Categories of alternative investments

On this page

Learning Outcome Statement

Describe features and categories of alternative investments.

On the exam: You receive a vehicle or case facts, including commitment versus invested capital, valuation label, liquidity, risk, and fee terms, then choose the best category, feature, return label, calculation, or investor conclusion in a multiple-choice, matrix, fill-in, or ordered-response question.

Alternative investments are defined not just by the asset, but by how you own, value, and exit it. Compared with traditional investments, alternative investments commonly involve lower liquidity, less transparency, more valuation judgment, and higher or more complex fees than traditional investments. A return number is not comparable until you label its fees, financing, cash-flow timing, and value source.

Category or termLiquidity, capital, or timingValue, return, risk, or fee detail
Hedge fundsLockups possible, uneven liquidityMarket or model value, leverage, performance fees
Private equity and venture capitalCapital calls, long holding periodsAppraisal or transaction value, concentration, carry
Real estateProperty-specific, limited exit routesAppraisal or transaction value, vacancy, leverage
Private creditBorrower-specific, limited tradingAppraisal or transaction value, default risk, fees
CommoditiesExchange access varies, daily pricesMarket value, price and roll risk, trading costs
Natural resourcesProject-specific, limited exit routesTransaction or appraisal value, operating risk, fees
InfrastructureLong-lived assets, limited exit routesAppraisal or transaction value, project risk, carry
Open-ended vehicleSubscriptions and redemptionsLiquidity terms still govern
Closed-end vehicleCommitments, capital calls, exit distributionsLow liquidity, waterfall terms
CommitmentPromised before a capital callNot invested capital
Invested capitalCalled and deployedSpecified return or fee base
Appraisal valueEstimate with limited transactionsCan be stale
Transaction valueCompleted deal priceObservable deal evidence
Market valueCurrent observable priceMore timely when traded
Gross or net returnFees and carry included or excludedReport before or after deductions
Levered or unlevered returnBorrowing included or excludedFinancing changes risk and outcome
Time-weighted returnExternal cash timing removedPortfolio performance
Money-weighted returnInvestor cash timing includedInvestor experience
Multiple-based returnProceeds relative to invested capitalNot annualized alone

Read the value label and return basis before trusting a smooth result, because an appraisal can be stale when observable transactions are limited. Commitment is promised capital, while invested capital is capital that has been called and deployed. This distinction also explains why fund diagrams separate the initial promise from later calls and eventual distributions.

The waterfall follows the cash rather than the headline return. Gross exit proceeds, $P$, arrive first. The investor's deployed amount is invested capital, $I$. A preferred return rate, $h$, applies over holding period $t$ and produces preferred return $R$.

For this calculation, the preferred return is simple on invested capital, and committed capital is $K$. The management fee rate is $m$, and total management fees are $F$. Profit after the hurdle is $Q$, and carry rate is $k$. Carried interest is $C$, residual proceeds are $L$, and net investor proceeds are $N$.

$$ \begin{aligned} R&=I\cdot h\cdot t\ Q&=P-I-R\ C&=k\cdot\max(Q,0)\ L&=Q-C\ F&=K\cdot m\cdot t\ N&=I+R+L-F\ \text{Gross multiple}&=\frac{P}{I}\ \text{Net multiple}&=\frac{N}{I+F} \end{aligned} $$

A larger $P$ raises $Q$ and $N$, while a larger $I$ returns more capital but leaves less $Q$ when $P$ is fixed. A larger $h$ raises $R$, a larger $k$ reduces $L$, and a larger $K$ or $m$ raises $F$ and lowers $N$. A longer $t$ raises both $R$ and $F$, and $C$ is zero whenever $Q\le0$. The gross multiple uses $\frac{P}{I}$ before fees and carry, while the net multiple uses $\frac{N}{I+F}$ after the waterfall.

Worked example

You are handed a private fund with a USD 10 million commitment, but only USD 8 million has been called and deployed. The manager charges a management fee rate of $0.02$ per year on commitment and a simple preferred return rate of $0.08$ per year on invested capital over $2$ years, with carry of $0.2$ on positive profit after the hurdle. All amounts are in USD millions, the transaction is unlevered, and the rates are shown as decimals. You need the investor's net proceeds and gross and net multiples.

InputValue
CommitmentUSD 10 million
Invested capitalUSD 8 million
Management fee$0.02$ per year on commitment
Holding period$2$ years
Preferred return$0.08$ per year on invested capital
Carry rate$0.2$ on positive hurdle profit
Gross exit proceedsUSD 12 million

The bars show the gross exit amount and each separate waterfall amount. Carry and management fees appear as positive magnitudes, although both reduce the investor's net proceeds. Read the bars as components of the same cash allocation, not as amounts to add on top of gross proceeds. The capital and preferred return bars go to the investor before profit is divided.

Loading diagram…

Start at the USD 12.00 million exit bar, then trace the distribution through return of capital and the preferred return. The remaining profit is split between carry and residual proceeds, while fees are charged separately against the investor's result. The stage amounts below make that sequence explicit and let you reconcile each component to the calculation. Keep the fee line distinct because it uses commitment as its base, even though the first waterfall tier returns invested capital.

Waterfall stageUSD millions
Gross exit proceeds12.00
Return of invested capital8.00
Preferred return1.28
Carried interest0.54
Residual proceeds2.18
Management fees0.40
  1. Return invested capital. The investor receives $I=8.00$ USD millions first, which clears the capital-return tier.
  2. Calculate the simple preferred return on invested capital. $R=8\cdot0.08\cdot2=1.28$ USD millions, so the hurdle uses deployed capital rather than commitment.
  3. Find profit after the hurdle. $Q=12-8-1.28=2.72$ USD millions, and only this positive amount can create carry.
  4. Apply carry to that profit. $C=2.72\cdot0.2=0.54$ USD millions, which leaves the investor's residual profit after carried interest.
  5. Allocate residual proceeds. $L=2.72-0.54=2.18$ USD millions returns to the investor.
  6. Charge management fees on commitment. The annual fee is $10\cdot0.02=0.2000$ USD millions, so the fee base is $10$, not $8$.
  7. Accumulate that fee over $2$ years. $F=0.2000\cdot2=0.40$ USD millions.
  8. Add the waterfall amounts before fees. The investor distribution is $8+1.28+2.18=11.46$ USD millions.
  9. Subtract management fees. Net proceeds are $11.46-0.40=11.06$ USD millions.
  10. Report both multiples. The gross multiple is $\frac{12}{8}=1.50$, and the net multiple is $\frac{11.06}{8+0.40}=1.32$. This keeps gross and net bases separate.

The investor receives USD 11.06 million net. If your mandate compares net, unlevered outcomes, use the 1.32 net multiple rather than the 1.50 gross headline.

Changed condition

Keep every term unchanged and reduce only gross exit proceeds from USD 12 million to USD 10 million. Predict the waterfall before calculating it.

MeasureBase caseLower exit
Gross exit proceedsUSD 12 millionUSD 10 million
Carry paidUSD 0.54 millionUSD 0.14 million
Net proceedsUSD 11.06 millionUSD 9.46 million

Lower exit proceeds cut profit after the hurdle from USD 2.72 million to USD 0.72 million, so carry falls from USD 0.54 million to USD 0.14 million. Management fees remain USD 0.40 million because commitment, rate, and period are unchanged. Net proceeds fall from USD 11.06 million to USD 9.46 million. Calculate the lower-exit waterfall yourself before reading on.

Common error

You may treat the USD 10 million commitment as the USD 8 million invested capital and apply fees or returns to the wrong base. That feels right because the commitment is the fund investment's headline size. When you read commitment before a capital call, compare it with invested capital after the fund deploys cash, and keep the two amounts separate.

Check yourself

Practice

An alternative investment reports appraisal value while observable transactions are limited. Which conclusion is best?

Revision snapshot

Alternative investments commonly involve lower liquidity, less transparency, more valuation judgment, and higher or more complex fees than traditional investments. Common categories include hedge funds, private equity and venture capital, real estate, private credit, commodities, natural resources, and infrastructure. Commitment is promised capital. Invested capital is capital that has been called and deployed. State whether value is appraisal value, transaction value, or market value. An appraisal can be stale when observable transactions are limited. Label returns as gross or net and levered or unlevered. Identify whether performance is time-weighted, money-weighted, or multiple-based. Track the waterfall with $R=I\cdot h\cdot t$, $F=K\cdot m\cdot t$, and $N=I+R+L-F$. Carry applies only to positive profit after return of invested capital and preferred return. A fee waterfall should separate return of invested capital, preferred return, carried interest, residual proceeds, and management fees. The trap is using commitment for a fee or return base. Match facts to the category, label, or conclusion.

Unlock the full lesson and continue reading

Signup to continue reading this lesson and unlimited access questions, flashcards, AI notes, and more

Scan to download app

Scan to download
UNLOCK FREE ACCESS

Practice Questions: Categories of alternative investments

  1. 1. Redwood Growth Fund is a closed-end private equity fund that acquires controlling interests in middle-market companies. Its limited partners include pension plans and university endowments. The investment period is scheduled to end after Year 4, and the fund will then focus on operating improvements and realizations. Because portfolio companies are not publicly traded, the general partner estimates fair values quarterly using market multiples and transaction evidence. The limited partners recognize that these estimates may be less current and less observable than quoted public-market prices. At the end of Year 3, an investment analyst reviews the fund's capital calls, distributions, residual value, and partnership terms. The analyst notes that the fund has not yet distributed an amount equal to total paid-in capital, although several portfolio companies have increased in estimated value. She intends to distinguish the amount already returned to investors from total value created to date. She also cautions the investment committee that neither measure is an annualized return because each ignores the precise timing of cash flows. The analyst then reviews the fee arrangement. During the investment period, the annual management fee is based on committed capital rather than invested capital. Consequently, the fee base includes capital that has not yet been called. Carried interest is governed by a whole-of-fund waterfall rather than a deal-by-deal waterfall. The agreement also includes a final clawback provision intended to reconcile carried interest received by the general partner with the amount supported by the fund's cumulative performance after liquidation. One committee member argues that the residual NAV should be excluded from every performance multiple until the underlying companies are sold. Another argues that the uncalled commitment should be included in paid-in capital because the limited partners are contractually obligated to provide it. The analyst responds that curriculum-consistent private capital multiples distinguish contributed capital from commitments and distinguish realized distributions from residual value. All cash flows in Exhibit 1 occur at year-end, and ending NAV is measured after that year's contributions and distributions. There are no recallable distributions, subscription credit facilities, or foreign-currency effects.

    • 2. The Apex Foundation is reviewing alternative investments intended to diversify its public equity portfolio. The investment committee seeks a hedge fund allocation with low directional exposure to broad equity markets, although it accepts manager-specific security selection risk and the use of leverage. The committee is comparing the three managers in Exhibit 1. Alder describes its process as fundamental equity selection implemented through simultaneous long and short positions. Its low net exposure is intentional, while its gross exposure permits security-selection gains and losses to have a meaningful effect on performance. Beacon invests only after an acquisition has been publicly announced and a definitive agreement has been executed. Its expected return reflects the spread between the target company's market price and the consideration promised at closing. Crest's investment committee permits significant directional positions when its macroeconomic views are strong. The foundation is also evaluating a fully collateralized commodity futures program. The consultant decomposes its expected return into spot price return, roll return, and collateral return, as shown in Exhibit 2. The forecast roll return already incorporates the expected effect of the futures curve and contract replacement; no separate adjustment for convergence is required. Management fees and trading costs are excluded from the forecast. Finally, the foundation is considering direct ownership of digital tokens under the custody arrangement described in Exhibit 3. Legal counsel confirms that the foundation would retain beneficial ownership of the tokens and that the custodian would act only as safekeeper. The foundation understands that distributed ledgers generally record transfers without relying on a traditional central securities depository. The investment staff is assessing whether outsourcing custody eliminates the operational risks associated with controlling digital assets. All return components in Exhibit 2 relate to the same one-year period and are additive for purposes of the consultant's estimate. No tax or currency effects are relevant.

      • 3. Northbridge Pension Plan is considering a commitment to Northbridge Growth Fund, a closed-end private equity fund that acquires controlling interests in established companies. The investment committee asks analyst Elena Ruiz to explain how the fund's fee basis, distribution waterfall, performance measures, and expected return pattern affect limited partners. The general partner will call capital as investments are identified. Investors cannot ordinarily redeem their interests before the fund terminates, although they may seek buyers in the secondary market. Any secondary sale may require the general partner's consent and may occur at a discount to reported net asset value. Portfolio companies are valued quarterly using models and comparable-company inputs because observable market prices are generally unavailable. Ruiz uses the simplified fund terms and cash flows in Exhibit 1. She assumes the entire investment is acquired when capital is drawn at inception and sold for cash at the end of Year 4. Management fees are paid separately and therefore do not reduce either the stated investment cost or the gross sale proceeds used to calculate gross MOIC. For the waterfall calculation, however, contributed capital means the USD 80.00 million invested at inception. The preferred return compounds annually for four full years. The general partner receives no carried interest until contributed capital and the preferred return have been distributed, and the agreement contains no general-partner catch-up tier. Ruiz explains that MOIC measures total value relative to invested capital but does not annualize performance or explicitly incorporate the timing of intermediate cash flows. An internal rate of return incorporates cash-flow timing but can be affected by early distributions and assumptions about reinvesting those distributions. The committee therefore intends to review both multiples and money-weighted returns rather than relying on one measure. The committee also asks about the return pattern normally observed during the early years of a private equity fund. Ruiz notes that management fees begin before many investments have matured, operating improvements take time, and conservative initial valuations may prevent unrealised gains from offsetting early expenses. Successful exits generally occur later in the fund's life. These structural features, together with illiquidity and model-based valuations, distinguish the fund from a portfolio of publicly traded equities.

        • 4. A pension invests alongside a private equity fund in one identified portfolio company, performs its own due diligence, and pays reduced fees on that transaction. The investment is best classified as:

          • A. A co-investment
          • B. A direct investment
          • C. A primary fund commitment
          Show answer

          Answer: A. A co-investment

          A co-investment - The pension invests alongside a private equity fund in one identified portfolio company, which defines a co-investment. - Its own due diligence and reduced transaction fees are consistent with co-investing and do not change that classification. A direct investment - A direct investment is undertaken independently, rather than alongside the private equity fund investing in this company. - Performing its own due diligence does not make the pension’s investment direct when it participates with the fund. A primary fund commitment - A primary fund commitment buys an interest in a fund, typically providing exposure to multiple investments rather than one identified company. - The pension instead invests in a specific transaction alongside the fund and pays reduced fees on that transaction.

        • 5. An institution commits capital for ten years, accepts capital calls, and has no routine redemption right. The structure is most likely a:

          • A. Exchange-traded fund
          • B. Limited partnership
          • C. Separately managed account
          Show answer

          Answer: B. Limited partnership

          Limited partnership - A private investment limited partnership commonly requires investors to commit capital that the manager draws through capital calls. - Its ten-year term and lack of routine redemption rights are consistent with an illiquid, closed-end structure. Exchange-traded fund - An exchange-traded fund offers shares that investors can generally sell on an exchange, unlike this commitment with no routine exit. - Investors buy its shares rather than pledge capital for later capital calls. Separately managed account - A separately managed account holds assets for an individual client rather than pooling investors in a limited partnership. - It is not ordinarily funded through a ten-year commitment drawn by capital calls.

        • 6. A timber property begins the year at USD 10.0 million, distributes USD 0.4 million from sustainable harvests, and ends at USD 10.3 million. Its holding-period return is closest to:

          • A. 7.0%
          • B. 3.0%
          • C. 14.0%
          Show answer

          Answer: A. 7.0%

          7.0% - The property’s value rises by USD 0.3 million (USD 10.3 million − USD 10.0 million), in addition to its USD 0.4 million harvest distribution. - Holding-period return is (USD 0.3 million + USD 0.4 million) ÷ USD 10.0 million = 7.0%. 3.0% - This is USD 0.3 million ÷ USD 10.0 million = 3.0%. - It omits the USD 0.4 million distribution, which is part of the holding-period return. 14.0% - Double-counting both return components gives 2 × (USD 0.3 million + USD 0.4 million) ÷ USD 10.0 million = 14.0%. - The value increase and harvest distribution each enter the holding-period return once, not twice.

        • 7. A hedge fund begins the year with NAV of USD 100 million and a USD 105 million high-water mark. Before fees, year-end NAV is USD 112 million. A 2% management fee is charged on year-end pre-fee NAV, followed by a 20% incentive fee on post-management-fee NAV above the high-water mark. Total fees are closest to:

          • A. USD 2.24 million
          • B. USD 3.19 million
          • C. USD 3.64 million
          Show answer

          Answer: B. USD 3.19 million

          USD 3.19 million - The management fee is 2% × USD 112 million = USD 2.24 million, leaving USD 109.76 million after that fee. - The incentive fee is 20% × (USD 109.76 million − USD 105 million) = USD 0.952 million, bringing total fees to USD 3.192 million, closest to USD 3.19 million. USD 2.24 million - USD 2.24 million is the management fee alone: 2% × USD 112 million. - It omits the USD 0.952 million incentive fee earned on post-management-fee NAV above the high-water mark. USD 3.64 million - This results from calculating the incentive fee on pre-fee NAV: 20% × (USD 112 million − USD 105 million) = USD 1.40 million. - Adding that to the USD 2.24 million management fee gives USD 3.64 million, but the question requires post-management-fee NAV for the incentive calculation.

        • 8. Crestview Advisory is evaluating real estate investments for institutional and private wealth clients. Analyst Marcus Lee first values the Harbor Office Property, an unlevered stabilized building operating at market occupancy. Crestview expects the property's current net operating income to remain constant in nominal terms over the next year. Lee uses direct capitalization and the market capitalization rate shown in Exhibit 1. No near-term capital expenditures or leasing commissions are required, and the reported operating expenses include property taxes, insurance, utilities, maintenance, and management costs. Lee reminds an associate that property-level net operating income is measured before financing costs, income taxes, and depreciation. The associate nevertheless proposes subtracting both interest expense and depreciation before applying the capitalization rate. Lee must determine whether that treatment is consistent with direct capitalization of an unlevered property. Crestview also follows Metro REIT, a publicly traded equity REIT reporting under US GAAP. Selected information is provided in Exhibit 2. All depreciation and amortization in the exhibit relates to real estate, and the entire gain on sale arose from the disposal of a property. There are no impairment charges, unconsolidated affiliate adjustments, preferred shares, or non-controlling interests. Crestview calculates funds from operations using the standard adjustment to net income and estimates NAV using current property values rather than depreciated accounting carrying amounts. One client, Dana Layton, has USD 5 million available for real estate exposure. Layton seeks broad diversification across property sectors, observable pricing, and the ability to liquidate the position on any trading day. Layton does not require control over individual properties and is unwilling to accept capital calls. Crestview is considering three alternatives: acquiring a single office property directly, subscribing to a closed-end private property fund with a seven-year lockup and capital-call structure, or purchasing a diversified publicly traded REIT exchange-traded fund. Lee explains that public real estate securities can exhibit greater short-term correlation with broad equity markets than direct appraised property. Nevertheless, public securities generally offer substantially greater liquidity, lower minimum investment sizes, and easier diversification. Direct ownership can provide control over leasing and capital improvements but requires significant transaction costs and property-level operating expertise. Private funds delegate those responsibilities to a manager but introduce manager-selection risk, fee layers, limited transparency, and restricted redemption rights.

          Flashcards: Categories of alternative investments

          1. 1. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what base is used to calculate management fees for hedge funds?

            Show answer

            Assets under management (AUM), typically the net asset value of the fund's investments.

          2. 2. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), how does a deal-by-deal (American) waterfall differ from a whole-of-fund (European) waterfall?

            Show answer

            An American waterfall distributes profits as each individual investment is sold. A European waterfall pays no performance fees until LPs have received 100% of their initial investment plus the hurdle rate across the entire fund.

          3. 3. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is the difference between a "soft" hurdle rate and a "hard" hurdle rate?

            Show answer

            With a soft hurdle, performance fees are based on the entire return once the hurdle is met. With a hard hurdle, fees are based only on the return that exceeds the hurdle rate.

          4. 4. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is a "catch-up clause"?

            Show answer

            A provision that allows the GP to receive 100% of gains beyond the hurdle rate until they catch up to their stated performance fee percentage of the overall gains.

          5. 5. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is a "clawback provision"?

            Show answer

            A rule stipulating that if the GP receives incentive payments on early gains that are subsequently negated by later losses, the LPs can recover the excess performance fees.

          6. 6. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is a "high-water mark"?

            Show answer

            A rule ensuring no performance fee is paid on gains that only offset prior losses; the fund's net-of-fees value must exceed its previous historical high.

          7. 7. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is "dry powder" in private capital?

            Show answer

            Committed capital that has not yet been drawn down or invested by the fund manager.

          8. 8. In Alternative Investments (Features & Methods), what is "direct investing"?

            Show answer

            An investor purchases assets themselves without pooling funds or using an outside specialized manager, retaining maximum control but requiring high expertise.

          Everything you need for CFA prep

          Get full Oncourse access with lessons, practice questions, flashcards and AI study tools.

          GET STARTED FOR FREE
          75% OFFLimited time offer
          GET 75% OFF