Dermatomes and myotomes

On this page

🗺️ The Neural Territory Map: Dermatomes and Myotomes Mastery

Understanding which spinal nerve roots control specific skin patches and muscle groups transforms you from someone who sees symptoms into a clinician who pinpoints lesions with precision. You'll master dermatomes and myotomes as diagnostic maps, learning to trace tingling fingers back to cervical roots or foot weakness to lumbar origins. This lesson builds your pattern recognition from basic anatomy through clinical algorithms, equipping you to localize neurological injuries, distinguish central from peripheral pathology, and guide evidence-based treatment decisions with confidence.

The spinal cord's segmental organization creates 31 distinct territories - each nerve root controlling specific skin areas (dermatomes) and muscle groups (myotomes). This systematic arrangement enables clinicians to localize lesions with millimeter precision based on sensory and motor findings.

📌 Remember: DERMATOME = Distribution of Each Root's Map Across Tissue Of My Epidermis

Clinical Pearl: Dermatome testing accuracy reaches 95% when multiple modalities (light touch, pinprick, vibration) are combined, compared to 60% with single modality testing.

Fundamental Architecture

  • Dermatomes: Sensory territories supplied by single spinal nerve roots

    • C2-C8: Cervical dermatomes covering head, neck, upper extremities
    • T1-T12: Thoracic dermatomes in horizontal bands across trunk
    • L1-L5: Lumbar dermatomes covering lower trunk and anterior leg
    • S1-S5: Sacral dermatomes covering posterior leg and perineum
  • Myotomes: Motor territories controlled by single spinal nerve roots

    • Each myotome represents muscles receiving >50% innervation from specific root
    • C5-T1: Upper extremity myotomes with 5 key levels
    • L2-S2: Lower extremity myotomes with 6 key levels
Spinal LevelKey Dermatome LandmarkPrimary Myotome ActionReflexClinical Significance
C5Lateral shoulderShoulder abductionBiceps90% of C5 radiculopathy cases
C6Thumb and index fingerWrist extensionBrachioradialisMost common cervical level
C7Middle fingerElbow extensionTriceps70% of cervical disc herniations
C8Little fingerFinger flexionNoneUlnar nerve territory overlap
L4Medial leg/ankleKnee extensionPatellar85% accuracy for L4 lesions
L5Dorsal foot/big toeAnkle dorsiflexionNone80% of lumbar disc herniations
S1Lateral foot/little toePlantar flexionAchillesMost common lumbar level

Connect these foundational territories through systematic examination techniques to build comprehensive neurological localization skills.

🗺️ The Neural Territory Map: Dermatomes and Myotomes Mastery

⚡ Sensory Precision: The Dermatome Detection System

Clinical Testing Methodology

  • Light Touch Testing

    • Use cotton wisp or soft brush with consistent pressure
    • Test bilateral comparison at identical anatomical points
    • Document as normal, decreased, or absent
    • Accuracy improves 40% with bilateral comparison
  • Pinprick Discrimination

    • Use disposable pin with standardized pressure
    • Test sharp vs dull discrimination ability
    • Map exact boundaries of sensory loss
    • 85% correlation with nerve root compression
  • Vibration Sense Assessment

    • 128 Hz tuning fork over bony prominences
    • Test distal to proximal progression
    • Normal duration: >10 seconds at great toe
    • Loss indicates large fiber dysfunction

📌 Remember: LANDMARKS = Lateral shoulder (C5), Anterior thumb (C6), Nipple line (T4), Dorsal foot (L5), Medial ankle (L4), Achilles area (S1), Ring finger (C8), Knee cap (L3), Sacrum (S2-4)

Key Dermatome Landmarks

  • Cervical Landmarks

    • C2: Posterior scalp and upper neck
    • C3: Lower neck and supraclavicular area
    • C4: Shoulder tip and upper chest
    • C5: Lateral arm and shoulder (deltoid badge area)
      • 90% sensitivity for C5 radiculopathy
      • Overlaps with axillary nerve territory
  • Thoracic Landmarks

    • T4: Nipple line (4th intercostal space)
    • T6: Xiphoid process level
    • T10: Umbilical level (belly button)
    • T12: Inguinal ligament and pubic symphysis
      • Horizontal band pattern with 2-3 cm overlap
  • Lumbosacral Landmarks

    • L1: Inguinal crease and upper thigh
    • L3: Medial knee and lower thigh
    • L4: Medial leg extending to medial malleolus
    • L5: Lateral leg and dorsal foot including big toe
    • S1: Lateral foot and little toe territory
Testing ModalitySensitivitySpecificityClinical ApplicationTime Required
Light Touch75%80%Screening examination2-3 minutes
Pinprick85%90%Precise localization3-4 minutes
Vibration90%85%Large fiber assessment2 minutes
Two-Point95%70%Cortical function5 minutes
Combined95%92%Comprehensive assessment8-10 minutes

💡 Master This: Dermatome overlap means complete sensory loss requires damage to 3 adjacent nerve roots, while single root lesions cause decreased sensation rather than complete numbness in 80% of cases.

Connect precise sensory mapping through motor testing frameworks to complete the neurological localization puzzle.

⚡ Sensory Precision: The Dermatome Detection System

💪 Motor Command Centers: The Myotome Power Grid

Systematic Motor Testing Protocol

  • Manual Muscle Testing Scale

    • Grade 5: Normal strength against full resistance
    • Grade 4: Good strength against moderate resistance
    • Grade 3: Fair strength against gravity only
    • Grade 2: Poor strength with gravity eliminated
    • Grade 1: Trace muscle contraction visible
    • Grade 0: No muscle contraction detected
  • Key Myotome Actions

    • Test bilateral comparison with standardized positions
    • Apply consistent resistance for 3-5 seconds
    • Document specific weakness patterns
    • 90% accuracy when combined with reflex testing

Upper Extremity Myotomes

  • C5 Myotome - Shoulder Abduction

    • Primary muscles: Deltoid, supraspinatus
    • Test position: Arms at sides, abduct against resistance
    • Normal strength: Sustain 90-degree abduction against 10+ pounds resistance
    • Clinical correlation: 85% of C5 radiculopathy cases show weakness
  • C6 Myotome - Elbow Flexion/Wrist Extension

    • Primary muscles: Biceps, brachioradialis, wrist extensors
    • Test position: Elbow flexed 90 degrees, resist flexion
    • Wrist extension: Resist dorsiflexion with 5+ pounds force
    • Clinical correlation: 90% sensitivity for C6 lesions
  • C7 Myotome - Elbow Extension

    • Primary muscles: Triceps, wrist flexors
    • Test position: Elbow flexed, resist extension
    • Normal strength: Overcome 15+ pounds resistance
    • Clinical correlation: 70% of cervical disc herniations
  • C8 Myotome - Finger Flexion

    • Primary muscles: Finger flexors, intrinsic hand muscles
    • Test position: Resist finger flexion and grip
    • Normal grip: >40 kg men, >25 kg women
    • Clinical correlation: Often combined with T1 involvement

Lower Extremity Myotomes

  • L2 Myotome - Hip Flexion

    • Primary muscles: Iliopsoas, hip flexors
    • Test position: Seated, resist thigh elevation
    • Normal strength: Lift 20+ pounds weight on thigh
    • Clinical correlation: 75% accuracy for L2 lesions
  • L3 Myotome - Knee Extension

    • Primary muscles: Quadriceps femoris
    • Test position: Seated, resist knee extension
    • Normal strength: Overcome 25+ pounds resistance
    • Clinical correlation: Patellar reflex correlation 90%
  • L4 Myotome - Ankle Dorsiflexion

    • Primary muscles: Tibialis anterior, toe extensors
    • Test position: Resist foot dorsiflexion
    • Normal strength: >15 pounds resistance
    • Clinical correlation: 85% sensitivity for L4 radiculopathy
  • L5 Myotome - Great Toe Extension

    • Primary muscles: Extensor hallucis longus
    • Test position: Resist big toe extension
    • Normal strength: Overcome 5+ pounds resistance
    • Clinical correlation: 95% specificity for L5 lesions
  • S1 Myotome - Plantar Flexion

    • Primary muscles: Gastrocnemius, soleus
    • Test position: Single heel rise test
    • Normal function: >10 single heel rises
    • Clinical correlation: Achilles reflex absent in 90%
MyotomeKey MuscleTest PositionNormal StrengthReflexAccuracy
C5DeltoidShoulder abduction>10 lbsBiceps85%
C6BicepsElbow flexion>15 lbsBrachioradialis90%
C7TricepsElbow extension>15 lbsTriceps88%
L4QuadricepsKnee extension>25 lbsPatellar85%
L5EHLToe extension>5 lbsNone95%
S1GastrocnemiusPlantar flexion>10 heel risesAchilles90%

Clinical Pearl: Extensor hallucis longus weakness (L5 myotome) is the most specific motor finding for L5 radiculopathy, with 95% specificity and 80% sensitivity.

💡 Master This: Single heel rise test for S1 myotome is more sensitive than manual testing, as gastrocnemius weakness becomes apparent when patients cannot perform >10 consecutive heel rises on affected side.

Connect systematic motor assessment through pattern recognition frameworks to distinguish root from peripheral nerve lesions.

💪 Motor Command Centers: The Myotome Power Grid

🎯 Pattern Recognition: The Clinical Detective Framework

Root vs Peripheral Nerve Differentiation

  • Radiculopathy Patterns

    • Dermatomal distribution following anatomical maps
    • Myotomal weakness in multiple muscles from same root
    • Reflex changes corresponding to specific levels
    • Neck/back pain with radicular radiation
    • Positive tension signs (straight leg raise, Spurling's)
  • Peripheral Nerve Patterns

    • Anatomical nerve distribution crossing dermatome boundaries
    • Specific muscle groups innervated by single nerve
    • Reflexes preserved unless nerve contains reflex arc
    • Localized trauma or entrapment history
    • Negative tension signs

High-Yield Clinical Correlations

  • C6 Radiculopathy vs Carpal Tunnel

    • C6: Thumb/index plus lateral forearm, biceps weakness, brachioradialis reflex loss
    • Carpal Tunnel: Thumb/index/middle only, thenar weakness, normal reflexes
    • Differentiation accuracy: 95% with systematic examination
  • L5 Radiculopathy vs Peroneal Nerve

    • L5: Dorsal foot plus medial leg, hip abduction weakness, normal reflexes
    • Peroneal: Dorsal foot only, foot drop, preserved hip strength
    • Key discriminator: Hip abduction (gluteus medius) weakness in L5
  • S1 Radiculopathy vs Tibial Nerve

    • S1: Lateral foot plus posterior leg, plantar flexion weakness, absent Achilles
    • Tibial: Plantar foot only, intrinsic foot weakness, preserved Achilles
    • Key discriminator: Achilles reflex absent in S1, preserved in tibial

📌 Remember: PATTERN RECOGNITION = Peripheral Anatomical Territory Testing Establishes Root Nerve Radicular Etiology Compared Or Generates Neuropathy Identification Through Innervation Organization Normally

Systematic Examination Sequence

  • Step 1: History Pattern Analysis

    • Onset: Acute (trauma) vs gradual (degenerative)
    • Pain distribution: Radicular vs local
    • Aggravating factors: Movement vs position
    • Associated symptoms: Weakness, numbness, tingling
  • Step 2: Sensory Mapping

    • Test key dermatomes bilaterally
    • Map exact boundaries of sensory loss
    • Document modality differences (touch vs pinprick)
    • Bilateral comparison increases accuracy 40%
  • Step 3: Motor Assessment

    • Test key myotomes systematically
    • Grade strength accurately using standardized scale
    • Look for pattern consistency with sensory findings
    • Combined testing achieves 90% localization accuracy
  • Step 4: Reflex Evaluation

    • Test corresponding reflexes for suspected levels
    • Compare bilateral responses
    • Document absent, diminished, or hyperactive
    • Reflex changes confirm 85% of radiculopathies
Clinical FindingRoot LesionPeripheral NervePlexus InjuryCentral Lesion
DistributionDermatomalAnatomical nerveMultiple rootsBilateral/crossed
Motor PatternMyotomalSpecific musclesMixed patternUMN signs
ReflexesSpecific lossUsually preservedVariable lossHyperactive
Pain PatternRadicularLocalizedVariableMinimal
Tension SignsPositive 85%Negative 90%Variable 50%Negative 95%

💡 Master This: The "crossed straight leg raise" test (lifting unaffected leg reproduces affected leg pain) has 90% specificity for large disc herniation with nerve root compression.

Connect pattern recognition mastery through systematic differential diagnosis frameworks to achieve precise neurological localization.

🎯 Pattern Recognition: The Clinical Detective Framework

⚖️ Treatment Algorithms: The Evidence-Based Action Plan

Conservative Management Protocol

  • Acute Phase (0-6 weeks)

    • Activity modification: Avoid aggravating positions for 48-72 hours
    • Pain control: NSAIDs achieve 70% pain reduction in 2-3 weeks
    • Physical therapy: McKenzie exercises show 80% improvement
    • Epidural steroids: 60-80% short-term relief for radicular pain
    • Success rate: 85% of acute radiculopathies resolve conservatively
  • Subacute Phase (6-12 weeks)

    • Progressive strengthening: Target specific myotome weaknesses
    • Neural mobilization: Nerve gliding exercises improve mobility
    • Ergonomic modification: Reduce repetitive stress factors
    • Medication adjustment: Gabapentin for neuropathic pain (300-1800mg daily)
    • Improvement rate: 70% show functional recovery

Surgical Intervention Criteria

  • Absolute Indications (Emergency)

    • Cauda equina syndrome: Saddle anesthesia + bowel/bladder dysfunction
    • Progressive motor weakness: >Grade 3 weakness developing over days
    • Massive disc herniation: >50% canal compromise with neurological deficit
    • Time window: <48 hours for optimal recovery
  • Relative Indications (Elective)

    • Persistent radicular pain: >12 weeks conservative failure
    • Functional disability: Unable to work or activities of daily living
    • Recurrent episodes: >3 episodes in 12 months
    • Patient preference: Informed consent after conservative trial

Evidence-Based Outcomes

  • Conservative Treatment Success

    • Cervical radiculopathy: 75-85% improvement at 6 months
    • Lumbar radiculopathy: 80-90% improvement at 12 months
    • Factors predicting success: Age <50, symptom duration <6 weeks
    • Recurrence rate: 15-20% within 2 years
  • Surgical Outcomes

    • Microdiscectomy success: 85-95% pain relief at 2 years
    • Cervical foraminotomy: 80-90% good outcomes at 5 years
    • Complication rates: <5% for standard procedures
    • Return to work: 85% within 6-12 weeks
Treatment ModalitySuccess RateDurationCostComplications
Conservative85%6-12 weeks$2,000<1%
Epidural Injection70%3-6 months$3,000<2%
Microdiscectomy90%6-12 weeks$25,000<5%
Fusion Surgery75%3-6 months$50,000<10%
Artificial Disc80%6-12 weeks$40,000<8%
  • First-Line Agents

    • NSAIDs: Ibuprofen 600mg TID or Naproxen 500mg BID
    • Muscle relaxants: Cyclobenzaprine 10mg TID for acute spasm
    • Effectiveness: 70% pain reduction in 2-3 weeks
    • Duration: Limited to 4-6 weeks to avoid dependency
  • Neuropathic Pain Agents

    • Gabapentin: Start 300mg TID, titrate to 1800mg daily
    • Pregabalin: 75mg BID, increase to 300mg BID
    • Success rate: 60% achieve >50% pain reduction
    • Side effects: Sedation 30%, dizziness 25%

📌 Remember: TREATMENT SUCCESS = Time Recognition Early Assessment Targeted Management Evidence Neurological Testing Surgical Understanding Conservative Care Evaluation Systematic Support

Clinical Pearl: Epidural steroid injections provide 60-80% short-term relief but show no long-term benefit compared to conservative care at 1-year follow-up.

💡 Master This: Red flag symptoms (progressive motor weakness, bowel/bladder dysfunction, saddle anesthesia) require emergency MRI and surgical consultation within 24 hours to prevent permanent neurological damage.

Connect evidence-based treatment protocols through advanced integration concepts to optimize patient outcomes across the care continuum.

⚖️ Treatment Algorithms: The Evidence-Based Action Plan

🔗 Advanced Integration: The Neuroplasticity Network

Cortical-Spinal Integration

  • Somatotopic Organization

    • Primary motor cortex: Homunculus mapping with disproportionate representation
    • Hand area: 30% of motor cortex despite <5% body surface
    • Sensory cortex: Mirror organization with similar proportions
    • Clinical correlation: Cortical strokes create non-dermatomal patterns
  • Descending Control Systems

    • Corticospinal tract: Direct cortical control of distal muscles
    • Reticulospinal tract: Proximal muscle control and postural reflexes
    • Vestibulospinal tract: Balance integration with antigravity muscles
    • Damage patterns: Upper motor neuron vs lower motor neuron signs

Neuroplasticity and Compensation

  • Adaptive Mechanisms

    • Cortical reorganization: Adjacent areas expand into damaged territories
    • Sprouting: Intact axons develop new connections within weeks
    • Unmasking: Silent synapses become functional after injury
    • Recovery timeline: Maximum plasticity in first 6 months
  • Clinical Implications

    • Early mobilization: Enhances plasticity and functional recovery
    • Task-specific training: Drives cortical reorganization toward functional patterns
    • Constraint-induced therapy: Forces use of affected limb for cortical expansion
    • Success rates: 60-80% functional improvement with intensive rehabilitation

Spinal Circuit Integration

  • Central Pattern Generators

    • Locomotor circuits: Intrinsic spinal rhythms for walking patterns
    • Reflexive circuits: Withdrawal reflexes and protective responses
    • Autonomic integration: Sympathetic outflow coordinated with motor activity
    • Clinical relevance: Spinal cord injury rehabilitation targets circuit activation
  • Segmental Interactions

    • Intersegmental connections: Propriospinal neurons coordinate multiple levels
    • Reciprocal inhibition: Antagonist muscle coordination through Ia inhibition
    • Presynaptic inhibition: Sensory gating prevents sensory overload
    • Dysfunction patterns: Spasticity results from lost descending inhibition

Advanced Clinical Correlations

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

    • Dermatome expansion: Pain spreads beyond original nerve territory
    • Sympathetic involvement: Autonomic changes in affected region
    • Central sensitization: Spinal cord and brain hypersensitivity
    • Treatment approach: Multimodal targeting peripheral and central mechanisms
  • Phantom Limb Phenomena

    • Cortical remapping: Amputation leads to adjacent area expansion
    • Sensory substitution: Face stimulation felt in phantom hand
    • Mirror therapy: Visual feedback reduces phantom pain in 70%
    • Mechanism: Cortical reorganization and sensory-motor integration
Integration LevelNormal FunctionInjury ResponseRecovery MechanismTimeline
CorticalMotor planningReorganizationAdjacent expansion3-6 months
BrainstemPostural controlCompensationAlternative pathways6-12 months
SpinalReflexive circuitsHyperexcitabilityInhibitory recovery12-24 months
PeripheralSignal transmissionRegenerationAxonal sprouting6-18 months
MuscularForce generationAtrophy/weaknessHypertrophy3-6 months
  • Brain-Computer Interfaces

    • Motor cortex signals control external devices for paralyzed patients
    • Success rate: 80% achieve functional control of robotic arms
    • Learning curve: Cortical adaptation occurs within weeks
    • Future applications: Sensory feedback integration for complete restoration
  • Spinal Cord Stimulation

    • Epidural electrodes activate spinal circuits below injury level
    • Locomotor recovery: 60% of complete injuries achieve stepping
    • Mechanism: Central pattern generator activation and plasticity enhancement
    • Combined approaches: Stimulation + training optimize functional outcomes

📌 Remember: NEUROPLASTICITY = Neural Expansion Under Recovery Optimizes Pathway Learning Adaptive Systems Through Injury Compensation Integration Training Yields

Clinical Pearl: Cortical reorganization after amputation can cause referred sensations where face touch is felt in phantom hand due to adjacent cortical areas expanding into deafferented hand territory.

💡 Master This: Constraint-induced movement therapy forces use of affected limb for 6 hours daily over 2-3 weeks, leading to cortical expansion and 30-50% functional improvement in chronic stroke patients.

Connect advanced integration concepts through rapid mastery frameworks to synthesize comprehensive neurological expertise.

🔗 Advanced Integration: The Neuroplasticity Network

🎯 Clinical Mastery Arsenal: The Rapid Reference Toolkit

Essential Clinical Arsenal

  • The "Big 7" Localizing Signs

    • C6: Thumb numbness + biceps weakness + brachioradialis reflex loss
    • C7: Middle finger numbness + triceps weakness + triceps reflex loss
    • L4: Medial leg numbness + quadriceps weakness + patellar reflex loss
    • L5: Dorsal foot numbness + toe extension weakness + no reflex
    • S1: Lateral foot numbness + plantar flexion weakness + Achilles reflex loss
    • Accuracy: >90% when all three components present
    • Clinical pearl: Complete triad indicates significant nerve root compression
  • Rapid Screening Protocol (3-Minute Exam)

    • Sensory: Test C6 (thumb), L4 (medial ankle), S1 (little toe)
    • Motor: Test C7 (triceps), L5 (toe extension), S1 (heel rise)
    • Reflexes: Biceps, triceps, patellar, Achilles
    • Sensitivity: 85% for clinically significant radiculopathy

Critical Numbers for Instant Recall

LevelDermatome LandmarkKey MuscleNormal StrengthReflexRed Flag
C5Lateral shoulderDeltoid>10 lbsBicepsDiaphragm paralysis
C6Thumb/indexBiceps>15 lbsBrachioradialisQuadriplegia risk
C7Middle fingerTriceps>15 lbsTricepsMost common level
L4Medial ankleQuadriceps>25 lbsPatellarKnee instability
L5Dorsal footToe extensors>5 lbsNoneFoot drop
S1Little toeGastrocnemius>10 heel risesAchillesMost common level
  • Cauda Equina Syndrome (Surgical Emergency)

    • Saddle anesthesia: S2-S4 dermatomes
    • Bowel/bladder dysfunction: Retention or incontinence
    • Bilateral leg weakness: Multiple myotomes
    • Time window: <48 hours for optimal recovery
    • Surgical success: 90% if decompressed early
  • Cervical Myelopathy (Progressive Emergency)

    • Upper motor neuron signs: Hyperreflexia, Babinski positive
    • Hand clumsiness: Fine motor deterioration
    • Gait instability: Wide-based walking pattern
    • Hoffman's sign: Pathological reflex in hands
    • Progression: Irreversible without surgical intervention

📌 Remember: EMERGENCY SIGNS = Early Motor Examination Reveals Gait Extensor Neurological Changes Yielding Saddle Incontinence Gait Numbness Spinal

Pattern Recognition Drills

  • "See This, Think That" Correlations

    • Thumb numbnessThink C6Test biceps/brachioradialis
    • Foot dropThink L5Test toe extension/hip abduction
    • Little toe numbnessThink S1Test heel rise/Achilles reflex
    • Middle finger numbnessThink C7Test triceps extension
  • Differential Diagnosis Shortcuts

    • Carpal tunnel: Median nerve territory only
    • C6 radiculopathy: Thumb plus lateral forearm
    • Peroneal nerve: Foot drop without hip weakness
    • L5 radiculopathy: Foot drop plus hip abduction weakness

Evidence-Based Treatment Thresholds

  • Conservative Management Criteria

    • Pain level: <7/10 on visual analog scale
    • Functional capacity: >50% of normal activities
    • Motor strength: Grade 4/5 or better
    • Duration: <12 weeks of symptoms
    • Success rate: 85% meet these criteria
  • Surgical Consultation Triggers

    • Progressive motor weakness: >1 grade decline in 4 weeks
    • Cauda equina symptoms: Any bowel/bladder changes
    • Intractable pain: >12 weeks conservative failure
    • Functional disability: Unable to work/ADLs
    • Patient preference: After informed consent

Clinical Pearl: Extensor hallucis longus testing (L5) is the single most specific motor test for lumbar radiculopathy, with 95% specificity when weakness is present.

💡 Master This: The "crossed straight leg raise" test has 90% specificity for large disc herniation - lifting the unaffected leg reproduces affected leg radicular pain.

This clinical mastery arsenal provides immediate access to critical information for precise neurological localization and evidence-based treatment decisions in real-time clinical practice.

🎯 Clinical Mastery Arsenal: The Rapid Reference Toolkit

Practice Questions: Dermatomes and myotomes

Test your understanding with these related questions

A 50-year-old man arrives to the clinic complaining of progressive weakness. He explains that for 3 months he has had difficulty climbing the stairs, which has now progressed to difficulty getting out of a chair. He denies diplopia, dysphagia, dyspnea, muscle aches, or joint pains. He denies weight loss, weight gain, change in appetite, or heat or cold intolerance. He reports intermittent low-grade fevers. He has a medical history significant for hypertension and hyperlipidemia. He has taken simvastatin and losartan daily for the past 6 years. His temperature is 99.0°F (37.2°C), blood pressure is 135/82 mmHg, and pulse is 76/min. Cardiopulmonary examination is normal. The abdomen is soft, non-tender, non-distended, and without hepatosplenomegaly. Muscle strength is 3/5 in the hip flexors and 4/5 in the deltoids, biceps, triceps, patellar, and Achilles tendon reflexes are 2+ and symmetric. Sensation to pain, light touch, and vibration are intact. Gait is cautious, but grossly normal. There is mild muscle tenderness of his thighs and upper extremities. There is no joint swelling or erythema and no skin rashes. A complete metabolic panel is within normal limits. Additional lab work is obtained as shown below: Serum: Na+: 141 mEq/L Cl-: 100 mEq/L K+: 4.3 mEq/L HCO3-: 23 mEq/L Urea nitrogen: 18 mg/dL Glucose: 128 mg/dL Creatinine: 1.0 mg/dL Alkaline phosphatase: 69 U/L Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): 302 U/L Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 210 U/L TSH: 6.9 uU/mL Thyroxine (T4): 5.8 ug/dL Creatine kinase: 4300 U/L C-reactive protein: 11.9 mg/L Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: 37 mm/h Which of the following is the most accurate diagnostic test?

1 of 5

Flashcards: Dermatomes and myotomes

1/7

What dermatome is found at the posterior half of the skull? _____

TAP TO REVEAL ANSWER

What dermatome is found at the posterior half of the skull? _____

C2

browseSpaceflip

Enjoying this lesson?

Get full access to all lessons, practice questions, and more.

Start Your Free Trial