DNA repair

On this page

🔬 The Cellular Guardian Network: DNA Repair Mastery

Every cell in your body sustains thousands of DNA lesions daily from metabolism, radiation, and replication errors, yet most go unnoticed because sophisticated repair systems constantly patrol your genome. You'll discover how cells detect damage through molecular sensors, triage lesions to specialized repair pathways, and execute precise corrections-from single-base edits to double-strand break reconstruction. Understanding these mechanisms reveals why some cancers resist chemotherapy, how inherited repair defects cause disease, and where targeted therapies can exploit repair vulnerabilities to selectively kill malignant cells.

Comprehensive overview of DNA repair pathways showing cellular damage response

DNA repair represents the most sophisticated quality control system in biology, operating through five major pathways that collectively maintain genomic stability. Each pathway targets specific damage types with >99% efficiency, preventing the 10,000+ DNA lesions that occur daily in every human cell from becoming permanent mutations.

📌 Remember: BENDER - Base excision repair (oxidative damage), Excision repair nucleotide (bulky lesions), Non-homologous end joining (double breaks), Direct repair (alkylation), Error correction mismatch (replication errors), Recombination homologous (sister chromatid repair)

The repair machinery operates with extraordinary precision, distinguishing between normal DNA variations and pathological damage through molecular recognition systems that detect structural distortions as small as 0.1 nanometers. This surveillance network processes damage signals through ATM/ATR kinase cascades within minutes of detection, coordinating repair responses that can halt cell division, recruit specific repair proteins, or trigger apoptosis when damage exceeds repair capacity.

  • Spontaneous Damage Sources (daily cellular assault)

    • Hydrolytic reactions: 10,000 base modifications/cell/day
    • Oxidative stress: 2,000 8-oxoguanine lesions/cell/day
    • Replication errors: 1 error per 10^10 nucleotides (post-proofreading)
      • Mismatch frequency: 1:1000 before MMR correction
      • Slippage events: 1:100,000 in repetitive sequences
  • Environmental Damage Amplifiers

    • UV radiation: 100,000+ pyrimidine dimers/cell (1 hour sun exposure)
    • Ionizing radiation: 40 double-strand breaks/Gy/cell
    • Chemical mutagens: 1,000-fold increase in alkylation damage
      • Cigarette smoke: 4,000+ DNA adducts/pack
      • Alcohol metabolism: 500+ acetaldehyde crosslinks/drink
Repair PathwayTarget DamageDetection TimeRepair EfficiencyClinical DeficiencyCancer Risk Increase
Base Excision RepairOxidative, alkylation<5 minutes99.9%MUTYH syndrome100-fold colorectal
Nucleotide ExcisionUV dimers, bulky adducts15-30 minutes95%Xeroderma pigmentosum1000-fold skin cancer
Mismatch RepairReplication errors2-4 hours99%Lynch syndrome80% lifetime colorectal
Homologous RecombinationDouble-strand breaks1-6 hours90%BRCA mutations70% breast/ovarian
Non-homologous End JoiningDouble-strand breaks30 minutes85%SCID syndromesLymphoma/leukemia

💡 Master This: DNA repair deficiency creates mutator phenotypes where mutation rates increase 100-10,000 fold, driving cancer development through genomic instability rather than single oncogene activation - explaining why repair-deficient cancers often respond better to DNA-damaging chemotherapy despite seeming paradoxical.

Understanding repair pathway coordination reveals how cells prioritize error-free mechanisms during S/G2 phases when sister chromatids are available, while relying on error-prone NHEJ during G1 phase when homologous templates are absent, creating cell cycle-dependent vulnerability windows for targeted cancer therapy.

🔬 The Cellular Guardian Network: DNA Repair Mastery

⚡ Damage Detection Command Center: Molecular Surveillance Systems

📌 Remember: SHARP sensors - Single-strand breaks (PARP), Homologous recombination blocks (ATR), Asymmetric DNA ends (ATM), Replication fork stalling (ATR), Pyrimidine dimers (specialized sensors)

  • ATM Kinase Cascade (double-strand break response)

    • Activation threshold: 1-2 DSBs per cell
    • Autophosphorylation sites: Ser1981, Ser367, Ser1893
    • Downstream targets: >1000 proteins within 30 minutes
      • p53 phosphorylation: Ser15 (transcriptional activation)
      • Chk2 activation: Thr68 (cell cycle checkpoint)
      • BRCA1 recruitment: Ser1524 (repair focus formation)
  • ATR Signaling Network (replication stress response)

    • RPA-coated ssDNA threshold: >30 nucleotides
    • ATRIP recruitment: <2 minutes post-damage
    • Chk1 phosphorylation: Ser345/Ser317 (S-phase arrest)
      • Fork protection: 70% reduction in collapse rate
      • Origin firing suppression: 80% decrease in late origins
      • Dormant origin activation: 5-fold increase in backup firing
Sensor ProteinDamage RecognitionActivation TimePhosphorylation TargetsDeficiency SyndromeCellular Phenotype
ATMDSB ends, chromatin breaks1-5 minutes>1000 substratesAtaxia-telangiectasiaRadiosensitivity, cancer
ATRRPA-ssDNA, stalled forks2-10 minutes>300 substratesSeckel syndromeReplication defects
PARP1SSBs, base damage<30 seconds>100 substratesRare variantsMild repair defects
DNA-PKcsDSB ends (NHEJ)1-3 minutes>200 substratesSCIDImmunodeficiency
p53Multiple inputs15-60 minutes>500 targetsLi-FraumeniCancer predisposition

💡 Master This: Damage sensor activation creates positive feedback loops where initial repair attempts generate additional DNA breaks (e.g., nucleotide excision repair creates transient SSBs), requiring temporal coordination of sensor responses to prevent hyperactivation and inappropriate apoptosis induction.

The sensor network demonstrates remarkable damage threshold sensitivity, where single DSBs can trigger ATM activation affecting thousands of downstream targets, while chronic low-level damage from oxidative stress requires cumulative sensor input over hours to days before triggering permanent cell cycle arrest or senescence pathways.

⚡ Damage Detection Command Center: Molecular Surveillance Systems

🛠️ Repair Pathway Selection: The Cellular Triage System

Repair pathway selection operates through hierarchical decision trees where damage structure provides the primary sorting signal, cell cycle phase determines template availability, and chromatin modifications influence repair factor accessibility. This triage system prioritizes high-fidelity repair when possible while maintaining backup pathways for emergency situations.

  • Damage-Specific Pathway Routing

    • Single base modifications: BER pathway (>95% efficiency)
    • Bulky DNA adducts: NER pathway (15-30 nucleotide patches)
    • Replication errors: MMR system (1000-fold error reduction)
      • Mismatch recognition: MSH2/MSH6 (base-base mismatches)
      • Insertion/deletion loops: MSH2/MSH3 (1-4 nucleotide slips)
      • Strand discrimination: PCNA/RFC (newly synthesized strand)
  • Cell Cycle-Dependent Repair Choice

    • G1 phase: NHEJ preferred (80% of DSB repair)
      • No sister chromatid template available
      • Ku70/Ku80 binding within seconds
      • DNA-PKcs recruitment and autophosphorylation
    • S/G2 phases: HR pathway dominant (70% of DSB repair)
      • Sister chromatid template present
      • CtIP-mediated end resection
      • RAD51 nucleofilament formation

📌 Remember: CHOICE factors - Cell cycle phase (G1=NHEJ, S/G2=HR), Homology availability (sister chromatids), Oxidative damage (BER), Insertion/deletion errors (MMR), Chromatin state (open=accessible), End processing requirements (blunt vs. processed)

Repair Decision FactorPathway InfluenceTiming ImpactFidelity OutcomeClinical RelevanceTherapeutic Target
Cell Cycle PhaseG1→NHEJ, S/G2→HRImmediateHR>NHEJ accuracyCell cycle checkpointsCDK inhibitors
Chromatin StateOpen→accessible5-15 minutesContext-dependentEpigenetic therapyHDAC inhibitors
Damage ComplexitySimple→fast, complex→slowMinutes to hoursInversely relatedRadiation sensitivityRadiosensitizers
Repair Factor AvailabilityPathway competitionVariableResource-limitedSynthetic lethalityPARP inhibitors
Metabolic StateEnergy-dependentATP/NAD+ levelsQuality controlCancer metabolismMetabolic inhibitors

The repair selection system demonstrates pathway redundancy where multiple mechanisms can address similar damage types with different fidelity levels. For example, double-strand breaks can be repaired by HR (>99% accuracy), NHEJ (85-95% accuracy), or alternative end-joining (<50% accuracy), with pathway choice determining mutation frequency and chromosomal stability.

💡 Master This: Repair pathway selection creates therapeutic vulnerabilities where pathway-specific inhibitors can force cells into suboptimal repair modes, increasing mutation burden and genomic instability that preferentially affects rapidly dividing cancer cells over quiescent normal tissues.

Understanding pathway hierarchy reveals why combination therapies targeting multiple repair pathways simultaneously achieve synergistic effects, as cells cannot compensate for simultaneous pathway blockade and undergo catastrophic genomic instability leading to apoptosis or mitotic catastrophe.

🛠️ Repair Pathway Selection: The Cellular Triage System

🔍 Repair Mechanism Precision: Molecular Surgery Techniques

  • Base Excision Repair Precision

    • Damage recognition: 8-oxoguanine detection by OGG1 glycosylase
    • Base removal: N-glycosidic bond hydrolysis (<1 second)
    • AP site processing: APE1 endonuclease creates 3'-OH and 5'-dRP
      • Short-patch repair: 1 nucleotide replacement (80% of events)
      • Long-patch repair: 2-10 nucleotides (20% of events)
      • DNA ligase III sealing: ATP-dependent phosphodiester formation
  • Nucleotide Excision Repair Architecture

    • Damage verification: XPA protein confirms helix distortion
    • Dual incision: XPF-ERCC1 (3' cut) and XPG (5' cut)
    • Oligonucleotide removal: 24-32 nucleotide patch excision
      • TFIIH helicase: ATP-dependent unwinding (3-5 bp/second)
      • RPA coating: ssDNA protection during gap filling
      • PCNA-dependent synthesis: high-fidelity Pol δ/ε

Nucleotide excision repair showing dual incision and gap filling mechanism

Repair EnzymeSubstrate SpecificityCatalytic RateError FrequencyDeficiency DiseaseFunctional Consequence
OGG18-oxoguanine0.1/second<1:10^6Mild cancer riskOxidative damage accumulation
UNGUracil in DNA1/second<1:10^7ImmunodeficiencySomatic hypermutation defects
XPG5' incision (NER)0.01/second<1:10^5Xeroderma pigmentosumUV sensitivity, cancer
MSH2Mismatch recognition0.1/second1:10^3 detectionLynch syndromeMicrosatellite instability
PARP1SSB detection10/secondN/A (sensor)Rare variantsRepair coordination defects

Clinical Pearl: XP patients with XPG mutations show 1000-fold increased skin cancer risk due to defective 5' incision in nucleotide excision repair, requiring complete UV avoidance and prophylactic skin surveillance every 3-6 months to detect early malignancies.

The precision of repair mechanisms extends to chromatin restoration, where histone modifications are faithfully restored post-repair through chromatin remodeling complexes and histone chaperones that maintain epigenetic information across repair events, ensuring gene expression patterns remain unchanged despite DNA synthesis.

💡 Master This: Repair precision creates therapeutic windows where repair inhibitors can selectively target cancer cells with defective repair pathways while sparing normal cells with intact backup mechanisms, forming the basis for synthetic lethality approaches in precision oncology.

Understanding enzymatic precision reveals why repair pathway mutations often show tissue-specific phenotypes - UV-sensitive skin in XP, neurodegeneration in ataxia-telangiectasia, immunodeficiency in SCID - reflecting tissue-specific repair demands and damage exposure patterns that exceed residual repair capacity.

🔍 Repair Mechanism Precision: Molecular Surgery Techniques

⚖️ Therapeutic Targeting: Exploiting Repair Vulnerabilities

Mechanism of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality in BRCA-deficient cancer cells

Therapeutic targeting leverages repair pathway dependencies where cancer cells with defective repair mechanisms become hyperdependent on remaining functional pathways. PARP inhibitors exemplify this approach, achieving 60-80% response rates in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancers by overwhelming residual repair capacity and forcing catastrophic genomic instability.

  • PARP Inhibitor Mechanisms

    • PARP1/2 trapping: DNA-protein crosslink formation
    • Base excision repair blockade: SSB accumulation
    • Replication fork collision: DSB conversion during S-phase
      • Olaparib: IC50 = 5nM (PARP1), FDA-approved 2014
      • Rucaparib: IC50 = 1.4nM (PARP1), platinum-sensitive recurrence
      • Niraparib: IC50 = 3.8nM (PARP1), maintenance therapy
  • Combination Therapy Strategies

    • PARP + Checkpoint inhibitors: 70% response in BRCA-mutated cancers
    • PARP + ATR inhibitors: Synthetic lethality in HR-deficient tumors
    • PARP + DNA damaging agents: Radiosensitization (2-5 fold)
      • Cisplatin + Olaparib: Progression-free survival 19.1 months
      • Radiation + PARP inhibition: Enhancement ratio 1.5-2.0
      • Temozolomide + PARP: MGMT-deficient glioblastoma targeting
Therapeutic TargetMechanismCancer TypeResponse RateResistance MechanismCombination Strategy
PARP1/2SSB repair blockadeBRCA-mutated60-80%HR restorationATR inhibitors
ATR kinaseReplication checkpointReplication stress30-50%p53 activationPARP inhibitors
CHK1 kinaseS-phase checkpointp53-deficient20-40%Checkpoint adaptationGemcitabine
DNA-PKcsNHEJ inhibitionHR-deficient40-60%Alternative end-joiningRadiation
WEE1 kinaseG2/M checkpointp53-mutated25-45%CDK1 mutationsDNA damaging agents

Clinical Pearl: Platinum-resistant ovarian cancers often develop secondary BRCA mutations that restore reading frame and HR function, conferring PARP inhibitor resistance. Circulating tumor DNA monitoring can detect these reversion mutations months before clinical progression, guiding therapy switching.

The therapeutic landscape continues expanding with next-generation inhibitors targeting repair pathway crosstalk: ATR inhibitors show synergy with PARP inhibitors in HR-proficient cancers, CHK1 inhibitors enhance replication stress in p53-deficient tumors, and DNA-PKcs inhibitors sensitize radioresistant cancers to ionizing radiation.

💡 Master This: Successful repair-targeted therapy requires biomarker-driven patient selection using homologous recombination deficiency scores, genomic instability signatures, and functional repair assays to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific repair inhibitor combinations.

Understanding resistance mechanisms reveals evolutionary pressure where surviving cancer cells develop compensatory mutations, pathway rewiring, or drug efflux mechanisms, necessitating combination approaches that target multiple repair pathways simultaneously to prevent adaptive resistance and achieve durable responses.

⚖️ Therapeutic Targeting: Exploiting Repair Vulnerabilities

🔗 Systems Integration: The Repair Network Ecosystem

  • Pathway Crosstalk Networks

    • BER-NER coordination: PARP1 signals recruit NER factors for complex lesions
    • HR-NHEJ competition: CtIP versus 53BP1 determines pathway choice
    • MMR-HR integration: MSH2/MSH6 can trigger HR at replication forks
      • Shared factors: PCNA coordinates replication and repair
      • RPA protein: Universal ssDNA coating in multiple pathways
      • ATM/ATR signaling: Checkpoint coordination across all pathways
  • Metabolic Integration Points

    • NAD+ consumption: PARP activation depletes cellular NAD+ pools
    • ATP requirements: Helicase activity demands high energy input
    • dNTP availability: Repair synthesis competes with replication
      • Ribonucleotide reductase: Rate-limiting for dNTP production
      • Thymidine kinase: Salvage pathway during repair stress
      • SAMHD1 regulation: dNTP pool homeostasis maintenance

Network diagram showing DNA repair protein interactions and regulatory connections

Integration LevelKey ComponentsCoordination MechanismFailure ConsequenceClinical ManifestationTherapeutic Opportunity
Pathway CrosstalkShared proteins, signalsCompetitive bindingRepair pathway imbalanceCancer predispositionPathway-specific targeting
Cell Cycle IntegrationCheckpoints, CDKsPhosphorylation cascadesGenomic instabilityDevelopmental disordersCell cycle inhibitors
Metabolic CouplingNAD+, ATP, dNTPsResource competitionEnergy-dependent failureMetabolic syndromesMetabolic modulators
Stress Responsep53, NF-κB pathwaysTranscriptional programsInappropriate cell deathTissue degenerationStress pathway drugs
Epigenetic ControlChromatin modifiersHistone modificationsGene expression changesDevelopmental defectsEpigenetic therapies

Clinical Pearl: Fanconi anemia patients demonstrate network-wide repair failure affecting multiple pathways simultaneously, requiring comprehensive management including bone marrow transplantation (90% cure rate), cancer surveillance (lifetime risk >50%), and fertility preservation due to gonadal dysfunction.

The network architecture reveals emergent properties where system-level behaviors exceed individual pathway capabilities. Repair pathway redundancy provides robustness against single pathway failures, while pathway competition can create vulnerabilities when multiple systems are simultaneously compromised.

💡 Master This: Network-level understanding enables precision medicine approaches where multi-pathway biomarkers predict therapeutic responses better than single gene mutations, guiding combination therapy selection and resistance monitoring through systems-level analysis.

Integration complexity explains why repair disorders often present with multi-system phenotypes - neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, cancer predisposition, and developmental abnormalities - reflecting tissue-specific repair demands and network vulnerability patterns that vary across cell types and developmental stages.

🔗 Systems Integration: The Repair Network Ecosystem

🎯 Clinical Mastery Arsenal: Rapid-Fire Repair Diagnostics

Clinical decision tree for DNA repair deficiency syndrome diagnosis

Master clinicians recognize repair deficiency patterns through constellation findings that combine cancer types, age of onset, family clustering, and treatment responses into diagnostic signatures that guide genetic testing, surveillance protocols, and therapeutic selection with evidence-based precision.

📌 Remember: REPAIR clinical signs - Recurrent cancers (multiple primaries), Early onset (<50 years), Pedigree clustering (family history), Atypical presentations (rare sites), Immune dysfunction (infections), Radiation sensitivity (severe reactions)

  • Essential Clinical Thresholds

    • Lynch syndrome: >70% lifetime colorectal cancer risk
    • BRCA mutations: 60-80% breast, 40-60% ovarian cancer risk
    • Li-Fraumeni: >90% lifetime cancer risk (any type)
      • Radiation sensitivity: 50-70% dose reduction required
      • Chemotherapy toxicity: Grade 3-4 reactions in >80%
      • Surgical considerations: Prophylactic procedures reduce risk >90%
  • Rapid Diagnostic Framework

    • Age <50 + colorectal cancerLynch syndrome testing
    • Triple-negative breast + family historyBRCA analysis
    • Multiple primaries + radiation sensitivityATM evaluation
      • Microsatellite instability: >95% sensitivity for MMR defects
      • Tumor mutational burden: >10 mutations/Mb suggests repair deficiency
      • Homologous recombination deficiency score: >42 predicts PARP sensitivity
Clinical ScenarioGenetic Test PrioritySurveillance ProtocolTreatment ModificationRisk Reduction StrategyFamily Screening
Early-onset colorectalLynch panel (MMR genes)Colonoscopy q1-2 yearsMSI-high = immunotherapyProphylactic surgeryFirst-degree relatives
Triple-negative breast <40BRCA1/2 sequencingMRI + mammography q6moPARP inhibitor eligibleBilateral mastectomyCascade testing
Radiation hypersensitivityATM sequencingEnhanced imaging surveillance50% dose reductionAvoid radiation therapyClinical assessment
Multiple primary cancersComprehensive panelMulti-organ screeningTargeted therapy selectionRisk-reducing surgeryGenetic counseling
Childhood cancer + family HxLi-Fraumeni (p53)Whole-body MRI annuallyAvoid radiationIntensive surveillancePredictive testing

💡 Master This: Tumor-first genetic testing approaches identify somatic repair defects in 15-20% of cancers without germline mutations, expanding targeted therapy eligibility and revealing acquired vulnerabilities that guide precision treatment selection beyond hereditary cancer syndromes.

The clinical arsenal includes functional assays that measure actual repair capacity rather than genetic status alone: RAD51 focus formation assays assess HR function, comet assays measure overall repair efficiency, and chromosomal instability analysis reveals pathway-specific defects that predict therapeutic responses with greater accuracy than mutation testing alone.

Understanding repair deficiency presentations enables proactive management where early detection, risk-reducing interventions, and targeted therapies transform high-risk genetic profiles into manageable clinical conditions with significantly improved outcomes through precision medicine approaches tailored to individual repair pathway status.

🎯 Clinical Mastery Arsenal: Rapid-Fire Repair Diagnostics

Practice Questions: DNA repair

Test your understanding with these related questions

A 5-month-old male infant from a consanguineous marriage presents with severe sunburns and freckling in sun exposed areas. The mother explains that the infant experiences these sunburns every time the infant goes outside despite applying copious amounts of sunscreen. Which of the following DNA repair mechanisms is defective in this child?

1 of 5

Flashcards: DNA repair

1/10

Which enzyme catalyzes the formation of a phosphodiester bond between Okazaki fragments?_____

TAP TO REVEAL ANSWER

Which enzyme catalyzes the formation of a phosphodiester bond between Okazaki fragments?_____

DNA ligase

browseSpaceflip

Enjoying this lesson?

Get full access to all lessons, practice questions, and more.

Start Your Free Trial