Randomization methods

Randomization methods

Randomization methods

On this page

Randomization - The Bias Buster

  • Primary Goal: To prevent selection bias by removing conscious or unconscious investigator influence in assigning participants to treatment or control groups.
  • Mechanism: Employs a method of pure chance (e.g., computer-generated random numbers) to create an unpredictable allocation sequence, making it impossible to foresee group assignment.
  • Key Outcome: Achieves baseline comparability. It distributes known and unknown confounding variables evenly across study groups, ensuring the only systematic difference is the intervention itself.

Randomization in RCTs vs. RbG: Confounder distribution

⭐ Its greatest strength is controlling for unknown confounders, which cannot be addressed by other methods like matching or restriction.

The Methods - A Fair Shake

  • Goal: To eliminate selection bias by giving all participants an equal chance of being assigned to any group. This balances both known and unknown confounders.

  • Common Methods:

    • Simple Randomization: Analogous to a coin toss for each participant. Can lead to unequal group sizes, especially in small trials.
    • Block Randomization: Ensures balance in group sizes at regular intervals. Participants are randomized in small, predetermined blocks (e.g., AABB, ABAB) to maintain a balanced ratio.
    • Stratified Randomization: Used to control for major prognostic factors (e.g., age, disease severity). Participants are first grouped by the factor (strata), then randomized within each stratum.

⭐ Randomization aims to make groups comparable for both known and unknown confounders. In contrast, matching in case-control studies only controls for known confounders.

Allocation Concealment - Peeking Prevention

  • Definition: A procedure in an RCT that prevents researchers and participants from knowing the treatment allocation for the next enrolled subject. It protects the randomization sequence before assignment.
  • vs. Blinding:
    • Concealment: Prevents foreknowledge of the next allocation.
    • Blinding: Prevents knowledge of allocation after randomization.
  • Importance: Crucial for preventing selection bias, where investigators might consciously or unconsciously influence which patients get which treatment.
  • Methods:
    • Centralized, off-site randomization (e.g., by a central pharmacy).
    • Sequentially Numbered, Opaque, Sealed Envelopes (SNOSE). 📌 SNOSE keeps the docs' noses out of allocation!

Allocation concealment using opaque sealed envelopes

⭐ Inadequate allocation concealment can exaggerate treatment effects even more than a lack of blinding. It's a major threat to an RCT's validity.

High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways

  • Randomization aims to prevent selection bias and create groups with similar baseline characteristics.
  • Simple randomization can lead to unbalanced group sizes, particularly in smaller trials.
  • Block randomization ensures group sizes remain balanced throughout the trial.
  • Stratified randomization controls for specific prognostic factors or confounders (e.g., age, sex).
  • Allocation concealment is crucial to prevent foreknowledge of assignments, protecting the randomization process.
  • Randomization minimizes confounding but doesn't guarantee its absence.

Practice Questions: Randomization methods

Test your understanding with these related questions

A 38-year-old project manager is told by her boss that her team will need to work on an additional project in the coming week for a very important client. This frustrates the woman, who already feels that she works too many hours. Instead of discussing her feelings directly with her boss, the woman leaves a voice message for her boss the next day and deceitfully says she cannot come to work for the next week because of a family emergency. Which of the following psychological defense mechanisms is this individual demonstrating?

1 of 5

Flashcards: Randomization methods

1/8

_____ risk reduction is the proportion of risk reduction attributable to an intervention compared to a control

TAP TO REVEAL ANSWER

_____ risk reduction is the proportion of risk reduction attributable to an intervention compared to a control

Relative

browseSpaceflip

Enjoying this lesson?

Get full access to all lessons, practice questions, and more.

Start Your Free Trial