Ethical Issues in End-of-Life Care

Ethical Issues in End-of-Life Care

Ethical Issues in End-of-Life Care

On this page

Ethical Pillars - Guiding Lights

  • Core Ethical Principles (📌 ABNJ):
    • Autonomy: Patient's right to make informed decisions about their body & medical care, including refusal.
    • Beneficence: Healthcare provider's duty to act in the patient's best interest, promoting health & well-being.
    • Non-maleficence: Obligation to "do no harm"; avoid actions that could inflict injury or suffering.
    • Justice: Fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources and treatment opportunities.
  • Informed Consent: Essential. Requires:
    • Full Disclosure, Comprehension, Voluntariness, Capacity.
  • Capacity Assessment: Clinically determined. Assesses ability to:
    • Understand relevant information.
    • Appreciate consequences of choices.
    • Reason through options.
    • Communicate a consistent choice.

    ⭐ Capacity is decision-specific and can fluctuate; it's not an all-or-nothing global assessment. oka

Patient's Voice - Future Wishes

  • Advance Medical Directives (AMD / Living Will): Patient's written instructions for future medical care if they lose decision-making capacity.
    • Specifies preferences for life-sustaining treatments (LST).
    • Appoints a healthcare proxy/agent.
    • Legally recognized in India.

    ⭐ The Supreme Court of India in Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs. Union of India & Anr. (2018) recognized the legal validity of advance medical directives (living wills).

  • Surrogate Decision-Making: If no AMD and patient lacks capacity, decisions are made by a surrogate.
    • Hierarchy is crucial for identifying the appropriate surrogate.
  • Shared Decision-Making: Collaborative process involving patient (if able), family, and healthcare team. Ensures patient values guide care. (📌 PVS: Patient's Values Shared)
  • Capacity Assessment: Crucial before honouring AMD or involving surrogates. Assessed by treating physician. Not a global or permanent state necessarily.

Treatment Crossroads - Hard Choices

  • Life-Sustaining Treatments (LST): Involves tough choices on withholding or withdrawing care. Guided by ethical principles: patient autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.
  • Medical Futility: When LST offers no meaningful benefit to the patient.
    • Quantitative: Very low probability of success (e.g., < 1%).
    • Qualitative: Outcome involves an unacceptable quality of life.

    ⭐ Medical futility is determined by the potential for benefit to the patient, not just physiological effect of the treatment.

  • Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE): Justifies an action with a primary good intention (e.g., alleviating severe pain) even if it has a foreseen but unintended negative consequence (e.g., hastening death). The intended good must outweigh the unintended harm.
  • LST Decision Pathway:

Comfort & Clarity - Easing Paths

  • Symptom Control (Comfort): Essential for dignity & quality of life.
    • Pain: Stepwise approach (WHO ladder). Titrate opioids (e.g., morphine, fentanyl) effectively. Adapted Analgesic Ladder for Pain Management
    • Dyspnea: Low-dose opioids (morphine 2.5-5 mg oral/SC), oxygen, non-pharmacological methods (e.g., fan).
    • Nausea/Vomiting: Prophylactic antiemetics (e.g., ondansetron, haloperidol, metoclopramide).
    • Agitation/Delirium: Identify reversible causes. Haloperidol for hyperactive delirium; lorazepam for anxiety.
    • Terminal secretions ("death rattle"): Anticholinergics (e.g., glycopyrrolate, hyoscine hydrobromide). Reposition patient.
  • Communication (Clarity): Builds trust, reduces patient & family distress.
    • Breaking Bad News: Use SPIKES protocol (Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, Strategy/Summary).
    • Advance Care Planning (ACP): Discuss patient values & preferences for future care, including resuscitation status.
    • Empathetic listening: Address fears, spiritual needs, family concerns. Validate emotions.

⭐ Palliative sedation is ethically distinct from euthanasia; its primary intent is to relieve refractory suffering, not to hasten death, and is permissible under specific guidelines when symptoms are intractable despite optimal palliative efforts and death is imminent (days to weeks).

High‑Yield Points - ⚡ Biggest Takeaways

  • Autonomy: Patient's right to refuse treatment is paramount.
  • Advance directives (living will, durable power of attorney for healthcare) guide care if patient lacks decision-making capacity.
  • Informed consent requires disclosure, comprehension, voluntariness, and capacity.
  • Confidentiality must be maintained, even after death, with limited legal exceptions.
  • Doctrine of Double Effect: Justifies interventions (e.g., palliative sedation) where intent is symptom relief, not hastening death.
  • Medical futility: Physicians are not obligated to provide interventions that offer no benefit.
  • Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) are illegal in India; distinguishing from withdrawal/withholding of life support is crucial.

Practice Questions: Ethical Issues in End-of-Life Care

Test your understanding with these related questions

Which of the following drugs should be given in a sustained-release oral dosage form?

1 of 5

Flashcards: Ethical Issues in End-of-Life Care

1/9

If the patient has presented to a non-PCI-capable hospital, a fibrinolytic agent is given within 30 minutes of the patient presenting if the anticipated time to PCI is >_____ minutes

TAP TO REVEAL ANSWER

If the patient has presented to a non-PCI-capable hospital, a fibrinolytic agent is given within 30 minutes of the patient presenting if the anticipated time to PCI is >_____ minutes

120

browseSpaceflip

Enjoying this lesson?

Get full access to all lessons, practice questions, and more.

Start Your Free Trial