Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs
Practice US Medical PG questions for Observational studies vs experiments. These multiple choice questions (MCQs) cover important concepts and help you prepare for your exams.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 1: A study is funded by the tobacco industry to examine the association between smoking and lung cancer. They design a study with a prospective cohort of 1,000 smokers between the ages of 20-30. The length of the study is five years. After the study period ends, they conclude that there is no relationship between smoking and lung cancer. Which of the following study features is the most likely reason for the failure of the study to note an association between tobacco use and cancer?
- A. Late-look bias
- B. Latency period (Correct Answer)
- C. Confounding
- D. Effect modification
- E. Pygmalion effect
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Latency period***
- **Lung cancer** typically has a **long latency period**, often **20-30+ years**, between initial exposure to tobacco carcinogens and the development of clinically detectable disease.
- A **five-year study duration** in young smokers (ages 20-30) is **far too short** to observe the development of lung cancer, which explains the false negative finding.
- This represents a **fundamental flaw in study design** rather than a bias—the biological timeline of disease development was not adequately considered.
*Late-look bias*
- **Late-look bias** occurs when a study enrolls participants who have already survived the early high-risk period of a disease, leading to **underestimation of true mortality or incidence**.
- Also called **survival bias**, it involves studying a population that has already been "selected" by survival.
- This is not applicable here, as the study simply ended before sufficient time elapsed for disease to develop.
*Confounding*
- **Confounding** occurs when a third variable is associated with both the exposure and outcome, distorting the apparent relationship between them.
- While confounding can affect study results, it would not completely eliminate the detection of a strong, well-established association like smoking and lung cancer in a properly conducted prospective cohort study.
- The issue here is temporal (insufficient follow-up time), not the presence of an unmeasured confounder.
*Effect modification*
- **Effect modification** (also called interaction) occurs when the magnitude of an association between exposure and outcome differs across levels of a third variable.
- This represents a **true biological phenomenon**, not a study design flaw or bias.
- It would not explain the complete failure to detect any association.
*Pygmalion effect*
- The **Pygmalion effect** (observer-expectancy effect) refers to a psychological phenomenon where higher expectations lead to improved performance in the observed subjects.
- This concept is relevant to **behavioral and educational research**, not to objective epidemiological studies of disease incidence.
- It has no relevance to the biological relationship between carcinogen exposure and cancer development.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 2: Which of the following study designs would be most appropriate to investigate the association between electronic cigarette use and the subsequent development of lung cancer?
- A. Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects with lung cancer who did not smoke
- B. Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who smoke normal cigarettes
- C. Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects without lung cancer who smoke
- D. Subjects with lung cancer and subjects without lung cancer
- E. Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who do not smoke (Correct Answer)
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who do not smoke***
- This design represents a **cohort study**, which is ideal for investigating the **incidence** of a disease (lung cancer) in groups exposed and unexposed to a risk factor (electronic cigarette use).
- By following these two groups over time, researchers can directly compare the **risk of developing lung cancer** in e-cigarette users versus non-smokers.
*Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects with lung cancer who did not smoke*
- This option incorrectly compares two groups both with lung cancer, where the exposure to smoking can either be **electronic or traditional cigarettes,** but does not provide a control group without lung cancer to assess the association.
- This design would not allow for the calculation of an **incidence rate** or a **relative risk** of lung cancer development specific to electronic cigarette use.
*Subjects who smoke electronic cigarettes and subjects who smoke normal cigarettes*
- This design compares two different types of smoking, which might be useful for comparing their relative risks but doesn't include a **non-smoking control group** to establish the absolute association with electronic cigarettes.
- While it could show if e-cigarettes are "safer" than traditional cigarettes, it wouldn't directly answer whether e-cigarettes themselves **cause lung cancer**.
*Subjects with lung cancer who smoke and subjects without lung cancer who smoke*
- This describes a **case-control study** but focuses on smoking in general rather than specifically electronic cigarettes, which is the independent variable of interest.
- While valuable for identifying risk factors, it would need to specifically differentiate between **electronic cigarette smokers** and other smokers to answer the question adequately.
*Subjects with lung cancer and subjects without lung cancer*
- This general description of a **case-control study** is too broad; it does not specify the exposure of interest, which is electronic cigarette use.
- To be relevant, the study would need to gather data on **electronic cigarette use** in both the lung cancer group and the non-lung cancer control group.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 3: A research group wants to assess the safety and toxicity profile of a new drug. A clinical trial is conducted with 20 volunteers to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and monitor the apparent toxicity of the drug. The study design is best described as which of the following phases of a clinical trial?
- A. Phase 0
- B. Phase III
- C. Phase V
- D. Phase II
- E. Phase I (Correct Answer)
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Phase I***
- **Phase I clinical trials** involve a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-100) to primarily assess **drug safety**, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
- The main goal is to establish the **maximum tolerated dose (MTD)** and evaluate the drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles.
*Phase 0*
- **Phase 0 trials** are exploratory studies conducted in a very small number of subjects (10-15) to gather preliminary data on a drug's **pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics** in humans.
- They involve microdoses, not intended to have therapeutic effects, and thus cannot determine toxicity or MTD.
*Phase III*
- **Phase III trials** are large-scale studies involving hundreds to thousands of patients to confirm the drug's **efficacy**, monitor side effects, compare it to standard treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug to be used safely.
- These trials are conducted after safety and initial efficacy have been established in earlier phases.
*Phase V*
- "Phase V" is not a standard, recognized phase in the traditional clinical trial classification (Phase 0, I, II, III, IV).
- This term might be used in some non-standard research contexts or for post-marketing studies that go beyond Phase IV surveillance, but it is not a formal phase for initial drug development.
*Phase II*
- **Phase II trials** involve several hundred patients with the condition the drug is intended to treat, focusing on **drug efficacy** and further evaluating safety.
- While safety is still monitored, the primary objective shifts to determining if the drug works for its intended purpose and at what dose.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 4: A 28-year-old male presents to his primary care physician with complaints of intermittent abdominal pain and alternating bouts of constipation and diarrhea. His medical chart is not significant for any past medical problems or prior surgeries. He is not prescribed any current medications. Which of the following questions would be the most useful next question in eliciting further history from this patient?
- A. "Does the diarrhea typically precede the constipation, or vice-versa?"
- B. "Is the diarrhea foul-smelling?"
- C. "Please rate your abdominal pain on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst pain of your life"
- D. "Are the symptoms worse in the morning or at night?"
- E. "Can you tell me more about the symptoms you have been experiencing?" (Correct Answer)
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Can you tell me more about the symptoms you have been experiencing?***
- This **open-ended question** encourages the patient to provide a **comprehensive narrative** of their symptoms, including details about onset, frequency, duration, alleviating/aggravating factors, and associated symptoms, which is crucial for diagnosis.
- In a patient presenting with vague, intermittent symptoms like alternating constipation and diarrhea, allowing them to elaborate freely can reveal important clues that might not be captured by more targeted questions.
*Does the diarrhea typically precede the constipation, or vice-versa?*
- While knowing the sequence of symptoms can be helpful in understanding the **pattern of bowel dysfunction**, it is a very specific question that might overlook other important aspects of the patient's experience.
- It prematurely narrows the focus without first obtaining a broad understanding of the patient's overall symptomatic picture.
*Is the diarrhea foul-smelling?*
- Foul-smelling diarrhea can indicate **malabsorption** or **bacterial overgrowth**, which are important to consider in some gastrointestinal conditions.
- However, this is a **specific symptom inquiry** that should follow a more general exploration of the patient's symptoms, as it may not be relevant if other crucial details are missed.
*Please rate your abdominal pain on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst pain of your life*
- Quantifying pain intensity is useful for assessing the **severity of discomfort** and monitoring changes over time.
- However, for a patient with intermittent rather than acute, severe pain, understanding the **character, location, and triggers** of the pain is often more diagnostically valuable than just a numerical rating initially.
*Are the symptoms worse in the morning or at night?*
- Diurnal variation can be relevant in certain conditions, such as inflammatory bowel diseases where nocturnal symptoms might be more concerning, or functional disorders whose symptoms might be stress-related.
- This is another **specific question** that should come after gathering a more complete initial picture of the patient's symptoms to ensure no key information is overlooked.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 5: You are interested in studying the etiology of heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and attempt to construct an appropriate design study. Specifically, you wish to look for potential causality between dietary glucose consumption and HFrEF. Which of the following study designs would allow you to assess for and determine this causality?
- A. Cross-sectional study
- B. Case series
- C. Cohort study (Correct Answer)
- D. Case-control study
- E. Randomized controlled trial
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Cohort study***
- A **cohort study** observes a group of individuals over time to identify risk factors and outcomes, allowing for the assessment of **temporal relationships** between exposure (dietary glucose) and outcome (HFrEF).
- This design is suitable for establishing a potential **causal link** as it tracks participants from exposure to outcome, enabling the calculation of incidence rates and relative risks.
*Cross-sectional study*
- A **cross-sectional study** measures exposure and outcome simultaneously at a single point in time, making it impossible to determine the **temporal sequence** of events.
- This design can only identify **associations** or correlations, not causation, as it cannot establish whether high glucose consumption preceded HFrEF.
*Case series*
- A **case series** describes characteristics of a group of patients with a particular disease or exposure, often to highlight unusual clinical features, but it lacks a **comparison group**.
- It cannot assess causality because it does not provide information on the frequency of exposure in healthy individuals or the incidence of the disease in unexposed individuals.
*Case-control study*
- A **case-control study** compares individuals with the outcome (cases) to those without the outcome (controls) to determine past exposures, which makes it prone to **recall bias**.
- While it can suggest associations, it cannot definitively establish a temporal relationship or causation as the outcome is already known when exposure is assessed.
*Randomized controlled trial*
- A **randomized controlled trial (RCT)** is the gold standard for establishing causation by randomly assigning participants to an intervention or control group, but it may not be ethical or feasible for studying long-term dietary exposures and chronic diseases like HFrEF due to the long follow-up period and complexity of diet.
- While ideal for causality, directly controlling and randomizing dietary glucose intake over decades to observe HFrEF development might be practically challenging or unethical.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 6: A new study is investigating the effects of an experimental drug, Exerzisin, on the duration and intensity of exercise. In the treatment group participants are given daily Exerzisin at the main treatment facility and instructed to exercise as much as they would like on the facility's exercise equipment. Due to an insufficient number of exercise units at the main treatment center, the control subjects are given free access to an outside, private gym. The duration and intensity of exercise in both groups is measured with a pedometer. The perspicacious undergraduate, hired to input all the data, points out that the treatment group may be more motivated to exercise harder and longer because their exercising can be observed by the investigators. To which form of bias is he alluding?
- A. Selection bias
- B. Recall bias
- C. Hawthorne effect (Correct Answer)
- D. Pygmalion effect
- E. Lead time bias
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Hawthorne effect***
- The Hawthorne effect describes the phenomenon where individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being **observed**.
- In this study, the treatment group may exercise more intensely because they know investigators are watching, potentially confounding the drug's true effect.
*Selection bias*
- **Selection bias** occurs when the selection of subjects for a study, or their likelihood of staying in the study, leads to a sample that does not accurately represent the target population.
- While there are issues with how the control and treatment groups are handled, the specific concern here is about behavior change due to observation, not how initial subjects were chosen or lost.
*Recall bias*
- **Recall bias** is a systematic error caused by differences in the accuracy or completeness of the recollections of past events or experiences by study participants.
- This type of bias is relevant when participants are asked to remember past information, which is not the primary issue in this scenario where current exercise behavior is being observed.
*Pygmalion effect*
- The **Pygmalion effect** occurs when higher expectations placed upon individuals lead to better performance.
- This typically involves an investigator's expectations influencing a participant's performance, rather than the participant's awareness of being observed influencing their own behavior.
*Lead time bias*
- **Lead time bias** is a form of bias that occurs in screening and early detection studies, where earlier diagnosis of a disease (due to screening) makes it seem like patients live longer, even if the treatment doesn't change the actual course of the disease.
- This bias is not relevant here as the study is observing the effects of a drug on exercise, not disease prognosis or survival.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 7: An office team is being observed by an outside agency at the request of management to make sure they are completing all their tasks appropriately. Several of the employees are nervous that they are being watched and take care to perform their jobs with extra care, more so than they would have done during a normal workday. What best describes this behavior?
- A. Pygmalion effect
- B. Novelty effect
- C. Hawthorne effect (Correct Answer)
- D. Observer bias
- E. Ringelmann effect
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Hawthorne effect***
- The **Hawthorne effect** describes changes in behavior that occur among individuals who are aware that they are being observed.
- In this scenario, the employees' increased diligence due to being watched by an outside agency aligns perfectly with this psychological phenomenon.
*Pygmalion effect*
- The **Pygmalion effect** refers to the phenomenon where higher expectations lead to improved performance in a given area.
- It focuses on how an observer's expectations can influence the subject's behavior, rather than the subject's awareness of observation itself.
*Novelty effect*
- The **novelty effect** occurs when the initial interest or enthusiasm for a new item or intervention temporarily improves performance, which then wanes over time.
- This effect is related to the newness of a situation, not the act of being observed.
*Observer bias*
- **Observer bias** (also known as ascertainment bias) happens when the observer's expectations, beliefs, or preconceptions influence how they perceive or record data.
- It refers to a bias in the *observer*, not a change in the *observed subject's behavior* due to being watched.
*Ringelmann effect*
- The **Ringelmann effect** (or social loafing) describes the tendency for individual members of a group to become less productive as the size of their group increases.
- This is a phenomenon of reduced individual effort in a group setting, not an alteration in behavior due to being observed.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 8: A group of gastroenterologists is concerned about low colonoscopy screening rates. They decide to implement a free patient navigation program to assist local residents and encourage them to obtain colonoscopies in accordance with U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Local residents were recruited at community centers. Participants attended monthly meetings with patient navigators and were regularly reminded that their adherence to screening guidelines was being evaluated. Colonoscopy screening rates were assessed via chart review, which showed that 90% of participants adhered to screening guidelines. Data collected via chart review for local residents recruited at community centers who did not participate in the free patient navigation system found that 34% of that population adhered to USPSTF guidelines. Which of the following has most likely contributed to the observed disparity in colonoscopy screening rates?
- A. Recall bias
- B. Confirmation bias
- C. Reporting bias
- D. Hawthorne effect (Correct Answer)
- E. Sampling bias
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Hawthorne effect***
- The **Hawthorne effect** is a type of reactivity in which individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed.
- In this study, participants were aware that their adherence to screening guidelines was being evaluated, likely leading to increased compliance simply due to this awareness rather than the efficacy of the patient navigation program alone.
*Recall bias*
- **Recall bias** occurs when participants disproportionately remember or inaccurately recall past events, often due to their current health status or beliefs.
- This bias is less likely here as colonoscopy screening rates were assessed via **chart review**, an objective measure, rather than participant self-report.
*Confirmation bias*
- **Confirmation bias** is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.
- This bias typically affects the researchers or observers, not the participants' behavior in the observed manner, as the question focuses on the participants' increased screening rates.
*Reporting bias*
- **Reporting bias** refers to selective revealing or suppression of information during the reporting of research findings, and can occur when study participants selectively report symptoms or behaviors.
- While participants might selectively report, the data here was gathered through **chart review**, which is a more objective measure of actual behavior, making reporting bias less likely to explain the disparity in screening rates.
*Sampling bias*
- **Sampling bias** occurs when a sample is not representative of the population from which it is drawn, leading to skewed results.
- While there might be some sampling bias in who chose to participate in the free program, the observed disparity is specifically about behavior change in those *being observed*, pointing more strongly to the Hawthorne effect.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 9: You are conducting a lab experiment on skeletal muscle tissue to examine force in different settings. The skeletal muscle tissue is hanging down from a hook. The experiment has 3 different phases. In the first phase, you compress the muscle tissue upwards, making it shorter. In the second phase, you attach a weight of 2.3 kg (5 lb) to its lower vertical end. In the third phase, you do not manipulate the muscle length at all. At the end of the study, you see that the tension is higher in the second phase than in the first one. What is the mechanism underlying this result?
- A. The tension in phase 1 is only active, while in phase 2 it is both active and passive.
- B. Shortening the muscle in phase 1 pulls the actin and myosin filaments apart.
- C. Lengthening of the muscle in phase 2 increases passive tension. (Correct Answer)
- D. There are more actin-myosin cross-bridges attached in phase 2 than in phase 1.
- E. Shortening of the muscle in phase 1 uses up ATP stores.
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Lengthening of the muscle in phase 2 increases passive tension.***
- Attaching a weight of 2.3 kg (5 lb) in phase 2 **stretches** the muscle, increasing the **passive tension** generated by elastic components like **titin**.
- This added passive tension, combined with any active tension, results in a **higher total tension** compared to the shortened state in phase 1 where passive tension is minimal.
*The tension in phase 1 is only active, while in phase 2 it is both active and passive.*
- While passive tension is more significant in phase 2 due to stretching, the muscle in phase 1, even when compressed, can still generate some **active tension** if stimulated.
- The key difference contributing to higher tension in phase 2 is the additional **passive component** from stretching, not necessarily the exclusive presence of active tension in one phase.
*Shortening the muscle in phase 1 pulls the actin and myosin filaments apart.*
- Shortening the muscle too much, beyond its optimal resting length, leads to **overlap of actin filaments** and **crumpling of myosin filaments**, reducing the number of available cross-bridge binding sites.
- This **decreases active tension** rather than pulling filaments apart, which would require excessive stretching.
*There are more actin-myofibril cross-bridges attached in phase 2 than in phase 1.*
- Shortening the muscle in phase 1 beyond optimal length **reduces the number of cross-bridges** that can form due to actin filament overlap.
- While lengthening in phase 2 might bring the muscle closer to an **optimal length** for cross-bridge formation (increasing active tension), the primary reason for the higher tension in phase 2 as described is the increase in **passive tension** from stretching, rather than solely increased active cross-bridge formation.
*Shortening of the muscle in phase 1 uses up ATP stores.*
- Muscle contraction, whether shortening or lengthening, requires **ATP hydrolysis** for cross-bridge cycling.
- The act of shortening itself doesn't uniquely "use up" ATP stores more significantly than other contractile actions to explain the observed tension difference; ATP is continuously consumed and regenerated during muscle activity.
Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG Question 10: A 45-year-old man presents for his annual checkup. The patient has a past medical history of diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 that is well-controlled with diet. In addition, he was admitted to this hospital 1-year ago for a myocardial infarction (MI). The patient reports a 40-pack-year smoking history. However, after his MI, his doctors informed him about how detrimental smoking was to his heart condition. Since then, he has made efforts to cut down and now, for the past seven months, has stopped smoking. He says he used to use smoking as a means of dealing with his work and family stresses. He now attends wellness sessions at work and meditates early every morning before the family wakes up. Which of the following stages of the transtheoretical model is this patient most likely in?
- A. Preparation
- B. Contemplation
- C. Action
- D. Precontemplation
- E. Maintenance (Correct Answer)
Observational studies vs experiments Explanation: ***Maintenance***
- The patient has **successfully stopped smoking for seven months**, indicating sustained behavior change.
- He has also adopted **new coping mechanisms** like wellness sessions and meditation, which are crucial for preventing relapse and falls under this stage.
*Preparation*
- This stage involves **intending to take action** in the immediate future (e.g., within the next month) and involves some steps towards change, such as making a plan.
- The patient has already acted and sustained the behavior change, moving past mere preparation.
*Contemplation*
- Individuals in this stage are **aware a problem exists** and are seriously thinking about overcoming it but have not yet committed to taking action.
- The patient has clearly moved past just thinking about quitting and has actively stopped smoking.
*Action*
- This stage involves **modifying behavior, experiences, or environment** in order to overcome problems.
- While the patient was in the action stage when he initially quit, he has now maintained this change for an extended period (seven months), progressing beyond the initial action phase.
*Precontemplation*
- In this stage, individuals are **not intending to take action** in the foreseeable future (e.g., within 6 months) and are often unaware or underaware of their problems.
- This patient actively quit smoking and maintained cessation, showing he was not in precontemplation.
More Observational studies vs experiments US Medical PG questions available in the OnCourse app. Practice MCQs, flashcards, and get detailed explanations.
