vitamin D intake**.
*Osteopenia*
- Osteopenia refers to **lower-than-normal bone mineral density** that is not as severe as osteoporosis.
- Similar to osteoporosis, osteopenia itself does not explain the **hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia, and markedly elevated PTH** and alkaline phosphatase levels observed in this patient.
More Clinical decision rules US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
