Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Critical decision points recognition. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 1: A 29-year-old man is admitted to the emergency department following a motorcycle accident. The patient is severely injured and requires life support after splenectomy and evacuation of a subdural hematoma. Past medical history is unremarkable. The patient’s family members, including wife, parents, siblings, and grandparents, are informed about the patient’s condition. The patient has no living will and there is no durable power of attorney. The patient must be put in an induced coma for an undetermined period of time. Which of the following is responsible for making medical decisions for the incapacitated patient?
- A. The spouse (Correct Answer)
- B. An older sibling
- C. Physician
- D. Legal guardian
- E. The parents
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***The spouse***
- In the absence of a **living will** or **durable power of attorney**, the law typically designates the **spouse** as the primary decision-maker for an incapacitated patient.
- This hierarchy is established to ensure decisions are made by the individual most intimately connected and presumed to understand the patient's wishes.
*An older sibling*
- Siblings are generally further down the **hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers** than a spouse or parents.
- They would typically only be considered if higher-priority family members are unavailable or unwilling to make decisions.
*Physician*
- The physician's role is to provide medical care and guidance, not to make medical decisions for an incapacitated patient when family surrogates are available.
- Physicians only make decisions in **emergency situations** when no surrogate is immediately available and treatment is immediately necessary to save the patient's life or prevent serious harm.
*Legal guardian*
- A legal guardian is usually appointed by a **court** when there is no appropriate family member available or when there is a dispute among family members.
- In this scenario, with a spouse and other close family members present, a legal guardian would not be the first choice.
*The parents*
- While parents are close family members, they are typically considered **secondary to the spouse** in the hierarchy of surrogate decision-makers for an adult patient.
- They would usually only be the decision-makers if the patient were unmarried or the spouse were unavailable.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 2: A research group wants to assess the safety and toxicity profile of a new drug. A clinical trial is conducted with 20 volunteers to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and monitor the apparent toxicity of the drug. The study design is best described as which of the following phases of a clinical trial?
- A. Phase 0
- B. Phase III
- C. Phase V
- D. Phase II
- E. Phase I (Correct Answer)
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Phase I***
- **Phase I clinical trials** involve a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-100) to primarily assess **drug safety**, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
- The main goal is to establish the **maximum tolerated dose (MTD)** and evaluate the drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.
*Phase 0*
- **Phase 0 trials** are exploratory studies conducted in a very small number of subjects (10-15) to gather preliminary data on a drug's **pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics** in humans.
- They involve microdoses, not intended to have therapeutic effects, and thus cannot determine toxicity or MTD.
*Phase III*
- **Phase III trials** are large-scale studies involving hundreds to thousands of patients to confirm the drug's **efficacy**, monitor side effects, compare it to standard treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug to be used safely.
- These trials are conducted after safety and initial efficacy have been established in earlier phases.
*Phase V*
- "Phase V" is not a standard, recognized phase in the traditional clinical trial classification (Phase 0, I, II, III, IV).
- This term might be used in some non-standard research contexts or for post-marketing studies that go beyond Phase IV surveillance, but it is not a formal phase for initial drug development.
*Phase II*
- **Phase II trials** involve several hundred patients with the condition the drug is intended to treat, focusing on **drug efficacy** and further evaluating safety.
- While safety is still monitored, the primary objective shifts to determining if the drug works for its intended purpose and at what dose.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 3: A medicine resident on her nephrology rotation notices that she has received more alerts of high serum potassium levels on her patients through the hospital electronic medical record despite her census not having changed. On inspection of the laboratory result reports, critical alert markers are seen for potassium values greater than 5.5 mEq/L 3 days ago, whereas the same alerts are seen for values > 5.0 mEq/L since yesterday. One of her patient's nurses asks if the patient should get an electrocardiogram. How has the potassium value reporting been affected?
- A. Sensitivity increased and specificity increased
- B. Sensitivity decreased and specificity increased
- C. Sensitivity increased and specificity unchanged
- D. Sensitivity decreased and specificity decreased
- E. Sensitivity increased and specificity decreased (Correct Answer)
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Sensitivity increased and specificity decreased***
- Lowering the alert threshold from **>5.5 mEq/L** to **>5.0 mEq/L** means more true positives (patients with actual hyperkalemia) will be identified, thus **increasing sensitivity**.
- However, this also means more false positives (patients without clinically significant hyperkalemia triggering an alert) will occur, thereby **decreasing specificity**.
*Sensitivity increased and specificity increased*
- This option would imply that the test is better at identifying both true positives and true negatives, which is not the case when only the threshold is changed.
- While sensitivity increases by lowering the threshold, specificity invariably decreases, as more benign cases are flagged.
*Sensitivity decreased and specificity increased*
- This scenario would occur if the threshold were raised (e.g., from >5.0 mEq/L to >5.5 mEq/L), which would miss more true cases but reduce false alarms.
- The alert range change described (from >5.5 to >5.0) directly opposes this outcome.
*Sensitivity decreased and specificity decreased*
- This would indicate a significant worsening of the test's ability to correctly identify both cases and non-cases, which is not directly supported by merely adjusting a threshold.
- While specificity does decrease, sensitivity increases, making this option incorrect.
*Sensitivity increased and specificity unchanged*
- Changing the threshold will impact both sensitivity and specificity, making it impossible for specificity to remain unchanged if sensitivity increases.
- A threshold adjustment always involves a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity; improving one typically impacts the other.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 4: Following a motor vehicle accident, a 63-year-old man is scheduled for surgery. The emergency physician notes a posture abnormality in the distal left lower limb and a fracture-dislocation of the right hip and acetabulum based on the radiology report. The senior orthopedic resident mistakenly notes a fracture dislocation of the left hip and marks the left hip as the site of surgery. The examination by the surgeon in the operating room shows an externally rotated and shortened left lower limb. The surgeon inserts a pin in the left tibia but erroneously operates on the left hip. A review of postoperative imaging leads to a second surgery on the fracture-dislocation of the right hip. Rather than the surgeon alone, the surgical team and the hospital system are held accountable for not implementing the mandatory protocol of preincision 'time-out' and compliance monitoring. Which of the following best describes this systems-based approach to understanding how medical errors occur?
- A. Root cause analysis
- B. Primordial prevention
- C. Sentinel event
- D. Closed-loop communication
- E. Swiss-cheese model (Correct Answer)
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Swiss-cheese model***
- The scenario describes multiple layers of failure (the resident's error, the surgeon's error, lack of "time-out" protocol adherence) leading to a major accident, aligning with the **Swiss-cheese model** of accident causation.
- This model emphasizes that medical errors result from the **alignment of multiple latent failures** and active failures in a system, rather than a single individual's mistake.
*Root cause analysis*
- While a **root cause analysis** would be performed *after* an event to understand "why" it occurred, the question asks for the approach that *describes* how errors can occur from system failures, which is the Swiss-cheese model.
- This is a retrospective problem-solving method to identify the **fundamental causes of an undesirable event**, not a model for understanding error propagation.
*Primordial prevention*
- **Primordial prevention** aims to prevent risk factors for disease from ever developing, often through societal and environmental interventions.
- This concept is focused on **public health and preventing disease onset**, not on preventing surgical errors within a healthcare system.
*Sentinel event*
- A **sentinel event** is an unexpected occurrence involving death or serious physical or psychological injury, or the risk thereof. The incorrect surgery is indeed a sentinel event.
- However, "sentinel event" refers to the *outcome* itself, not the *model* used to understand how multiple systemic failures lead to such an event.
*Closed-loop communication*
- **Closed-loop communication** is a technique used to avoid misunderstandings, where the sender states a message, and the receiver repeats it back to confirm understanding.
- While the *lack* of this communication might have contributed to the error, the question specifically asks for the model that describes how multiple systemic failures, like the missed "time-out," lead to the overall mistake.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 5: An orthopaedic surgeon at a local community hospital has noticed that turnover times in the operating room have been unnecessarily long. She believes that the long wait times may be due to inefficient communication between the surgical nursing staff, the staff in the pre-operative area, and the staff in the post-operative receiving area. She believes a secure communication mobile phone app would help to streamline communication between providers and improve efficiency in turnover times. Which of the following methods is most appropriate to evaluate the impact of this intervention in the clinical setting?
- A. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle (Correct Answer)
- B. Failure modes and effects analysis
- C. Standardization
- D. Forcing function
- E. Root cause analysis
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle***
- The **Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle** is a structured, iterative model used for continuous improvement in quality and efficiency, making it ideal for evaluating the impact of a new intervention like a communication app.
- This cycle allows for small-scale testing of changes, observation of results, learning from the observations, and refinement of the intervention before full implementation.
*Failure modes and effects analysis*
- **Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)** is a prospective method to identify potential failures in a process, predict their effects, and prioritize actions to prevent them.
- While useful for process improvement, FMEA is typically performed *before* implementing a change to identify risks, rather than to evaluate the impact of an already implemented intervention.
*Standardization*
- **Standardization** involves creating and implementing consistent processes or protocols to reduce variability and improve reliability.
- While the communication app might contribute to standardization, standardization itself is a *method of improvement* rather than a method for *evaluating the impact* of an intervention.
*Forcing function*
- A **forcing function** is a design feature that physically prevents an error from occurring, making it impossible to complete a task incorrectly.
- An app that streamlines communication does not act as a forcing function, as it facilitates a process rather than physically preventing an incorrect action.
*Root cause analysis*
- **Root cause analysis (RCA)** is a retrospective method used to investigate an event that has already occurred (e.g., an adverse event) to identify its underlying causes.
- This method is used *after* a problem has manifested to understand *why* it happened, not to evaluate the *impact* of a new intervention designed to prevent future problems.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 6: A 65-year-old man presents to the emergency department for sudden weakness. He was doing mechanical work on his car where he acutely developed right-leg weakness and fell to the ground. He is accompanied by his wife, who said that this has never happened before. He was last seen neurologically normal approximately 2 hours prior to presentation. His past medical history is significant for hypertension and type II diabetes. His temperature is 98.8°F (37.1°C), blood pressure is 177/108 mmHg, pulse is 90/min, respirations are 15/min, and oxygen saturation is 99% on room air. Neurological exam reveals that he is having trouble speaking and has profound weakness of his right upper and lower extremity. Which of the following is the best next step in management?
- A. Thrombolytics
- B. Noncontrast head CT (Correct Answer)
- C. CT angiogram
- D. MRI of the head
- E. Aspirin
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Noncontrast head CT***
- A **noncontrast head CT** is the most crucial initial step in managing acute stroke symptoms because it can rapidly rule out an **intracranial hemorrhage**.
- Distinguishing between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke is critical, as the management strategies are vastly different and administering thrombolytics in the presence of hemorrhage can be fatal.
*Thrombolytics*
- **Thrombolytics** can only be administered after an **intracranial hemorrhage** has been excluded via noncontrast head CT.
- Administering thrombolytics without imaging could worsen a hemorrhagic stroke, causing significant harm or death.
*CT angiogram*
- A **CT angiogram** is used to identify large vessel occlusions in ischemic stroke and is typically performed after a noncontrast CT rules out hemorrhage.
- This imaging is crucial for determining eligibility for **endovascular thrombectomy** but is not the very first diagnostic step.
*MRI of the head*
- An **MRI of the head** is more sensitive for detecting acute ischemic changes but takes longer to perform and is often not readily available in the acute emergency setting.
- It is not the initial imaging of choice for ruling out hemorrhage due to its longer acquisition time compared to CT.
*Aspirin*
- **Aspirin** is indicated for acute ischemic stroke but should only be given after an **intracranial hemorrhage** has been ruled out.
- Like thrombolytics, aspirin could exacerbate a hemorrhagic stroke and is thus deferred until initial imaging is complete.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 7: A 25-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with fatigue and weakness. She states over the past 24 hours she has not felt like herself and has felt like she has no strength. The patient has no significant past medical history other than a single episode of blood-tinged diarrhea 1 week ago which resolved on its own. Her temperature is 99.4°F (37.4°C), blood pressure is 124/62 mmHg, pulse is 95/min, respirations are 29/min, and oxygen saturation is 95% on room air. Physical exam is notable for 2/5 strength of the lower extremities and decreased sensation in the lower extremities and finger tips. Which of the following is the best initial step in management?
- A. IV immunoglobulin
- B. Dexamethasone
- C. Spirometry (Correct Answer)
- D. Intubation
- E. Pyridostigmine
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Spirometry***
- The patient's symptoms (fatigue, weakness, decreased strength, and sensation in extremities) following a gastrointestinal infection are highly suggestive of **Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)**.
- **Spirometry** is the most critical initial step to assess respiratory function, as **respiratory muscle weakness** is the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in GBS.
*IV immunoglobulin*
- While **intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)** is a treatment for GBS, it is not the *initial* management step.
- The immediate priority in suspected GBS is to assess and stabilize the patient's respiratory status, not to initiate definitive treatment.
*Dexamethasone*
- **Corticosteroids** like dexamethasone have **not been shown to be effective** in treating GBS and may even prolong recovery in some cases.
- Their use is generally avoided in the management of GBS.
*Intubation*
- **Intubation** is indicated if spirometry reveals rapidly declining or severely compromised respiratory function, but it is not the *initial* step.
- An assessment of respiratory capacity via spirometry should precede intubation unless acute respiratory failure is immediately apparent.
*Pyridostigmine*
- **Pyridostigmine** is an anticholinesterase inhibitor used primarily for the symptomatic treatment of **myasthenia gravis**.
- It is not indicated for the management of GBS, which involves a different pathophysiological mechanism.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 8: A 71-year-old woman with a past medical history of type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension was admitted to the hospital 8 hours ago with substernal chest pain for management of acute non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The ECG findings noted by ST-depressions and T-wave inversions on anterolateral leads, which is also accompanied by elevated cardiac enzymes. Upon diagnosis, management with inhaled oxygen therapy, beta-blockers and aspirin, and low-molecular-weight heparin therapy were initiated, and she was placed on bed rest with continuous electrocardiographic monitoring. Since admission, she required 2 doses of sublingual nitroglycerin for recurrent angina, and the repeat troponin levels continued to rise. Given her risk factors, plans were made for early coronary angiography. The telemetry nurse calls the on-call physician because of her concern with the patient's mild confusion and increasing need for supplemental oxygen. At bedside evaluation, The vital signs include: heart rate 122/min, blood pressure 89/40 mm Hg, and the pulse oximetry is 91% on 6L of oxygen by nasal cannula. The telemetry and a repeat ECG show sinus tachycardia. She is breathing rapidly, appears confused, and complains of shortness of breath. On physical exam, the skin is cool and clammy and appears pale and dull. She has diffuse bilateral pulmonary crackles, and an S3 gallop is noted on chest auscultation with no new murmurs. She has jugular venous distention to the jaw-line, rapid and faint radial pulses, and 1+ dependent edema. She is immediately transferred to the intensive care unit for respiratory support and precautions for airway security. The bedside sonography shows abnormal hypodynamic anterior wall movement and an ejection fraction of 20%, but no evidence of mitral regurgitation or ventricular shunt. The chest X-ray demonstrates cephalization of pulmonary veins and pulmonary edema. What is the most appropriate next step in the stabilization of this patient?
- A. Obtain blood cultures and start preliminary broad-spectrum antibiotics
- B. Start intravenous fluids and epinephrine therapy
- C. Intubate the patient and perform an emergency cardiocentesis
- D. Initiate dopamine therapy and diuresis (Correct Answer)
- E. Insert two large-bore intravenous catheters and start rapid fluid resuscitation
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Initiate dopamine therapy and diuresis***
- This patient is presenting with **cardiogenic shock** secondary to extensive NSTEMI, characterized by **hypotension**, signs of **end-organ hypoperfusion** (confusion, cool clammy skin), **pulmonary edema** (crackles, dyspnea, elevated jugular venous pressure), and **severely reduced ejection fraction**. Dopamine is a vasopressor that can increase cardiac output and blood pressure.
- **Diuresis** with loop diuretics such as furosemide is crucial to reduce the fluid overload contributing to the pulmonary edema and jugular venous distention.
*Obtain blood cultures and start preliminary broad-spectrum antibiotics*
- While infection is a concern in critically ill patients, there are **no signs of infection** in this clinical presentation. The patient's symptoms are clearly attributable to acute cardiac decompensation.
- A delay in treating cardiogenic shock to investigate for infection would be detrimental and potentially fatal.
*Start intravenous fluids and epinephrine therapy*
- Intravenous fluids would **worsen the existing pulmonary edema and fluid overload** in a patient with an ejection fraction of 20% and clinical signs of volume overload (crackles, JVD, S3 gallop).
- Epinephrine is a potent vasopressor but is generally reserved for more severe shock refractory to other inotropes, or in cases of **cardiac arrest**, not typically first-line for cardiogenic shock with significant pulmonary congestion.
*Intubate the patient and perform an emergency cardiocentesis*
- While the patient is confused and has respiratory distress, **intubation** should be considered after hemodynamic stabilization, if respiratory failure persists or worsens.
- **Cardiocentesis** is indicated for **cardiac tamponade**, which is not supported by the absence of an effusion on bedside sonography and the finding of hypodynamic anterior wall movement, which points to pump failure.
*Insert two large-bore intravenous catheters and start rapid fluid resuscitation*
- This patient is in **cardiogenic shock with clear evidence of fluid overload**, including pulmonary edema and elevated jugular venous pressure.
- **Rapid fluid resuscitation would exacerbate heart failure** and worsen respiratory compromise due to increased preload.
Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG Question 9: A 15-year-old girl is hospitalized because of increased fatigue and weight loss over the past 2 months. The patient has no personal or family history of a serious illness. She takes no medications, currently. Her blood pressure is 175/74 mm Hg on the left arm and 90/45 on the right. The radial pulse is 84/min but weaker on the right side. The femoral blood pressure and pulses show no abnormalities. Temperature is 38.1℃ (100.6℉). The muscles over the right upper arm are slightly atrophic. The remainder of the examination reveals no abnormalities. Laboratory studies show the following results:
Hemoglobin 10.4 g/dL
Leukocyte count 5,000/mm3
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate 58 mm/h
Magnetic resonance arteriography reveals irregularity, stenosis, and poststenotic dilation involving the proximal right subclavian artery. Prednisone is initiated with improvement of her symptoms. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in the patient management?
- A. Perform angioplasty of subclavian artery stenosis
- B. Add cyclophosphamide for severe disease
- C. Initiate antihypertensive therapy with ACE inhibitor
- D. Monitor ESR and adjust prednisone dosage (Correct Answer)
- E. Add methotrexate as steroid-sparing agent
Critical decision points recognition Explanation: ***Monitor ESR and adjust prednisone dosage***
- The patient's presentation with **fatigue, weight loss, differential blood pressures, weak radial pulse**, elevated ESR, and subclavian artery stenosis is highly suggestive of **Takayasu arteritis**.
- **Prednisone is the initial treatment** for Takayasu arteritis, and disease activity is monitored by clinical symptoms and inflammatory markers like **ESR**; thus, monitoring ESR and adjusting the dosage is appropriate.
*Perform angioplasty of subclavian artery stenosis*
- While there is **subclavian artery stenosis**, revascularization procedures like angioplasty are typically considered only **after 2-3 months of medical therapy** has failed to control inflammation and symptoms, or if there is critical ischemia.
- Doing so acutely, while inflammation is still active, carries a **higher risk of restenosis** and complications.
*Add cyclophosphamide for severe disease*
- Cyclophosphamide is a strong immunosuppressant often reserved for **severe, refractory cases** or disease with critical organ involvement, or when patients fail to respond to less aggressive treatments.
- The initial step is to optimize steroid therapy and assess response, as the patient has already shown some improvement with prednisone.
*Initiate antihypertensive therapy with ACE inhibitor*
- The elevated blood pressure is likely a consequence of the underlying **vasculitis affecting renal arteries** or aorta, or differential readings due to subclavian stenosis.
- Addressing the underlying **inflammation with steroids is the primary treatment** for hypertension in Takayasu arteritis; adding antihypertensives might be considered later if hypertension persists despite inflammation control.
*Add methotrexate as steroid-sparing agent*
- **Methotrexate is a steroid-sparing agent** commonly used in Takayasu arteritis, particularly if patients cannot be tapered off steroids or experience significant side effects.
- However, the immediate next step after initiating prednisone and seeing improvement is to **monitor disease activity** and adjust the prednisone dose before adding a second-line agent.
More Critical decision points recognition US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
